Find a nursing home

Home / Mississippi / Meadville

Meadville Convalescent Home

300 Hwy 556/Route 2 Box 66, Meadville, MS 39653 · Franklin County · (601) 773-7778

60 certified beds, about 42 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 1995

Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
3 of 5
Health inspections
3 of 5
Staffing
5 of 5
Quality measures
1 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 255213 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on August 21, 2025, inspectors cited 5 health deficiencies (the Mississippi average is 6.8, the national average 9.2).

None of its 18 health citations since August 2022 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.

CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.94 hours per resident per day, against 4.18 across Mississippi and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.71 of those hours.

34.0% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Mississippi average 45.7%).

CMS links it to Cavalier Healthcare, an affiliated group of 4 nursing homes.

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 18 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
0G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
13D
2E
3F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
0C
November 12, 2025Complaint inspection · 2 citations
  1. E
    Honor the resident's right to choose his or her attending physician.
    F555 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 22, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and facility policy review the facility failed to inform residents/resident representatives that their chosen attending physician was unable to meet requirements as the facility sought to seek alternate physician for provision of care and treatment without attempt to work with the residents' chosen attending physicians or mediate differences for nine (9) of eleven (11) sampled residents; Resident #2, Residents #3, Resident #4, Resident #5, Resident #7, Resident #8, Resident #9, Resident #10 and Resident #11. Findings Included:Policy review of the facility policy titled, Standard of Care with Revision Date 9/15/22 revealed, It is the policy of this facility to provide a standard of treatment and care most beneficial to residents. Regardless of payment methods, all residents shall have access to. [...]
  2. D
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    F552 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 22, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review, facility policy review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the resident's right to be informed of, and participate in, treatment decisions, including the right to be fully informed in advance of the care to be furnished, the type of practitioner providing treatment, and the risks and benefits of proposed care for one (1) of ten (10) sampled residents (Resident #3). Findings Included:A policy review of the facility's policy titled Standard of Care, with a revision date of 9/15/25, revealed the policy stated, It is the policy of this facility to provide a standard of treatment and care most beneficial to residents. Regardless of payment methods, all residents shall have access to. Care that meets their needs, Their attending physician, Clinical and administrative staff. In providing care to all residents our staff will be. [...]
August 21, 2025Standard inspection · 5 citations
  1. D
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    F550 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 10, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, facility policy review and record review the facility failed to respect a resident's dignity, as evidenced by leaving a feeding pump exposed in a public area for one (1) of two (2) residents receiving Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy feedings. Resident #34. Findings Include:Record review of the facility policy Our Residents' Rights, reviewed 05/18/2021, revealed, .Right to a Dignified Existence: Be treated with consideration, respect, and dignity, recognizing each resident's individuality. On 08/19/2025 at 12:54 PM, during an observation Resident #35 was observed in the hallway by the hair salon door, with a peg tube formula flowing at 50 milliliters/hour (ml/hr). There was not a privacy covering over the feeding pump. [...]
  2. D
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 10, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews and record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to follow the care plan while providing Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (peg) tube care for one (1) of four (4) observations. Resident #34.
  3. D
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    F693 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 10, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, record review, and facility statement review the facility failed to provide follow physician orders when providing peg site care for one (1) of two (2) residents who require peg site care. Resident #34. Findings Include:Record review of a typed statement on facility letterhead, undated, and signed by the Director of Nursing (DON) revealed We do not have a policy on peg care. During an observation on 08/20/2025 at 2:43 PM, revealed LPN #2 cleaned the peg site using a Q-tip with normal saline. She cleaned site back and forward three times in a circular motion without rotating Q-tip, then applied a dressing. She did not dry site prior to applying dressing. In an interview on 08/20/2025 at 4:10 PM, LPN #2 confirmed she did not rotate the Q-tips while cleaning the peg site and did not dry the peg site before applying the cover dressing. [...]
  4. D
