Find a nursing home

Home / Pennsylvania / Bethlehem

Moravian Village of Bethlehem

634 East Broad Street, Bethlehem, PA 18018 · Northampton County · (610) 625-4885

93 certified beds, about 52 residents a day · Non profit - Corporation · Medicare since 2005

CMS high performing icon Part of a continuing care retirement community Certified for Medicare
Overall
5 of 5
Health inspections
4 of 5
Staffing
5 of 5
Quality measures
5 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 396096 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on July 1, 2026, inspectors cited 6 health deficiencies (the Pennsylvania average is 10, the national average 9.2).

None of its 10 health citations since May 2024 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.

CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.33 hours per resident per day, against 3.89 across Pennsylvania and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 1.22 of those hours.

46.8% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Pennsylvania average 44.5%).

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 10 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
0G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
8D
1E
0F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
1B
0C
July 1, 2026Standard inspection · 6 citations
  1. E
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    F628 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 11, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to provide the resident and the resident's representative(s) with a written notice of transfer(s), which included the reasons for the moves, the effective date of the transfer, a statement of the residents' appeal rights, and the Ombudsman information. Additionally, the facility failed to provide written notice of duration of the bed-hold policy, and copies of the written transfer notices to a representative of the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman for three out of three residents who were transferred out of the facility. (Residents 3, 10, and 50)
  2. D
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    F554 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 11, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on facility policy review, clinical record review, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to assess a resident's capability to self-administer medications for two of 10 sampled residents. (Residents 4 and 5)
  3. D
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 11, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan that addressed each resident's needs as identified in the comprehensive assessment for one of 10 sampled residents. (Resident 8)
  4. D
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    F677 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 11, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, observation, and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide services to maintain adequate grooming and hygiene for one of 10 sampled residents. (Resident 18)
  5. D
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    F684 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 11, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement a physician's order for one of 10 sampled residents. (Resident 5)
  6. D
    Provide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
    F810 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 11, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, observation, and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that adaptive equipment was provided to one of 10 sampled residents. (Resident 26)
April 9, 2026Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. D
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    F757 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 14, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on review of manufacturer instructions, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were free from unnecessary medications for one of three sampled residents reviewed for their drug regimen. (Resident 1)
March 12, 2026Complaint inspection · 2 citations
  1. D
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    F755 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 12, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that physician prescribed medications were provided for one of four sampled residents. (Resident CR 1)
  2. B
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    F842 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for minimal harm, pattern · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 12, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that clinical record documentation was complete and accurate for one of four sampled residents. (Resident CR 1)
June 18, 2025Standard inspection · 1 citation
  1. D
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    F684 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 18, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, staff interview, and resident interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement physician's orders for one of 14 sampled residents. (Resident 36)
May 23, 2024Standard inspection · 0 citations

Fines and payment denials

CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homePennsylvaniaUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)4.333.893.86
Registered nurses1.220.790.69
All nursing staff on weekends4.143.533.42
Nurse aides2.08
Licensed practical nurses1.04
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)46.8%44.5%45.8%
Registered nurse turnover50.0%39.9%42.9%
Administrators who left0

CMS expects 3.38 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.41 on weekdays and 4.14 on weekends, 6% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 25.1% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.22 in April to June 2025 to 4.33 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20264.331.224.414.14 25.1%0 of 9052
Oct to Dec 20254.401.164.484.19 24.0%0 of 9253
Jul to Sep 20254.381.154.494.10 23.2%0 of 9247
Apr to Jun 20254.221.144.333.93 24.4%0 of 9149
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
Pennsylvania, Jan to Mar 20263.690.653.823.3411.3%0.1% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Staff pay reports

Staff pay at this home

No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.

Official wage estimates for Pennsylvania

JobMedianMiddle halfEmployed
Pennsylvania, all employers
CNAs (nursing assistants)$21.44$18.88 to $22.5267,740
LPNs and LVNs$30.74$29.02 to $35.0138,260
Registered nurses$46.36$38.75 to $50.35146,520
United States, nursing care facilities
CNAs (nursing assistants)$20.67$17.91 to $22.55534,270
LPNs and LVNs$33.86$30.05 to $37.40188,210
Registered nurses$41.11$37.85 to $47.68142,270

Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.

Work here? Share your pay anonymously

For Moravian Village of Bethlehem. No name, email or phone, and nothing you could type about a resident: every answer is a number or a choice.

Your job
Employed by
Usual shift
Do you get a shift differential?
Optional questions
Mandatory overtime?
How did staffing feel on your usual shift?

Every report is reviewed before it counts; what it says about the home never decides whether it counts. How pay reports are handled.

How staff pay reports work · CNA pay by state

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homePennsylvaniaUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
22.116.813.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.00.70.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
2.11.41.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.03.13.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
2.91.41.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
9.817.014.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
4.44.84.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
10.417.715.4
Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
22.622.523.8
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
5.09.512.0
Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
0.61.61.9
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
0.01.21.8

Short-term rehab results

For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Moravian Village of Bethlehem's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it better than the national rate (64.9% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.

Went home or back to the community

64.9% this home

Better than the national rate

US median of homes 51.5% · Pennsylvania: 100 better, 108 worse

Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 231 eligible stays.

Potentially preventable readmissions

10.0% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 10.7% · Pennsylvania: 3 better, 9 worse

Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 237 eligible stays.

Infections that led to a hospital stay

4.6% this home

Better than the national rate

US median of homes 7.1% · Pennsylvania: 7 better, 5 worse

Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 171 eligible stays.

Self-care and mobility at discharge

45.8% this home

Median of homes: Pennsylvania54.4% · US 56.6%

Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 153 residents counted.

Falls with major injury

1.1% this home

Median of homes: Pennsylvania0.0% · US 0.0%

Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 181 residents counted.

New or worsened pressure ulcers

6.9% this home

Median of homes: Pennsylvania2.0% · US 1.7%

Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 181 residents counted.

Medication list given at discharge

100.0% this home

Median of homes: Pennsylvania100.0% · US 98.7%

Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 123 residents counted.

Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.

Owners and operators

Legal business name: MORAVIAN VILLAGE OF BETHLEHEM, INC..

NameRoleTypeShareSince
Bethlehem Area Moravians, Inc5% or greater direct ownership interestOrganization06/24/2005
Boyd, TerriCorporate directorIndividual02/18/2020
Boyer, BethCorporate directorIndividual02/16/2022
Charrier, DavidCorporate directorIndividual02/16/2022
Davison, BrianCorporate directorIndividual02/16/2016
Kleintop, DouglasCorporate directorIndividual02/16/2022
Matz, WilliamCorporate directorIndividual04/21/2004
Michaels, JustinCorporate directorIndividual01/01/2026
Miller, DanCorporate directorIndividual02/16/2022
Patton, TracyCorporate directorIndividual04/01/2019
Pheiffer, ThomasCorporate directorIndividual02/16/2022
Rohmann, CarlCorporate directorIndividual02/16/2022
Sergent, ArtCorporate directorIndividual02/16/2016
Soos, DanielCorporate directorIndividual07/01/2008
Taylor, DwightCorporate directorIndividual02/18/2020
Soos, DanielCorporate officerIndividual07/01/2008
Bethlehem Area Moravians, IncOperational/managerial controlOrganization06/24/2005
Soos, DanielOperational/managerial controlIndividual07/01/2008
Bethlehem Area Moravians, IncAdp of the SNFOrganization02/12/2025
Bach, RichardAdp of the SNFIndividual04/01/2022
Gamble, RobinAdp of the SNFIndividual08/16/2024
Michaels, JustinAdp of the SNFIndividual07/01/2024
Patton, TracyAdp of the SNFIndividual04/01/2019
Pham, PhuongAdp of the SNFIndividual02/01/2025
Senick, BradAdp of the SNFIndividual01/01/2018
Soos, DanielAdp of the SNFIndividual07/01/2008

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on July 1, 2026: "Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable."
  2. How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on July 1, 2026: "Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies."
  3. When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on July 1, 2026: "Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured."
  4. How are medications reviewed, and how often are antipsychotic or sedating drugs used?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on April 9, 2026: "Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs."

Other nursing homes nearby

Pennsylvania contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in Pennsylvania. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Common questions

What is Moravian Village of Bethlehem's Medicare star rating?
CMS rates Moravian Village of Bethlehem 5 out of 5 stars overall, with 4 for health inspections, 5 for staffing and 5 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Moravian Village of Bethlehem get at its last inspection?
6 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on July 1, 2026. The Pennsylvania average is 10.
Has Moravian Village of Bethlehem been fined?
CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
Does Moravian Village of Bethlehem accept Medicaid?
CMS lists it as "Medicare", so it is not certified for Medicaid.
Who owns Moravian Village of Bethlehem?
CMS lists 26 owners and managers. Legal business name: MORAVIAN VILLAGE OF BETHLEHEM, INC..

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection