Home / New Jersey / Lawrenceville
2381 Lawrenceville Road, Lawrenceville, NJ 08648 · Mercer County · (609) 896-9500
56 certified beds, about 54 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 1971
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 315127 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on January 30, 2026, inspectors cited 23 health deficiencies (the New Jersey average is 8.6, the national average 9.2).
None of its 38 health citations since June 2023 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.65 hours per resident per day, against 3.85 across New Jersey and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 1.01 of those hours.
37.0% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (New Jersey average 39.7%).
CMS links it to Marquis Health Services, an affiliated group of 90 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 38 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review and review of other pertinent documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to have a system in place to inform and offer written information regarding the option to formulate an Advance Directive. This deficient practice was identified for 2 of 2 residents (Resident #9 and Resident #69) reviewed for AD, and affected all residents who resided in the facility. The evidence was as follows:a. On 1/28/26 at 10:43 AM, Resident #9 was observed in bed, and they were unable to participate in an interview with the surveyor due to confusion. On 1/28/26 at 10:31 AM, the surveyor reviewed the medical record for Resident #9 which revealed the following: A review of the admission Record (an admission summary) reflected that the resident was admitted with diagnoses which included but were not limited to; [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and review of documents it was determined that the facility failed to ensure residents who required Medicaid were admitted to the facility per the facility SNF/NF (Skilled Nursing Facility/Nursing Facility) designation from the Centers for Medicare/Medicaid (CMS) and per the New Jersey Department of Health (DOH). The deficient practice affected all residents admitted to the facility and was evidenced by the following: On 01/27/26 at 11:04 AM, during the facility entrance conference held with the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA), and an Executive [NAME] President (EVP) the surveyor asked what the resident population of the facility was. The LNHA confirmed the residents were all short term, and there were no long-term care residents at the facility. When asked if the facility's residents met and had an organized group meeting (Resident Council Meeting). [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review, it was determined that the facility failed to implement a comprehensive, effective data driven Quality Assurance Program (QAPI) that included self-identifying areas for improvement and maintaining documentation of QAPI initiatives. The deficient practice affected all residents who resided at the facility and was evidenced by the following:Refer to F620, F627, F881 On 01/30/26 at 9:12 AM, the surveyor interviewed the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) regarding how the facility determines what was reviewed by the QAPI team and how QAPI plans were developed. The LNHA stated skin issues, and fall concerns were reviewed. The LNHA stated trends were reviewed, including the dates and the trends were analyzed. The surveyor asked what all the current facility QAPI initiatives were. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review it was determined that the facility failed to investigate, analyze and monitor adverse events and utilize data to develop activities to prevent further adverse events. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents who resided at the facility and was evidenced by the following: On 01/30/26 at 9:12 AM, the surveyor interviewed the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) regarding how the facility determines what was reviewed by the QAPI team and how QAPI plans were developed. The surveyor asked if incidents were reviewed, including grievances. The LNHA stated skin issues, and fall concerns were reviewed at QAPI. The LNHA stated trends were reviewed, including the dates and the trends were then analyzed. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review of pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a system was in place to utilize an infection assessment tool prior to prescribing antibiotics and ensure the Antibiotic Stewardship program was implemented consistently. This deficient practice was identified for (2) of two (2) residents reviewed for antibiotic stewardship, (Resident #84 and Resident # 69) and was evidenced by the following: a. On 1/28/26 at 12:00 PM, the surveyor reviewed Resident #69's electronic medical record which revealed the following: The admission Record revealed the resident had diagnoses which included, but were not limited to: dementia, retention of urine and benign prostatic hyperplasia (enlargement of the prostate gland). [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review and review of pertinent documents, it was determined that the facility failed to honor the right to self-determination related to resident choices for mealtimes for a resident who attended dialysis treatments three times per week. