Otterbein-Cridersville
100 Red Oak Drive, Cridersville, OH 45806 · Auglaize County · (419) 645-5114
50 certified beds, about 45 residents a day · Non profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1996
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 366050 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on April 23, 2025, inspectors cited 8 health deficiencies (the Ohio average is 10.5, the national average 9.2).
None of its 22 health citations since May 2021 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.74 hours per resident per day, against 3.69 across Ohio and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.68 of those hours.
42.0% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Ohio average 48.7%).
CMS links it to Otterbein Seniorlife, an affiliated group of 20 nursing homes.
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 22 health citations on file.
November 26, 2025Complaint inspection · 2 citations
- D Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
Inspectors wroteTHE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on medical record review, review of a facility self-reported incident (SRI), review of a witness statement, review of a police report, staff and resident interviews and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's right to privacy was maintained. This affected one (#10) of three residents reviewed for privacy. The facility census was 48.
- D Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
Inspectors wroteTHE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on medical record review, review of a facility self-reported incident (SRI), review of a witness statement, review of a police report, staff and resident interviews and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from abuse. This affected one (#10) of three residents reviewed for privacy. The facility census was 48.
April 23, 2025Standard inspection · 8 citations
- F Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interviews, review of dishwasher temperature logs and review of the dishwasher manual, the facility failed to ensure the dishwasher was washing and rinsing dishes at the proper temperatures to sanitize the dishes. This had the potential to affect all 44 residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 44.
- E Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, observation, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure medication were stored securely and not at the bedside. Additionally, the facility also failed to ensure medication cart was securely locked when unattended on Rehab Hall. This affected three (#147, #22 and #38) of three residents reviewed for medication storage and had the potential to affect 13 (#20, #29, #41, #196, #197, #198, 199, #200, #201, #202, #203, #204, and #205) residents the facility identified as independently mobile and cognitively impaired. The facility census was 44.
- D Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure a resident was provided a dignified dining experience. This affected one resident (#197) of five residents observed in the rehab dining. The facility census was 44. Findings Include: Medical record review of Resident #197 revealed the resident was admitted [DATE] with diagnoses of rheumatoid arthritis, diabetes type two, chronic kidney disease, and angina. Review of Resident #197's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 04/10/25, revealed Resident #197 was cognitively intact, no psychological issues or behaviors, and was independent with Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). [...]
- D Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, observations, staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to timely implement treatment orders for a newly identified pressure ulcer. This affected one (#38) out of three reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 44.
- D Provide appropriate foot care.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, observation, and staff and resident interviews, the facility failed to ensure resident's toenails were adequately trimmed. This affected one (#01) of one resident reviewed for podiatrist visits. The facility census was 44.
- D Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to perform post dialysis assessments. This affected one (#199) out of one resident reviewed for dialysis. The facility census was 44.
- D Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a complete and accurate medical record. This affected one (#15) out of six residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 44.
- D Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record reviews, observations, staff interviews and policy review, the facility staff failed to complete hand hygiene after resident contact and failed to wear proper Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) when providing resident care for a residents in Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP). This affected three (#2, #8 and #38) of four residents reviewed for the infection control. The facility census was 44.
June 22, 2023Standard inspection · 6 citations
- F Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, review of facility policies, and review of the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) guidance, the facility failed to have an appropriate Legionella water management program in place. This had the potential to affect all 38 residents in the facility. The census was 38.
- E Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure hot water was within appropriate parameters to potentially avoid burns. This had the potential to affect three residents (#15, #296, and #297) whose water supply shared the same water heater. In addition, the facility failed to ensure resident fall interventions were in place as ordered. This affected one resident (#32) of three reviewed for falls. The facility census was 38. Findings Include: Observation on 06/21/23 at approximately 9:52 A.M. revealed Former Resident #298's resident room revealed the resident bathroom sink temperature tempted at 130 degrees Fahrenheit. Interview on 06/21/23 at 10:00 A.M. with the Administrator verified Former Resident #298's resident bathroom sink water tempted at 130 degrees Fahrenheit. [...]
- D Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure the physician was notified when a resident's medications were not available and not administered as ordered. This affected one resident (#34) of one reviewed for mood and behaviors. The facility census was 38.
- D Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to to ensure mobility positioning devices were in place as ordered. This affected one (Resident #18) of two residents reviewed for position and mobility. The facility census was 38. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #18 revealed an admission date of 04/26/23 with medical diagnoses including diabetes type II, urine retention, acute kidney failure, and pain in left and right leg. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #18 was cognitively intact and required extensive assistance for bed mobility, transfers, walking, dressing, personal hygiene, and toileting. Review of Resident #18's care plan dated 04/27/23 revealed a self-care deficit for impaired ability to perform or complete Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). [...]
- D Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's pain was managed in a reasonable time. This affected one (Resident #295) of one resident reviewed for pain management. The facility census was 38.
