Home / West Virginia / Petersburg
127 Early Avenue, Petersburg, WV 26847 · Grant County · (304) 257-4233
110 certified beds, about 88 residents a day · Government - County · Medicare and Medicaid since 1997
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 515151 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on February 11, 2026, inspectors cited 13 health deficiencies (the West Virginia average is 11.7, the national average 9.2).
None of its 42 health citations since August 2022 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.25 hours per resident per day, against 3.67 across West Virginia and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.72 of those hours.
23.4% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (West Virginia average 44.1%).
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 42 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and staff interview, facility failed to ensure all exit doors are free from potential accident hazards. This failed practice was a random opportunity for discovery during the Long Term Care Survey process. Facility Census 90.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure nutrition assessments were being completed per facility policy and guidance. This was found to be true for four (4) of the seven (7) medical records reviewed under the nutrition pathway during the long-term care survey process. Resident identifiers: #8, #71, #74 and #78. Facility census: 90.
Inspectors wroteBased upon record review and staff interview, the facility failed to post daily nurse staffing data containing all required regulatory data. This was found to be true for 17 days of 17 days reviewed during the long-term care survey process. Facility census: 90Findings included: Posted nurse staffing data was requested for 05/24/25, 05/25/25, 05/26/25, 05/27/25, 05/28/25, 05/2925, 05/30/25, 05/31/25, 07/04/25, 07/05/25, 09/03/25, 09/04/25, 09/05/25, 09/06/25, 10/30/25, 10/31/25, 12/26/25, and 12/27/25. Results included: [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than five (5) percent. Of 29 medication observations, three (3) errors were observed. This was a medication error rate of 10.34%. Resident identifier: #58. Facility census: 90.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure storage and labeling of medications within accepted standards of practice. An expired multiuse bottle of medication was available for use. Additionally, three (3) multi-use insulin pens were not dated when first accessed. These were random opportunities for discovery during the medication storage and labeling facility task. Resident identifiers: #58, #31, #87, and #4. Facility census: 90.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, and resident interview, the facility failed to ensure food temperatures were at a safe and palatable temperature. This was a random opportunity discovered throughout the Long-Term Care Survey Process. Resident identifiers: #1, #2, #6, and #8. Facility census: 90.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure food was labeled, dated, and stored in accordance with professional food standards. This was found during the Long Term Care survey process. This deficient practice had the potential to affect more than a minimal number of residents who received nutrition from the kitchen. Facility Census 90.
Inspectors wroteBased upon resident interview, staff interviews, and record review, the facility failed to honor a resident's right for toileting assistance during meal periods. This was a random opportunity for discovery during the long-term care survey process. Resident identifier: #74. Census: 90.
Inspectors wroteBased upon record reviews and staff interviews, the facility failed to inform the resident or resident's representative of the benefits and risk of treatment, as well as a change in medication. This was found to be true for two (2) of five (5) resident records reviewed under the unnecessary drug pathway during the long term care survey process. Resident identifiers: #4, #5. Census: 90.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to follow their policy and procedure on preventing adverse consequences that can occur when two (2) or more medications are combined during treatment that could have adverse consequences that have a negative impact on the residents health, resulting in an hospitalization. This was true for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed for hospitalizations. Resident identifier: #12. Facility census: 90.
Inspectors wroteBased upon record review and staff interview, the facility failed to perform a drug regimen at least once a month by a licensed pharmacist. This was found to be true for one (1) of five (5) residents reviewed under the unnecessary drug pathway during the long-term care survey process. Resident identifier: #4. Facility census: 90.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure dietary staff had the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service. The facility did not ensure all Dietary Staff received their food handlers card within 30 days after being hired. This was found during the Annual Long-Term Care Survey Process. Facility census: 90.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure all garbage and dumpsters were properly contained and that the dumpsters were covered with lids (or otherwise covered.) This was true for three (3) of the four (4) dumpsters observed. This was a random opportunity for discovery during the Long-Term Care Survey Process. Facility Census 90.
