13881 Eagle Ridge Drive, Fort Myers, FL 33912 · Lee County · (239) 561-7700
120 certified beds, about 116 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 2000
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 106020 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on August 21, 2025, inspectors cited 3 health deficiencies (the Florida average is 7.1, the national average 9.2).
Of 30 health citations since March 2022, 5 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (1 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 2 fines totaling $63,886 in the last three years; the largest was $34,356, and the latest is dated January 30, 2025.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.49 hours per resident per day, against 3.82 across Florida and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.71 of those hours.
50.9% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Florida average 41.4%).
CMS links it to Aston Health, an affiliated group of 38 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 30 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, review of facility's policies and procedures, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from neglect for 1(Resident #1) of 3 residents reviewed. The facility failure to prevent the neglect of Resident #1 created a likelihood of serious harm or death of the resident from exposure to excessive heat which can cause heat related illness, including heat exhaustion and heat stroke and resulted in the determination of Immediate Jeopardy (IJ). On 4/23/26, after verification of an acceptable Immediate Jeopardy removal plan, the Immediate Jeopardy was removed, effective 4/16/26. The findings of Immediate Jeopardy were determined to be corrected on 4/21/26.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide a safe and appropriate discharge for 2 (Residents #1and #2) of 3 residents reviewed for transfer and/or discharges. The facility failed to confirm Resident #1's transportation, causing the resident to leave the facility in her wheelchair after waiting over two hours and attempt to wheel herself to her discharge location which is located 10 miles from the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that the full amount of funds owed to a resident upon discharge were refunded within 30 days of discharge for 1, Resident #3 of 3 residents reviewed for refund of funds due.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide housekeeping and maintenance services to ensure a clean environment for 7 (rooms 135, 139, 138, 126, 205, 203 and 207) of 20 rooms observed on the Memory care and the North unit.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide care and services in accordance with professional standards of practice by failing to communicate a significant weight loss to the physician for 1 (Resident #10) of 2 residents reviewed for nutrition.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to complete a Comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment within 14 calendar days of admission for 1 (Resident #70) of 45 reviewed.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision to prevent one resident (resident #1) of three residents sampled for falls to prevent multiple falls and major injuries to the resident, multiple falls, a fracture of to the right hip on 11/1/24 for which the resident was hospitalized for surgical intervention, and a fracture to the to the right humorous on 11/17/24.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, review of facility policy and procedures, and staff interviews, the facility failed provide the necessary supervision and assistance to prevent multiple falls for 1 (Resident #999) of 3 residents reviewed for falls. On 1/9/24, and 2/1/24, Resident #999 was not adequately supervised and fell. Each time the resident sustained a laceration to her face resulting in a transfer to an acute care hospital.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, review of facility policy and procedures and staff interviews the facility failed to treat 1 (Resident #45), and seven of 26 random residents with a diagnosis of dementia observed on the secured unit with dignity, and respect.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, review of facility policy and procedure, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services to maintain hygiene, for 8 (Residents #26, #37, #8, #45, #83, #85, 103 and #366) of 8 dependent residents reviewed for activities of daily living.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, residents, resident representative and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure sufficient nursing staffing to meet the needs of 8 (Residents #26, #37, #8, #45, #83, #85, 103 and #366) of 8 dependent residents. The failure to meet the residents' needs could lead to the residents not receiving services timely and not attaining or maintaining their highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide an active Hospice contract for 6 (Residents #1, #11, #21, #24 #38, and #71) of 6 residents receiving Hospice services.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical records review, resident and staff interviews the facility failed to develop and implement an individualized care plan to meet the needs of 2 (Residents #25, and #83) of 32 sampled residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and staff interview, the facility failed to post the federal staffing hours daily at the beginning of each shift.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, review of facility's policy and procedure, resident and staff, the facility failed to implement processes to ensure timely acquiring and receiving of physician's ordered medications to meet the needs of 1 (Resident #367) of 7 newly admitted residents reviewed.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of the clinical record, and staff interviews, the facility failed to act upon the consultant pharmacist's recommendation for behavior monitoring for 1 (Resident #85) of 5 residents sampled for unnecessary medications review.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, review of facility policy and procedures and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure insulin was properly dated when opened and failed to dispose of expired insulin stored in 1 of 1 medication cart observed on the secured unit of the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, review of facility's policy and procedure, staff, resident and resident representative interviews, the facility failed to document a grievance and ensure prompt efforts to replace lost dentures for 1 (Resident #8) of 3 residents sampled for grievance resolution.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide an active dialysis contract for 1 (Residents #46) of 1 resident reviewed for dialysis.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision and assistive devices to prevent multiple falls, including falls with injury for 1 (Resident #2) of 3 residents reviewed for falls.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, review of facility's policy and procedure, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure 1 (Resident #410) of 2 sampled residents at risk for development of pressure ulcers received necessary services to prevent the worsening and development of pressure ulcers. Resident #410's pressure ulcer significantly deteriorated, and the resident developed additional pressure ulcers.