Home / Pennsylvania / North Wales
1425 Horsham Road, North Wales, PA 19454 · Montgomery County · (215) 371-3000
324 certified beds, about 306 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 2001
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 396078 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on April 9, 2026, inspectors cited 10 health deficiencies (the Pennsylvania average is 10, the national average 9.2).
Of 51 health citations since September 2023, 3 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (2 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 2 fines totaling $114,699 in the last three years; the largest was $97,354, and the latest is dated January 8, 2025.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.57 hours per resident per day, against 3.89 across Pennsylvania and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.38 of those hours.
45.9% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Pennsylvania average 44.5%).
CMS links it to Imperial Healthcare Group, an affiliated group of 9 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 51 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy, clinical record reviews and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to revise resident care plans timely for four of thirty-five residents reviewed. (Residents R221, R222, R306, and R312)Findings Include: Review of facility policy titled, Care Planning-Interdisciplinary Team undated states, Policy Statement-The interdisciplinary team is responsible for the development of resident care plans. Policy Interpretation and Implementation 1. Resident care plans are developed according to the timeframes and criteria established by 483.21 Review of resident clinical record for Resident R221 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident R221 had a care conference held on October 31, 2025. The next care conference was not held until April 7, 2026. The time in between care plans was over five months. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and staff interview it was determined that the facility did not to prominently display and maintain facility daily staffing hours as required for three days (April 6, April 7, April 8). Findings Include: Observation of the front lobby reception desk revealed a nurse staff posting from Monday March 23, 2025. A tour was taken with the Director of Social Services Employee E22 on April 8, 2026 at 10:30 a.m. revealed the lobby reception desk nurse staff posting was still from Monday March 23, 2025. A tour of the A1 unit revealed nurse staffing posting from April 7, 2026 no PPD or census was listed. A tour of C3 unit revealed nurse staffing posting from April 7, 2026 with no PPD or census. The Director of Nursing confirmed on April 8, 2026 at 11:15 a.m. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, and resident interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide food and drink that was palatable and served at the proper temperature for twelve of thirty five residents reviewed (Residents R5, R12, R22, R151, R119, R144, R188, R223, R257, R113, R128 and R322).
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and interviews with residents and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that essential equipment related to medication refrigerator on unit D3 and ice and water dispenser on unit C1 were in a safe and working condition for use by residents and nursing staff on two of twelve nursing units.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, resident interviews, and review of facility policy, it was determined that the facility did not maintain a dignified environment for three of thirty-five residents observed (Resident R151, R194, R312) and on three of twelve dining rooms (C1, D1, D2). Findings Include: Review of facility policy titled, Homelike Environment undated states, Policy Statement-Residents are provided with a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment and encouraged to use their personal belongings to the extent possible. 2. The facility staff and management maximizes, to the extent possible, the characteristics of the facility that reflect a personalized, homelike setting. These characteristics include: .i. comfortable sound levels . 3. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on a review of the clinical record, facility documentation, observations, and interviews with staff and residents, it was determined that the facility failed to provide Activities of Daily Living (ADL) assistance for one of 35 resident records reviewed (Resident R271).
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews with resident and facility staff, review of hospital documentation resident clinical documentation and facility policies, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' choices, to ensure facilities identify and provide needed care and services to maintain appropriate care for one resident's indwelling foley catheter and failed to assess and reassess the foley catheter to determine appropriate indications of use for one of 35 residents reviewed (Resident R271)
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to monitor resident weights and implement timely interventions for significant weight loss. Resident R81.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy, resident clinical records, facility documentation, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure proper documentation was maintained to support continuity of hospice care for one resident (Resident R81) out of three residents reviewed. Findings Include: Review of the facility's policy titled Hospice Program dated July 2017 revealed that the facility maintains an agreement with a Medicare-certified hospice provider to support end-of-life care for eligible residents. The policy requires clear, timely communication and comprehensive documentation between the facility and hospice services. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to follow acceptable infection control practices related to care and maintenance of oxygen concentrators for three of 35 residents reviewed (Resident R199, R13 and R119).