Inspectors wroteBased on facility record review and staff interview, the facility failed to complete final internal food temperatures and ensure food was held prior to food service at appropriate temperatures. This has the potential to affect all residents that receive their nutrition form the kitchen. Facility census:
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and staff interview the facility failed to complete labeling and dates in a unit refrigerator and complete refrigerator temperature log unit refrigerator and freezers on the 100, 200 and Sub halls and main dining room in accordance with professional standards for food service safety related to storage. This has the ability to affect all Residents that get their nutrition from the kitchen. Facility Census: 82. Findings Include: a) 100 Hall Unit Refrigerator Observation during the Unit tour on 04/15/24 at 12:44 PM found 3 sodas open, cherry pie, and plastic container in the resident refrigerator with no labeling or dates. During an interview on 04/15/24 at 11:44, the Dietary Manager (DM) verified there was no labeling or dates on the items in the 100-hall resident refrigerator. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to implement appropriate interventions for quality deficiencies of which it was aware. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. Facility census: 82.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to document the attendance of the Medical Director or designee at all quarterly Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) meetings. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. Facility census: 82.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a new Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) was completed for Resident #68, #67, and #18 when the residents developed a new mental illness diagnosis during their stay at the facility. This was true for three (3) out of five (5) residents reviewed for care area of PASARR during the long term care survey process. Resident Identifier: #68, #67, and #18. Facility census: 82.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, medical record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure skin assessments were done at a professional standard of practice and failed to administer Immunizations recommended by the CDC in a timely manner. This failed practice had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents who currently reside at the facility. Resident Identifier: #52, #19, #18, and #12. Facility census 82.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and staff interview the facility failed to ensure the resident environment over which it had control was as free of accident hazards as is possible . These failed practices were random opportunities for discovery and was true for Resident #65 and #26. Resident identifiers: #65 and #26. Facility census 82.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to insure the physician documented the actions or rational if no action taken for monthly drug regimen reviews. This was true for three (3) of five (5) reviewed for unnecessary medications. Resident identifier #65, #7 and #43. Facility census: 82.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored and labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles. Insulin pens were not dated when opened. Additionally, controlled substances were not properly secured in medication rooms. Also, expired medications were found in the medication room. This deficient practice had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. Resident identifiers: #70, #8, #72. Facility census: 82. Findings Include: a) Insulin pens Review of the facility's policy titled Administering Medications, with implementation date 2001 and revision date 2009, stated when a multi-dose container is opened, the opening date should be recorded on the container. On 04/17/24 at 8:16 AM, the 400 hallway medication cart was inspected with Registered Nurse (RN) #18 in attendance. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, policy review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure each resident had a dignified existence. This was a random opportunity for discovery and was true for Resident #37, #65, #40, #57, #330 and #44. Resident identifiers: #37, #65, #40, #57, #330, and #44 . Facility census 82.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and resident and staff interview the facility failed to promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choices in regards to the resident's preference as to how many showers they would like per week. This was true for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed for self-determination. Resident identifier: Resident #60. Facility Census: 82. Findings Include: a) Resident #60 During an interview on 04/15/24 at 1:23 PM, Resident #60 stated they had asked the staff for three (3) baths per week and was told the facility did not have enough help. The resident reported their shower days are scheduled for Wednesdays and Sundays but they would like to shower on Fridays in addition. The resident reported they have a condition which causes them to itch and believes they may feel better with more frequent showers. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview the facility failed to develop a personalized centered care plan for a focus of respiratory relating to Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). This was true for one (1) of twenty six (26) care plans reviewed during the long term care process. Resident Identifier: #12. Facility Census: 82 Findings Include: a) Resident #12 On 04/15/24 at 12:40 PM and 2:40 PM and on 04/16/24 at 8:24 AM it was observed that Resident #12 had a respiratory nebulizer mask at bedside. On 04/16/24 at 1:30 PM, a record review found Resident #12 had a medical diagnosis of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). There was also physicians orders as follows: Ipratropium Albuterol Solution 0.5-2.5 (3) milligrams (MG)/3 milliliters (ml) 1 application inhale orally two times a day related to Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and staff interview the facility failed to store respiratory equipment in a clean sanitary manner consistent with professional standards of practice. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Resident Identifiers: #12 and #13. Facility Census: 82 Findings Include: a) Resident #12 On 04/15/24 at 12:40 PM and 2:40 PM and on 04/16/24 at 08:24 AM it was observed that Resident #12's respiratory nebulizer mask was not stored in a clean sanitary manner. It was on the bedside table outside of the plastic storage bag. Resident #12 had a physicians order for: Ipratropium Albuterol Solution 0.5-2.5 (3) milligrams (MG)/3 milliliters (ml) 1 application inhale orally two times a day related to Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. and Ipratropium Albuterol Solution 0.5-2.5 (3) milligrams (MG)/3 milliliters (ml) 1 application inhale orally every 12 hours as needed for COPD. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure an order for a PRN (as needed) psychotropic medication did not exceed 14 days for Resident #43, and failed to attempt a Gradual Dose Reduction (GDR) for an antidepressant for Resident #7. This was true for two (2) of five (5) residents reviewed for the care area of unnecessary medications during the long-term care survey process. Resident identifiers: #43,and #7. Facility census: 82. A) Resident #43 At approximately 11:00 AM on 04/15/24, a record review of orders for Resident #43 was conducted. During the review, it was determined the resident had the following order for Ambien: Ambien oral tablet 10 MG (Zolpidem Tartrate) Give 10 mg by mouth as needed at bedtime for insomnia. The hours listed on the order are PRN. The order was written on 12/06/23 and was the current order at the time of this review. [...]
