117 Jacob Parrott Boulevard, Kenton, OH 43326 · Hardin County · (419) 674-4197
125 certified beds, about 89 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1991
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 365843 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on May 7, 2026, inspectors cited 10 health deficiencies (the Ohio average is 10.5, the national average 9.2).
None of its 39 health citations since February 2020 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.21 hours per resident per day, against 3.69 across Ohio and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.30 of those hours.
45.7% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Ohio average 48.7%).
CMS links it to Aom Healthcare, an affiliated group of 20 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 39 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, resident and staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to maintain comfortable temperatures throughout the building for Residents #2, #5, #24, #28 and #47. The facility census was 91.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) were updated when residents received new mental health diagnoses. This affected four (#3, #11, #14 and #87) of five residents reviewed for PASARRs. The facility census was 91.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the walls in resident rooms were maintained in a functional and comfortable manner. This affected five (#2, #8, #41, #50, and #82) of 25 residents reviewed for physical environment. The facility census was 91.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record reviews, resident and staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the residents right to privacy was maintained. This affected two (#25 and #82) of two residents reviewed for privacy. The facility census was 91.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a level two Pre-admission Assessment and Resident Review (PASARR) was completed for Resident #3. This affected one (#3) of five residents reviewed for PASARR. The facility census was 91.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #7 had a discharge plan of care. This affected one (#7) of 25 residents reviewed for care plans. The facility census was 91.
Inspectors wroteBased on record reviews, staff interviews, observations, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents who were at risk for falls had the care planned fall interventions in place. This affected two (#29 and #82) of three residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 91.
Inspectors wroteBased on record reviews, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to identify and care plan trauma triggers and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) related interventions for the residents. This affected three (Residents #3, #22, and #87) of three residents reviewed for trauma-informed care. The facility census was 91.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, staff interview, facility policy review, and review of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidance, the facility failed to ensure staff performed proper hand hygiene when utilizing gloves and donned appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) during high contact resident care activities for residents in enhanced barrier precautions (EBP). This affected two (#6 and #77) of three residents reviewed for infection control. The facility census was 91.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, record review, and personnel file review, the facility failed to hire a qualified worker to fill the social work role with the facilities capacity being 125. This had the potential to affect all 91 residents residing in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, staff and resident interviews and policy review the facility failed to ensure the facility environment temperatures were maintained at a comfortable level. This had the potential to affect 24 (#113, #68, #109, #18, #83, #58, #25, #17, #39, #80, #96, #50, #27, #48, #33, #42, #63, #12, #89, #93, #61, #21, #86 and #91) residents residing on the 300 hall.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observations and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure dietary orders were followed. This affected one (#16) of three residents reviewed for dietary preferences. The facility census was 106.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of the daily staffing posting, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to post current nurse staffing information. This had the potential to affect all residents who reside in the facility. The facility census was 100.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, staff interview, resident interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from physical restraints. This affected one (Resident #34) of one resident reviewed for physical restraints. The facility census was 100.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, staff interviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to complete an accurate assessment to reflect a resident's current status. This affected one (Resident #82) of one resident reviewed for accuracy of assessments. The facility census was 100.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, medical record review, staff interviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to develop accurate care plans to reflect residents' current status. This affected two (Residents #40 and #34) of three reviewed for care planning. The facility census was 100.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to provide a dependent resident with grooming needs. This affected one (Resident #74) of four residents reviewed for activities of daily living. The facility census was 100.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to implement fall interventions to potentially prevent falls. This affected one (Resident #90) of two residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 100.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observation, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to properly administer medications via enteral gastrostomy tube. This affected one (Resident #74) of one resident reviewed for medication administration via gastrostomy tube. The facility census was 100.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow fluid restrictions. This affected one (Resident #23) of one resident reviewed for fluid restrictions. The facility census was 100.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors. This affected one (Resident #13) of one resident reviewed for significant medication errors. The facility census was 100.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, staff interview, review of manufacturer information for insulin, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure insulin vials were labeled with resident names and staff could decipher opening dates vs expiration dates. This had the potential to affect three (Residents #30, #23, and #22) of three residents who received insulin from the 100 medication cart. The facility census was 100.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, medical record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to follow appropriate infection control procedures for a resident with Clostridium difficile (C-diff). This affected one (Resident #298) and had the potential to affect 26 residents who resided on the 100 hall. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure proper infection control procedures were followed during medication administration. This affected one (Resident #346) of five reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 100.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to properly label and date opened food items in the upright kitchen refrigerator. This had potential to affect 87 of 88 residents who receive food from the kitchen. The facility identified one resident (Resident #21) did not receive food from the kitchen.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, review of facility's maintenance documents, and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to have appropriate Legionella monitoring. In addition, the facility failed to maintain infection control for one (Resident #26) of four residents observed for medication administration. This had the potential to affect all 89 residents residing in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on facility record review, observation and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain a clean and sanitary environment. This had the potential to affect all 89 residents residing in the facility