Inspectors wroteBased on a review of facility policies, clinical records, and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to promptly inform the resident's representative of a significant change in the resident's condition and hospital transfer. This failure affected one of three residents reviewed (Resident R1). Review of the facility policy titled Change in a Resident's Condition or Status, dated February 2024, indicated that the facility is required to notify the resident and/or the resident's representative of any significant change in condition, including transfer to the hospital. Review of the resident's clinical record revealed that Resident R1 legally designated her family member as Power of Attorney, dated August 1, 2023. Review of the medical provider notes for Resident R1 dated January 9, 2025, at 9:31 a.m., documented: [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility provided documentation, review of policy and interview with staff, it was determined that facility did not ensure to report the results of all investigations within five working days to the administrator or his/her designated representative and to other officials in accordance with State law for two of seven residents reviewed (Resident R1, R9). Review of facility's policy 'Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation or Misappropriation - Reporting and Investigating,' revised September 2024, indicates that all reports of resident abuse, neglect, exploitation, or theft/misappropriation of resident property are reported to local, state and federal agencies (as required by current regulations) and thoroughly investigated by facility management. Findings of all investigations are documented and reported. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide food and drink that were served at palatable temperatures for one of 5 residents reviewed. (Resident R10)
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interviews and the review of facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a complete and thorough investigation was conducted for bruises of unknown origin for 1 out of 1 residents reviewed (Resident R4).
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interviews, review of facility policy and review of facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that medical records requested by/and or on behalf of residents were provided in a timely manner for 3 out of 3 records reviewed. (Resident R1, Resident R2, and R3)Review of the facility policy, Release of Information, with a revision date of November 2009 indicated that the resident may initiate a request to release information to anyone he/she wishes and that such request will be honored only upon the receipt of written, signed, and dated request from the resident or representative. The policy also stated that a resident may have access to his or her records within 24 hours (excluding weekends or holidays) of the resident's written request. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to ensure each resident is provided with the necessary behavioral health care in a timely manner to attain or maintain the highest practicable mental and psychosocial well-being for one of five resident records reviewed (Resident R1). Findings Include: Review of care plan for Resident R1 dated August 4, 2025, revealed that the resident was at risk to be verbally aggressive (yelling/cursing when redirected) related to dementia. Interventions included, Psychiatric/Psychogeriatric consult as indicated. Review of clinical record for Resident R1 dated July 1, 2025, revealed that the resident noted to be agitated, resident was going into other residents' rooms, several attempts were made to redirect the resident, and it was unsuccessful. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on a review of clinical records, facility policies and documentation and staff interview, it was determined facility did not ensure adequate supervision and assistance to prevent accidents during a mechanical lift transfer for one of two residents reviewed (Resident R2). Review of facility policy title Lifting Machine, Using a Mechanical, revised July 2017, revealed that at least two (2) nursing staff are needed to safely move a resident with a mechanical lift, when possible. A review of Resident R2's clinical record revealed that he was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (an ongoing lung condition caused by damage to the lungs). A review of Resident R2's allegation of abuse incident investigation report revealed that on June 18, 2025, Employee E13, nurse aide, was providing care to Resident R2 using a sit to stand lift. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility documentation, observations, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide food and drink that was palatable and served at the proper temperature.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations; review of clinical records, policies, and procedures; and staff interviews; it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident was free from physical restraints for one out of 35 residents reviewed (Resident R156).
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, review of facility policies, clinical record reviews and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure appropriate enteral feeding practices related to labeling for one of two residents reviewed for tube feeding (Resident R299).
