1355 Churchill Hubbard Rd, Youngstown, OH 44505 · Trumbull County · (330) 759-7858
110 certified beds, about 100 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1996
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 366113 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on March 5, 2026, inspectors cited 6 health deficiencies (the Ohio average is 10.5, the national average 9.2).
Of 39 health citations since April 2023, 4 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.
CMS lists 2 fines totaling $60,091 in the last three years; the largest was $43,290, and the latest is dated September 16, 2025.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.75 hours per resident per day, against 3.69 across Ohio and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.54 of those hours.
43.1% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Ohio average 48.7%).
CMS links it to Windsor House, Inc., an affiliated group of 11 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 39 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) were maintained for chronic wound ulcers. This affected one resident (Resident #273) out of three residents reviewed for wound care. The facility census was 95.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, review of the facility's self-reported incident (SRI) investigation, and interview, the facility failed to maintain complete and accurate records of transactions for resident funds accounts. This affected nine residents (#16, #45, #49, #59, #63, #68, #124, #125, #126) out of 15 residents reviewed for resident funds. The facility census was 101.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, resident interview, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to provide showers as scheduled and per resident preferences for residents who required assistance with bathing. This affected five residents (#55, #81, #87, #90, and #98) out of five reviewed for bathing. The facility census was 101.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #45 was treated with dignity and respect by failing to provide appropriate clothing and coverings to maintain privacy and dignity. This affected one resident (#45) out of two residents investigated for dignity. In addition, the facility failed to ensure the call light was within reach for Resident #45. This affected one resident (#45) out of eight residents investigated for call lights. The facility census was 101.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, medical record review, policy review and interview, the facility failed to identify and monitor bruises for one (Resident #76) of 42 residents observed for non-pressure related skin concerns and failed to implement bowel protocol and physician orders for Resident #85 and failed to change Resident #105's peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) line dressing changed weekly as ordered by the physician. This affected two residents (#76 and 3105) of five residents reviewed for medication use. The facility census was 101.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to implement pressure-relieving interventions for one (Resident #76) of five residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 101.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to implement appropriate infection control protocols during medication administration for Resident #19 and failed to wear appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) while administering intravenous (IV) medication to Resident #105. This affected two residents (#19 and #105) out of four residents reviewed for infection control. The facility census was 101.
Inspectors wroteBased on closed record review, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive and individualized pressure ulcer prevention program to prevent, accurately and timely assess, promote healing and prevent pressure ulcer/wound infection from occurring. This affected one (Resident #95) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 93. Actual Harm occurred on 07/03/25 when Resident #95 was assessed to have an acute change in condition requiring hospitalization. Upon hospital assessment, the resident was assessed to have a Stage II pressure ulcer to the sacrum with extensive gas forming soft tissue infection at the lower back extending to the tip of the coccyx measuring 9.0 centimeters (cm) by 2.3 cm by 16.1 cm. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observation, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff performed hand hygiene to prevent the cross contamination of germs during Resident #61 and Resident #44's medication administration and Resident #58's incontinence care. This affected two (Residents #61 and #44) out of seven residents observed for medication administration and one (Resident #58) out of three residents reviewed for incontinence care. The facility census was 93.
