Myrtle Point Rehabilitation & Care
637 Ash Street, Myrtle Point, OR 97458 · Coos County · (541) 572-2066
35 certified beds, about 25 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 1997
CMS abuse icon: cited for abuse in a recent inspection Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
2 of 5
Health inspections
2 of 5
Staffing
4 of 5
Quality measures
3 of 5
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 385254 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on April 10, 2026, inspectors cited 6 health deficiencies (the Oregon average is 9.2, the national average 9.2).
Of 71 health citations since August 2023, 3 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (2 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 5.06 hours per resident per day, against 5.03 across Oregon and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.73 of those hours.
67.2% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Oregon average 47.4%).
CMS links it to Sapphire Health Services, an affiliated group of 8 nursing homes.
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
3908/23
109/24
109/24
2111/24
312/25
604/26
Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 71 health citations on file.
Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
2J
0K
0L
Actual harm
1G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
40D
17E
11F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
0C
April 10, 2026Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 6 citations
- E Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were provided activities of choice for 4 of 4 sampled residents (#s 5, 8, 13, and 19) reviewed for choices and activities. This placed residents at risk of diminished psychosocial well-being.
- D Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure dignity was maintained for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#1) reviewed for dignity. This placed residents at risk for lack of dignity.
- D Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to update a care plan to reflect changes in care needs for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#22) reviewed for bowel and bladder. This placed residents at risk for skin breakdown.
- D Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were free of significant medication errors for 1 of 1 sampled Resident (#32) reviewed for medication errors. This placed residents at risk for adverse medication side effects.
- D Provide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure meal preferences were honored during posted mealtimes for 1 of 1 kitchen and 2 of 4 sampled residents (#s 13 and 21) reviewed for food, choices, and kitchen. This placed residents at risk for lack of meal satisfaction.
- D Have a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide education to residents and monitor personal food safety for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#13) reviewed for food. This placed residents at risk for food borne illnesses. Resident 13 was admitted to the facility in 10/2024 with diagnoses including diabetes and heart failure. A 3/2022 Foods Brought by Family/Visitors policy indicated the following:-Safe food handling practices were to be explained to family and visitors in a language and format they understand.-Food left with the resident to consume later was to include a label of the item, the use by date, and stored in the refrigerator.-The nursing staff was to discard perishable foods on or before the use by date. A 11/6/25 Annual MDS revealed a BIMS assessment score of 14 (cognitively intact) for Resident 13. [...]
December 8, 2025Complaint inspection · 3 citations
- D Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide residents a private environment for physical intimacy for 2 of 4 sample residents (#s 1 and 2) reviewed for abuse. This placed residents at risk for lack of privacy.
- D Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident was assessed for sexual consent for 1 of 4 sampled residents (#1) reviewed for abuse. This placed residents at risk for trauma.
- D Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure an allegation of abuse was reported within two hours for 1 of 4 sampled residents (#1) reviewed for abuse. This placed residents at risk for ongoing abuse.
November 8, 2024Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 21 citations
- F Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to employ a director of food and nutrition services with the required certification for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for qualified dietary staff. This placed residents at risk for unmet dietary needs.
- F Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to submit Payroll Based Journal staffing data and other verifiable and auditable data as required for 1 of 1 facility reviewed. This placed residents at risk for inaccurate staffing data reporting.
- E Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide a clean and homelike environment, and failed to ensure residents' belongings were safe for 2 of 7 sampled residents (#s 18 and 19) and 1 of 1 sunroom reviewed for environment and personal property. This placed residents at risk for an unclean, un-homelike environment, and missing belongings.
- E Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to protect residents' right to be free from verbal abuse by staff and neglect related to failure to provide residents needed supplies for 4 of 5 sampled residents (#3, 14, 18, and 20) reviewed for supplies and abuse.
- E Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide an ongoing activity program to meet the needs of residents for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#6) and 1 of 1 facility reviewed for activities. This placed residents at risk for decrease in quality of life.