Inspectors wroteBased on observed, clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide appropriate respiratory care and services for one of 35 residents reviewed (R205).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of clinical records, staff and resident interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide culturally competent, trauma care in accordance with professional standards of practice, accounting for the resident's past experiences and preferences in order to eliminate and/or mitigate triggers that may cause re-traumatization of the resident for one of three residents sampled for behavior. (Resident R130)
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, review of facility policies, review of facility documentation, clinical record review and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an effective infection control program related with Enhanced Barrier Precautions for one of 14 residents reviewed (R142).
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that the necessary resident information was communicated to the physician before the resident was discharged against medical advice (AMA) for one of one resident reviewed. (Residents R1).
Inspectors wroteBased on a review of clinical records and interview with resident and staff, it was determined that the facility did not ensure that routine dental services were provided to residents in a timely manner for one of five clinical records reviewed (Resident R1) .
Inspectors wroteBased on interview with and review of clinical records, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure timely provision of professional services furnished by outside providers, for one of 5 residents reviewed (Residents R1).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of clinical records, interviews with staff, and facility policy, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents who require dialysis treatment receive such services, consistent with professional standards of practice, including ongoing assessment of the resident's condition and monitoring for complications before, during, and after dialysis treatments for one of three dialysis resident's reviewed (Resident R104). The facility's failure to properly monitor Resident R104's right arm fistula (used for dialysis access) resulted in actual harm to Resident R104 who required an emergent transfer to the hospital from the dialysis center when the resident's fistula was assessed as swollen, infected with purulent (thick, yellowish substance that occurs with infection) drainage and the development of a non-occlusive right brachial deep vein thrombosis. (Resident R104).
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interview with residents and staff, it was determined that the facility did not provide sufficient nursing staff at all times to provide nursing and related services to meet the resident's needs for 12 out of 35 residents reviewed (Resident R180, R46, R155, R247, R75, R78, R137, R32, R134, R11, R161 and R7)
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide food and drink that was palatable and served at palatable temperatures for 15 of 35 residents reviewed (Residents R114, R55, R406, R10, R268, R204, R31, R18, R285, R407, R22, R221, R182, R28 and R118).
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility did not ensure that care plans were updated in a timely manner for one of 35 records reviewed related to resident's behaviors of dislodging a peg tube (Resident R237).
Inspectors wroteBased on interview with residents, interview with staff, and review of clinical records, it was determined that facility failed to obtained a consultation with an especialist and administered insulin medications as ordered by the physican for two of 35 residents reviewed. (Resident R40 and Resident R94)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to provide respiratory care/oxygen services consistent with professional standards of practice for three of 35 residents reviewed (Residents R406, R18, and R114).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility provided documentation, it was determined that facility did not ensure nurse aides had completed annual performance evaluation for three out of nine nurse aides reviewed (Employee E11, E12, E13)
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement an individualized person-centered care plan to address a resident's dementia care needs for one of 35 residents reviewed (Resident R46). Findings Include: Reviewed facility dementia policy title Dementia Clinical Protocol dated in November 2018 states that treatment/management for the individual with confirmed dementia, the IDT team will identify a resident-centered care plan to maximized remain function and quality of life. Review of the admission sheet of Resident R46, revealed that Resident R46 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with the diagnosis of Dementia (Dementia is not a specific disease but is rather a general term for the impaired ability to remember, think, or make decisions that interferes with doing everyday activities). [...]