Inspectors wroteTHE FOLLWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on record review, review of video recorded evidence, review of the facility self-reported incident, review of facility policy, observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #16 was free from humiliation, intimidation and verbal and physical abuse by staff. Using the reasonable person concept, actual harm occurred on 07/14/24 when Resident #16, who was cognitively impaired and dependent on staff for all activities of daily living (ADL), was forcefully rolled onto his right side for incontinence care by State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #434 causing Resident #16's face to go into a pillow requiring him to move his head to yell let me breathe. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, interviews, and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) website, the facility failed to allow Resident #95 to return to the facility after being sent out to the hospital. This affected one resident (#95) out of three residents reviewed for discharge. The facility census was 94.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, schedule review, Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) review and Facility Annual Assessment review, that facility failed to ensure there was adequate Registered Nurse (RN) coverage for at least eight consecutive hours a day, seven days a week as required. This had the potential to affect all 101 residents residing in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, interview, facility policy review and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidance review, the facility failed to ensure Contact Precautions were implemented as ordered for Resident #22. This affected one resident (#22) of five residents reviewed for infection control and had the potential to affect all 50 additional residents (#3, #4, #7, #8, #10, #11, #13, #14, #16, #17, #19, #23, #24, #26 #29, #30, #31, #33, #37, #39, #41, #42, #43, #48, #50, #53, #55, #56, #58, #59, #60, #62, #63, #65, #68, # 69, #71, #75, #76, #79, #80, #85, #88, #96, #255, #256, #257, #305, #307 and #405) residing on the East Wing. The facility census was 101.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff spoke to Resident #15 in a dignified manner. This affected one resident (#15) of three residents reviewed for dignity had the potential to affect all residents in the facility. The facility census was 101.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, interview, facility self-reported incident (SRI) review and facility policy review, the facility failed to implement their abuse policy regarding thoroughly investigating an injury of unknown origin for Resident #8 and an allegation of staff-to-resident abuse for Resident #77. This affected two residents (#8 and #77) of three residents reviewed for abuse and had the potential to affect all 101 residents residing in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, interview, facility self-reported incident (SRI) review and facility policy review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an injury of unknown origin for Resident #8 and an allegation of staff-to-resident abuse for Resident #77. This affected two residents (#8 and #77) of three residents reviewed for abuse and had the potential to affect all 101 residents residing in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for the care and maintenance of an enteral feeding tube for Resident #92. This affected one resident (#92) of two residents reviewed for enteral feedings. The facility census was 101.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review and facility policy review the facility failed to provide oral care for Resident #23 and fingernail care for Resident #50. This affected two residents (#23 and #50) of 83 residents observed for assistance with personal care. The facility census was 101.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review and facility policy review the facility failed to provide proper positioning in a wheelchair as ordered for Resident #10. This affected one resident (#10) of 34 residents reviewed for positioning. The facility census was 101.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure hearing aides were ordered and available as needed for Residents #3 and #13). This affected two residents (#3 and #13) of three residents reviewed for communication concerns. The facility census was 101.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, review of the dialysis agreements, staff interviews and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to complete dialysis assessments according to the physician's orders and failed to ensure residents had reliable transportation to and from the dialysis center. This affected two residents (#35 and #406) of two residents reviewed for dialysis treatments. The facility census was 101.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure clear instructions were in place for the use of narcotic pain medication and did not ensure non-pharmacological interventions were attempted prior to the administration of pain medication. This affected two residents (#53 and #64) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 101.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate diagnoses and rationale for prescribed medications. This affected two residents (#22 and #53) of five reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 101.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide a pneumococcal vaccination after consent was provided for Resident #77. This affected one resident (#77) of five reviewed for immunizations. The facility census was 101.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure Resident #77 was free of an accident hazard during a staff assisted transfer. Actual Harm occurred on 01/30/24 when Resident #77 suffered a second-degree burn (a burn that involves the first two layers of skin which may present as deep reddening of the skin, pain, blisters, glossy appearance from leaking fluid, and possible loss of some skin) that measured 15 centimeters (cm) in length by 7.5 cm width to her left lower leg from a portable oxygen tank that had been placed on her bed while staff were transporting the resident from her room to the shower room. The improper transport of the oxygen caused the tank to freeze to the resident's leg causing pain/discomfort and the burn. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to implement their abuse policy regarding an allegation of potential staff-to-resident abuse for Resident #77. This affected one resident (#77) of seven residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 97.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to report an allegation of staff-to-resident abuse to the state agency as required. This affected one resident (#77) of seven residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 97.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to investigate an allegation of staff-to-resident abuse as required. This affected one resident (#77) of seven residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 97.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure residents received showers according to their preference. This affected three residents (#41, #70 and #77) of six residents reviewed for showers. This had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility as the facility identified all residents require assistance with showers. The facility census was 97.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review the facility failed to complete an accurate plan of care for Resident #52. This affected one resident (#52) of three residents reviewed for care planning. The facility census was 95.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review and interview the facility failed to ensure therapy discharge recommendations were implemented in order to maintain a resident's mobility and range of motion (ROM) capabilities. This affected one (Resident #5) of 24 residents observed for limitations in range of motion. Actual harm occurred on 01/31/23 when Resident #5 presented with limitations in ROM after the facility failed to implement therapy recommendations for restorative nursing programs. Prior to 01/31/23, no ROM impairment had been identified and the resident was noted to be able to ambulate. On 01/31/23 an assessment noted a decrease in range of motion to the resident's right knee and bilateral ankles. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure proper infection control practices and procedures were in place to prevent the spread of COVID-19. This affected six residents (#2, #5, #21, #44, #67, and #73) and had to potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 89.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure there were sufficient staff to implement restorative nursing programs as recommendeded by therapy and to ensure showers were received as scheduled. This affected two residents (Resident #2 and Resident #5) of four residents reviewed for staffing, with the potential to affect all 89 residents in the facility eligible for restorative services.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure showers were completed for Resident #2 per the resident's preferences and shower schedule. This finding affected one (Resident #2) of three residents reviewed for showers and activities of daily living (ADL's).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #5's wound prevention intervention was implemented per the physician's orders. This finding affected one (Resident #5) of two residents reviewed for wounds.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, medical record review, and review of manufacturer information and interview, the facility failed to ensure fall interventions were implemented for one (Resident #146) of five residents reviewed for falls.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure non-pharmacological interventions were attempted prior to the administration of anti-pain medication. This affected one resident (Resident #4) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medication.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure as needed (prn) medication orders for anti-anxiety medications were limited to 14 days and failed to ensure non-pharmacological interventions were attempted prior to the administration of anti-anxiety medication. This affected one resident (Resident #4) of five reviewed for unnecessary medications.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure laboratory tests were obtained in accordance with physician orders. This affected one (Resident #74) of five residents reviewed for medication use.
