3929 Hoover Road, Grove City, OH 43123 · Franklin County · (614) 875-7700
148 certified beds, about 106 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 1967
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 365077 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on June 4, 2026, inspectors cited 10 health deficiencies (the Ohio average is 10.5, the national average 9.2).
Of 38 health citations since May 2022, 1 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.49 hours per resident per day, against 3.69 across Ohio and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.48 of those hours.
55.6% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Ohio average 48.7%).
CMS links it to Optalis Health & Rehabilitation, an affiliated group of 36 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 38 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteRecord review of the resident trust fund accounts and quarterly financial statements and staff interview revealed the facility failed to timely notify residents and/or responsible parties of the need to spend down excess resources to maintain Medicaid eligibility for three (Resident's #4, #55, and #56) out of four residents reviewed for personal funds. Findings Include:1. Review of the record for Resident #4 revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] and had [NAME] Medicaid coverage. Review of the quarterly trust account statement for the period 01/01/26 through 03/31/26 revealed the resident's account balance exceeded the Medicaid resource limit of $2,000.00 from 01/01/26 through 02/12/26. The resident's balance decreased to $1,108.47 on 02/12/26. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on medication regimen review, medical record review, staff interview, and facility policy, the facility failed to appropriately monitor adverse affects for psychiatric medications as ordered and failed to ensure a gradual dose reduction order was completed timely. This affected one resident (Resident #69) out of five reviewed for unnecessary medications.
Inspectors wroteBased on resident record reviews, observations, staff interviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure adequate activities of daily living (ADL) care was provided for two residents (#77 and 87). This affected two residents out of five residents reviewed for activities of daily living. Findings Include: 1. Review of a resident record revealed that Resident #77 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses that included cognitive communication deficit, need for assistance with personal care and vascular dementia. Review of Resident #77's admission photo revealed that he was clean shaven. Review of Resident #77's Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed that he had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 03, indicative of severe cognitive impairment. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review, interviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure a physician-ordered pressure reducing mattress was functioning as intended for Resident #131 who had multiple pressure ulcers requiring pressure relieving interventions. This affected one (Resident #131) out of four residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. Findings Include:Review of the medical record for Resident #131 revealed an admission date of 05/22/26. Diagnoses included cognitive communication deficit, disorder of muscle, rhabdomyolysis, chronic pain syndrome, spinal stenosis of the lumbar region without neurogenic claudication, peripheral vascular disease, osteoarthritis, other specified disorders of bone density and structure, idiopathic scoliosis, and macular degeneration. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, interviews, and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure fall prevention interventions were implemented and maintained following a fall for two (Resident #07 and #84) out of two residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 112. Findings Include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #07 revealed an admission date of 11/06/25 and re-entry date of 03/11/26. Diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, fracture of neck of left femur with routine healing following surgical repair, type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy, chronic kidney disease stage 3, and syncope and collapse. Review of the significant change Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 02 indicating severe cognitive impairment. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, resident interview, staff interview, and facility policy, the facility failed to monitor and document fluid intake for Resident #08 who was on fluid restrictions. Additionally, the facility failed to monitor weights for Resident #01 with a significant weight loss. This affected two (Residents #01 and #08) out of three residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility census was 112. Findings Include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #08 revealed an admission date of 11/21/25. Diagnoses included congestive heart failure, chronic kidney disease stage 4, dependence on renal dialysis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Review of the care plan dated 11/23/25 revealed interventions for fluid management related to congestive heart failure, chronic kidney disease, and dialysis dependence. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on review of resident records, interviews and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure appropriate pain management medications were administered per professional standards of practice, when parameters were not in place for as needed pain medications, including opioids, for two residents. This affected two residents (#21 and #101) of three residents reviewed for pain management.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to properly store medications. This affected two residents (#16 and #122) out of 28 residents in the survey sample. Findings Include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #131 revealed an admission date of 11/07/25. Diagnoses included type two diabetes mellitus without complications, essential (primary) hypertension, peripheral vascular disease, and acute kidney failure. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 14 indicating intact cognition. The assessment indicated the resident required extensive assistance with activities of daily living and medication administration. Review of physician orders revealed an active order for Losartan Potassium 100 milligrams by mouth daily for hypertension. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure complete documentation of urinary output tracking as ordered by the physician. This affected one resident (#02) out of two reviewed for catheters. The facility identified nine residents with catheters. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure complete documentation regarding regular cleaning of a residents continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) machine. This affected one resident (#101) of one resident reviewed for respiratory care. The facility census was 112. Findings Include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #02 revealed a re-admission date of 01/24/26 with diagnoses of but not limited to chronic kidney disease, obstructive and reflux uropathy, acute kidney failure, anemia. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and review of Centers for Disease Control (CDC) guidance, the facility failed to ensure glucometers were sanitized/disinfected between resident use. This affected one resident (#05) and had the potential to affect four residents the facility identified as residents who utilized the facility glucometer. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #69 revealed the resident was originally admitted on [DATE] with the diagnosis of diabetes type two. Review of Resident #69's physician orders revealed an order for Humalog insulin 100 units per milliliter per sliding scale (a specific dose of insulin per the residents blood glucose reading). Review of the medical record for Resident #05 revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with the diagnosis of diabetes mellitus. Observation on 06/04/26 at 11:15 A.M. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on review of resident records, staff interviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to provide documented evidence of good faith efforts to notify a former resident of an active urinary tract infection. This affected one former resident (Former Resident #115) out of four residents reviewed for urinary tract infections. The facility census was 113 residents.
Inspectors wroteTHIS IS AN INCIDENCE OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on medical record review, review of facility incident report, resident and staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was safely transferred by a mechanical lift. This resulted in Actual Harm on 05/27/25 when one staff attempted to transfer Resident #103 from the wheelchair to the bed with the mechanical lift and the strap to the lift pad tore and Resident #103 dropped to the floor. Resident #103 was observed by staff to have one missing tooth, and one tooth was broken in half at the time of the incident. Resident #103 was sent to the hospital and returned to the facility with no other injuries noted. The resident has a follow up appointment with the emergency dentist. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve foods in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This had the potential to affect all residents in the facility except one (Resident #34) who was ordered nothing by mouth (NPO) and didn't receive food from the kitchen. The facility census was 111.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen was maintained in a clean and sanitary manner. This had the potential to affect all residents who received food from the kitchen. The facility identified one resident (#60) who consumed nothing by mouth. The facility census was 108.
Inspectors wroteBased on record reviews, staff interview, review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure the Water Management Program was timely and appropriately implemented to prevent the spread of Legionella. This had the potential to affect all 108 residents residing in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure nail care was provided for dependent residents. This affected four residents (#75, #91, #95, #104) of six residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL). The facility census was 108.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure there were sufficient activities in the memory care unit especially in the evening and weekend. This affected four residents (#75, #91, #95, and #99) of four residents reviewed for activities and had the potential to affect all 25 residents residing in the memory care unit. The facility census was 108.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure resident dignity was maintained during dining experiences. This affected two residents (#35 and #103) observed for dining during the annual survey. The facility census was 108.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide residents with a bed hold notification prior to hospital stay. This affected two (Residents #15 and #39) of four residents reviewed for notification of bed hold. The facility census was 108.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure Thrombo-Embolic Deterrent (TED) hose were applied as ordered by the physician. This affected one resident (#57) of the eight residents reviewed for skin conditions during the annual survey. Additionally, the facility failed to timely collect urine and treat a urinary tract infection (UTI) for Resident #86. This affected one resident (#86) of one reviewed for UTI. The facility census was 108.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, resident and staff interviews, medical record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff assisted one resident (#13) with the placement of bilateral hearing aids daily as ordered. This affected one resident (#13) of one reviewed for hearing services. The facility census was 108.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, record reviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure pressure ulcer prevention interventions were in place per the plan of care, failed to ensure pressure ulcers were comprehensively evaluated upon admission, and failed to ensure staff were educated on the appropriate settings for Low Air Loss (LAL) mattresses. This affected two residents (#43 and 362) out of the five residents reviewed for pressure ulcers during the annual survey. The facility census was 108.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure care and services to prevent the development or worsening of contractures were timely and appropriately implemented. This affected two residents (#43 and #91) out of two residents reviewed for limited range of motion during the annual survey. The facility census was 108.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, record reviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure fall interventions were in place per the plan of care. This affected one resident (#57) of the four residents reviewed for falls during the annual survey. The facility census was 108.