Inspectors wroteBased upon review of resident records and interviews with staff it was determined that the facility failed to maintain ongoing communication between the facility and a dialysis provider that was completed and/or available for review for three of three residents receiving dialysis (Resident R104, R139 and R230).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility provided documentation and interview with staff, it was determined that facility did not ensure required in-services training was provided for one nurse aide out of nine nurse aides reviewed (Employee E14)
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility documentation, review of clinical records, and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman of facility-initiated emergency transfers to the hospital and that a resident's representative was made aware of a facility-initiated transfer, for two of eight residents reviewed. (Residents R67 and R237) Findings Include: Review of nursing notes for Resident R67 dated November 10, 2024, at 10:18 a.m. revealed that the resident had a unwitnessed fall and was transferred to a local hospital for evaluation. Further review revealed a note, dated October 8, 2024, at 11:16 p.m., which indicated that Resident R67 was admitted to the local hospital for feeling nauseous and dizzy and was observation with syncope. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on the review of clinical records, facility documentation, facility policies, and interview with residents and staff, it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident's environment was free of accident hazards, and failed to ensure hazardous materials were not accessible to one of nine residents (Resident R1). Staff failed to provide supervision for Resident R1 with documented history of suicidal ideation and who voiced suicidal thoughts. This failure resulted in Resident R1 obtaining a disposable razor and cutting her/his wrist. This failure placed Resident R1 at risk for serious injury and resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy situation for Resident R1. This deficiency is cited as past non-compliance. Findings Include: [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility records, job descriptions, and staff interviews, it was determined that the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) and the Director of Nursing (DON) did not effectively manage the facility to ensure that the resident's environment was free of accident hazards, and failed to ensure hazardous materials were not accessible to a resident. This failure resulted in Resident R1 able to obtaining a disposable razor and cutting her/his wrist. The facility's failure placed Resident R1 who had a history of suicidal ideation at risk for serious injury and resulted in Immediate Jeopardy situation.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews, review of clinical records and facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that adequate supervision was provided to a resident who verbally expressed to nursing staff that she wanted to kill herself, which resulted in an Immediate jeopardy to Resident R1 who ingested acetaminophen, was transferred out to the hospital, had elevated blood levels of acetaminophen, and received treatment for intentional acetaminophen overdose (Resident R1).
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interviews, the review of the clinical record and facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the physician was notified regarding a resident's verbal threats of wanting to kill herself, and failed to ensure that the physician was notified when the resident reported to nursing staff that she ingested 25-30 milligrams of Tylenol for 1 out of 3 residents reviewed (Resident R1).
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews, review of clinical records, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure comprehensive person-centered plan of care for a resident with a history of passive suicidal ideation (thoughts of wanting to die or thinking one would be better off dead) for 1 out of 3 residents reviewed (Resident R1). Findngs include: Review of the facility policy, Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered with a revision date of March 2022 indicated that assessments of residents are ongoing and care plans are revised as information about the resident and the resident's conditions change. Review of the August 2024 physician orders for Resident R1 included the diagnoses of hypertension (high blood pressure); chronic kidney disease (a gradual loss of kidney function that can lead to kidney failure); cerebral infarction (a stroke); muscle weakness; [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interviews, review of facility policy, and review of the clinical record, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that resident's medications were administered in a timely manner for 1 out of 3 residents reviewed (Resident R2).
Inspectors wroteBased on a review of clinical records, facility documentation and interviews with staff, it was determined that the Nursing Home Administrator and the Director of Nursing failed to effectively manage the facility regarding the suicide attempt of one of three residents reviewed (Resident R1).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of the clinical record and facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure complete and accurate documentation related to a resident's mental health status for 1 out of 3 residents reviewed (Resident R1).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, review of clinical records, and interviews with residents and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain sufficient nursing staff levels to provide nursing care and services for three of 35 residents reviewed (Residents R135, R123 and R138 ).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interviews with staff and residents, it was determined that the facility did not employ sufficient staff to carry out the functions of food and nutrition services and that meals were served timely in one of three dining rooms (Second floor).