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 1 resident (Resident # 4) reviewed for dialysis care and was evidenced by the following:On 01/27/26 at 11:49 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #4 in their room and they informed the surveyor that they just returned from dialysis (a treatment that removes impurities from the blood when the kidneys do not function). The surveyor observed an opened breakfast tray on the bedside table and the resident stated that the food was cold. Resident #4 stated that they want to have their breakfast upon return from dialysis and the staff were aware of their preference. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and document review, it was determined that the facility failed to consistently follow a system to ensure a) prior to hire, all employees were pre-screened to ensure that they had not been found guilty in a court of law of abuse, neglect, or misappropriation, or had findings entered into the state nurse aide registry or against a professional license, and b) a process was in place to maintain documentation to confirm an appropriate pre-screening had occurred for all contracted facility employees which including dietary and housekeeping. The deficient practice was identified for 2 of 39 employee files reviewed that were provided by the facility. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review and review of pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a thorough investigation was completed to determine abuse or neglect had not occurred after a resident sustained a fall while attempting to transfer self to the bathroom. Resident #55 reported rough handling by the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) who assisted them from the floor to the wheelchair. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #55) reviewed for accidents and was evidenced by the following:On 1/27/26 at 10:58 AM, during the initial tour, the surveyor observed Resident #55 seated in a wheelchair in their room. Resident #55 stated, on 1/25/26, I had to go to the bathroom, I rang the call bell and called out for help. No one responded to the call bell for 45 minutes. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review and review of other pertinent documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) initiate a wound treatment order for a newly identified skin tear (Resident #9), and b.) upon admission to the facility, transcribe a resident's (Resident #7) allergy information documented on a hospital discharge summary. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #9) who was reviewed for skin conditions and for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #7) reviewed for choices and was evidenced by the following:a. On 1/28/26 at 10:43 AM, Resident #9 was lying in bed he was confused and unable to participate in an interview. The surveyor observed a large bloody gauze type dressing, undated and observed on their left upper arm. On 1/28/26 at 10:31 AM, the surveyor reviewed the medical record for Resident #9 which revealed the following: [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a physician order was followed to ensure a resident's heels for a resident who was at risk for skin breakdown. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 1 resident (Residents #4) reviewed for pressure ulcers and was evidenced by the following:During the initial tour of the 500 Unit on 1/27/26 at 11:30 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #4 lying in bed with the head of bed (HOB) slightly elevated. The surveyor observed that Resident #4's bilateral lower extremities were not offloaded and that Resident #4's feet were lying directly on the mattress. When interviewed, at that time, Resident #4 informed the surveyor that they just returned from dialysis and reported discomfort to the feet. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, record review and review of pertinent documentation it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that appropriate care and services were provided for a resident with a physician order for a bladder scan upon removal of a indwelling urinary catheter. The deficient practice occurred for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for unplanned hospitalization and urinary tract infection (Resident #69). The evidence was as follows: On 1/28/26 at 12:00 PM, the surveyor reviewed Resident #69's electronic medical record which revealed the following: The admission Record revealed the resident had diagnoses which included, but were not limited to: dementia, retention of urine and benign prostatic hyperplasia (enlargement of the prostate gland). A Progress Note (PN) documented by the Unit Manager (UM) dated 12/23/25 at 7:04 AM which revealed: [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, and review of other pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the necessary respiratory care and services for a resident with a tracheostomy (trach; a device inserted into a surgically created opening in the neck into the windpipe to help with breathing) in accordance with standard of practice. This deficient practice was identified for one (1) of one (1) resident reviewed for respiratory/tracheostomy care (Resident #77) and was evidenced by the following:On 1/27/26 at 11:42 AM, during the initial tour, Resident #77 was observed asleep, in bed, the head of the bed was elevated and was receiving oxygen (O2) via tracheostomy tube. The surveyor reviewed the medical record for Resident #77. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to thoroughly review dialysis communication sheets post dialysis and informed the physician of new recommendations based on laboratory chemistry obtained at dialysis treatment, and ensure the care plan addressed the care of the dialysis access site. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 1 residents (Resident #4) reviewed for dialysis and was evidenced by the following: a. On 1/27/26 at 11:30 AM during the initial tour of the facility, the surveyor observed Resident #4 in bed. The resident informed the surveyor they just returned from dialysis treatment. On 1/27/26 at 12:10 PM, the surveyor inquired regarding the dialysis communication book and obtained the communication book from the nurse assigned to the unit. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, record review, and review of facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to evaluate the performance of all Certified Nursing Aides (CNAs) on an annual basis. This deficient practice was identified for 3 of 5 CNAs whose personnel records were reviewed and was evidenced by the following:On 1/29/26 at 1:33 PM, the surveyor reviewed the Annual Staff Performance Appraisals for five randomly selected CNAs. CNA#1, with a date of hire of 5/24/23, had their most recent Annual Staff Performance Appraisal signed as completed on 3/20/24. CNA#2, with a hire date of 9/8/20, had their most recent Annual Staff Performance Appraisal signed as completed on 4/8/24. CNA#3, with a hire date of 3/27/23, had their most recent Annual Staff Performance Appraisal signed as completed on 8/24/24. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a.) Lokelma (sodium zirconium cyclosilicate, a potassium binder for those with high potassium) a medication was administered in accordance with manufacturer's specifications for one (1) of four (4) nurses observed b.) Questran (cholestyramine used to lower cholesterol), a medication was labeled with cautionary instructions for proper administration, for one (1) of four (4) residents observed during the medication pass, c.) quality control testing (calibration) was conducted for the blood glucose (bg) monitors, both used for residents as per manufacturer's specifications, for two (2) of two (2) medication carts inspected, d.) consistent disposition (destruction), reconciliation, and accountability of the controlled dangerous substance (narcotic; [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the Consultant Pharmacist identified irregularities during the drug regimen review of a newly admitted resident. The deficient practice was identified for one (1) of four (4) residents observed during the medication pass (Resident #55). Refer to 755. Reference:According to the manufacturer's specifications for Lokelma section 2.3 Reconstitution and Administration: In general, Lokelma should be administered at least 2 hours before and 2 hours after Lokelma. According to the manufacturer's specifications for Questran under Drug Interaction; since Questran may bind other drugs given concurrently, it is recommended that patients take other drugs at least one hour before or four (4) to 6 hours after Questran (or at as great an interval as possible) to avoid impeding their absorption. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to perform appropriate hand hygiene for 2 of 2 staff observed and disinfect shared medical equipment prior to and after use, in accordance with facility infection control policy. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following:On 1/27/26 at 11:30 AM, the surveyor observed a signage posted at the entrance door of Resident #4's room. The signage indicated Enhanced Barrier Precaution. There was a Personal Protective Equipment box hung outside the door that included gowns and gloves. The surveyor then observed the LPN approached the room with the medication cart and a blood pressure machine. The LPN placed the medication cart next to the entrance door. The LPN, donned (put on) gloves and a gown and entered the room without first performing hand hygiene. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and review of facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a) Certified Nursing Aides (CNAs) received 12 hours of mandatory annual in-service training for 2 of 5 CNAs reviewed and b) CNA education included abuse training for 3 of 5 CNA education files reviewed. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following:On 1/29/2026 at 1:33 PM, the surveyor reviewed the in-service education hours for five randomly selected CNAs, which were provided by the facility. The [Name Redacted] Transcripts provided showed the following: CNA#1, with a hire date of 5/24/23, had 3.4 hours of education from 5/24/24 - 5/24/25, which did not include training on abuse. The last abuse training documented was 7/3/24. CNA#2, with a hire date of 9/8/20, had 4.98 hours of education from 9/8/24 - 9/8/25. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the admission Agreement did not required residents to waive their right to receive 30-day written notice of discharge. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for appropriate discharge (Resident # 71) and was evidenced by the following: On 1/27/26 at 1:05 PM, the surveyor reviewed the facility entrance binder (a binder that contained the required recertification survey documentation per the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid-CMS- entrance conference requirements) that was provided by the LNHA. A 44 Page Welcome Packet was identified as the facility admission Agreement. The Notice of Resident's Rights Regarding Transfer or discharge: You may be transferred or discharged for one of the following reasons: 1. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, record review and review of pertinent documents it was determined that the facility failed to ensure an appropriate discharge process was in place for residents who had a change in payor source. This deficient practice occurred for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for appropriate discharge (Resident #71) and was evidenced by the following: On 01/27/26 at 11:04 AM, during the facility entrance conference held with the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA), and an Executive [NAME] President (EVP) the surveyor asked what the resident population of the facility was. The LNHA stated the residents were all short term, and there were no long-term care residents at the facility. When asked if the facility held resident council meetings, the LNHA stated there was no resident council meeting held at the facility. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, review of medical records, other facility documentation, and review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, it was determined that the facility failed to accurately complete the Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool, for 3 of 19 residents reviewed (Resident #71, Resident # 72, and Resident #74). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following:On 1/28/2026 at 9:25 AM, the surveyor reviewed the electronic medical record (EMR) for Resident #71 which revealed an admission record (face sheet) with diagnoses that included but not limited to hemiplegia and hemiparesis (weakness) following CVA (stroke) affecting the right dominant side and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to develop or initiate a comprehensive, person-centered care plan to address a.) the care of a Foley catheter. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 27 residents (Resident #80) reviewed for a comprehensive Care Plan (CP) and was evidenced by the following:On 1/27/2 at 11:45 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #80 in the room sitting in a wheelchair by the bed. Resident #80 was awake and alert and able to answer the surveyor's inquiry. The resident informed the surveyor that they were in Physical therapy this morning and they were admitted to the facility for rehabilitation. The surveyor observed that Resident #80 wore a urinary catheter leg bag. The surveyor reviewed the Electronic Health Record (EHR) of Resident #80. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to post the nursing staffing report daily. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 1/27/26, on entrance and initial tour, the survey team did not observe the nursing staffing report to be posted in the facility. On 1/28/26 at 12:56 PM, the surveyor did not observe the nursing staffing posted in the lobby, on the second floor, or on the fifth floor. On 1/28/2026 at 1:06 PM, the surveyor interviewed the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) about the posted staffing. She stated it is posted on floors two and five by the time clock. LNHA walked with surveyor to the second-floor time clock, staffing was not observed to be posted there. The LNHA stated she observed it posted there yesterday. admitted that it should be posted there. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and review of other pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility who had been in an active COVID-19 (potentially, deadly virus) outbreak since 08/21/24, failed to conduct complete and thorough contact tracing (method used to identify COVID-19 exposure and prevent transmission) upon the identification of a single new case of COVID-19 in a resident or staff member in accordance with the facility policy, Centers for Disease Control (CDC), Local Health Department, State Health Department and all current guidance related to infection control. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 1 resident, (Resident #21) reviewed for COVID-19. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to handle potentially hazardous food to prevent food borne illness. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 09/03/24 at 8:46 AM, during the initial tour of the kitchen, the surveyor observed the following in the walk-in meat freezer in the presence of two (2) Food Service Directors (FSD #1 and FSD #2). 1. An opened slab of roast beef on the top shelf was not labeled or dated. 2. An opened bag containing six (6) salisbury patties was not labeled or dated. At that time, during an interview with the surveyor, FSD #1 stated, everything that is in the freezer should have dates. Once it is opened, it should be dated. FSD #2 discarded the roast beef and salisbury patties. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and review of pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that their Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program's (QAPI) sources of quantitative data was being analyzed to evaluate program effectiveness and implement new processes. This deficient practice was identified during the standard survey and was evidenced by the following: Refer to S1410 On 09/03/24 at 08:32 AM, during the entrance conference the surveyor requested the facility's QAPI book. On 09/06/24 at 08:45 AM, the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) provided the QAPI book. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and review of other pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure full implementation of the antibiotic stewardship program, including ongoing monitoring and use of a nationally recognized surveillance criteria prior to consulting the prescriber. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for antibiotic stewardship, (Resident #27). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 09/04/24 at 9:38 AM, the surveyor interviewed the Infection Preventionist (IP) regarding the facility Antibiotic Stewardship Program (efforts to ensure that antibiotics are used only when necessary and appropriate). The IP stated that she had worked at the facility for nearly one year and had worked as an IP since 2019. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and review of other pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the administration of a resident's enteral tube feeding (allows liquid food to enter the stomach or intestine through a tube) was consistently documented to indicate if it were administered or held on the Medication Administration Record. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 1 resident, (Resident #27) reviewed for tube feedings. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: During the initial tour of the facility on 09/03/24 at 8:38 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #27 lying awake in bed. The resident stated that their tube was clogged four to five weeks ago. A review of Resident #27's admission Record (an admission summary) revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnosis which included but was not limited to: [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, record review, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to a) ensure that meals were consistently delivered on time as per resident's preferences for seven (7) of 21 residents (Resident #5, #18, #147, #199, #202, #203 and #204) which represented two (2) of two (2) units reviewed for mealtime preferences and b) make reasonable accommodation of needs and preferences for 1 of 21 residents reviewed, (Resident #244). This deficient practice was evidenced as follows: 1. On 5/23/23 at 10:10 AM, a resident council meeting was conducted with five residents. Five out of five residents stated that the meals were not delivered on time and were consistently late. On 5/23/23 at 12:00 PM, the surveyor observed Resident #147 seated in a wheelchair in his/her room and was agreeable to be interviewed. [...]
Inspectors wroteNJ00161372 Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services in accordance with professional standards a.) accurately transcribe a physician order, for 1 of 2 residents observed during medication pass (Resident #150), b.) ensure that residents' medications were available for medication administration for 2 of 2 residents observed during medication pass (Resident #149 and Resident #150) and c). ensure that all routine medications on the physician order's sheet (POS), and medication administration record (MAR) had a corresponding medical indication for 10 of 21 residents reviewed (Residents #150, #149, #5, #18, #35, #147,#145, #146, #248 and #249). The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45. Chapter 11. Nursing Board. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the safe and appetizing temperatures of hot and cold food and drink served to the residents. This deficient practice was identified for four (4) of five (5) residents interviewed during the Resident Council meeting and confirmed during the lunchtime meal service on 6/2/21 for 2 of 2 nursing units tested for food temperatures by four surveyors and was evidenced by the following: On 5/23/23 at 10:10 AM, the surveyor met with five (5) residents for council meeting. Four out of five residents stated that they were displeased with food temperatures and that hot food items were not served hot. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, record review, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that resident's dietary preferences were consistently identified and implemented for eight (8) of eight (8) residents (Resident #5, #18, #145, #147,#199, #202, #203 and #204) which represented two (2) of two (2) units reviewed for dietary preferences. This deficient practice was evidenced as follows: On 5/23/23 at 10:10 AM, a resident council meeting was conducted with five residents. Five of five residents stated that they did not receive food that they ordered from the menu and that items were missing from their meal trays. In addition, five of five residents stated that someone brings them menus to fill out, but the menus are often not picked up. Resident # 202 stated that the following occurred: [...]
