Find a nursing home

Home / California / Santa Maria

Marian Regional Medical Center D/P SNF

1530 East Cypress Way, Santa Maria, CA 93454 · Santa Barbara County · (805) 739-3650

95 certified beds, about 87 residents a day · Non profit - Church related · Medicare and Medicaid since 1986

CMS high performing icon Inside a hospital Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
5 of 5
Health inspections
5 of 5
Staffing
5 of 5
Quality measures
4 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 555236 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on April 16, 2026, inspectors cited 3 health deficiencies (the California average is 15.6, the national average 9.2).

None of its 15 health citations since February 2024 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.

CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 6.18 hours per resident per day, against 4.52 across California and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 2.11 of those hours.

16.0% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (California average 36.7%).

CMS links it to Commonspirit Health, an affiliated group of 18 nursing homes.

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 15 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
0G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
12D
1E
2F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
0C
April 16, 2026Standard inspection · 3 citations
  1. D
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    F641 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 1, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure portion of the MDS assessment (MDS - a tool used to assess residents in a nursing home) ccurately reflect the resident's medication status for two 2 of 16 sampled residents (Resident 11 & 39) at the time of the assessment. This facility failure has the potential to result in MDS misinformation which serves as the clinical basis for care planning and care delivery.
  2. D
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    F759 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 1, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to maintain a medication error rate below 5%. When one of 18 sampled resident ( Resident 26), received multiple sets of eye drops without the required time delay between administrations as result staff committed two errors out of 29 opportunities, resulting in a 6.9% error rate. This facility failure has the potential to result in causing patient harm.
  3. D
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    F761 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 1, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medication cart was kept locked if unattended and medications were stored and discarded after after expiration date when:A medication cart was observed to be unlocked and unattended. Povidone-iodine swabsticks (sterile, single-use, 10% solution applicators designed for antiseptic skin preparation, minor wound care) was expired. These failures had the potential to result to unlimited access to the medications and decreased medication mechanisms.1. During a concurrent observation and interview on [DATE] at 10:30 a.m., with the Administrative Support Nurse (ASN), a medication cart in wing 300 parked between room [ROOM NUMBER] and room [ROOM NUMBER] was observed to be unlocked and unattended. The ASN confirmed the medication cart was unlocked and it should be kept locked while unattended. [...]
June 13, 2025Complaint inspection · 2 citations
  1. D
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    F690 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 13, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement scheduled toileting interventions for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1), as indicated in the resident's care plan. This failure had the potential to result in negative outcomes such as incontinence, skin breakdown, and decreased quality of care.
  2. D
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    F697 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 13, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to administer pain medications per physician orders for one resident (Resident 1). This failure had the potential to result in negative resident outcomes, jeopardizing the quality and safety of resident care.
April 8, 2025Standard inspection · 3 citations
  1. F
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 13, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food and ice were stored in accordance with professional standards for food service safety when: 1. The ice machine located in the kitchen had a brown substance on the grate above the water trough where water was present; and 2. Food items were above 41 degrees Fahrenheit (F) in three of the four wings (Wing 100, 300, 400) unit refrigerators located on the nursing units. These failures have the potential to result in a growth of microorganisms which can increase the risk of foodborne illness for all the residents eating and drinking at the facility. The facility census was 89.
  2. E
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    F806 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 13, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the grilled cheese sandwich, provided as an alternative meal option, was of similar or nutritive value to the scheduled entrée when residents (Residents 5, 9, 62) requested a different meal choice. This resulted in resident's not being provided equal nutritive value which may result in weight loss, further compromising the nutritional and medical status.
  3. D
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 13, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of four sampled residents (Resident 5), was transferred from wheelchair to bed using a two person assist. This failure had the potential to result in an avoidable fall for Resident 5.
February 15, 2024Standard inspection · 7 citations
  1. F
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    F801 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 15, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Food Service Manager (FSM) demonstrated skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service when: 1. Dietary staff were not trained on monitoring, and documenting, wash water temperature for the high temperature dish machine in accordance with manufacturer's guidelines and facility policy and procedure. 2. There was not a system, to include a policy and procedure, to guide staff on the requirement to purchase pasteurized shell eggs to have readily available in order to honor a resident's request for an undercooked egg, such as sunny side up eggs, in a safe manner for Resident A (confidential resident). [...]
  2. D
    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
    F637 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 15, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 61), had a comprehensive assessment (completion of the Minimum Data Set [MDS] a standardized assessment and care screening tool) including completion of the Care Area Assessment [CAA] a process for guiding review of the triggered areas of the MDS) and care planning (health professionals and the resident agreeing on specific care needs and treatments) after a significant change (a major decline in the resident's status that will not normally resolve itself without further intervention by staff) was identified by the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR - a tool used to assess for a possible mental illness [MI]). This facility failure had the potential to delay the care or services recommended by the PASRR Level II Determination Report for Resident 61.
  3. D
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 15, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of six sampled residents (Residents 6 and 61): 1. For Resident 6, a person-centered interdisciplinary team nutrition care plan (IDTNCP - detailed plans of care created by representatives from several medical disciplines or specialties) was developed to include resident's goals and preferences, clear measurable objectives, and resident specific nutrition interventions. This failure resulted in unclear measurable weight gain goal and lacked resident specific dietary instructions which impedes the IDT from effectively monitoring, evaluating and revising the care plan, as appropriate, to ensure nutrition care needs would not go unrecognized and unmet. (Cross Reference F806) 2. [...]
  4. D
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    F700 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 15, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure an entrapment risk assessment (an assessment to evaluate and monitor a patient's risk for getting entangled on a bed rail) was completed and an informed consent (a process in which a healthcare provider educates a patient about the risks, benefits, and alternatives of a given procedure or treatment) was obtained prior to the use of bed rails for one of 18 sampled residents (Resident 21). These failures do not support optimal bed safety which could potentially place Resident 21 at risk for entrapment and serious injury.
  5. D
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    F805 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 15, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that food was prepared in a form to meet resident needs for one of 18 sampled residents (Resident 67), when a minced and moist diet was served as a pureed diet. This failure had the potential for risk of weight loss for Resident 67.
  6. D
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    F806 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 15, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 18 sampled residents (Resident 6) food preferences were honored in a timely manner. This facility failure to honor Resident 6's food preferences in a timely manner could diminish appetite, caloric intake and promote continued weight loss.
  7. D
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 15, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was consistently dated in the kitchen in one of three chilling (refrigerator/freezer) units. This failure had the potential to affect food quality and/or food safety, and would not provide a mechanism to ensure the facility's shelf life guidelines could be followed.