- E Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to have adequate staff available to meet the needs of residents for 2 of 4 residents (#s 14 and 18) reviewed for ADLs, and 1 of 1 facility reviewed for staffing. This placed residents at risk for unmet needs.
- E Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure nursing staff were able to demonstrate competency in skills and techniques necessary to care for residents for 3 of 5 staff (#s 18, 26, and 27) reviewed for competencies. This placed residents at risk for poor quality of care and lack of competent staff.
- E Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure the required annual CNA training and annual performance reviews were completed for 2 of 5 sampled CNA staff (#s 26 and 28) reviewed for staffing. This placed residents at risk for unmet needs and lack of competent staff.
- E Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to ensure food was stored appropriately and was discarded in a timely manner for 1 of 1 resident refrigerator reviewed for food storage and handling. This placed residents at risk for food-borne illness and cross-contamination.
- E Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to follow infection control standards for 1 of 7 sampled residents (#27) reviewed for infection control. This placed residents at risk for exposure and contraction of infectious diseases.
- D Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to accommodate resident needs for 2 of 7 sampled residents (#s 8 and 14) reviewed for environment. This placed residents at risk for lack of independence.
- D Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to report allegations of abuse for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#14) reviewed for abuse reporting. This placed residents at risk for abuse.
- D Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to investigate an allegation of abuse for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#14) reviewed for abuse. This placed residents at risk for abuse.
- D Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure dependent residents received required assistance with ADLs for 1 of 4 sampled residents (#14) reviewed for ADLs. This placed resident at risk for unmet needs.
- D Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to respond to changes in condition and follow physician orders for 2 of 7 sampled residents (#s 4 and 29) reviewed for change of condition. This placed residents at risk for delayed treatment and unmet needs.
- D Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to maintain an environment free from accident hazards and to monitor a resident after a fall for 2 of 4 sampled residents (#s 6 and 18) reviewed for accidents. This placed residents at risk for accidents.
- D Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to provide pain medications as ordered for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#14) reviewed for pain management. This placed residents at risk for uncontrolled pain.
- D Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide accurate and timely pharmaceutical services for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#14) reviewed for pain management. This placed residents at risk for medication errors.
- D Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a follow-up dental appointment was made for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#18) reviewed for dental. This placed residents at risk for dental pain.
- D Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents' food preferences were honored for 1 of 3 sample residents (#14) reviewed regarding food. This placed residents at risk for unmet needs.
- D Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure resident records were complete and accessible for 2 of 2 sampled residents (#s 11 and 18) whose records were reviewed. This placed residents at risk for unmet needs.
September 19, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- D Provide timely, approved x-ray services, or have an agreement with an approved provider to obtain them.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to timely obtain radiology services for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#300) reviewed for specialized medical appointments. This placed residents at risk for lack of radiology services.
September 4, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- D Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to follow care plan interventions to ensure residents were free from physical abuse for 1 of 6 sampled residents (#2) reviewed for abuse. This placed residents at risk for physical abuse.
August 2, 2023Standard inspection · 39 citations
- J Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to timely respond to changes in condition and follow physician orders for 4 of 10 sampled residents (#s 2, 18, 26 and 129) reviewed for change of condition, position and mobility, UTIs and medications. This deficient practice was determined to be an immediate jeopardy situation as a result of a delay in treatment for Resident 129's sepsis (infection of the blood stream), UTI, lactic acidosis (buildup of lactic acid in blood stream), acute kidney failure, acute low blood pressure and GI bleed (bleeding in the intestinal tract). Resident 129 required hopsitalization, and died on [DATE].
- J Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide essential services related to dialysis for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#26) reviewed for dialysis. An immediate jeopardy situation was identified. The facility failed to provide essential dialysis-related assessment, care planning and monitoring to Resident 26 resulting in pain, extensive bruising, and the likelihood of severe medical complications such as infection, bleeding, fluid overload, and adverse side effects including death.
- G Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent accidents and failed to implement fall risk interventions and thoroughly investigate falls for 2 of 4 sampled residents (#s 20 and 25) reviewed for accidents. Resident 20 experienced a fall resulting in a leg fracture.
