502 E Coke Rd, Winnsboro, TX 75494 · Wood County · (903) 342-6951
60 certified beds, about 47 residents a day · Government - Hospital district · Medicare and Medicaid since 1992
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 675051 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on February 11, 2026, inspectors cited 6 health deficiencies (the Texas average is 9.4, the national average 9.2).
Of 27 health citations since October 2023, 2 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $34,234 in the last three years; the largest was $34,234, and the latest is dated November 20, 2024.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.34 hours per resident per day, against 3.39 across Texas and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.50 of those hours.
41.3% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Texas average 55.3%).
CMS links it to Nexion Health, an affiliated group of 51 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 27 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure all drugs were stored in a locked compartment, only accessible by authorized personnel, and labeled and dated correctly for 2 of 2 medication cart observed for medication storage and for medication labeling. The facility failed to ensure insulin was dated when opened on the medication/nurse cart for the East Hall. The facility failed to ensure that insulin was labeled with a resident name the medication/nurse cart for the [NAME] Hall. These failures could place residents at risk for not receiving drugs and biologicals as needed, not receiving the right medication, medications being used passed their effective or expiration date, and a drug diversion.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement its written policies and procedures to prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, and exploitation of residents and misappropriation of resident property for 5 of 9 residents (Resident #7, Resident #13, Resident #25, Resident #34, and Resident #45) reviewed for abuse. 1. The facility failed to implement their policy when they did not complete incident reports after a resident-to-resident incident between Resident #34, Resident #13, and Resident #25 on 05/01/2025, and on 07/19/2025 for Resident #7. 2. The facility failed to implement their policy when they did not complete incident report after injury of unknown origin for Resident #45 on 07/31/25 and failed to document the training related to this incident. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for food service safety. 1. The facility failed to seal, label and date a clear plastic bag of frozen chicken wings in freezer #1, and an opened box of egg rolls in Freezer #2. 2. The facility failed to label and date a clear plastic bag of frozen chicken parts in Freezer #1, and a bag of frozen cauliflower in Freezer #2. 3. The facility failed to label and date a clear plastic bag of sliced cheese and an open container of chicken base in Refrigerator #1. 4. The facility failed to keep a container identified as thickener sealed in dry storage room. These failures placed residents who ate food served by the kitchen at risk of cross contamination and food-borne illness. Findings Included: [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents assessments accurately reflected the resident's status for 2 of 14 residents (Residents #17 and #41) reviewed for accuracy of assessments. 1. The facility failed to accurately complete the MDS assessment to indicate Resident #17's tobacco use. 2. The facility failed to accurately complete the MDS assessment to indicate Resident #41's PASARR positive. These failures could place residents at risk of not receiving the appropriate care and services to maintain their highest level of well-being.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a person-centered care plan for each resident that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment for 1 of 14 residents (Resident #3) reviewed for comprehensive care plans in that: The facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for Resident #3's EBP (enhance barrier precautions) due to G-tube (gastric-tube for feeding and medications). This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving the appropriate care, services or treatment needed in a timely manner.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure all drugs were stored in a locked compartment, only accessible by authorized personnel, and labeled and dated correctly for 1 of 27 residents (Resident #29) observed for medication storage. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #29 did not have a refresh plus eye drop ampule sitting on top of a covered bowl of cereal on top of his dresser. These failures could place residents at risk for not receiving drugs and biologicals as needed and injury.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 2 of 10 residents (Residents #3 and #31) observed for Infection Control. 1. The facility failed to implement EBP for Resident #3 during a G-tube medication administration on 02/10/2026. 2. The facility failed to implement EBP for Resident #31 during a wound care dressing change on 02/10/2026. These failures could place residents and staff at risk for cross-contamination and development of infections. Findings Included:1. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to consult with the resident's physician when there was a significant change in the resident's physical and mental status that is, a deterioration in health, mental, or psychosocial status in either life-threatening conditions or clinical complications for 1 of 15 (Resident #19) residents reviewed for notification of change. The facility failed to ensure Resident #19's physician was notified of his increased pain following a wound debridement (removal of dead or unhealthy tissue from the wound to promote the healing process) by the Wound Care NP on 11/12/2024. This failure could place residents at risk for experiencing unnecessary pain, not receiving necessary treatments and medications, and a decreased quality of life.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure pain management was provided to residents who require such services, consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #19) reviewed for pain. The facility failed to ensure Resident #19 received adequate pain management during wound care after he reported increased pain following a wound debridement (removal of dead or unhealthy tissue from the wound to promote the healing process) by the Wound Care NP on 11/12/2024. This failure could place residents at risk for experiencing unnecessary pain and a decreased quality of life.