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to treat residents in a dignified manner during meal times. This affected five residents (Resident #4, #9, #39, #4 #80) observed during meal time. The facility census was 89.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, review of the facility's policy and staff and resident interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided with comprehensive discharge summaries with the required information upon discharge from the facility. This affected five residents (#136, #137, #138, #139, #141) of six residents reviewed for discharge. The facility identified 20 residents discharged from the facility in the last 60 days. The facility census was 89.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, review of chemical warning labels, staff interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to have safe storage of chemicals. This had the potential to affect nine residents (#32, #33, #51, #58, #32, #36, #49, #33 and #83) who were both cognitively impaired and independently mobile as identified by the facility. The facility census was 89.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, review of manufacturer's recommendations and review of facility policy, the facility failed to properly date and store medications. This affected two of three medication rooms and two of five medication carts. The facility census was 89.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observation, resident and staff interview and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to provide reasonable privacy when a resident's door could not close and not shutting the window curtains when providing care. This affected two (Resident #76 and #85) of 26 residents observed in the initial and final sample pool. The facility census was 89.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, staff and resident interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to conduct quarterly care conferences. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure a resident and appropriate/required members of the interdisciplinary team (IDT) were invited to participate in the care planning process. This affected three (#8, #27, and #50) of four resident reviewed for care planning. The facility census was 89.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, observation, staff interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to complete accurate, routinely wound assessments for Resident #73. This affected one (#73) of four residents reviewed for non-pressure wounds. The facility census was 89.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review and staff interview; the facility failed to obtain physician orders and provide care and services for a resident's indwelling urinary catheter. This affected one (#137) of three residents reviewed for urinary catheter. The facility identified eight residents with indwelling urinary catheters. The facility census was 89.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, observations, staff interviews and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to timely implement nutritional recommendations for the residents. This affected two (#23 and #71) of three residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility censes was 89. Findings Include: 1. Review of the medical record for the Resident #23 revealed an admission date of 12/16/19. Diagnosis included Alzheimer's disease, delirium, dementia, major depressive disorder, type two diabetes mellitus, atrial fibrillation, and muscle weakness. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 01/01/20, revealed the Resident #23 required set up assistance for eating and substantial to maximal assistance for oral hygiene. Review of the care plan, dated 12/24/19, revealed the resident had imbalanced nutrition related to poor intake. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to change oxygen supplies as physician ordered. This affected one (#8) of two residents reviewed for respiratory care. The facility identified 10 residents who receive respiratory care. The facility census was 89.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, observation, review of the facility's policy and staff interview, the facility failed to follow a pharmacy recommendation and physician order. In addition, the facility failed to ensure medications were not left unattended at the resident's bedside. This affected one resident (#1) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications and affected one (#26) of 26 residents observed on the initial and final sample. The facility census was 89.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, observation, staff interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to maintain a medication error rate less than 5%. There were three medication errors out of 32 opportunities, which was a 9.38% medication error rate. This affected two (#26 and #76) of four residents observed for medication administration. The facility census was 89.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to obtained physician ordered laboratory blood tests. This affected one (#8) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medication. The facility census was 89.
38 fire safety citations on file: 18 on May 7, 2026, 6 on July 27, 2023, 14 on February 13, 2020.
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Ohio | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.21 | 3.69 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.30 | 0.64 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 2.99 | 3.28 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 1.89 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.03 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 45.7% | 48.7% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 42.9% | 43.9% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.69 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.30 on weekdays and 2.99 on weekends, 9% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 5.7% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.23 in April to June 2025 to 3.21 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.21 | 0.30 | 3.30 | 2.99 | 5.7% | 0 of 90 | 89 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.17 | 0.30 | 3.26 | 2.94 | 8.3% | 2 of 92 | 94 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.30 | 0.29 | 3.41 | 3.01 | 14.5% | 0 of 92 | 91 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.23 | 0.26 | 3.36 | 2.88 | 20.5% | 1 of 91 | 93 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Ohio, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.64 | 0.60 | 3.80 | 3.24 | 4.6% | 0.4% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ohio, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.76 | $17.93 to $21.44 | 63,280 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $29.78 | $27.34 to $31.68 | 39,900 |
| Registered nurses | $39.67 | $38.08 to $47.61 | 143,730 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Ohio | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.5 | 5.3 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.3 | 0.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.0 | 3.2 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.0 | 6.1 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.3 | 3.4 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 22.9 | 8.8 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 30.0 | 24.9 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 10.8 | 12.9 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.4 | 1.7 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.0 | 1.8 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Kenton Nursing and Rehabilitation Center's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (47.4% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
47.4% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Ohio: 147 better, 20 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 63 eligible stays.
11.7% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Ohio: 3 better, 7 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 85 eligible stays.
6.5% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Ohio: 1 better, 4 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 40 eligible stays.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Ohio55.6% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 17 residents counted.
5.6% this home
Median of homes: Ohio0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 36 residents counted.
3.0% this home
Median of homes: Ohio1.4% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 36 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Ohio100.0% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 7 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: KENTON NURSING & REHABILITATION CENTER LLC. CMS links this home to Aom Healthcare, a group of 20 nursing homes averaging 2.8 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Serenity Equity Holdings LLC | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 16% | 09/18/2017 |
| Zw Aom Re LLC | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 16% | 09/18/2017 |
| Goldstein, Jeffery | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 21% | 01/15/2024 |
| Sherman, Alexander | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 17% | 01/15/2024 |
| Horowitz, Zaleman | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Individual | 5% | 09/18/2017 |
| Wagschal, Zalman | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Individual | 16% | 09/18/2017 |
| Huston, Sharon | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 09/18/2017 | |
| Goldstein, Jeffery | Corporate officer | Individual | 09/18/2017 | |
| Sherman, Alexander | Corporate officer | Individual | 09/18/2017 | |
| Sherman, Samuel | Corporate officer | Individual | 09/18/2017 | |
| Aom Healthcare LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 09/18/2018 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Ohio. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.