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure documentation of effective coordination of care and adequate monitoring for complications and appropriate interventions for 2 (Resident #79 and #56) of 3 sampled dialysis residents reviewed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate less than 5%. Three nurses and 33 of opportunities were observed. Twenty medication errors were identified resulting in a 60.60% medication error rate.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, review of facility policy and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure proper labeling of medications in 2 (South Hall, and North middle hall) of 4 medication carts observed. The facility failed to ensure expired medications were not retained longer than the expiration date in 1 (South Unit) of 2 medication storage rooms observed. This has the potential for expired medications to be administered to residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, review of facility policy, and staff interviews the facility failed to ensure accurate advance directives were in place for 1 (Resident #19) of 6 residents reviewed.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, review of facility policy, staff and resident interviews the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Sets (MDS) assessment accurately reflected the medical status of 2 (Residents #57 and #58) of 5 residents reviewed for dialysis care. Inaccurate MDS assessments can result in a resident not receiving appropriate health care.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, resident and staff interview the facility failed to provide an ongoing activity program that supports resident's preferences for 1 (resident #510) of 2 residents reviewed for activities.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, review of facility's policy and procedure, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide appropriate interventions to prevent the worsening of contracture for 1 (Resident #19) of 2 residents reviewed with a limitation of range of motion (ROM). This has the potential to cause pain and worsening of the contracture.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, policy and procedure review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure 1 (Resident #463) of 1 sampled resident receiving oxygen had a written physician's order for oxygen therapy.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1(Agency nurse staff X) of 2 agency nurses observed had the appropriate skill sets to provide services in a safe and timely manner.
7 fire safety citations on file: 2 on January 25, 2024, 5 on March 24, 2022.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| January 30, 2025 | Fine | $34,356 |
| December 7, 2023 | Fine | $29,530 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Florida | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.49 | 3.82 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.71 | 0.73 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.22 | 3.49 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.21 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.57 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 50.9% | 41.4% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 48.1% | 46.0% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 3 |
CMS expects 3.84 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.59 on weekdays and 3.22 on weekends, 10% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 1.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.66 in April to June 2025 to 3.49 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.49 | 0.71 | 3.59 | 3.22 | 1.0% | 0 of 90 | 116 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.47 | 0.65 | 3.56 | 3.23 | 0.1% | 0 of 92 | 112 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.42 | 0.80 | 3.50 | 3.21 | 0.1% | 0 of 92 | 103 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.66 | 0.95 | 3.78 | 3.38 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 111 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Florida, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.76 | 0.70 | 3.90 | 3.44 | 1.1% | 0.2% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Florida, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.03 | $17.33 to $20.34 | 96,960 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $29.70 | $28.14 to $31.11 | 38,620 |
| Registered nurses | $40.48 | $37.82 to $48.64 | 229,940 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Florida | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 10.6 | 8.7 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.3 | 2.5 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 12.1 | 9.5 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.3 | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 9.9 | 8.6 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 17.3 | 26.1 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 9.2 | 9.1 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.2 | 2.1 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 0.6 | 1.1 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Eagleridge Health and Rehabilitation Center's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it better than the national rate (58.4% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
58.4% this home
Better than the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Florida: 169 better, 109 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 175 eligible stays.
10.6% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Florida: 2 better, 35 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 203 eligible stays.
6.5% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Florida: 6 better, 21 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 100 eligible stays.
54.3% this home
Median of homes: Florida55.1% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 81 residents counted.
0.7% this home
Median of homes: Florida0.6% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 149 residents counted.
0.5% this home
Median of homes: Florida1.3% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 149 residents counted.
100.0% this home
Median of homes: Florida97.7% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 63 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: EAGLERIDGE OPERATIONS, LLC. CMS links this home to Aston Health, a group of 38 nursing homes averaging 2.7 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eagleridge Rehab Holdings | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 01/04/2023 |
| Bp Eagleridge Trust | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 50% | 05/05/2023 |
| Lf Eagleridge Trust | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 50% | 05/05/2023 |
| Wildes, Donna | Corporate officer | Individual | 08/28/2025 | |
| Baskin, Bryan | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 08/04/2025 | |
| Gerena, Rose | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 02/20/2025 | |
| Kinkade, Julie | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 09/18/2024 | |
| Nassif, Roderick | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 09/01/2023 | |
| Wildes, Donna | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 08/28/2025 | |
| Aston Healthcare LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 05/05/2023 | |
| Baskin, Bryan | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 12/09/2025 | |
| Nassif, Roderick | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 12/09/2025 | |
| Wildes, Donna | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 08/28/2025 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Florida. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.