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    F695 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 10, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure that respiratory care was provided in accordance with professional standards of practice for one (1) of (13) residents sampled. Resident #7. Specifically, an Oxygen in Use sign was not posted on Resident #7s door who was receiving oxygen therapy.
  5. D
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 10, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure expired nutritional supplements were removed from a storage area for one (1) of (1) observation.
May 30, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. D
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    F580 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 27, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review, staff, and Resident Representative (RR) interviews and facility policy review, the facility failed to notify the resident's RR of change a in the resident's condition for one (1) of four (4) sampled residents. (Resident #1)
April 24, 2024Standard inspection · 8 citations
  1. F
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    F578 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 27, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review, interviews and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure Advance Directives were completed according to the resident preference for two (2) of (2) residents reviewed for Advance Directives. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents who do not have an Advance Directive. Resident #7 and Resident #41. Findings Include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Residents' Rights Regarding Treatment and Advance Directives Policy, revised 8/23/22, revealed, Policy: It is the policy of this facility to support and facilitate a resident's right .to formulate an advance directive. Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: 1. On admission, the facility will determine if the resident has executed an advance directive and, if not, determine whether the resident would like to formulate an advance directive. 2. [...]
  2. F
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 27, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to monitor and record freezer and refrigerator temperatures daily and discard expired foods for one (1) of four (4) kitchen observations. This has the potential to affect 48 of the 52 residents that reside in the facility.
  3. F
    Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
    F851 · Administration · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 27, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to accurately submit direct care staffing information based on payroll data to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) as required for the first quarter of Fiscal Year (FY) 2024 (October - December 2023) for one (1) of four (4) quarters reviewed.
  4. D
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    F584 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 27, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations and staff interviews the facility failed to ensure tiles in the resident shower area were free from black grime and broken tiles were repaired and floors in three (3) common areas were free from cracked tiles and gaps in the floor for one (1) of four (4) days of survey.
  5. D
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    F604 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 27, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, staff interviews, record review and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from a physical restraint offer as evidenced by failure to identify a seatbelt as a restraint for one (1) of 15 sampled residents.
  6. D
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 27, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan to reflect the use of restraints for one (1) of 15 sampled residents.
  7. D
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    F684 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 27, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure physician orders were implemented and followed as ordered for one (1) of 15 sampled residents.
  8. D
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 27, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, record reviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident's CPAP (Continuous positive airway pressure) mask was properly stored, when not in use, for one (1) of (1) residents reviewed that required respiratory care. Resident #11.
August 31, 2022Standard inspection · 2 citations
  1. E
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    F641 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 4, 2022
    Inspectors wroteBased on interviews, record reviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for one (1) of 16 MDS assessments reviewed for accuracy. Resident #28 Findings Include: A record review of the facility's Comprehensive Assessment and Re-Assessment policy with revision date 11/28/2017 revealed, . The facility shall comply with Resident Assessment Instrument (R.A.I.) guidelines for comprehensive assessments and re-assessments .The sources of information for the M.D.S. include: Review of the resident's record . Review of Resident #28's Face Sheet revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that include Altered Mental Status, Pain, Edema, and Depression. A record review of Resident #28's Quarterly MDS with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 07/14/2022 revealed, . [...]
  2. D
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 4, 2022
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety related to food items not dated with a use-by date, and food items not discarded after the expiration date, for one (1) of three (3) kitchen observations. Findings Include: [...]