- F Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure an RN worked as the charge nurse for eight consecutive hours per day seven days per week for 64 of 81 days reviewed for RN coverage. This placed residents at risk for lack of RN oversight including resident assessment, care and services.
- F Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure staff annual performance reviews were completed for 4 of 5 CNA staff (#s 6, 7, 10 and 16) reviewed for sufficient staffing and abuse. This placed residents at risk for inadequate care.
- F Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the Dietary Manager (DM) did not possess the required certification to provide DM services for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for qualified dietary staff. This placed residents at risk for unmet dietary needs.
- F Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
Inspectors wroteBased on immediate jeopardy situations and the number of citations including deficient practice in the areas of resident rights, freedom from abuse, comprehensive assessments and care planning, quality of care, nursing services, food and nutrition services, and QAPI and training requirements, it was determined the facility was not managed in a manner that enabled it to use its resources effectively and efficiently to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident. This resulted in two immediate jeopardy situations and substandard quality of care.
- F Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to develop a Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) program that identified quality deficiencies and develop and implement action plans to correct identified quality deficiencies. The facility failed to conduct an analysis of quality data, design interventions, test those interventions, and determine if the desired outcome was achieved or sustained. This failed practice placed all residents at risk for not receiving the care and services necessary for optimal resident outcomes.
- F Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to have a Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) program which systematically identified issues related to infection control, nursing care and services, sufficient RN nursing staff and to ensure that improvements were realized and sustained. Two immediate jeopardy situations were identified with coincident identification of substandard quality of care.
- F Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determine the facility failed to have a quality assessment and assurance committee that met and which included required members to systematically identify issues. This placed all residents at risk. Two immediate jeopardy situations were identified with coincident identification of substandard quality of care.
- F Develop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff members.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to have an effective training program for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for training. This placed residents at risk for untrained staff.
- F Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure CNA staff completed the required 12 hours annual training for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for CNA staff training and performance reviews. This placed residents at risk for untrained CNAs.
- E Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to maintain a clean and homelike environment for 2 of 2 halls reviewed for environment. This placed residents at risk for an unclean and non-homelike environment.
- E Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to comprehensively assess 4 of 8 sampled residents (#s 2, 20, 24 and 129) reviewed for medications and nutrition. This placed residents at risk for unassessed needs.
- E Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide respiratory care and services in accordance with physician orders for 3 of 3 sampled residents (#s 14, 20 and 130) reviewed for respiratory services. This placed residents at risk for unmet respiratory needs.
- E Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to serve food in a sanitary manner and keep refrigerators and the ice machine clean for 1 of 1 kitchen observed. This placed residents at risk for food borne illnesses.
- E Have an agreement with at least one or more hospitals certified by Medicare or Medicaid to make sure residents can be moved quickly to the hospital when they need medical care.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to make a good faith effort to obtain a transfer agreement with the local hospital(s) for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for transfer agreements. This place residents at risk for delayed transfers.
- E Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to follow infection control procedures for vital sign machines and implement a water management plan for 4 of 4 rooms during random observations and 1 of 1 facility reviewed for infection control. This placed residents at risk for cross contamination and communicable diseases.
- E Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determine the facility failed to implement an antibiotic stewardship program for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for infection control. This place residents at risk for developing antibiotic resistance.
- E Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to assess immunization status and provide vaccines for 5 of 5 sampled residents (#s 5, 6 14, 18 and 20) reviewed for immunizations. This placed residents at risk for illnesses and being uninformed about vaccinations.
- D Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to follow up regarding advance directives for 3 of 3 sampled residents (#s 11, 19 and 20) reviewed for advance directives. This placed residents at risk for not having their healthcare wishes honored.
- D Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to notify a physician regarding medication refusals and errors for 1 of 5 sampled residents (#20) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This placed residents at risk for lack of physician oversight.
- D Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide a written grievance resolution or communicate with a resident or resident's representative regarding the resolution of a resident grievance for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#129) reviewed for grievances. This placed residents at risk for unaddressed concerns and grievances.
- D Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to protect residents' rights to be free from verbal abuse by staff and physical abuse by a resident for 2 of 4 sampled residents (#s 6 and 179) reviewed for abuse. This placed residents at risk for verbal and physical abuse.
- D Not hire anyone with a finding of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or theft.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview the facility failed to ensure staff were employable for 1 of 6 staff (#10) reviewed for personnel files. This placed residents at risk for abuse.
- D Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to implement abuse policies and failed to address abuse with the QAPI committee for 2 of 5 sampled residents (#s 6 and 180) reviewed for abuse. This placed residents at risk for abuse by staff and other residents.
- D Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to report an injury of unknown origin for 1 of 4 sampled residents (#180) reviewed for abuse. This placed residents at risk for being abused, sustaining injury and unmet care needs.
- D Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a thorough investigation was completed for an injury of unknown origin for 1 of 5 sampled residents (#180) reviewed for abuse. This placed residents at risk for being abused, sustaining injury and unmet care needs.
- D Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to implement a baseline care plan for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#405) reviewed for catheter care. This placed residents at risk for unmet care needs.
- D Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive care plans for 2 of 5 of sampled residents (#s 20 and 129) reviewed for accidents and change of condition. This placed residents at risk for unmet needs.
- D Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to update care plans for 2 of 5 sampled residents (#s 20 and 26) reviewed for accidents and UTIs. This placed residents at risk for unmet needs.
- D Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure dependent residents received required assistance with ADLs for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#26) reviewed for UTI. This placed resident at risk for unmet needs.
- D Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to properly assess, follow physician orders and provide adequate catheter care for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#26) reviewed for UTI. This placed residents at risk for unmet catheter needs.
- D Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to maintain healthy parameters of nutritional status for 1 of 4 sampled residents (#129) reviewed for nutrition. This placed residents at risk for weight loss.
- D Ensure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were seen as required by a physician for 2 of 5 sampled residents (#s 20 and 24) reviewed for medications. This placed residents at risk for unmet medical needs.
- D Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were free of unnecessary psychotropic medications for 2 of 5 sampled residents (#s 5 and 18) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This placed residents at risk for receiving unnecessary psychotropic medication.
- D Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents' food preferences were honored for 1 of 5 sampled residents (#129) reviewed regarding food preferences. This placed residents at risk for unmet dietary preferences.
- D Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure resident records were complete and accurate for 3 of 8 sampled residents (#s 18, 26 and 129) reviewed for change of condition, dialysis and medications. This placed residents at risk for inaccurate care.
- D Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a hospice agreement was in place with a hospice provider for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#4) reviewed for hospice services. This placed the resident at risk for unmet hospice care needs.
Fire safety inspections
26 fire safety citations on file: 15 on April 10, 2026, 7 on November 8, 2024, 4 on August 2, 2023.
Every fire safety citation26 citations
- F Develop and maintain an Emergency Preparedness Program (EP).
- F Develop Emergency Preparedness policies and procedures.
- F Establish emergency prep training and testing.
- F Establish staff and initial training requirements.
- F Conduct testing and exercise requirements.
- F Install emergency lighting that can last at least 1 1/2 hours.
- F Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.
- F Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
- F Install smoke barrier doors that can resist smoke for at least 20 minutes.
- F Have simulated fire drills held at unexpected times.
- F Have power receptacles that are properly grounded.
- E Ensure that special areas are constructed so that walls can resist fire for one hour or have an approved fire extinguishing system.
- E Have proper medical gas storage and administration areas.
- D Provide properly protected cooking facilities.
- D Meet requirements for the installation and maintenance of electrical systems.
- F Establish policies and procedures including evacuation.
- F Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.
- F Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
- F Meet other general requirements that are deficient.
- F Have simulated fire drills held at unexpected times.
- F Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
- D Provide properly protected cooking facilities.
- F Conduct testing and exercise requirements.
- F Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
- F Have simulated fire drills held at unexpected times.
- D Have proper medical gas storage and administration areas.
