333 E Ashley St., Jacksonville, FL 32202 · Duval County · (904) 798-5300
120 certified beds, about 104 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 1993
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 105834 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on September 25, 2025, inspectors cited 5 health deficiencies (the Florida average is 7.1, the national average 9.2).
None of its 15 health citations since December 2021 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.62 hours per resident per day, against 3.82 across Florida and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.71 of those hours.
45.9% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Florida average 41.4%).
CMS links it to Summit Care, an affiliated group of 22 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 15 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, staff interviews, and a review of facility documentation, the facility failed to 1) Follow proper environmental cleaning and disinfection protocols for a resident shared bathroom (room [ROOM NUMBER]) for three consecutive days, 2) Properly dispose of used razors left accessible in two resident rooms (rooms [ROOM NUMBERS]), 3) Properly clean and disinfect identified feces in a resident bathroom shower (room [ROOM NUMBER]), 4) Use appropriate infection control practices by staff failing to don appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) and practice proper hand hygiene when administering medication through a gastrostomy tube (g-tube - feeding tube) for one of seven residents with g-tubes receiving medication. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews, record review, and a review of facility policies and procedures, the facility failed to appropriately address one (Resident #72) of one resident reviewed for pressure injury, by failing to provide services to prevent pressure ulcers in accordance with professional standards of practice to meet the resident's physical needs, including assistance with repositioning due to a casted lower left extremity and off-loading measures to prevent pressure injury. The facility failed to update the Matrix for a facility-acquired pressure injury and failed to update the resident's Care Plan and Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS) to include fracture and acquired pressure wound.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review, resident and staff interviews, and a review of facility documentation, the facility failed to adequately maintain a safe environment. Disposable razors were improperly disposed of and were left accessible in resident rooms at the vanity sinks for two (Residents #44 and #24) of two residents reviewed for accident hazards from a total survey sample of 31 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, record review, and a review of the facility policies and procedures, the facility failed to ensure that residents who needed oxygen therapy received it as ordered for one (Resident #34) of 15 residents receiving oxygen therapy in a total survey sample of 31 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and facility policy and procedure review, the facility failed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents, by failing to ensure that one (Resident #61) of four residents with personal refrigerators had an internal refrigerator thermometer and refrigerator temperatures were monitored to ensure safety. This had the potential to place Resident #61 at risk for infection, which could result in illness and potential functional decline.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record reviews, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of 5% or less based on four errors out of 27 opportunities for error, resulting in an error rate of 14.81% and involving three (Residents #66, #61, and #53) of seven residents observed during medication administration. Failure to administer medications correctly as ordered could result to side effects with serious harm to the residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and a review of the facility's policies and procedures, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe and sanitary environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections during point-of-care testing for two (Residents #66 and #61) of two residents observed during point-of-care testing, out of seven residents observed during medication administration. Failure to adhere to infection control standards during point-of-care testing poses a risk to residents of acquiring communicable diseases.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, staff and resident interviews, medical record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure that four (Residents #29, #30, #70, and #54) of 31 residents sampled, received necessary services to maintain grooming and personal hygiene. Residents #29, #30, and #70 did not receive appropriate nail care. Resident #54's facial hair was overgrown, and his mustache was growing past his upper lip and into his mouth.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assist one (Resident #28) of one resident reviewed for dental care, from a total sample of 31 residents, in obtaining routine and/or 24-hour emergency dental care. Failure to provide dental care could result in pain/discomfort, tooth loss, and infection.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to employ staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service. This had the potential to negatively impact all residents who received meals from the kitchen.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, staff and resident interviews, and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure the call light was within reach for one (Resident #62) of 29 sampled residents, for whom the facility had assessed and developed care plans. This action prevented the resident from requesting help when he needed it, leaving him vulnerable to not having his needs met.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to fully develop and/or implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for one (Resident #71) of a total sample of twenty-nine residents. Specifically, Resident #71's care plans did not address medication administration on dialysis days, and the facility was not implementing her care plan for the provision of oxygen as per her physician's orders.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that residents who required dialysis services received such services, consistent with professional standards of practice, by failing to ensure ongoing communication with the dialysis facility regarding dialysis care and services for one (Resident #71) of two residents receiving hemodialysis from a total sample of twenty-nine residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to monitor behaviors for one (Resident #31) of ten residents investigated for unnecessary medications, from a total of 29 residents in the sample.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free of significant medication errors by failing to administer as-needed antihypertensive medications to residents for blood pressures at or above the parameters established by the physician for two (Resident #52 and Resident #22) of two residents reviewed, from a total of 29 residents in the sample.
9 fire safety citations on file: 8 on September 25, 2025, 1 on October 12, 2023.
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Florida | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.62 | 3.82 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.71 | 0.73 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.31 | 3.49 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.19 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.73 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 45.9% | 41.4% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 45.5% | 46.0% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 1 |
CMS expects 3.80 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.75 on weekdays and 3.31 on weekends, 12% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.69 in April to June 2025 to 3.62 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.62 | 0.71 | 3.75 | 3.31 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 104 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.64 | 0.73 | 3.76 | 3.34 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 109 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.69 | 0.82 | 3.83 | 3.36 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 101 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.69 | 0.73 | 3.80 | 3.41 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 103 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Florida, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.76 | 0.70 | 3.90 | 3.44 | 1.1% | 0.2% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Florida, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.03 | $17.33 to $20.34 | 96,960 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $29.70 | $28.14 to $31.11 | 38,620 |
| Registered nurses | $40.48 | $37.82 to $48.64 | 229,940 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Florida | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.0 | 8.7 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.6 | 0.7 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.8 | 2.5 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.1 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.7 | 9.5 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 7.0 | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.2 | 8.6 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 26.1 | 26.1 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 11.9 | 9.1 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.2 | 2.1 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 0.5 | 1.1 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for North Bank Center for Rehabilitation and Healing's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (37.5% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
37.5% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Florida: 169 better, 109 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 41 eligible stays.
12.1% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Florida: 2 better, 35 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 82 eligible stays.
6.9% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Florida: 6 better, 21 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 52 eligible stays.
59.3% this home
Median of homes: Florida55.1% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 54 residents counted.
2.9% this home
Median of homes: Florida0.6% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 70 residents counted.
1.1% this home
Median of homes: Florida1.3% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 70 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Florida97.7% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 10 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: ASHLEY STREET SNF OPERATIONS LLC. CMS links this home to Summit Care, a group of 22 nursing homes averaging 3.4 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ashley Street SNF Intermediary Holdings LLC | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 09/30/2022 |
| Ashley Street SNF Operations Holdings LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 09/30/2022 |
| Blumenthal, Justin | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 03/20/2023 | |
| Ashley Street Opco Manager LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 09/30/2022 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Florida. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.