Inspectors wroteNJ00161372 Based on observations, interviews, and review of facility provided documentation, the facility failed to a.) ensure call bells were answered timely for 4 of 21 residents reviewed (Residents #151, #204, #244 and #246) and b.) maintain the required minimum direct care staff-to-resident ratios as mandated by the state of New Jersey for 32 of 48-day shifts and 2 of 48 evening shifts reviewed. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Reference: New Jersey Department of Health (NJDOH) memo, dated 1/28/2021, Compliance with N.J.S.A. (New Jersey Statutes Annotated) 30:13-18, new minimum staffing requirements for nursing homes, indicated the New Jersey Governor signed into law P.L. 2020 c 112, codified at N.J.S.A. 30:13-18 (the Act), which established minimum staffing requirements in nursing homes. The following ratio(s) were effective on 2/01/21: [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and review of facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a clean/homelike and sanitary environment for the residents. This deficient practice was identified on 1 of 2 nursing units and was evidenced by the following: During the initial tour of the 2nd floor unit on 05/22/23 from 10:06 AM to 01:35 PM, the following was observed by the surveyors: 1. In room [ROOM NUMBER] (double occupancy room): -the wall behind A bed (bed closest to the door) had multiple areas of white substance with multiple open holes and scrape marks -the wall on the opposite side of the room had multiple areas of white substance with multiple open scrapes 2. In room [ROOM NUMBER] (listed as a private room): [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) maintain the necessary care and services for residents who were receiving oxygen (O2) treatment according to standards of practice and b.) ensure a physician's order was obtained for a resident receiving O2. This deficient practice was identified for two (2) of two (2) residents (R # 146 and R # 145) reviewed for respiratory care. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. On 5/24/23 at 12:00 PM, the surveyor observed Resident #146 awake and seated in a wheelchair across from the nurse's station. Oxygen was in use via a nasal cannula (consisting of two hollow prongs projecting from a hollow face piece) at two liters per minute (LPM). The oxygen was attached to a portable oxygen tank attached to the back of the wheelchair. The O2 tubing was undated. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to properly secure medications in 1 (one) of 2 (two) emergency crash carts inspected. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 5/31/23 at 11:30 AM, the surveyor inspected the 2nd-floor emergency crash cart that contained the facility's Emergency-Kit (E-Kit) in the presence of a Licensed Practical Nurse/Unit Manager (LPN/UM#1). The surveyor observed the crash cart which was covered and secured by Velcro straps. The surveyor observed LPN/UM #1 remove the covering and then move a handle on the top portion of the crash cart from the locked to unlocked position. The surveyor then observed LPN/UM#1 open each drawer of the crash cart and the surveyor observed the third drawer contained syringes and the 4th drawer contained a E-Kit box that contained 14 medications. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, record review and other pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain proper infection control practices by ensuring a.) appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) was worn in a room where a resident was on contact precautions (contact precautions are intended to prevent transmission of infectious agents and microorganisms, which are spread by direct or indirect contact with the patient), this was identified on one (1) of two (2) units, b.) housekeeping staff wear gloves appropriately on 1 of 2 units, c.) disposable PPE was appropriately contained in rooms where residents were identified as COVID - 19 positive, this was identified for two (2) of three (3) rooms on the fifth floor unit, and d.) one (1) of (1) resident (Resident #196) identified as exposed to COVID-19 positive nurse staff member was tested [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide written notification of the emergency transfer to the resident, resident representative, and the Office of the Long-Term Care Ombudsman (LTCO) for one (1) of one (1) residents' (Resident # 144), reviewed for hospitalizations. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: The surveyor reviewed the closed medical record of Resident #144. Review of the admission Record (an admission summary) reflected that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the electronic History and Physical dated 3/13/23, indicated diagnoses which included but not limited to; pleural effusion, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, unspecified asthma, uncomplicated, hypertension, and diabetes mellitus without complications. [...]
18 fire safety citations on file: 7 on January 30, 2026, 8 on September 6, 2024, 3 on June 2, 2023.