Fines and payment denials
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Oregon | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 5.06 | 5.03 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.73 | 0.72 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 4.33 | 4.51 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 3.36 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.96 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 67.2% | 47.4% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 71.4% | 51.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 2 |
CMS expects 3.29 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 5.35 on weekdays and 4.33 on weekends, 19% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 1.1% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 5.83 in April to June 2025 to 5.06 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 5.06 | 0.73 | 5.35 | 4.33 | 1.1% | 0 of 90 | 25 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 5.68 | 0.91 | 5.95 | 5.00 | 2.6% | 1 of 92 | 26 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 6.02 | 1.08 | 6.29 | 5.34 | 2.4% | 0 of 92 | 25 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 5.83 | 0.85 | 6.00 | 5.39 | 1.3% | 0 of 91 | 26 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Oregon, Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.91 | 0.64 | 5.12 | 4.40 | 6.2% | 0.4% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Oregon | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 11.4 | 14.9 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.4 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.1 | 2.0 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 2.4 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 22.2 | 20.6 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 10.4 | 5.8 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 9.4 | 13.9 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 25.8 | 21.4 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 21.6 | 16.1 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.2 | 1.5 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 5.3 | 2.4 | 1.8 |
Owners and operators
Legal business name: SAPPHIRE AT MYRTLE POINT, LLC. CMS links this home to Sapphire Health Services, a group of 8 nursing homes averaging 2.1 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Becker, Andrew | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 30% | 01/20/2023 |
| Hilty, Lisa | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 25% | 01/20/2023 |
| Morris, Bryan | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 5% | 01/20/2023 |
| Ricker, Kevin | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 40% | 01/20/2023 |
| Sapphire Healthcare Srvs. | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 09/01/2023 | |
| Nashawi, Mhd Tarek | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Vance, Nathan | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 05/01/2025 | |
| Myrtle Point Hc Investors, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 05/27/2025 | |
| Sapphire Healthcare Srvs. | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 06/30/2025 | |
| Nashawi, Mhd Tarek | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Vance, Nathan | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 05/01/2025 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 14 problems in this area, most recently on April 10, 2026: "Provide activities to meet all resident's needs."
- How are allegations of abuse or neglect reported and investigated, and who tells the family?Inspectors cited 11 problems in this area, most recently on December 8, 2025: "Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody."
- Who is the administrator and director of nursing, and how long have they been in the job?Inspectors cited 9 problems in this area, most recently on November 8, 2024: "Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data."
- How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 8 problems in this area, most recently on April 10, 2026: "Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights."
- Who is on the floor on Saturday and Sunday, and how many residents does each aide care for?Weekend nurse staffing here was 4.33 hours per resident per day, below the Oregon average of 4.51.
- How long has the current administrator been here?CMS counts 2 administrators who left in the period it measured.
Other nursing homes nearby
- Avamere Rehabilitation of Coos Bay Coos Bay, 22.5 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 45 citations
- Life Care Center of Coos Bay Coos Bay, 22.5 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 45 citations
Oregon contacts for a concern about a nursing home
These are the official offices in Oregon. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.
- Inspections and complaints: Oregon Department of Human Services, Nursing Facility Licensing, the state agency that inspects nursing homes for CMS and takes complaints about care.
- Resident advocate: Oregon Office of the Long-Term Care Ombudsman, (800) 522-2602. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
- State inspection reports: Oregon Licensed Long-Term Care Settings Search, where Oregon publishes its own records on licensed homes.
Common questions
- What is Myrtle Point Rehabilitation & Care's Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates Myrtle Point Rehabilitation & Care 2 out of 5 stars overall, with 2 for health inspections, 4 for staffing and 3 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did Myrtle Point Rehabilitation & Care get at its last inspection?
- 6 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on April 10, 2026. The Oregon average is 9.2.
- Has Myrtle Point Rehabilitation & Care been fined?
- CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
- Does Myrtle Point Rehabilitation & Care accept Medicaid?
- It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
- Who owns Myrtle Point Rehabilitation & Care?
- CMS lists 11 owners and managers, and links the home to Sapphire Health Services. Legal business name: SAPPHIRE AT MYRTLE POINT, LLC.
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.