Inspectors wroteBased on observations of the Food and Nutrition Services, reviews of policies and procedures and food committee meeting minutes, and interviews with residents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that each resident received foods and beverages that were palatable and at safe and appetizing temperatures for five of 35 residents reviewed (Residents R123, R11, R134, R135 and R69) and in two of six nursing units.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, review of facility policy and interviews with residents, it was determined the facility failed to implement a resident's care plan related showers to one of ten residents reviewed. (Resident R1) Findings Include: Review of facility policy titled Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), Supporting states Residents will be provided with care, treatment and services as appropriate to maintain or improve their ability to carry out activities of daily living (ADLs). [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on review of clinical records and facility policy determined the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan related to one residents required assistants with activities of daily living for one of four resident records reviewed (Resident R1).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policies, clinical record review and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain intravenous (IV) devices in accordance with professional standards of practice for one of four resident records reviewed (Resident R2)
43 fire safety citations on file: 22 on April 9, 2026, 10 on June 20, 2025, 11 on February 7, 2025.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| January 8, 2025 | Fine | $17,345 |
| August 20, 2024 | Fine | $97,354 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Pennsylvania | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.57 | 3.89 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.38 | 0.79 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.24 | 3.53 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.13 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.06 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 45.9% | 44.5% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 57.5% | 39.9% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 4 |
CMS expects 4.20 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.70 on weekdays and 3.24 on weekends, 12% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.5% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.66 in April to June 2025 to 3.57 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.57 | 0.38 | 3.70 | 3.24 | 0.5% | 0 of 90 | 306 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.64 | 0.40 | 3.75 | 3.38 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 314 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.73 | 0.39 | 3.85 | 3.43 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 302 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.66 | 0.42 | 3.80 | 3.33 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 302 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Pennsylvania, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.69 | 0.65 | 3.82 | 3.34 | 11.3% | 0.1% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pennsylvania, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $21.44 | $18.88 to $22.52 | 67,740 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $30.74 | $29.02 to $35.01 | 38,260 |
| Registered nurses | $46.36 | $38.75 to $50.35 | 146,520 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Pennsylvania | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 8.0 | 16.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.2 | 0.7 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.9 | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.6 | 3.1 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.1 | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 6.1 | 17.0 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.3 | 4.8 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 15.3 | 17.7 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 26.4 | 22.5 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 6.5 | 9.5 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.4 | 1.6 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 0.8 | 1.2 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Horsham Center for Jewish Life's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it better than the national rate (60.1% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
60.1% this home
Better than the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Pennsylvania: 100 better, 108 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 669 eligible stays.
10.0% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Pennsylvania: 3 better, 9 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 720 eligible stays.
5.5% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Pennsylvania: 7 better, 5 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 453 eligible stays.
64.8% this home
Median of homes: Pennsylvania54.4% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 310 residents counted.
0.6% this home
Median of homes: Pennsylvania0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 542 residents counted.
1.4% this home
Median of homes: Pennsylvania2.0% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 542 residents counted.
98.8% this home
Median of homes: Pennsylvania100.0% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 255 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: 1425 HORSHAM SNF OPERATIONS LLC. CMS links this home to Imperial Healthcare Group, a group of 9 nursing homes averaging 2.2 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1425 Horsham SNF Operations Holdings LLC | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 10/26/2020 |
| Chrh Equities LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 08/20/2021 | |
| Cs Horsham Holdings LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 10/26/2020 | |
| Cw Horsham Holdings LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 11/01/2021 | |
| Ens Holding Group II LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 08/20/2021 | |
| Ens Holdings, LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 08/20/2021 | |
| The Ens Family Trust | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 08/20/2021 | |
| Ymcs Equities LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 08/20/2021 | |
| Gottesman, Daniel | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Individual | 08/20/2021 | |
| Coastal States Bank | 5% or greater security interest | Organization | 10/26/2020 | |
| Firstrust Savings Bank | 5% or greater security interest | Organization | 10/26/2020 | |
| Greystone Servicing Company, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company | 5% or greater security interest | Organization | 10/26/2020 | |
| Huntington National Bank | 5% or greater security interest | Organization | 10/26/2020 | |
| Synovous Bank, National Association | 5% or greater security interest | Organization | 10/26/2020 | |
| Klitnick, Yechiel | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 01/22/2023 | |
| Herzka, Yisroel | Corporate officer | Individual | 08/20/2021 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Pennsylvania. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.