What is Mennonite Home's Medicare star rating?

CMS rates Mennonite Home 4 out of 5 stars overall, with 4 for health inspections, 4 for staffing and 3 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).

How many deficiencies did Mennonite Home get at its last inspection?

5 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on March 27, 2026. The Oregon average is 9.2.

Does Mennonite Home accept Medicaid?

It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.

Who owns Mennonite Home?

CMS lists 17 owners and managers. Legal business name: MENNONITE HOME OF ALBANY, INC.

Mennonite Home: Inspections, Staffing & Ratings

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on March 27, 2026, inspectors cited 5 health deficiencies (the Oregon average is 9.2, the national average 9.2).

Of 20 health citations since September 2023, 2 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.

CMS lists 2 fines totaling $17,934 in the last three years; the largest was $9,110, and the latest is dated March 4, 2025.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.76 hours per resident per day, against 5.03 across Oregon and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.56 of those hours.

62.5% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Oregon average 47.4%).

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

709/23

107/24

611/24

103/25

503/26

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 20 health citations on file.

Severity

Isolated

Pattern

Widespread

Immediate jeopardy

Actual harm

Potential for more than minimal harm

15D

Potential for minimal harm

March 27, 2026Standard inspection · 5 citations

E

Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.

F761 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 5, 2026

Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure appropriate medication storage temperatures were logged and maintained for 2 of 2 medication rooms reviewed for medication storage. This placed residents at risk for reduced efficacy of medication.
D

Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.

F550 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 5, 2026

Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents the right to a dignified dining experience for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#32) reviewed for dignity. This placed residents at risk for lack of dignity.
D

Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.

F552 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 5, 2026

Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to inform residents and the resident's responsible party of the risks and benefits, and to ensure consent was obtained, for the use of psychotropic medications for 1 of 5 sampled residents (#4) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This placed residents at risk for lack of informed consent of psychotropic medications.
D

Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.

F677 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 5, 2026

Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide hygiene and grooming care to 1 of 1 sampled resident (#32) reviewed for ADLs. This placed residents at risk for unmet hygiene and grooming needs.
D

Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.

F760 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 5, 2026

Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents received seizure medications for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#25) reviewed for medications. This placed residents at risk for seizures.

March 4, 2025Complaint inspection · 1 citation

G

Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

F689 · Quality of Life and Care · Actual harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 23, 2025

Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure an environment free from accident hazards for 1 of 3 (#10) sampled residents reviewed for accidents. The facility failed to properly attach the sling with the lower leg straps to the Hoyer (a mechanical lift device used to transfer residents) during a transfer. As a result, Resident 10 sustained a left leg femoral (largest leg bone) fracture and an avulsion injury to the left foot (occurs when an injury causes a ligament or tendon to break off a small piece of a bone that is attached to it).

November 21, 2024Standard inspection · 6 citations

F

Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 10, 2025

Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to serve food in a sanitary manner for 2 of 2 dining rooms. This placed residents at risk for foodborne illness.
D

Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.

F550 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 10, 2025

Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with dignity for 1 of 10 sampled residents (#29) reviewed for dining. This placed residents at risk for lack of dignity.
D

Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.

F552 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 10, 2025

Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to timely inform the resident representative of the risks and benefits of psychotropic medication use for 1 of 5 sampled residents (#18) reviewed for medications. This placed residents at risk for the lack of informed consent.
D

Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.

F636 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 10, 2025

Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to complete a comprehensive assessment within the required timeframe for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#2) reviewed for resident assessment. This placed residents at risk for unassessed needs.
D

Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.

F641 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 10, 2025

Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure accurate assessments for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#31) reviewed for limited range of motion. This placed residents at risk for unassessed needs.
D

Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.

F688 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 10, 2025

Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident with limited ROM received appropriate treatment and services to prevent further decline for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#31) reviewed for ROM. This placed residents at risk for worsening contractures.

July 24, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation

G

Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

F689 · Quality of Life and Care · Actual harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 12, 2024

Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to timely evaluate and analyze repeated falls to ensure fall interventions were effective for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#4) and failed to ensure fall interventions were followed for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#1) reviewed for accidents. As a result, Resident 1 fell and sustained a fracture.

September 8, 2023Standard inspection · 7 citations

F

Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 28, 2023

Inspectors wroteBased on interview it was determined the facility failed to implement a water management program for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for infection control. This placed residents at risk for exposure to water-borne illnesses.
D

Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.