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | New Jersey | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 4.65 | 3.85 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 1.01 | 0.68 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 4.06 | 3.50 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.11 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.53 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 37.0% | 39.7% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 46.7% | 37.7% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 5.54 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.88 on weekdays and 4.06 on weekends, 17% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.9% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 5.19 in April to June 2025 to 4.65 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.65 | 1.01 | 4.88 | 4.06 | 0.9% | 0 of 90 | 54 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 5.07 | 0.92 | 5.25 | 4.60 | 0.4% | 0 of 92 | 54 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 4.98 | 1.05 | 5.26 | 4.27 | 0.3% | 0 of 92 | 53 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 5.19 | 1.15 | 5.37 | 4.72 | 0.2% | 0 of 91 | 52 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| New Jersey, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.68 | 0.59 | 3.82 | 3.34 | 11.6% | 0.2% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| New Jersey, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $22.52 | $21.13 to $23.44 | 32,400 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $36.13 | $32.16 to $38.45 | 17,410 |
| Registered nurses | $51.20 | $47.94 to $61.41 | 92,680 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | New Jersey | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.6 | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 21.1 | 24.9 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 6.1 | 8.1 | 12.0 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Lawrence Rehabilitation Hospital's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it better than the national rate (63.1% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
63.1% this home
Better than the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · New Jersey: 130 better, 19 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 661 eligible stays.
12.4% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · New Jersey: 2 better, 8 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 605 eligible stays.
9.7% this home
Worse than the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · New Jersey: 3 better, 13 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 375 eligible stays.
99.2% this home
Median of homes: New Jersey68.7% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 132 residents counted.
0.3% this home
Median of homes: New Jersey0.6% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 334 residents counted.
0.8% this home
Median of homes: New Jersey1.7% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 334 residents counted.
98.7% this home
Median of homes: New Jersey99.5% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 74 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: LAWRENCE OPERATOR LLC. CMS links this home to Marquis Health Services, a group of 90 nursing homes averaging 3.1 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Synovous Bank, National Association | 5% or greater mortgage interest | Organization | 02/01/2023 | |
| Synovous Bank, National Association | 5% or greater security interest | Organization | 02/01/2023 | |
| Harman, Dina | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 02/01/2023 | |
| Onyenemezu, Jenelle | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 02/01/2023 | |
| Varma, Purti | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 08/01/2023 | |
| Viroja, Yogesh | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 02/01/2023 | |
| Varma, Purti | Corporate director | Individual | 08/01/2023 | |
| Posen, Mindee | Corporate officer | Individual | 02/01/2023 | |
| Marquis Limited LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 02/01/2023 | |
| Nutraco LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 02/01/2023 | |
| Jain, Madhu | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 02/01/2023 | |
| Varma, Purti | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 08/01/2023 | |
| Flagler, Osher | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 03/18/2025 | |
| Kahanow, Aviva | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 03/18/2025 | |
| Levovitz, Tzvi | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 03/18/2025 | |
| Rokeach, Fraide | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 03/18/2025 | |
| Rokowsky, Yitzchok | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 03/18/2025 | |
| Lawrence Real Property LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 02/01/2023 | |
| Marquis Limited LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 05/01/2025 | |
| Nfr 2020 Irrv Tr | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 02/01/2023 | |
| Nutraco LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 05/01/2025 | |
| Quinto Nexgen LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 02/01/2023 | |
| Rsbrmk Holdings LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 02/01/2023 | |
| Sk Nexgen Tr | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 02/01/2023 | |
| Tryko Nexgen Holdings LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 02/01/2023 | |
| Uak 2020 Irrv Tr | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 02/01/2023 | |
| Ukr Nexgen LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 02/01/2023 | |
| Yk Nexgen Tr | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 02/01/2023 | |
| Yr Nexgen Tr | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 02/01/2023 | |
| Harman, Dina | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 02/01/2023 | |
| Jain, Madhu | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 02/01/2023 | |
| Onyenemezu, Jenelle | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 02/01/2023 | |
| Posen, Mindee | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 02/01/2023 | |
| Varma, Purti | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 08/01/2023 | |
| Viroja, Yogesh | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 02/01/2023 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in New Jersey. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.