5 fire safety citations on file: 1 on March 5, 2026, 1 on May 2, 2024, 3 on April 3, 2023.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| September 16, 2025 | Fine | $43,290 |
| February 8, 2024 | Fine | $16,801 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Ohio | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.75 | 3.69 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.54 | 0.64 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.13 | 3.28 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.14 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.06 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 43.1% | 48.7% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 33.3% | 43.9% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 1 |
CMS expects 3.70 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.00 on weekdays and 3.13 on weekends, 22% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 2.3% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.70 in April to June 2025 to 3.75 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.54 | 4.00 | 3.13 | 2.3% | 0 of 90 | 100 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.55 | 0.51 | 3.73 | 3.12 | 0.5% | 0 of 92 | 96 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.79 | 0.56 | 4.05 | 3.12 | 0.4% | 0 of 92 | 94 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.70 | 0.45 | 3.97 | 3.02 | 0.4% | 0 of 91 | 91 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Ohio, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.64 | 0.60 | 3.80 | 3.24 | 4.6% | 0.4% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ohio, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.76 | $17.93 to $21.44 | 63,280 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $29.78 | $27.34 to $31.68 | 39,900 |
| Registered nurses | $39.67 | $38.08 to $47.61 | 143,730 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Ohio | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.1 | 5.3 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.7 | 0.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.5 | 3.2 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.9 | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.1 | 6.1 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.5 | 3.4 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 11.3 | 8.8 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 43.8 | 24.9 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 9.0 | 12.9 | 12.0 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Liberty Health Care Center Inc's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (54.6% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
54.6% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Ohio: 147 better, 20 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 143 eligible stays.
10.8% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Ohio: 3 better, 7 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 133 eligible stays.
5.6% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Ohio: 1 better, 4 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 77 eligible stays.
39.0% this home
Median of homes: Ohio55.6% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 59 residents counted.
2.2% this home
Median of homes: Ohio0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 92 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Ohio1.4% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 92 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Ohio100.0% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 18 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: LIBERTY HEALTH CARE CENTER, INC.. CMS links this home to Windsor House, Inc., a group of 11 nursing homes averaging 3.6 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Omni Manor, Inc. | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 08/17/1995 |
| Masternick, John | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Individual | 12% | 08/17/1995 |
| Masternick, John | Corporate director | Individual | 08/17/1995 | |
| Daliman, John | Corporate officer | Individual | 04/01/2014 | |
| James, Kenneth | Corporate officer | Individual | 04/01/2014 | |
| Masternick, John | Corporate officer | Individual | 08/17/1995 | |
| Windsor House Inc. | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 04/01/2014 | |
| Daliman, John | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 04/01/2014 | |
| James, Kenneth | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 04/01/2014 | |
| Masternick, John | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 04/01/2014 | |
| Omni Manor, Inc. | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 04/01/2014 | |
| Windsor House Inc. | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 07/16/2025 | |
| Daliman, John | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 04/01/2014 | |
| Delliquadri, John | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 12/03/1996 | |
| Haurin, Kimberly | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 09/12/2024 | |
| James, Kenneth | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 04/01/2014 | |
| Masternick, John | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 04/01/2014 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Ohio. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.