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to complete timely follow up to obtain sleep study results for one resident (Resident #13). This affected one (Resident #13) of four residents reviewed for respiratory care. The facility census was 108.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident with Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) was appropriately assessed to identify the cause of the resident's PTSD and minimize triggers and/or re-traumatization. This affected one (#46) of three resident identified by the facility as having PTSD/trauma. The facility census was 108.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #69's blood pressure was monitored as ordered. This affected one (#69) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 108.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation,staff interview, and review of medical record, the facility failed to ensure Resident #29 was served his meal as physician ordered. This affected one resident (#29) of 25 residents in the memory care unit. The facility census was 108.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, record reviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure resident received appropriate set up assistance and adaptive equipment during meals necessary to maintain adequate nutrition. This affected one resident (#43) out of the five residents reviewed for nutrition during the annual survey. The facility census was 108.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accurately complete Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments for residents. This affected six residents (#1, #22, #69, #91, #95, #99) of six residents reviewed for MDS accuracy. The facility census was 108.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide a safe and sanitary environment for residents who use the facility shower rooms. This had the potential to affect all 118 residents in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, facility reported incident review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents remained free from staff to resident abuse and resident to resident altercations. This affected three residents (#144, #158, and #214) of 13 residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 118.
Inspectors wroteBased on facility document review and staff interview, the facility failed to fully participate in Quality Assurance and Assessment (QAA) committee activities. This had the potential to affect 85 of 85 residents in the facility. Findings Include: Review of facility QAA meeting sign in sheets, dated March 2021 to March 2022, revealed the only meeting that the facility medical director attended was in April 2021. Review of facility Medical Director Monthly Reports, dated January 2022, October 2021, and July 2021, revealed hand written notes that indicated the QAA meeting minutes were reviewed with the medical director. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to properly store/date food in the main kitchen. This had the potential to affect 82 of 85 residents who receive food from the facility kitchen (Residents #8, #16, and #19 receive no food by mouth). The census was 85. Findings Include: Observations on 05/02/22 from 8:38 A.M. to 8:47 A.M. revealed the following items were found in the walk in freezer as opened and undated/improperly dated: opened bag of country friend steak that had a delivery date of 01/05/22 on the opened box, but no date on the bag of steak that was opened, and bags of chicken patties, breadsticks, green peas, and chicken tenders were opened and undated as to when they were opened or should be used by. Observations on 05/02/22 from 8:50 A.M. to 8:55 A.M. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident and facility staff interview the facility failed to maintain a safe home like environment. This had the potential to affect three residents (#133, #15 and #68) of 24 residents reviewed. The total facility census was 85. Findings Include: During initial observation of rooms on the secured hallway on 05/02/22 at 9:40 A.M. it was observed Resident #133's room had 10 floor tiles that were gouged through the top layer of the tile. The wall at the head of the resident's bed was damaged with the top layer of the drywall removed exposing the inner surface of the drywall. At this time, observation of Resident #15's room revealed the wall, the resident's bed was against, had multiple divots in the drywall. During an interview and observation of Resident #68's room on 05/02/22 at 10:29 A.M. it was revealed the cold water side of the sink did not work. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on resident record review, resident interview, staff interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide a resident the opportunity to participate in a plan of care meeting. This affected one Resident (#4) of one resident reviewed for care planning. The facility census was 85. Findings Include: On 05/02/22 at 1:12 P.M., an interview with Resident #4 was conducted. Resident #4 stated she was concerned about a wound that was bothering her on her head and a loose tooth causing discomfort in her mouth. Resident #4 further stated she did not remember talking to the staff about her concerns. She also stated she had not been asked to participate in a plan of care meeting to discuss those concerns. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, and facility staff interview the facility failed to ensure a resident who had discontinuation of hospice services had timely monitoring and evaluation of anti-seizure medication. This affected one resident (#38) of one resident reviewed for change of condition. The total facility census was 85. Findings Include: Review of Resident #38's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include but are not limited to unspecified dementia adult failure to thrive, seizures, unstable angina, repeated falls. hypertension and trans ischemic attack. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, and facility staff interview the facility failed to ensure a physician was directing the care of a resident. This affected one resident (#38) of one reviewed for change of condition. The total facility census was 85. Findings Include: Review of Resident #38's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include but are not limited to unspecified dementia adult failure to thrive, seizures, unstable angina, repeated falls, hypertension, and trans ischemic attack. Review of significant change Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] revealed the resident is not able to complete the brief interview of mental status score, resident had no behaviors, delusions, hallucinations, rejection of care but had one instance of wandering during the review period. [...]
21 fire safety citations on file: 2 on June 4, 2026, 1 on November 18, 2025, 2 on December 17, 2024, 7 on November 24, 2024, 9 on May 5, 2022.
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Ohio | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.49 | 3.69 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.48 | 0.64 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.11 | 3.28 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.11 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.90 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 55.6% | 48.7% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 60.9% | 43.9% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 4.41 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.64 on weekdays and 3.11 on weekends, 15% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.59 in April to June 2025 to 3.49 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.49 | 0.48 | 3.64 | 3.11 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 106 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.57 | 0.52 | 3.73 | 3.14 | 0.8% | 0 of 92 | 103 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.91 | 0.70 | 4.04 | 3.57 | 7.6% | 0 of 92 | 110 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.59 | 0.76 | 3.71 | 3.27 | 11.2% | 0 of 91 | 111 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Ohio, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.64 | 0.60 | 3.80 | 3.24 | 4.6% | 0.4% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ohio, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.76 | $17.93 to $21.44 | 63,280 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $29.78 | $27.34 to $31.68 | 39,900 |
| Registered nurses | $39.67 | $38.08 to $47.61 | 143,730 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Ohio | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.6 | 5.3 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.5 | 3.2 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.4 | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.4 | 6.1 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 19.4 | 3.4 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 6.1 | 8.8 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 20.2 | 24.9 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 0.0 | 12.9 | 12.0 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Monterey Care Center's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (53.4% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
53.4% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Ohio: 147 better, 20 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 82 eligible stays.
10.7% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Ohio: 3 better, 7 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 88 eligible stays.
6.8% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Ohio: 1 better, 4 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 40 eligible stays.
82.8% this home
Median of homes: Ohio55.6% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 29 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Ohio0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 46 residents counted.
4.9% this home
Median of homes: Ohio1.4% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 46 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Ohio100.0% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 4 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: MACINTOSH COMPANY. CMS links this home to Optalis Health & Rehabilitation, a group of 36 nursing homes averaging 2.4 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Om Holdco 3 LLC | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 06/01/2022 |
| Charles Franklin LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 06/01/2022 | |
| Hemant Shah 2018 Irrevocable Trust | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 06/01/2022 | |
| Snw LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 06/01/2022 | |
| Dunn, Charles | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Individual | 06/01/2022 | |
| Siena Lending Group LLC | 5% or greater security interest | Organization | 06/01/2022 | |
| Patel, Rajan | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 06/01/2022 | |
| Optum Management Solutions. Inc | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 06/01/2022 | |
| Link, Marsha | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 03/31/2025 | |
| Patel, Rajan | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 06/01/2022 | |
| Ratnarajah, Gokulan | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 03/31/2025 | |
| Sharon, Robert | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 05/13/2024 | |
| Sizemore, Ashlee | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/01/2019 | |
| Dunn, Charles | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 04/29/2025 | |
| Shah, Hemant | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 04/02/2025 | |
| Cliftonlarsonallen LLP | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/01/2025 | |
| Optum Management Solutions. Inc | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 04/29/2025 | |
| Schlaupitz Madhavan | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 06/01/2022 | |
| Sptmisc Properties Trust | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 06/01/2022 | |
| Link, Marsha | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 04/29/2025 | |
| Ratnarajah, Gokulan | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 04/29/2025 | |
| Sharon, Robert | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 05/13/2024 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Ohio. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.