Fire safety inspections

8 fire safety citations on file: 2 on April 16, 2026, 6 on February 15, 2024.

Every fire safety citation8 citations
  1. E
    Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
    K 353 · April 16, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  2. C
    Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.
    K 345 · April 16, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  3. E
    Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.
    K 345 · February 15, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  4. E
    Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
    K 353 · February 15, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  5. D
    Use approved construction type or materials.
    K 161 · February 15, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  6. D
    Have posted "No-smoking" signs in areas where smoking is not permitted or ashtrays provided where smoking was allowed.
    K 741 · February 15, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  7. D
    Have restrictions on the use of portable space heaters.
    K 781 · February 15, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  8. D
    Ensure proper usage of power strips and extension cords.
    K 920 · February 15, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeCaliforniaUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)6.184.523.86
Registered nurses2.110.670.69
All nursing staff on weekends5.654.093.42
Nurse aides3.19
Licensed practical nurses0.89
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)16.0%36.7%45.8%
Registered nurse turnover15.2%38.1%42.9%
Administrators who leftnot reported

CMS expects 3.89 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 6.40 on weekdays and 5.65 on weekends, 12% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 6.13 in April to June 2025 to 6.18 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20266.182.116.405.65 0.0%0 of 9087
Oct to Dec 20256.091.996.265.64 0.0%0 of 9288
Jul to Sep 20256.152.116.385.58 0.0%0 of 9287
Apr to Jun 20256.132.086.355.56 0.0%0 of 9191
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
California, Jan to Mar 20264.360.594.523.972.3%0.5% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Staff pay reports

Staff pay at this home

No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.

Official wage estimates for California

JobMedianMiddle halfEmployed
California, all employers
CNAs (nursing assistants)$22.90$22.04 to $26.35110,060
LPNs and LVNs$38.34$35.98 to $45.0682,850
Registered nurses$67.44$58.87 to $83.25338,940
United States, nursing care facilities
CNAs (nursing assistants)$20.67$17.91 to $22.55534,270
LPNs and LVNs$33.86$30.05 to $37.40188,210
Registered nurses$41.11$37.85 to $47.68142,270

Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.

Work here? Share your pay anonymously

For Marian Regional Medical Center D/P SNF. No name, email or phone, and nothing you could type about a resident: every answer is a number or a choice.

Your job
Employed by
Usual shift
Do you get a shift differential?
Optional questions
Mandatory overtime?
How did staffing feel on your usual shift?

Every report is reviewed before it counts; what it says about the home never decides whether it counts. How pay reports are handled.

How staff pay reports work · CNA pay by state

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeCaliforniaUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
13.510.313.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
3.10.80.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
1.01.21.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
2.01.63.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
2.71.41.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
10.69.814.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
2.44.34.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
17.112.015.4
Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
15.922.923.8
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
10.811.212.0
Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
1.82.31.9
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
0.61.61.8

Short-term rehab results

For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Marian Regional Medical Center D/P SNF's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it better than the national rate (70.8% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.

Went home or back to the community

70.8% this home

Better than the national rate

US median of homes 51.5% · California: 301 better, 190 worse

Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 656 eligible stays.

Potentially preventable readmissions

9.3% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 10.7% · California: 10 better, 22 worse

Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 619 eligible stays.

Infections that led to a hospital stay

3.5% this home

Better than the national rate

US median of homes 7.1% · California: 8 better, 48 worse

Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 379 eligible stays.

Self-care and mobility at discharge

48.8% this home

Median of homes: California59.2% · US 56.6%

Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 324 residents counted.

Falls with major injury

0.0% this home

Median of homes: California0.0% · US 0.0%

Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 371 residents counted.

New or worsened pressure ulcers

3.8% this home

Median of homes: California0.6% · US 1.7%

Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 371 residents counted.

Medication list given at discharge

100.0% this home

Median of homes: California96.2% · US 98.7%

Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 43 residents counted.

Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.

Owners and operators

Legal business name: DIGNITY HEALTH. CMS links this home to Commonspirit Health, a group of 18 nursing homes averaging 2.7 stars overall.

NameRoleTypeShareSince
Dignity Health5% or greater direct ownership interestOrganization100%12/31/2001
Commonspirit Health5% or greater indirect ownership interestOrganization100%02/01/2019
Petersdorf, JohnW-2 managing employeeIndividual02/01/2019
Scharmann, StevenW-2 managing employeeIndividual02/01/2019
Carswell, ScottCorporate directorIndividual01/27/2021
Melfi, MitchCorporate directorIndividual01/27/2021
O'Quinn, MarvinCorporate directorIndividual01/27/2021
Shih, ElizabethCorporate directorIndividual01/27/2021
Melfi, MitchCorporate officerIndividual01/27/2021
Morissette, DanielCorporate officerIndividual02/01/2019
O'Quinn, MarvinCorporate officerIndividual02/01/2019
Petersdorf, JohnCorporate officerIndividual11/14/2022
Scharmann, StevenCorporate officerIndividual11/14/2022
Shih, ElizabethCorporate officerIndividual02/01/2019

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 6 problems in this area, most recently on April 8, 2025: "Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards."
  2. How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on June 13, 2025: "Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections."
  3. When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on April 16, 2026: "Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment."
  4. How are medications reviewed, and how often are antipsychotic or sedating drugs used?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on April 16, 2026: "Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater."

Other nursing homes nearby

Assisted living in Santa Maria

Licensed assisted living homes in the same town or within 5 miles, each with its California inspection record.

Assisted living in California

California contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in California. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Common questions

What is Marian Regional Medical Center D/P SNF's Medicare star rating?
CMS rates Marian Regional Medical Center D/P SNF 5 out of 5 stars overall, with 5 for health inspections, 5 for staffing and 4 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Marian Regional Medical Center D/P SNF get at its last inspection?
3 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on April 16, 2026. The California average is 15.6.
Has Marian Regional Medical Center D/P SNF been fined?
CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
Does Marian Regional Medical Center D/P SNF accept Medicaid?
It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Marian Regional Medical Center D/P SNF?
CMS lists 14 owners and managers, and links the home to Commonspirit Health. Legal business name: DIGNITY HEALTH.

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection