Home / Louisiana / Baton Rouge
8340 Baringer Foreman Road., Baton Rouge, LA 70817 · E. Baton Rouge County · (225) 753-3203
136 certified beds, about 120 residents a day · Non profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 2003
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 195571 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on March 25, 2026, inspectors cited 1 health deficiency (the Louisiana average is 6.4, the national average 9.2).
None of its 12 health citations since March 2024 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.25 hours per resident per day, against 3.76 across Louisiana and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.28 of those hours.
45.7% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Louisiana average 47.6%).
CMS links it to Commcare Corporation, an affiliated group of 19 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 12 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review, the facility failed to meet Hospice requirements by failing to maintain a system to ensure a resident's Hospice Binder contained the most recent Hospice Plan of Care for 1 (#12) of 2 residents reviewed for Hospice care. Review of Resident #12's Clinical Record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Further review revealed Resident #12 was a patient of a local Hospice agency with an admission date of 02/20/2025. Review of Resident #12's Hospice Binder and Electronic Health Record revealed no current Hospice Plan of Care on file for current Certification Period of 03/05/2026 through 05/03/2026. An interview was conducted on 03/25/2026 at 11:55 a.m. with S1DON. S1DON stated she worked in collaboration with hospice representatives to coordinate care to the resident provided by the facility. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure each resident who was unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADLs) received the necessary services to maintain good personal hygiene by failing to ensure: 1. Each resident received scheduled baths for 2 (#37 and #75) of 7 (#12, #23, #37, #45, #68, #75, and #92) residents reviewed for ADLs; and 2. Each resident received necessary perineal care after incontinent episodes and prior to application of a clean brief for 3 (#12, #23, and #92) of 7 (#12, #23, #37, #45, #68, #75, and #92) residents reviewed for ADLs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to store foods under sanitary conditions. The facility failed to ensure: 1. Food was dated after opening, and 2. Temperatures were documented on temperature logs daily. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 110 residents who were provided meals from the facility's kitchen.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set accurately reflected the residents' status for 1 (#49) of 4 (#33, #49, #214, and #414) residents by failing to ensure Resident #49 was coded correctly for infections.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident received meals which accommodated preferences for 1 (#36) of 2 (#36 and #37) residents reviewed for food.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to implement and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. The facility failed to ensure staff donned proper Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) during feeding tube care for 1 (#41) of 3 (#15, #41 and #60) residents observed for Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure nurse staffing data was posted daily in a prominent location readily accessible to residents and visitors. This deficient practice had the potential to affect any of the 111 residents residing in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for 2 (#2 and #3) of 3 (#1, #2, and #3) residents reviewed for MDS.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure there was a system in place to ensure facility residents received routine dental care and routine dental care was provided for 1 (#73) of 3 (#8, #73, and #82) residents reviewed for dental services. This deficient practice had the potential to affect any of the 107 residents residing in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review, and interview, the facility failed to store, prepare, and distribute foods under sanitary conditions. The facility failed to ensure Dietary staff wore a hair restraint correctly while preparing food. There were a total of 106 out of 107 facility residents who were provided meals and beverages from the facility's kitchen.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure notifications of change in a residents conditions were made for 1 (#101) of 2 (#68, #101) residents reviewed for hospitalizations. The facility failed to ensure clinical staff reported to the physician when Resident #101 had hallucinations and a change in behavior.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was unable to carry out ADLs received the necessary services to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene for 1 (#82) of 3 (#8, #73 and #82) residents reviewed for ADL's. The facility failed to trim and file fingernails for Resident #82.
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Louisiana | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 4.25 | 3.76 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.28 | 0.31 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.55 | 3.21 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.61 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.36 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 45.7% | 47.6% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 42.9% | 41.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 1 |
CMS expects 3.78 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.54 on weekdays and 3.55 on weekends, 22% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.87 in April to June 2025 to 4.25 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.25 | 0.28 | 4.54 | 3.55 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 120 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 4.09 | 0.25 | 4.36 | 3.43 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 126 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 4.01 | 0.25 | 4.24 | 3.42 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 125 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.87 | 0.23 | 4.09 | 3.32 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 124 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Louisiana, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.64 | 0.26 | 3.86 | 3.10 | 3.6% | 0.9% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Louisiana, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $14.67 | $13.97 to $16.87 | 20,690 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $27.63 | $23.87 to $29.43 | 17,600 |
| Registered nurses | $38.57 | $33.19 to $45.00 | 48,970 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Louisiana | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 12.5 | 17.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.2 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.3 | 2.1 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.7 | 3.5 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.4 | 3.1 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 13.7 | 17.9 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 6.8 | 5.6 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 13.5 | 22.7 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 29.4 | 28.0 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 8.3 | 14.8 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.1 | 2.6 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.1 | 2.7 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Old Jefferson Community Care Center's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (55.8% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
55.8% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Louisiana: 16 better, 33 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 92 eligible stays.
11.0% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Louisiana: 0 better, 3 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 107 eligible stays.
9.1% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Louisiana: 1 better, 7 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 66 eligible stays.
81.6% this home
Median of homes: Louisiana50.0% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 38 residents counted.
1.5% this home
Median of homes: Louisiana1.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 66 residents counted.
4.4% this home
Median of homes: Louisiana2.8% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 66 residents counted.
100.0% this home
Median of homes: Louisiana100.0% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 23 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: COMMCARE CORPORATION. CMS links this home to Commcare Corporation, a group of 19 nursing homes averaging 3.1 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Commcare Corporation | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 03/01/1994 |
| Lundberg, Alec | Contracted managing employee | Individual | 06/01/2021 | |
| Prechter, Patricia | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 07/01/2022 | |
| Ford, Michael | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2021 | |
| Mangun, Garold | Corporate director | Individual | 06/09/1997 | |
| Plaisance, Wayne | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2022 | |
| Prechter, Patricia | Corporate director | Individual | 03/01/2018 | |
| Harvey Psarellis, Dawn | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/01/2010 | |
| Mangun, Garold | Corporate officer | Individual | 07/01/2022 | |
| Prechter, Patricia | Corporate officer | Individual | 07/01/2023 | |
| Commcare Management Corporation | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 07/01/2018 | |
| Gardner, George | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 07/01/2018 | |
| Harvey Psarellis, Dawn | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/01/2010 | |
| Hudson, Mary | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 11/12/2013 | |
| Lundberg, Alec | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 06/01/2021 | |
| Tucker, James | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/01/2010 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Louisiana. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.