Inspectors wrote, Based on observation, policy review, and staff interview the facility failed to ensure establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infection. This was a random opportunity for discovery and had the potential to affect a limited number of residents who currently reside at the facility. Facility census 82.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the environment over which it had control was free from accident hazards. The 300 Hall of the facility was being remodeled and there were multiple identified accident hazards readily accessible to residents. The 400 Hall had dangerous chemicals stored on top of an isolation cart. These were random opportunities for discovery. Facility census: 80. a) 300 Hall On 11/14/23 at 1:40 PM, a random opportunity for discovery found the 300 Hall of the facility was under construction and in the process of remodeling resident rooms. The two (2) double doors to the 300 Hall were open. Additionally, the doors to the resident rooms under construction were open. There were no posted room numbers at this time. The following accident hazards were observed: [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, facility record review, policy review and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe and sanitary environment and prevent the transmission of communicable diseases. The facility did not follow their policy and isolate Covid positive residents in their rooms. This practice had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. Resident identifiers: #41 and #67. Facility census: 75.
Inspectors wrotec) Resident #66 On 08/10/22 at 10:25 AM, after reviewing the treatment administration record (TAR) found resident #66 to have 12 blank holes for month of June for treatments for wounds, (apply Silver alginate to wound bed on sacrum with each dressing change after cleaning and prior to applying mepilex dressing until further notice. every shift). Four (4) blank holes for July for treatments,(apply Silver alginate to wound bed on sacrum with each dressing change after cleaning and prior to applying mepilex dressing until further notice. every shift). These treatment to wound were to be done by midnight shift as well. On 8/10/22 at 10: 40 AM, Interview with assistant director of nursing (ADON) after observing TAR showed 12 blank holes for June and four (4) blank holes for July of where treatment and observations were to be done on night shift. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on facility documentation review, staff interview and policy review the facility failed to obtain current and active food handler cards for all dietary staff. This was true for four (4) of 13 dietary staff reviewed. The failed practice had the potential to affect more than a limited number of Residents. Staff identifiers: #55, #56, #59 and #137. Facility census 71.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide the required Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice of Non-Coverage (SNF ABN) form and Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) form to one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed for the facility's beneficiary protection notification practice during an annual survey. This failure placed all skilled care residents at risk of not being informed of their rights prior to the end of Medicare Part A covered services. Resident identifier: #370. Facility census: 71.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #34, who lacked the capacity to consent, was free from sexual abuse. The facility also failed to ensure Resident #23 was free from verbal abuse. This was true for two (2) out of two (2) residents reviewed for the abuse pathway. This failed practice had the potential to affect a limited number of residents in the building. Resident identifiers: #34 and #23. Facility census: 71.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, the facility failed implement written abuse and neglect policies and procedures for reporting in order to prevent all types of abuse. The facility failed to report an incident of sexual abuse with Resident #34. The facility failed to report an incident of verbal abuse with resident #23. This practice affected two (2) of three (3) residents reviewed using the abuse pathway in the survey process. Resident identifiers: #34 and #23. Facility census: 71.
Inspectors wroteBased on policy review, record review, and staff interview the facility failed to ensure employees reported a suspicion of a crime against another resident to law enforcement. This was true for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed under the Abuse Pathway. This failed practice had the potential to affecta limited number of residents. Resident Identifier #34. Facility Census: 71.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that an allegation of sexual abuse and an allegation of verbal abuse were reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegations were made, to the administrator of the facility and to other officials (including to the State Survey Agency and Adult Protective Services where state law provides for jurisdiction in long-term care facilities) in accordance with State law through established procedures. The facility did not report a witnessed sexual abuse incident for Resident #34. The facility did not report within a two-hour timeframe a second witnessed sexual abuse incident for Resident #34. The facility did not report an allegation of verbal abuse made by Resident #23. This practice affected two (2) of three (3) residents reviewed using the abuse pathway in the survey process. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure that an incidents involving sexual abuse and verbal abuse were thoroughly investigated. The facility did not investigate a witnessed sexual abuse incident for Resident #34. The facility did not investigate an instance of verbal abuse for Resident #23. This practice affected two (2) of the three (3) residents reviewed using the abuse pathway in the survey process. Resident identifiers: #34 and #23. Facility census: 71. a) Resident #34 During a medical record review, completed on 08/09/22 at 8:45 AM, the following details were found: FIRST SEXUAL ABUSE INCIDENT ON 01/09/22 -Resident #34 is an [AGE] year-old female resident with a diagnosis of Dementia, Major Depressive Disorder, and Anxiety. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview the facility inaccurately assessed a non-insulin medication as an insulin on the minimal data set (MDS). This was true for one (1) of two (2) Residents reviewed for insulin. Resident identifier: #64. Facility census: 71.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to revise the comprehensive care plan for one (1) of 26 residents reviewed during the long-term care survey process. Resident Identifier: #34. Facility census: 71.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, and interview, the facility failed to deliver respiratory care services consistent with professional standards of practice. Oxygen supplies were not stored safely or properly for residents reviewed during the Long-Term Care Survey Process (LTCSP). This was a random opportunity for discovery. Resident identifier #268. Facility census: #71.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview and food tray temperatures the facility failed to serve food to residents that was at an appetizing temperature. This was a random opportunity for discovery. The failed practice had the potential to affect a limited number of residents. Facility census: 71.
20 fire safety citations on file: 13 on April 17, 2024, 7 on August 10, 2022.
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | West Virginia | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 4.25 | 3.67 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.72 | 0.73 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.87 | 3.17 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.57 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.96 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 23.4% | 44.1% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 0.0% | 42.3% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.62 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.40 on weekdays and 3.87 on weekends, 12% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.41 in April to June 2025 to 4.25 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.25 | 0.72 | 4.40 | 3.87 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 88 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 4.26 | 0.71 | 4.42 | 3.85 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 87 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 4.35 | 0.69 | 4.53 | 3.91 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 86 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 4.41 | 0.68 | 4.60 | 3.96 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 83 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| West Virginia, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.56 | 0.67 | 3.75 | 3.08 | 3.9% | 0.2% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| West Virginia, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $17.66 | $17.05 to $18.47 | 9,390 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $26.61 | $23.71 to $29.47 | 6,050 |
| Registered nurses | $38.52 | $32.77 to $47.97 | 23,430 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | West Virginia | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 24.2 | 14.7 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.7 | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 11.1 | 1.6 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 6.5 | 4.4 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.1 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 33.4 | 15.9 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 6.5 | 4.2 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 38.9 | 13.4 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 21.4 | 22.4 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 15.5 | 11.3 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.1 | 1.8 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.6 | 1.8 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Grant Rehabilitation and Care Center's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it worse than the national rate (30.4% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
30.4% this home
Worse than the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · West Virginia: 9 better, 28 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 59 eligible stays.
10.4% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · West Virginia: 0 better, 0 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 59 eligible stays.
7.2% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · West Virginia: 0 better, 2 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 35 eligible stays.
52.4% this home
Median of homes: West Virginia50.0% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 21 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: West Virginia1.2% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 24 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: West Virginia2.4% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 24 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: West Virginia97.6% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 13 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: GRANT REHAB & CARE CENTER.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thorne, Christina | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 11/18/2019 | |
| Abruzzino, Michelle | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Arnold, Dorothy | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Kile, Allan | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Abruzzino, Michelle | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Arnold, Dorothy | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Kile, Allan | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Forvis Mazars LLP | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/01/2025 | |
| Wv Therapy Services LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/01/2025 | |
| Bensenhaver, Dewey | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2025 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in West Virginia. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.