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents who require dialysis received such services, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan and the residents' goals and preferences for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #13) reviewed for dialysis. The facility failed to keep ongoing communication with the dialysis facility for Resident #13 on 09/12/2024, 09/14/2024, 09/21/2024, 09/28/2024, 10/10/2024, 10/12/2024, 10/19/2024, 10/26/2024, 11/02/2024, and 11/09/2024. These failures could place residents at risk for complications and not receiving proper care and treatment to meet their needs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food safety in the facility's only kitchen. The facility failed to ensure: the toaster was clean. the fryer and oil were clean. An opened loaf of bread was labeled and stored properly. Opened enchilada sauce was stored properly. An opened box of corn dogs was stored properly. An opened box of bacon was stored properly. A container of leftover beans dated 11/13/2024 was discarded. An opened ½ gallon of chocolate milk with a best by date of 11/14/2024 was discarded. The temperature of the top freezer in the dining room was monitored. The top freezer did not have brown residue in it. These failures could place residents at risk for foodborne illness.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure each resident had the right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences for 1 of 15 residents (Resident #12) reviewed for reasonable accommodations. The facility failed to ensure Resident #12's call light was within reach while in bed. This failure could place residents at risk for a delay in assistance and decreased quality of life.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, and comfortable homelike environment for 1 of 2 dining rooms (back dining room) reviewed for cleanliness of the physical environment. The facility failed to ensure the windowsill in the back dining room was free of cobwebs, bugs, and dust from 11/18/24 to 11/20/24. This failure could place residents at risk for a decreased quality of life and an unsanitary environment.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure assessments accurately reflected the resident status for 1 of 15 residents (Resident # 13) reviewed for MDS assessment accuracy. The facility failed to ensure Resident # 13's dialysis treatments were accurately reflected on her Quarterly MDS assessment with an ARD of 10/28/2024. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving care and services to meet their needs.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident's person-centered comprehensive care plan was reviewed and revised by the interdisciplinary team after each assessment for 1 of 15 residents (Residents #29), reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to revise Resident #29's care plan to reflect the need for weekly weights and ensure plus three times a day for his weight loss. This failure could affect residents of the facility by not addressing their physical, mental, and psychosocial needs for each to attain or maintain their highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial outcome.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was incontinent of bladder received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections and to restore continence to the extent possible for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #198) reviewed for incontinence. The facility failed to ensure Resident #198 was provided prompt incontinent care on 11/18/24 when his bed sheets and clothing were wet up to his shoulders and were brown around the edges of the wet spots. These failures could place residents at risk for urinary tract infections, skin breakdown, and a decreased quality of life.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents who are trauma survivors receive culturally competent, trauma-informed care in accordance with professional standards of practice and accounting for residents' experiences and preferences in order to eliminate or mitigate triggers that may cause re-traumatization of the resident for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #35) reviewed for trauma-informed care The facility failed to adequately assess Resident #35's history of trauma. This failure could place residents at an increased risk for severe psychological distress due to re-traumatization.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents were free of significant medication errors for 2 of 6 residents (Resident #13 and Resident #41) reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility failed to ensure Resident #13's amlodipine (medication that lowers blood pressure) was not administered when her blood pressure was outside of the ordered parameters on 11/16/24. The facility failed to ensure Resident #41's carvedilol (medication that lowers blood pressure) was not administered when her blood pressure was outside of the ordered parameters on 11/09/24. These failures could place residents at risk of medical complications and not receiving the therapeutic effects of their medications.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections, for 1 of 1 linen cart reviewed for infection control. The facility failed to ensure Laundry Aide H completely covered the linen cart while delivering the residents clean clothing on 11/20/2024. This failure could place residents at risk for cross-contamination and the spread of infection.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs, for 2 of 3 (Resident #s 26 and 29) residents reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to ensure Resident #26's comprehensive care plan addressed that she required a daily application of a right hand splint. The facility failed to ensure Resident #29's comprehensive care plan addressed that she received Cymbalta (antidepressant), Trazodone (antidepressant), and Lorazepam (antianxiety). These failures could place residents at risk of not receiving necessary medications and services.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to review and revise the person-centered care plan to reflect the current condition for 1 of 3 (Resident #38) residents reviewed for care plan revisions. The facility failed to ensure Resident #38's care plan was updated to reflect she was receiving Valium ([Diazepam] a medication used to relieve symptoms of anxiety and used off-labeled to treat insomnia) and discontinuation of anxiety medication of Lorazepam and Buspar. This deficient practice could affect residents by placing them at risk of not receiving appropriate interventions to meet their current needs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain grooming and personal hygiene were provided for 2 of 3 residents (Resident #s 36 and 37) reviewed for ADLs. The facility failed to provide fingernail care for Resident #s 36 and 37. These failures could place residents at risk of not receiving services and care, infection, and a decreased quality of life.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure that the resident environment remains as free of accident hazards as is possible and each resident receives adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 1 of 11 (Resident #30) residents reviewed for accidents hazards and supervision. The facility failed to secure and store a microwave. This failure could place residents at risk for injury.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that a resident who was incontinent of bladder received appropriate treatment and services, and an indwelling catheter is not used unless there is valid medical justification for catheterization and the catheter is discontinued as soon as clinically warranted for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #150) reviewed for urinary catheters. 