2200 Milton Boulevard, Newton Falls, OH 44444 · Trumbull County · (330) 872-1990
60 certified beds, about 55 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 1991
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 365855 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on June 18, 2025, inspectors cited 8 health deficiencies (the Ohio average is 10.5, the national average 9.2).
Of 15 health citations since October 2019, 1 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.05 hours per resident per day, against 3.69 across Ohio and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.72 of those hours.
20.5% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Ohio average 48.7%).
CMS links it to Country Club Rehabilitation Campus, an affiliated group of 7 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 15 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interviews and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the garbage and refuse was maintained in a sanitary condition. This had the potential to affect all 56 residents residing in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review and facility policy review, the facility to ensure Turbersol serum was dated upon opening per manufacturers instruction for efficacy. This had the potential to affect 15 (Residents #15, #19, #21, #51, #52, #106, #107, #156, #157, #206, #207, #208, #209, #256 and #257) identified as new admissions on the 100 unit in the last 30 days. The facility also did not ensure pills were not left at the bedside for Resident #35. This had the potential to affect seven (Residents #11, #24, #43, #106, #157, #208, and #257) who were identified as cognitively impaired and independently mobile on the 100 unit. The facility census was 56.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff and family interviews, record review and facility policy review, the facility didn't ensure indwelling urinary catheter bags were timely covered in a dignified manner. This affected one (Resident #8) out of two residents reviewed for dignity and had the potential to affect four additional (Residents #15, #37, #41, and #206) the facility identified as having indwelling urinary catheters. The facility census was 56.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents' wishes regarding end-of-life measures were signed by the physician. This affected two (Residents #6 and #47) of three residents reviewed for Advanced Directives. The facility census was 56.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, record reviews, tray ticket and facility policy reviews, the facility failed to ensure fluid restrictions were followed as ordered for Residents #26 and #158. This affected two (Residents #26 and #158) out of four residents reviewed for nutrition and had the potential to affect one additional (Resident #36) identified by the facility as being on a fluid restriction. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure weekly weights were obtained as ordered for Residents #26. This affected one (Residents #26) out of four residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility census was 56.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, record reviews and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure respiratory equipment was dated and monitored for routine replacement. This affected two (Residents #41 and #48) of four residents reviewed for respiratory care but had the potential to affect an additional 10 (Residents #2, #7, #9, #12, #20, #33, #34, #43, #157, and #158) the facility identified as using oxygen. The facility census was 56.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, staff interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure pharmacy recommendations were reviewed and responded to timely by the physician and/or practitioner. This affected two (Residents #17 and #20) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 56.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications had the appropriate diagnosis for administration. This affected one (Resident #28) out of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 56.
Inspectors wroteTHE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on record review, interview, facility self-reported incident (SRI) review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #55 was free from staff-to-resident physical abuse. This affected one resident (#55) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 54.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observation, review of Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) Quality, Safety, and Oversight (QSO) Memo 24-08-NH, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents with chronic wounds and those with indwelling medical devices were placed in enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) as required. This affected four residents (#8, #10, #26, and #39) of five residents reviewed for infection control. The facility census was 50.
Inspectors wroteTHE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on record review, interview, review of the medication error report review, facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the proper route of medication administration for Resident #51. This affected one resident (#51) of eight residents reviewed for proper medication administration. The facility census was 50.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, medical record review, interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's complaints of constant pain with ineffective pain interventions were addressed in a timely manner. This affected one (Resident #32) of four residents reviewed for pain. The facility census was 42. Actual harm occurred to Resident #32 on 03/01/23 when Resident #32 informed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #39 he had constant pain and ordered Tylenol was ineffective in managing the pain. The resident described the pain as a shocking/stabbing sensation to the left hip/leg/feet. LPN #39 failed to report the pain to the physician and no changes were made to pain management until 03/02/23 which resulted in a lack of effective pain relief and suffering for the resident for an extended period of time.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, review of the Ohio Administrative Code (OAC) for Prescription Processes, observation of medication administration and interview the facility failed to ensure nurses followed acceptable standards of practice for obtaining medication orders. This affected two (Residents #45 and #151) of five residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 42.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure appropriate treatments were applied to a pressure ulcer for one resident (Resident #5) of five residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 42.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to thoroughly and consistently record bowel movements for assessment of constipation for Resident #9. This affected one (Resident #9) of 12 residents interviewed regarding constipation. The facility census was 42.
7 fire safety citations on file: 2 on June 18, 2025, 5 on March 7, 2023.
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Ohio | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.05 | 3.69 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.72 | 0.64 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 2.62 | 3.28 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 1.85 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.48 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 20.5% | 48.7% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 30.0% | 43.9% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | not reported |
CMS expects 3.56 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.22 on weekdays and 2.62 on weekends, 19% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.00 in April to June 2025 to 3.05 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.05 | 0.72 | 3.22 | 2.62 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 55 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.16 | 0.76 | 3.33 | 2.74 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 51 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.13 | 0.80 | 3.28 | 2.76 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 55 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.00 | 0.81 | 3.23 | 2.45 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 53 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Ohio, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.64 | 0.60 | 3.80 | 3.24 | 4.6% | 0.4% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ohio, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.76 | $17.93 to $21.44 | 63,280 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $29.78 | $27.34 to $31.68 | 39,900 |
| Registered nurses | $39.67 | $38.08 to $47.61 | 143,730 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Ohio | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.5 | 5.3 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.5 | 3.2 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.3 | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 6.8 | 6.1 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 9.9 | 3.4 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 8.8 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 27.0 | 24.9 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 12.7 | 12.9 | 12.0 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Laurie Ann Nursing Home's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (42.2% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
42.2% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Ohio: 147 better, 20 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 79 eligible stays.
11.5% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Ohio: 3 better, 7 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 57 eligible stays.
9.6% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Ohio: 1 better, 4 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 46 eligible stays.
63.6% this home
Median of homes: Ohio55.6% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 33 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Ohio0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 51 residents counted.
10.8% this home
Median of homes: Ohio1.4% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 51 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Ohio100.0% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 1 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: HOOBERRY & ASSOCIATES, INC.. CMS links this home to Country Club Rehabilitation Campus, a group of 7 nursing homes averaging 2.9 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gresock, Joshua | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 10% | 12/01/2017 |
| Harris, Janet | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 30% | 12/01/2017 |
| Holland, Benjamin | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 10% | 12/01/2017 |
| Holland, Nicholas | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 10% | 12/01/2017 |
| Holland, Noah | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 10% | 12/01/2017 |
| Holland-Gresock, Adam | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 10% | 12/01/2017 |
| Holland-Gresock, Patricia | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 10% | 12/01/2017 |
| Muirden-Holland, John | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 10% | 12/01/2017 |
| Harris, Janet | Corporate director | Individual | 12/01/2017 | |
| Harris, Janet | Corporate officer | Individual | 12/01/2017 | |
| Harris, Janet | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 11/05/2024 | |
| Gresock, Joshua | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 12/12/2024 | |
| Harris, Janet | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 12/12/2024 | |
| Holland, Benjamin | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 11/05/2024 | |
| Holland, Nicholas | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 11/05/2024 | |
| Holland, Noah | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 11/05/2024 | |
| Holland-Gresock, Adam | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 11/05/2024 | |
| Holland-Gresock, Patricia | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 11/05/2024 | |
| Muirden-Holland, John | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 11/21/2024 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Ohio. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.