1010 Lincoln Ave, Wapakoneta, OH 45895 · Auglaize County · (419) 738-3711
73 certified beds, about 66 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 1970
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 365238 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on July 23, 2026, inspectors cited 3 health deficiencies (the Ohio average is 10.5, the national average 9.2).
Of 14 health citations since September 2022, 1 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.57 hours per resident per day, against 3.69 across Ohio and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.62 of those hours.
36.5% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Ohio average 48.7%).
CMS links it to Hcf Management, an affiliated group of 22 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 14 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, resident interviews, and staff interviews the facility failed to ensure medications were administered as ordered related to not having a continuous supply of prescribed medications. This affected two residents, (#3 and #43) of five residents reviewed for medications. The facility census was 67.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to address pharmacy recommendations in a timely manner. This affected two (#57 and #61) of five reviewed for unnecessary medications. The census was 67.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, review of the facility policy, resident interview, and staff interview the facility failed to follow proper protocols for residents in isolation precautions. This affected one resident, Resident #43, out of three residents reviewed for isolation precautions. The current census is 67.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to complete adequate wound assessments and failed to ensure pressure-reducing interventions were in place as ordered. This affected one (#11) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 58.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, staff interview, observation, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure interventions were in place to prevent the development of a pressure ulcer. This resulted in actual harm when Resident #07 acquired a stage four pressure ulcer to his left heel while at the facility. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure pressure ulcer treatments were completed as ordered. This affected two (#07 and #51) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The census was 62.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #210's catheter bag was covered to promote dignity. This affected one (Resident #210) of one residents reviewed for dignity. The facility census was 62.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure resident comprehensive care plans had interventions for psychiatric disorders. This affected one (Resident #18) of two reviewed for care planning. The census was 62. Findings Include: Review of Resident #18's medical record revealed an admission date of 03/06/24. Diagnoses listed included Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, and type two diabetes mellitus. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #18 was cognitively intact with a diagnoses of PTSD. Interview with Resident #18 on 05/13/24 at 2:33 P.M. revealed she had not had a care conference since admission. Review of Resident #18's comprehensive care plan revealed PTSD was not listed and no interventions were in place. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to hold care conferences with residents. This affected (Residents #07 and #18) of two residents reviewed for care conferences. Additionally, the facility also failed to implement fall interventions and update the care plan after falls. This affected one (Resident #209) of three reviewed for falls care planning. The census was 62. Findings Include: 1. Review of Resident #07's medical record revealed an admission date of 06/04/23. Diagnoses listed included type II diabetes mellitus, congestive heart failure, skin cancer, obesity, major depressive disorder, and stage four pressure ulcer of left heel. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #07 had a stage four pressure ulcer, lower extremity impairment to both sides, and was cognitively intact. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on review of contract with dialysis center, review of facility policy, observation of care, interview with resident, and interview with staff, the facility failed to ensure Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) were implemented. This affected two (Residents #51 and #52) of three residents reviewed for EBP. The current census is 62.
Inspectors wroteBased on resident record review and staff interview; the facility failed to ensure minimum data set (MDS) assessments were accurate. This affected four (#18, #22, #41, and #45) of 14 residents reviewed for accuracy of the MDS assessment. The census was 44.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, observations and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain a safe environment when medications were left unattended by staff. This directly affected one resident (#31) and had the possibility to affect seven residents (#2, #3, #13, #34, #36, #39, and #43) identified by the facility as being independently mobile and cognitively impaired, residing in the D hall. The facility census was 44.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to serve meals in the dining room due to staffing issues. This potentially affected 40 residents (with exception of Residents #3, #13, #18, and #40 who preferred to eat in their rooms) who receive meals from the kitchen. The census was 44.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure treatments were completed as ordered. This affected one (Resident #41) of two residents reviewed for wounds. The census was 44.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to post daily nurse staffing information. This affected 44 residents who reside in the facility. The census was 44.
1 fire safety citation on file: 1 on September 1, 2022.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| May 16, 2024 | Payment Denial | 20 days from June 15, 2024 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Ohio | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.57 | 3.69 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.62 | 0.64 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.35 | 3.28 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.39 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.55 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 36.5% | 48.7% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 30.8% | 43.9% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 4.03 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.66 on weekdays and 3.35 on weekends, 8% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.1% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.72 in April to June 2025 to 3.57 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.57 | 0.62 | 3.66 | 3.35 | 0.1% | 0 of 90 | 66 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.44 | 0.83 | 3.55 | 3.14 | 0.1% | 0 of 92 | 69 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.60 | 0.86 | 3.72 | 3.30 | 0.3% | 0 of 92 | 65 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.72 | 0.91 | 3.87 | 3.34 | 0.2% | 0 of 91 | 64 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Ohio, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.64 | 0.60 | 3.80 | 3.24 | 4.6% | 0.4% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ohio, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.76 | $17.93 to $21.44 | 63,280 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $29.78 | $27.34 to $31.68 | 39,900 |
| Registered nurses | $39.67 | $38.08 to $47.61 | 143,730 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Ohio | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.1 | 5.3 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.8 | 3.2 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.0 | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.7 | 6.1 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.5 | 3.4 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 12.8 | 8.8 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 35.2 | 24.9 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 6.6 | 12.9 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.8 | 1.7 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 0.6 | 1.8 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Wapakoneta Manor's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (45.8% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
45.8% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Ohio: 147 better, 20 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 112 eligible stays.
9.7% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Ohio: 3 better, 7 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 105 eligible stays.
5.5% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Ohio: 1 better, 4 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 53 eligible stays.
41.9% this home
Median of homes: Ohio55.6% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 43 residents counted.
1.5% this home
Median of homes: Ohio0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 66 residents counted.
2.6% this home
Median of homes: Ohio1.4% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 66 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Ohio100.0% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 14 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: Legal Business Name Not Available. CMS links this home to Hcf Management, a group of 22 nursing homes averaging 3 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership data not available |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Ohio. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.