1. Resident #150 had an indwelling urinary catheter since admission on [DATE] without a physician's order with an acceptable diagnosis for use. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #150's order for bladder training for Foley catheter removal was implemented. These deficient practices could affect residents who had urinary catheters at risk of not receiving care needed.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to have target behavioral monitoring in place for behaviors associated with the use of psychotropic medications and documented in the clinical record for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary psychotropic drugs (Resident #23 and Resident #150). 1. The facility failed to adequately monitor Resident #23's behaviors regarding his antidepressant and antianxiety medications. 2. The facility failed to adequately monitor Resident #150's behaviors regarding his antidepressant and antianxiety medications. These failures could place residents at risk of receiving unnecessary psychotropic medications with possible medication side effects, adverse consequences, decreased quality of life and dependence on unnecessary medications.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure all drugs were stored in a locked compartment, only accessible by authorized personnel for 1 of 2 medication carts and 1 of 1 medication room observed for medication storage. The facility failed to ensure the lock box that contained narcotic medications was permanently affixed to the refrigerator in the medication room. The facility did not ensure East Hall medication cart was secured and unable to be accessed by unauthorized personnel. These failures could place residents at risk for not receiving drugs and biologicals as needed, medications being used passed their effective or expiration date, and a drug diversion.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 2 of 2 residents (Resident #150 and Resident #14) reviewed for infection control practices. The facility failed to ensure CNA E changed her gloves and performed hand hygiene while providing Peri-care and catheter care to Resident #150. The facility failed to ensure CNA H changed gloves or performed hand hygiene while providing incontinent care for Resident #14. These failures could place residents and staff at risk for cross contamination and the spread of infection.
10 fire safety citations on file: 6 on February 11, 2026, 2 on November 20, 2024, 2 on October 11, 2023.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| November 20, 2024 | Fine | $34,234 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Texas | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.34 | 3.39 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.50 | 0.43 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 2.94 | 2.98 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 1.75 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.08 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 41.3% | 55.3% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 28.6% | 54.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.94 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.50 on weekdays and 2.94 on weekends, 16% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 2.2% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.44 in April to June 2025 to 3.34 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.34 | 0.50 | 3.50 | 2.94 | 2.2% | 0 of 90 | 47 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.35 | 0.51 | 3.57 | 2.79 | 0.3% | 0 of 92 | 47 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.21 | 0.52 | 3.40 | 2.73 | 0.2% | 0 of 92 | 48 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.44 | 0.57 | 3.65 | 2.90 | 1.2% | 0 of 91 | 47 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Texas, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.33 | 0.40 | 3.50 | 2.93 | 2.2% | 0.7% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Texas, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.03 | $16.97 to $20.71 | 88,680 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $29.92 | $27.46 to $32.89 | 57,560 |
| Registered nurses | $46.14 | $38.06 to $50.53 | 271,380 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Texas | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 16.8 | 15.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.9 | 3.3 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 18.8 | 14.0 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.7 | 3.8 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 6.0 | 9.6 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 21.0 | 25.7 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 13.7 | 12.3 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.8 | 2.2 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 4.3 | 2.1 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Lakeview Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (58.5% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
58.5% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Texas: 116 better, 50 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 34 eligible stays.
10.4% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Texas: 0 better, 9 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 52 eligible stays.
7.4% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Texas: 4 better, 11 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 27 eligible stays.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Texas57.3% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 17 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Texas0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 29 residents counted.
2.7% this home
Median of homes: Texas1.3% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 29 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure.
Median of homes: Texas98.5% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: WEST WHARTON COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICT. CMS links this home to Nexion Health, a group of 51 nursing homes averaging 2.2 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jones, Beau | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 04/01/2021 | |
| Mak, David | Corporate officer | Individual | 05/18/2021 | |
| Nexion Health at Winnsboro, Inc | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 04/01/2021 | |
| Fallon, John | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 04/01/2021 | |
| Herdrich, William | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 04/01/2021 | |
| Jones, Beau | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 04/01/2021 | |
| Kirley, Francis | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 04/01/2021 | |
| Lee, Brian | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 04/01/2021 | |
| Mak, David | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 05/18/2021 | |
| Reid, John | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 04/01/2021 | |
| Riner, Meera | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 04/01/2021 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Texas. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.