1225 Greencroft Dr, Goshen, IN 46527 · Elkhart County · (574) 537-4000
214 certified beds, about 152 residents a day · Non profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1982
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 155205 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on May 23, 2025, inspectors cited 15 health deficiencies (the Indiana average is 7.2, the national average 9.2).
Of 38 health citations since May 2023, 3 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.35 hours per resident per day, against 3.69 across Indiana and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.61 of those hours.
42.8% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Indiana average 45.9%).
CMS links it to Greencroft Communities, an affiliated group of 5 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 38 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to follow the plan of care for a resident with a history of falls. This deficient practice resulted in a resident falling and sustaining multiple injuries, including bilateral (affecting both sides) small acute subarachnoid hemorrhage along the temporal lobes, a small acute intraventricular hemorrhage in occipital horns, a 0.7 centimeter subdural hematoma and an acute right occipital bone fracture extending into the forearm magnum. (Resident B)
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide showers timely for a dependent resident for 1 of 4 residents who were reviewed for showers. (Resident D)During an interview on 12/16/2025 at 2:40 P.M., Resident D could not recall the last time he had had a shower. Resident D's record review was completed on 12/18/2025 at 2:45 P.M. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to: displaced fracture of cervical vertebra, Lewy Bodies dementia, Parkinson's disease and right foot drop. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 9/19/2025, indicated Resident D had intact cognition and was dependent on staff for showering. Resident D's record lacked the documentation that he had been given a shower on 11/17, 11/20, 11/27, 12/1 and 12/15/2025 as scheduled. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide wound care as directed by the physician for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for wounds.(Resident D).
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 3 residents reviewed for medication administration was free from significant medication errors. (Resident B) This deficient practice resulted in the resident experiencing nausea and vomiting and requiring the administration of an additional medication to treat the adverse side effect of the medication errors. Finding Includes:Resident B's clinical record was reviewed on 8/7/25 at 9:11 A.M., diagnoses included but were not limited to a history of stroke with hemiplegia, heart disease, constipation, gastroenteritis, colitis. Resident B was admitted to the facility for respite care from home and under hospice care on 6/3/25. Hospice Physician's orders dated 6/3/25, on admission, included but were not limited to; [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, observation and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were informed of where the Ombudsman and other state agencies phone numbers were located. This had the potential to affect 145 of 145 residents who resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 3 residents reviewed for resident rights were informed of treatment and medication changes. (Resident 36)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to provide a dignity bag to cover a urinary drainage bag for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for urinary catheters. (Resident 36)
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to limit an as needed psychotropic medication to a 14-day duration without required documentation for continued use of the psychotropic med for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Resident 36)
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure required transfer and resident clinical information was completed for 2 of 4 residents reviewed for transfers. (Residents 140 &148)
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop person centered care plans for a new pressure area and refusal to have facial hair removed for 2 of 31 residents whose care plans were reviewed. (Resident 94 and 33)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure medications were administered based on manufacturers guidelines for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for medication administration (Resident 37).
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, observation and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was at risk for pressure ulcers did not develop a stage II pressure ulcer and failed to implement a treatment for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. (Resident 94)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a safe smoking assessment was completed, smoking materials were locked up and safe disposal of cigarette butts was designated for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for accidents and hazards. (Resident 73)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to provide identified interventions to promote consumption of meals for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for nutrition. (Resident 31)
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to follow and administer physician ordered hydration orders for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for tube feeding. (Resident 52)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to store respiratory equipment in a sanitary manner for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for respiratory care. (Resident 66)
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide daily fistula checks for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for dialysis. (Resident 75)
Inspectors wrote8. During an observation in Resident 94's bathroom, on 5/21/2025 at 2:50 P.M., there was a small bottle sitting on the sink counter. The container had a label indicating it was nystatin powder for the residents' abdominal folds. The record for Resident 94 was completed on 5/21/2025 at 3:16 P.M. Diagnoses included but were not limited to hypertension, hemiplegia, anxiety, depression, and renal insufficiency. Current Physician Orders included 100,000 unit/gram topical powder-apply topical twice a day (BID) as needed for rash and redness in abdominal folds. During an observation of Resident 94's bathroom, on 5/22/2525 at 3:33 P.M., the Nystatin bottle remained on the counter in the bathroom. During an interview, on 5/22/2025 at 3:35 P.M., the Households Unit manager indicated the nystatin should not have been in the residents' room. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to provide enhanced barrier precautions for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for urinary catheters. (Resident 36)
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure hot food temperatures were assessed and logged consistently in the main kitchen to ensure food was served at palatable temperatures. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 155 of 155 residents in nursing care who were served from the main kitchen.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's responsible party was notified in a timely manner after a fall for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for falls, (Resident C).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 3 residents reviewed for accidents was provided safe transfer assistance utilizing a mechanical stand lift This deficient practice resulted in a significant injury which required a transfer to an acute care center for treatment, hospice admission and death, (Resident B).