Fire safety inspections

2 fire safety citations on file: 1 on April 24, 2024, 1 on August 31, 2022.

Every fire safety citation2 citations
  1. F
    Have simulated fire drills held at unexpected times.
    K 712 · April 24, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  2. D
    Develop and maintain an Emergency Preparedness Program (EP).
    E 4 · August 31, 2022 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeMississippiUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)4.944.183.86
Registered nurses0.710.640.69
All nursing staff on weekends3.773.503.42
Nurse aides2.74
Licensed practical nurses1.48
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)34.0%45.7%45.8%
Registered nurse turnover16.7%38.5%42.9%
Administrators who left2

CMS expects 3.45 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 5.41 on weekdays and 3.77 on weekends, 30% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 6.4% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.46 in April to June 2025 to 4.94 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20264.940.715.413.77 6.4%0 of 9042
Oct to Dec 20254.950.645.413.79 11.0%0 of 9239
Jul to Sep 20254.520.625.013.28 8.8%0 of 9245
Apr to Jun 20254.460.644.933.27 1.6%0 of 9147
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
Mississippi, Jan to Mar 20264.090.604.353.446.2%0.1% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Staff pay reports

Staff pay at this home

No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.

Official wage estimates for Mississippi

JobMedianMiddle halfEmployed
Mississippi, all employers
CNAs (nursing assistants)$15.15$14.19 to $16.9214,200
LPNs and LVNs$24.14$22.50 to $27.909,850
Registered nurses$37.06$31.22 to $40.6229,060
United States, nursing care facilities
CNAs (nursing assistants)$20.67$17.91 to $22.55534,270
LPNs and LVNs$33.86$30.05 to $37.40188,210
Registered nurses$41.11$37.85 to $47.68142,270

Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.

Work here? Share your pay anonymously

For Meadville Convalescent Home. No name, email or phone, and nothing you could type about a resident: every answer is a number or a choice.

Your job
Employed by
Usual shift
Do you get a shift differential?
Optional questions
Mandatory overtime?
How did staffing feel on your usual shift?

Every report is reviewed before it counts; what it says about the home never decides whether it counts. How pay reports are handled.

How staff pay reports work · CNA pay by state

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeMississippiUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
19.720.513.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.01.40.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
1.92.51.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
5.83.13.2
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
23.219.614.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
5.26.34.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
14.421.715.4
Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
3.52.41.9
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
5.12.91.8

Short-term rehab results

For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Meadville Convalescent Home's Medicare short-stay residents. How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.

Went home or back to the community

Not reported

CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

US median of homes 51.5% · Mississippi: 21 better, 14 worse

Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 23 eligible stays.

Potentially preventable readmissions

14.8% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 10.7% · Mississippi: 1 better, 10 worse

Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 52 eligible stays.

Infections that led to a hospital stay

9.5% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 7.1% · Mississippi: 1 better, 3 worse

Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 34 eligible stays.

Self-care and mobility at discharge

77.3% this home

Median of homes: Mississippi52.2% · US 56.6%

Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 22 residents counted.

Falls with major injury

0.0% this home

Median of homes: Mississippi0.7% · US 0.0%

Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 38 residents counted.

New or worsened pressure ulcers

4.2% this home

Median of homes: Mississippi2.8% · US 1.7%

Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 38 residents counted.

Medication list given at discharge

Not reported

CMS note: Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure.

Median of homes: Mississippi98.3% · US 98.7%

Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025.

Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.

Owners and operators

Legal business name: MEADVILLE LLC. CMS links this home to Cavalier Healthcare, a group of 4 nursing homes averaging 2.5 stars overall.

NameRoleTypeShareSince
Meadville LLC5% or greater direct ownership interestOrganization12/26/2001
Guins, George5% or greater direct ownership interestIndividual12/26/2001
Hornsby, AlbertW-2 managing employeeIndividual08/06/2014
Guins, GeorgeCorporate directorIndividual06/19/2008

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 6 problems in this area, most recently on November 12, 2025: "Honor the resident's right to choose his or her attending physician."
  2. When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on August 21, 2025: "Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured."
  3. How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on August 21, 2025: "Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube."
  4. Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on August 21, 2025: "Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards."
  5. How long has the current administrator been here?CMS counts 2 administrators who left in the period it measured.

Other nursing homes nearby

Mississippi contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in Mississippi. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Common questions

What is Meadville Convalescent Home's Medicare star rating?
CMS rates Meadville Convalescent Home 3 out of 5 stars overall, with 3 for health inspections, 5 for staffing and 1 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Meadville Convalescent Home get at its last inspection?
5 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on August 21, 2025. The Mississippi average is 6.8.
Has Meadville Convalescent Home been fined?
CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
Does Meadville Convalescent Home accept Medicaid?
It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Meadville Convalescent Home?
CMS lists 4 owners and managers, and links the home to Cavalier Healthcare. Legal business name: MEADVILLE LLC.

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection