Home / South Carolina / Summerville
920 Travelers Boulevard, Summerville, SC 29485 · Dorchester County · (843) 875-9053
88 certified beds, about 83 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 1986
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 425156 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on May 5, 2026, inspectors cited 4 health deficiencies (the South Carolina average is 3.7, the national average 9.2).
Of 13 health citations since May 2023, 3 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (1 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 3 fines totaling $22,564 in the last three years; the largest was $13,260, and the latest is dated July 15, 2025.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.13 hours per resident per day, against 3.84 across South Carolina and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.29 of those hours.
63.9% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (South Carolina average 45.9%).
CMS links it to Fundamental Healthcare, an affiliated group of 66 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 13 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews, record review, and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure adequate Registered Nurse (RN) coverage for 4 of 31 days in October 2025; 7 of 30 days in November 2025; and 3 of 31 days in December 2025, totaling 14 days during these 3 months/quarters. This failure has the potential to affect all resident quality of care outcomes that residents experience.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of the facility policy, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to remove expired medications, and label open medications in 3 of 4 medication carts and 1 of 2 medication rooms. Review of the facility policy, Pharmacy Services Policies and Procedures: Section 8 - Medication Storage with a revision date of 04/17/24, revealed, 7. Once any multi-dose packaged medication or biological is opened, nursing will mark multi-dose products (e.g. inhalers, insulin, ophthalmics, otics, and the like) with the date opened and follow the manufacturer/supplier guidelines with respect to expiration dates, and 12. Outdated, contaminated, or deteriorated medications. are immediately removed from stock, disposed of according to procedures for medication destruction. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the master menu and the posted daily menu matched the meal served during two lunches for 4 of 4 residents reviewed, (Resident (R)45, 26, 82 and 73). During an observation on 05/03/26 the posted menu for lunch was: Chili with beef, Tossed salad, Cornbread, Chilled fruit cup and a Beverage. During an observation on 05/03/26 at 11:50 AM in the main dining room, R45's lunch ticket read:House Mechanical Soft/ Regular bread, Chopped meats1/2 cup soft seasoned green beans6 oz Chili con carne1 2x3 Cornbread1 ea Margarine1 sl Mech soft pie of choice8 oz Beverage of choiceInner lip plateR45 was served: Bowl of ChiliPlain baked potatoContainer of cheese sauceSlice of cakeR45 did not receive the cornbread, margarine, or pie listed on her lunch ticket. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and review of the facility policy titled Indications for Glove Use, the facility failed to ensure adequate infection control practices were followed related to glove use for one of one observation.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to provide appropriate supervision for Resident (R)1, resulting in R1 successfully eloping from the facility on 06/22/25. On 07/15/25 at 1:51 PM, the State Agency (SA) determined that the facility's non-compliance with one or more federal health, safety, and/or quality regulations had caused or was likely to cause serious injury, serious harm, serious impairment, or death. On 07/15/25 at 1:55 PM, the survey team provided the Administrator with a copy of the CMS Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) Template and informed the facility that IJ existed as of 6/22/25. The IJ was related to 42 CFR 483.25 - Free of Accident Hazards/Supervision/Devices. On 07/15/25 at 4:17 PM, the facility provided an acceptable IJ Removal Plan. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on review of the facility policy, record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R)281 received prescribed tube feeding for 1 of 1 resident receiving tube feeding. This failure caused R281's blood sugar levels to drop, warranting additional orders needing to be obtained to increase his blood sugar to an acceptable level.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of the facility policy, record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R)58 was free from significant pain for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for pain.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of the facility policy, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure foods stored in the main walk in refrigerator and dry storage were labeled, dated and not expired. This failure could potentially affect all 85 residents in this facility, who consumed food from the kitchen.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of the facility policy, observations, record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that medications were properly stored and labeled in 2 of 2 medication rooms and 2 of 3 medication carts.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of the facility policy, record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that the environment was free from accidents for Resident (R) 231.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of the facility policy, record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that Resident (R)34 was free of significant medication error for 1 of 1 reviewed for insulin administration.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of the facility policy, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to complete an annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) for 1 of 3 residents (R)1, reviewed.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of the facility policy, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to develop/implement a Comprehensive care plan for 2 of 3 resident (R)2 and R3, reviewed.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| July 15, 2025 | Fine | $13,260 |
| February 11, 2025 | Fine | $4,652 |
| February 11, 2025 | Fine | $4,652 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | South Carolina | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.13 | 3.84 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.29 | 0.63 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 2.73 | 3.33 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 1.72 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.12 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 63.9% | 45.9% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 55.6% | 42.1% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 1 |
CMS expects 3.63 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.28 on weekdays and 2.73 on weekends, 17% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 13.7% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.12 in April to June 2025 to 3.13 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.13 | 0.29 | 3.28 | 2.73 | 13.7% | 3 of 90 | 83 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.07 | 0.22 | 3.25 | 2.60 | 23.4% | 15 of 92 | 84 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.09 | 0.25 | 3.25 | 2.70 | 29.3% | 14 of 92 | 80 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.12 | 0.34 | 3.28 | 2.71 | 27.7% | 3 of 91 | 78 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| South Carolina, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.62 | 0.53 | 3.81 | 3.13 | 7.2% | 0.3% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| South Carolina, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $17.90 | $16.81 to $19.08 | 21,760 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $29.72 | $27.59 to $34.24 | 9,400 |
| Registered nurses | $39.60 | $37.17 to $46.75 | 49,750 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | South Carolina | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 14.2 | 11.9 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.8 | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.3 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.8 | 3.2 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.0 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 8.8 | 12.7 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 6.3 | 5.1 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 14.0 | 15.3 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 22.2 | 24.3 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 15.7 | 13.9 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.0 | 1.8 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Oakbrook Health and Rehabilitation Center's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (53.0% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
53.0% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · South Carolina: 53 better, 21 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 133 eligible stays.
13.9% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · South Carolina: 0 better, 5 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 167 eligible stays.
6.6% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · South Carolina: 1 better, 3 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 94 eligible stays.
49.1% this home
Median of homes: South Carolina57.6% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 55 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: South Carolina0.5% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 119 residents counted.
0.7% this home
Median of homes: South Carolina2.1% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 119 residents counted.
90.0% this home
Median of homes: South Carolina98.3% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 40 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: OAKBROOK HEALTH CARE LLC. CMS links this home to Fundamental Healthcare, a group of 66 nursing homes averaging 2.5 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thi of South Carolina, LLC | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 08/01/2017 |
| Castle, Patty | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 09/28/2018 | |
| Castle, Patty | Corporate officer | Individual | 09/28/2018 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in South Carolina. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.