F553 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 28, 2023

Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were able to participate in care conferences for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#7) reviewed for care planning. This placed residents at risk for lack of participation in the care planning process.
D

Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.

F578 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 28, 2023

Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to periodically follow-up on advanced directives for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#10) reviewed for advanced directives. This placed residents at risk for healthcare decisions not being honored.
D

Ensure a qualified health professional conducts resident assessments.

F642 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 28, 2023

Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to complete and submit a discharge tracker for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#19) reviewed for assessments. This placed residents at risk for incomplete records.
D

Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 28, 2023

Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive care plan for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#17) reviewed for skin conditions. This placed resident at risk for unmet skin care needs.
D

Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.

F679 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 28, 2023

Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to honor activity preferences for 2 of 2 sampled residents (#s 10 and 30) reviewed for activities. This placed residents at risk for decline in psychosocial well-being.
D

Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.

F756 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 28, 2023

Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure pharmacy identified drug interactions were reviewed by a resident's physician for 1 of 5 sampled residents (#33) reviewed for medications. This placed residents at risk for adverse medication reactions.

Fire safety inspections

12 fire safety citations on file: 3 on March 27, 2026, 2 on November 21, 2024, 7 on September 8, 2023.

Every fire safety citation12 citations

F
Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.

K 345 · March 27, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
F
Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.

K 353 · March 27, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
F
Properly select, install, inspect, or maintain portable fire extinguishes.

K 355 · March 27, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
F
Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.

K 918 · November 21, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
E
Add doors in an exit area that do not require the use of a key from the exit side unless in case of special locking arrangements.

K 222 · November 21, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
F
Develop Emergency Preparedness policies and procedures.

E 13 · September 8, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
F
Address subsistence needs for staff and patients.

E 15 · September 8, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
F
Establish procedures for tracking staff and patients during an emergency.

E 18 · September 8, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
F
Add doors in an exit area that do not require the use of a key from the exit side unless in case of special locking arrangements.

K 222 · September 8, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
F
Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.

K 918 · September 8, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
D
Provide properly protected cooking facilities.

K 324 · September 8, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
D
Properly select, install, inspect, or maintain portable fire extinguishes.

K 355 · September 8, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

Date	Penalty	Amount or length
March 4, 2025	Fine	$9,110
July 24, 2024	Fine	$8,824

A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

Measure	This home	Oregon	United States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)	4.76	5.03	3.86
Registered nurses	0.56	0.72	0.69
All nursing staff on weekends	4.28	4.51	3.42
Nurse aides	3.53
Licensed practical nurses	0.67
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)	62.5%	47.4%	45.8%
Registered nurse turnover	50.0%	51.6%	42.9%
Administrators who left	0

CMS expects 3.39 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.95 on weekdays and 4.28 on weekends, 14% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 7.9% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 6.34 in April to June 2025 to 4.76 in January to March 2026.

Quarter	All nursing staff	Registered nurses	Weekdays	Weekends	Contract staff share	Days with no RN hours	Residents a day
Jan to Mar 2026	4.76	0.56	4.95	4.28	7.9%	2 of 90	38
Oct to Dec 2025	5.15	0.58	5.33	4.69	10.7%	0 of 92	34
Jul to Sep 2025	6.53	0.60	6.88	5.62	3.4%	0 of 92	35
Apr to Jun 2025	6.34	0.62	6.58	5.72	3.1%	0 of 91	36
United States, Jan to Mar 2026	3.75	0.62	3.92	3.33	5.3%	0.5% of days
Oregon, Jan to Mar 2026	4.91	0.64	5.12	4.40	6.2%	0.4% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Staff pay reports

Staff pay at this home

No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.

Official wage estimates for Oregon

Job	Median	Middle half	Employed
Oregon, all employers
CNAs (nursing assistants)	$23.96	$22.83 to $28.40	14,800
LPNs and LVNs	$38.69	$35.11 to $43.60	4,260
Registered nurses	$62.02	$51.55 to $64.63	39,730
United States, nursing care facilities
CNAs (nursing assistants)	$20.67	$17.91 to $22.55	534,270
LPNs and LVNs	$33.86	$30.05 to $37.40	188,210
Registered nurses	$41.11	$37.85 to $47.68	142,270

Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.

How staff pay reports work · CNA pay by state

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

Measure	This home	Oregon	US
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	36.8	14.9	13.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	5.1	1.4	0.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	3.3	2.0	1.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	2.4	2.4	3.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	0.0	1.4	1.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	37.3	20.6	14.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	3.3	5.8	4.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	12.5	13.9	15.4
Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231	18.7	21.4	23.8
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231	22.5	16.1	12.0

Short-term rehab results

For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Mennonite Home's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (54.5% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.

Went home or back to the community

54.5% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 51.5% · Oregon: 52 better, 3 worse

Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 43 eligible stays.

Potentially preventable readmissions

11.7% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 10.7% · Oregon: 3 better, 0 worse

Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 38 eligible stays.

Infections that led to a hospital stay

6.1% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 7.1% · Oregon: 0 better, 0 worse

Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 31 eligible stays.

Self-care and mobility at discharge

70.0% this home

Median of homes: Oregon59.2% · US 56.6%

Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 20 residents counted.

Falls with major injury

0.0% this home

Median of homes: Oregon0.0% · US 0.0%

Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 22 residents counted.

New or worsened pressure ulcers

12.4% this home

Median of homes: Oregon2.6% · US 1.7%

Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 22 residents counted.

Medication list given at discharge

Not reported

CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

Median of homes: Oregon98.5% · US 98.7%

Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 12 residents counted.

Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.

Owners and operators

Legal business name: MENNONITE HOME OF ALBANY, INC.

Name	Role	Type	Since
Hansell, Shauna	W-2 managing employee	Individual	12/05/2012
Rumpel, Maureen	W-2 managing employee	Individual	09/28/2018
Trahan, Angela	W-2 managing employee	Individual	02/07/2011
Walls, Elizabeth	W-2 managing employee	Individual	11/08/2006
Baker, Michael	Corporate director	Individual	10/31/2013
Desoyza, Shanilka	Corporate director	Individual	05/31/2016
Ferris, Nancy	Corporate director	Individual	05/18/2018
Histand, Phillip	Corporate director	Individual	05/06/2021
Jacobo, Kristi	Corporate director	Individual	11/06/2018
Melero, Mary	Corporate director	Individual	03/04/2021
Pimm, Rick	Corporate director	Individual	11/06/2018
Ropp, Dennis	Corporate director	Individual	02/28/2015
Stutzman, Gene	Corporate director	Individual	07/13/2021
Tieszen, Brett	Corporate director	Individual	05/08/2018
Hood, Diane	Corporate officer	Individual	01/30/2023
Mars, Clifford	Corporate officer	Individual	08/06/2012
Walls, Elizabeth	Operational/managerial control	Individual	04/28/2015

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 6 problems in this area, most recently on March 27, 2026: "Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights."
How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 5 problems in this area, most recently on March 27, 2026: "Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable."
When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on November 21, 2024: "Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months."
How are medications reviewed, and how often are antipsychotic or sedating drugs used?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on March 27, 2026: "Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs."
Who is on the floor on Saturday and Sunday, and how many residents does each aide care for?Weekend nurse staffing here was 4.28 hours per resident per day, below the Oregon average of 4.51.

Other nursing homes nearby

Regency Albany
Albany, 2.6 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 33 citations
Timberline Post Acute
Albany, 3.4 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 20 citations
Corvallis Manor Nursing & Rehabilitation Center
Corvallis, 8.4 mi · not rated · 82 citations
Avamere Rehabilitation of Lebanon
Lebanon, 8.6 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 60 citations
Lebanon Veterans Home
Lebanon, 8.8 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 35 citations
Independence Health and Rehabilitation
Independence, 19 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 31 citations
Salem Transitional Care
Salem, 20.6 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 35 citations
Avamere Transitional Care at Sunnyside
Salem, 20.7 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 52 citations

Oregon contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in Oregon. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Inspections and complaints: Oregon Department of Human Services, Nursing Facility Licensing, the state agency that inspects nursing homes for CMS and takes complaints about care.
Resident advocate: Oregon Office of the Long-Term Care Ombudsman, (800) 522-2602. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
State inspection reports: Oregon Licensed Long-Term Care Settings Search, where Oregon publishes its own records on licensed homes.

Common questions

What is Mennonite Home's Medicare star rating?: CMS rates Mennonite Home 4 out of 5 stars overall, with 4 for health inspections, 4 for staffing and 3 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Mennonite Home get at its last inspection?: 5 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on March 27, 2026. The Oregon average is 9.2.
Has Mennonite Home been fined?: Yes. CMS lists 2 fines totaling $17,934 in the last three years.
Does Mennonite Home accept Medicaid?: It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Mennonite Home?: CMS lists 17 owners and managers. Legal business name: MENNONITE HOME OF ALBANY, INC.

Sources

Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.