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident rights were respected regarding photos taken by a facility staff member posted on social media without the resident's knowledge or permission for 1 of 3 resident's reviewed for resident's rights, (Resident F) Finding Includes: A record review for Resident F was completed on 6/14/24 at 1:00 P.M. Diagnoses included but were not limited to: dementia, breast cancer, heart failure, spinal stenosis, depression, and cerebrovascular disease. An Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 5/3/24, indicated Resident F was cognitively intact, required moderate assistance for most Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), and utilized a wheelchair for locomotion. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to develop a person-centered care plan for the use and refusal of a splint for 1 of 30 residents whose care plans were reviewed. (Resident 90)
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to update a care plan regarding the use of a Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) machine for 1 of 33 residents reviewed for care plans. (Resident 254)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure physician orders were in place for a resident using a Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for quality of care. (Resident 254)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide proper G-tube (artificial opening placed in the stomach to provide nutritional support and/or gastric decompression) care per professional standards and facility policy related to G-tube feedings for 1 of 1 resident who was reviewed for G-Tube feeding. (Resident 67)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) equipment was properly stored when not in use, cleaned and the distilled water was dated when opened for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for respiratory care. (Resident 254) Finding Includes: During an observation on 5/23/2024 at 2:40 P.M., Resident 254's CPAP mask and tubing was hanging over the headboard and the distilled water container was on the bathroom floor under the sink, opened without an open date. During an observation and interview on 5/28/2024 at 1:03 P.M., Resident 254 indicated the mask and tubing had never been placed in a plastic bag, and the tubing had not been cleaned. The water was kept on the floor in the bathroom under the sink. She did not always get the water put in the machine, there were times she ran it without the water. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide ongoing assessment of the resident and monitoring for complications by completing Pre Dialysis Evaluations and Post Dialysis Evaluations assessments for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for dialysis. (Residents 354 & 88 ).
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent a significant medication error related to a resident being given an incorrect insulin pen for 1 of 2 residents who were reviewed for insulin use. (Resident 101)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to properly label medications with an open date for 3 of 5 medication carts observed. ([NAME] Vesta cart 2, [NAME] cart 1, [NAME] cart 2) In addition, the facility failed to ensure treatments, and inhaler were separated from oral medication for 2 out of 5 medication carts and 1 out of 3 medication room refrigerators reviewed.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to obtain a declination form for a resident who refused the pneumococcal vaccine for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for vaccinations. (Resident 101)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent a pressure ulcer from developing on the heel and buttock, for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. (Resident F)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to report allegations of alleged verbal abuse for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for abuse. (Resident 90)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to throughly investigate an allegation of alleged verbal abuse for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for abuse. (Resident 90)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to complete interventions ordered for pressure ulcer prevention for 1 of 4 resident's reviewed for pressure ulcers. (Resident 159)
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident on restorative nursing received her hand splint and carrot device per plan of care for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for position and mobility. (Resident 30)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure proper storage of nebulizer masks, obtain orders for nebulizer and oxygen tubing changes, and failed to have an identifier on the door indicating oxygen was in use for 2 out of 3 residents reviewed for respiratory care. (Resident 91 & 159)
30 fire safety citations on file: 6 on May 23, 2025, 16 on May 31, 2024, 8 on May 23, 2023.
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Indiana | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 4.35 | 3.69 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.61 | 0.67 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 4.02 | 3.25 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 3.01 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.73 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 42.8% | 45.9% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 38.5% | 40.3% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 2 |
CMS expects 3.72 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.48 on weekdays and 4.02 on weekends, 10% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 26.1% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.15 in April to June 2025 to 4.35 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.35 | 0.61 | 4.48 | 4.02 | 26.1% | 0 of 90 | 152 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 4.19 | 0.49 | 4.30 | 3.91 | 31.6% | 0 of 92 | 155 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 4.25 | 0.56 | 4.38 | 3.93 | 34.2% | 0 of 92 | 151 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 4.15 | 0.62 | 4.27 | 3.85 | 39.5% | 0 of 91 | 149 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Indiana, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.63 | 0.62 | 3.80 | 3.19 | 3.4% | 0.4% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Indiana, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.43 | $17.80 to $21.36 | 33,640 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $31.60 | $29.35 to $35.30 | 14,480 |
| Registered nurses | $40.14 | $37.86 to $48.28 | 68,980 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Indiana | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 26.5 | 11.0 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.3 | 1.1 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 6.2 | 3.9 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.5 | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 22.6 | 11.9 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.2 | 3.6 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 12.3 | 13.6 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 11.4 | 22.2 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 7.0 | 10.8 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 0.9 | 1.6 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Greencroft Healthcare's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it better than the national rate (59.0% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
59.0% this home
Better than the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Indiana: 111 better, 7 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 213 eligible stays.
11.3% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Indiana: 0 better, 17 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 228 eligible stays.
5.5% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Indiana: 0 better, 4 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 110 eligible stays.
57.4% this home
Median of homes: Indiana60.0% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 115 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Indiana0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 129 residents counted.
4.1% this home
Median of homes: Indiana1.4% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 129 residents counted.
93.5% this home
Median of homes: Indiana100.0% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 77 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: WOODLAWN HOSPITAL. CMS links this home to Greencroft Communities, a group of 5 nursing homes averaging 2.6 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Woodlawn Hospital | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 11/01/2015 |
| Bode, Glen | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 12/09/2022 | |
| Chudzynski, Kendra | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 10/15/2024 | |
| Johnson, Terri | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 06/13/2022 | |
| Miller, Brandon | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 04/07/2025 | |
| Rogers, Bradley | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 06/26/2026 | |
| Webb, Harry | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 10/15/2023 | |
| Heyde, Alison | Corporate director | Individual | 09/09/2019 | |
| Mellinger, Gregory | Corporate director | Individual | 06/13/2022 | |
| Greencroft Goshen, Inc. | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 11/01/2025 | |
| Greencroft Retirement Communities | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 11/01/2015 | |
| Beck, Jackson | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/01/2022 | |
| Bontrager, Benjamin | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/01/2022 | |
| Caffee, Dennis | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Caskey, Jim | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/01/2022 | |
| Cook, Brian | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 10/28/2024 | |
| Crossley, Julia | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/01/2021 | |
| Davis, Hugh | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 02/05/2024 | |
| Evans, James | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/01/2022 | |
| Garboden, Steven | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/01/2023 | |
| Geiser, Jonathon | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/01/2020 | |
| Herschberger, Wes | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/01/2024 | |
| Hertzler, Julie | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/01/2020 | |
| Leftwich, Launa | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/01/2022 | |
| Martin, Jenna | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/01/2024 | |
| Olinski, Lynda | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 04/08/2020 | |
| Rogers, Bradley | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 06/26/2026 | |
| Woodworth, Diane | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/01/2022 | |
| Yoder, Gene | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/01/2018 | |
| Bode, Glen | Trustee of the SNF | Individual | 12/09/2022 | |
| Chudzynski, Kendra | Trustee of the SNF | Individual | 10/15/2024 | |
| Johnson, Terri | Trustee of the SNF | Individual | 06/13/2022 | |
| Miller, Brandon | Trustee of the SNF | Individual | 04/07/2025 | |
| Greencroft Goshen, Inc. | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 11/01/2015 | |
| Beck, Jackson | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2022 | |
| Bontrager, Benjamin | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2022 | |
| Caffee, Dennis | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Caskey, Jim | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2022 | |
| Cook, Brian | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 10/28/2024 | |
| Crossley, Julia | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2021 | |
| Davis, Hugh | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 02/05/2024 | |
| Evans, James | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2022 | |
| Garboden, Steven | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2023 | |
| Geiser, Jonathon | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2020 | |
| Herschberger, Wes | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2024 | |
| Hertzler, Julie | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2020 | |
| Leftwich, Launa | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2022 | |
| Martin, Jenna | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2024 | |
| Olinski, Lynda | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 04/08/2020 | |
| Woodworth, Diane | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2022 | |
| Yoder, Gene | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2018 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Indiana. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.