- D Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure medications for sexualized behaviors were administered as ordered. This affected one resident (#34) of one reviewed for mood and behaviors. The facility census was 38. Findings Include: Review of Resident #34's medical record revealed an admission date of 01/18/23. Diagnoses included alcohol induced dementia, adult failure to thrive, anxiety disorder, conduct disorder, and emphysema. Review of Resident #34's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of six, indicating he was severely cognitively impaired. Resident #34 required supervision set up only with bed mobility, transfer, and toilet use. Resident #34 required limited assistance with dressing and personal hygiene. [...]
May 24, 2021Standard inspection · 6 citations
- D Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to notify a physician when a resident had a fall. This affected one (#28) out of one resident reviewed for falls. The census was 35.
- D Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, observation and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents plan of care reflected the residents use of hearing aids. This affected one (#9) out of one resident reviewed for vision and hearing. Facility census was 35.
- D Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, observation and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident was provided and/or assisted with her bilateral hearing aids each morning. This affected one (#9) out of one resident reviewed for vision and hearing. The census was 35.
- D Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, staff interviews, review of incident report, and review of facility policies, the facility failed to ensure a resident received the correct medications when staff administered medications to the wrong resident resulting in significant medication errors. This affected one (#8) out of five reviewed for potential medication errors. The facilities census was 35.
- D Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, observations and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident was not served and fed food listed as an allergy. This affected one (#5) out of one resident reviewed for nutrition. The facility's census was 35.
- D Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, observations, staff interviews, review of an electronic mail (e-mail) communication and policy review, the facility failed to ensure visitors followed proper infection control guidelines while visiting a resident who was quarantined to potentially prevent the spread of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). This affected one (#25) out of three residents reviewed who were quarantined. The census was 35.
Fire safety inspections
8 fire safety citations on file: 5 on June 22, 2023, 3 on May 24, 2021.
Every fire safety citation8 citations
- F Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.
- F Ensure receptacles at patient bed locations and where general anesthesia is administered, are tested after initial installation, replacement or servicing.
- C Conduct risk assessment and an All-Hazards approach.
- C List the names and contact information of those in the facility.
- C Provide emergency officials' contact information.
- F Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
- E Install emergency lighting that can last at least 1 1/2 hours.
- E Have power receptacles that are properly grounded.
Fines and payment denials
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Ohio | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.74 | 3.69 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.68 | 0.64 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.36 | 3.28 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.26 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.80 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 42.0% | 48.7% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 0.0% | 43.9% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 1 |
CMS expects 4.16 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.90 on weekdays and 3.36 on weekends, 14% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.29 in April to June 2025 to 3.74 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.74 | 0.68 | 3.90 | 3.36 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 45 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.75 | 0.72 | 3.89 | 3.37 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 48 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.52 | 0.75 | 3.67 | 3.12 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 47 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.29 | 0.69 | 3.42 | 2.95 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 50 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Ohio, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.64 | 0.60 | 3.80 | 3.24 | 4.6% | 0.4% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
Staff pay at this home
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.
Official wage estimates for Ohio
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ohio, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.76 | $17.93 to $21.44 | 63,280 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $29.78 | $27.34 to $31.68 | 39,900 |
| Registered nurses | $39.67 | $38.08 to $47.61 | 143,730 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Ohio | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.3 | 5.3 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.0 | 3.2 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.1 | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 15.0 | 6.1 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.0 | 3.4 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.6 | 8.8 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 19.1 | 24.9 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 10.5 | 12.9 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 3.5 | 1.7 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.8 | 1.8 | 1.8 |
Owners and operators
Legal business name: OTTERBEIN CRIDERSVILLE. CMS links this home to Otterbein Seniorlife, a group of 20 nursing homes averaging 3.1 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Otterbein Lsc, LLC | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 01/01/2016 |
| Otterbein Home | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 12/01/2021 |
| Bonifas, Barbara | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 12/01/2021 | |
| Dirr, Tony | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 12/01/2024 | |
| Ellerbrock, Adah | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 12/01/2024 | |
| Fried, Nathan | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 12/01/2021 | |
| Koch, Mark | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 12/01/2024 | |
| Lotz, Dave | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 12/01/2016 | |
| Muzleski, Charlotte | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 12/01/2021 | |
| Rader, Ann | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 12/01/2024 | |
| Randall, Tiffany | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 12/01/2023 | |
| Schneider, Joel | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 01/01/2024 | |
| Seese, Kaye | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 12/01/2021 | |
| Wolke, Jason | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 01/01/2016 | |
| Bonifas, Barbara | Corporate director | Individual | 12/01/2021 | |
| Green, James | Corporate director | Individual | 11/21/2005 | |
| Miller, Jason | Corporate director | Individual | 08/04/2014 | |
| Stephenson, John | Corporate director | Individual | 08/09/1982 | |
| Green, James | Corporate officer | Individual | 11/21/2005 | |
| Hawkins, Rita | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/16/2006 | |
| Miller, Jason | Corporate officer | Individual | 08/04/2014 | |
| Wilson, Jill | Corporate officer | Individual | 05/01/2009 | |
| Functional Pathways of Tennessee LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 12/01/2018 | |
| Otterbein Home | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 12/01/2021 | |
| App, Lynn | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 12/01/2021 | |
| Bartlett, Victoria | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 12/01/2021 | |
| Bayliff, Rebecca | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 05/21/2012 | |
| Brownson, William | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 12/01/2021 | |
| Burke, Daniel | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 12/01/2021 | |
| Coleman, Robert | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 12/01/2021 | |
| Fraley, Ralph | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 12/01/2021 | |
| Glosser, Heidi | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 12/01/2021 | |
| Green, James | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 12/01/2021 | |
| Hanna, Salim | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 12/01/2018 | |
| Hazelbaker, Tomas | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 12/01/2021 | |
| Nickles, Lance | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 09/15/2025 | |
| Powell, Angie | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 11/24/2014 | |
| Vonderhaar, Steve | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 12/01/2021 | |
| Baker, Steve | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 04/04/2025 | |
| Galbut, Abraham | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 04/04/2025 | |
| Galbut, Daniel | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 04/06/2025 | |
| Galbut, David | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 04/04/2025 | |
| Galbut, Eric | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 04/06/2025 | |
| Galbut, Robert | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 04/04/2025 | |
| Paritzky, Jonathan | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 04/04/2025 | |
| Rombro, David | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 04/04/2025 | |
| Zisek, Todd | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 04/04/2025 | |
| Bonifas, Barbara | Trustee of the SNF | Individual | 12/01/2021 | |
| Dirr, Tony | Trustee of the SNF | Individual | 12/01/2024 | |
| Ellerbrock, Adah | Trustee of the SNF | Individual | 12/01/2024 | |
| Fried, Nathan | Trustee of the SNF | Individual | 12/01/2021 | |
| Koch, Mark | Trustee of the SNF | Individual | 12/01/2024 | |
| Lotz, Dave | Trustee of the SNF | Individual | 12/01/2016 | |
| Muzleski, Charlotte | Trustee of the SNF | Individual | 12/01/2021 | |
| Rader, Ann | Trustee of the SNF | Individual | 12/01/2024 | |
| Randall, Tiffany | Trustee of the SNF | Individual | 12/01/2023 | |
| Schneider, Joel | Trustee of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2024 | |
| Seese, Kaye | Trustee of the SNF | Individual | 12/01/2021 | |
| Wolke, Jason | Trustee of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2016 | |
| Functional Pathways of Tennessee LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 04/04/2025 | |
| Otterbein Home | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 12/01/2021 | |
| Polaris Pharmacy Services of Ohio LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 12/01/2018 | |
| Hanna, Salim | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 10/01/2018 | |
| Nickles, Lance | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 09/23/2025 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 7 problems in this area, most recently on April 23, 2025: "Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing."
- How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on November 26, 2025: "Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential."
- How are medications reviewed, and how often are antipsychotic or sedating drugs used?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on April 23, 2025: "Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs."
- What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on April 23, 2025: "Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program."
- How long has the current administrator been here?CMS counts 1 administrator who left in the period it measured.
Other nursing homes nearby
- Cridersville Nursing and Rehab Cridersville, 0.9 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 31 citations
- Shawnee Manor Lima, 4 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 20 citations
- Wapakoneta Manor Wapakoneta, 5.4 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 14 citations
- Springview Manor Lima, 6.5 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 13 citations
- Springs of Lima the Lima, 6.6 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 18 citations
- Carecore at Lima Lima, 6.8 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 38 citations
- Lima Convalescent Home Lima, 6.8 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 22 citations
- Lost Creek Rehabilitation and Nursing Center Lima, 8.5 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 31 citations
Ohio contacts for a concern about a nursing home
These are the official offices in Ohio. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.
- Inspections and complaints: Ohio Department of Health, Nursing Homes and Facilities, the state agency that inspects nursing homes for CMS and takes complaints about care.
- Resident advocate: Ohio Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman, 1-800-282-1206. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
- State inspection reports: Ohio Long-Term Care Quality Navigator (Ohio Department of Aging), where Ohio publishes its own records on licensed homes.
Common questions
- What is Otterbein-Cridersville's Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates Otterbein-Cridersville 3 out of 5 stars overall, with 3 for health inspections, 3 for staffing and 4 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did Otterbein-Cridersville get at its last inspection?
- 8 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on April 23, 2025. The Ohio average is 10.5.
- Has Otterbein-Cridersville been fined?
- CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
- Does Otterbein-Cridersville accept Medicaid?
- It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
- Who owns Otterbein-Cridersville?
- CMS lists 64 owners and managers, and links the home to Otterbein Seniorlife. Legal business name: OTTERBEIN CRIDERSVILLE.
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.