250 School Street, Tomball, TX 77375 · Harris County · (281) 516-7929
125 certified beds, about 110 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 2008
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 676165 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on March 26, 2026, inspectors cited 7 health deficiencies (the Texas average is 9.4, the national average 9.2).
Of 28 health citations since November 2023, 2 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (2 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $14,069 in the last three years; the largest was $14,069, and the latest is dated June 9, 2025.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.20 hours per resident per day, against 3.39 across Texas and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.20 of those hours.
47.3% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Texas average 55.3%).
CMS links it to Hmg Healthcare, an affiliated group of 31 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 28 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of 3 of 9 residents (Resident #1, # 86 and #95) reviewed for pharmaceutical services. The facility failed to ensure Resident # 95 received Levothyroxine daily as prescribed by the physician. The facility failed to administer the correct dose of Metoprolol (an antihypertensive medication) as physician ordered to Resident #1 on 03/25/26. The facility failed to administer Clonidine (an antihypertensive medication) as physician ordered when Resident #86's systolic blood pressures were greater than 150 on 03/01/26, 03/02/26, 03/03/26, 03/04/26, 03/07/26, 03/17/26, 03/16/26, 03/17/26 and 03/20/26. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals were stored securely for one of nine residents (Resident #86) and one of three medication carts (200 Hall nurse medication cart) reviewed for medication storage. The facility failed to keep resident medications stored securely. Two large white oblong tablets were found in Resident #86's possession with no nursing staff present. The facility failed to lock the 200 Hall nurse medication cart and secure an IV medication that was left on top of the cart prior to walking away. These failures could affect residents receiving medications placing them at risk of receiving the wrong medication, adverse side effects and drug diversion.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident was fully informed in a language that he or she could understand of his or her total health status, including but not limited to, his or her medical condition for 2 (Resident #86 and #75) of 8 residents reviewed for resident rights. The facility failed to communicate effectively with Resident #86 whose primary language was Spanish, and Resident #75 whose primary language was Vietnamese. This failure could place residents who communicate in a foreign language at risk of unmet needs.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment for 1 of 8 (Resident #9) residents reviewed for comprehensive assessments. The facility failed to ensure Resident #9's care plan addressed the resident's history of UTI (urinary tract infection) and interventions for UTI.These failures could place residents at risk of not having their individually assessed needs determined, monitored and met.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who were fed by enteral means received the appropriate treatment and services to prevent complications of enteral feeding for one (Resident #1) of 2 residents reviewed for enteral nutrition. LVN B failed to check for Gtube (gastrostomy tube) placement prior to administration of medications as per Physician orders and facility policy. This failure could place residents who receive medications or feedings via Gtube at risk of aspiration, pain and hospitalization.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure bed rails were maintained and checked regularly to make sure they are installed correctly as rails may shift or loosen over time for 1 (Resident #14) of 10 residents reviewed for bed rails. The facility failed to ensure that Resident #14's bedrails were not loose. This failure could place residents at risk of injuries, entrapment or death.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety reviewed for 1 of 5 (Dietary Manager) kitchen staff members. The facility failed to ensure food service staff wore appropriate hair nets while in the kitchen and food was being prepared. This failure had the potential to contaminate food and affect residents' health and safety.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source were reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury, or not later than 24 hours if the events that cause the allegation do not involve abuse and do not result in serious bodily injury, to the administrator of the facility and to other officials (including to the State Survey Agency and adult protective services where state law provides for jurisdiction in long-term care facilities) in accordance with State law through established procedures for 1 of 1 facility and 2 of 10 staff (MA A and LVN A ) reviewed for misappropriation. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect and injury of unknown origin, are thoroughly investigated and results reported of all investigations to the State Survey Agency, within 5 working days of the incident for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for misappropriation. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services, including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals to meet the needs of each resident and ensure it had a system of records of receipt and disposition of all controlled drugs in sufficient detail to enable accurate reconciliation and that drug records were in order and an account of all controlled drugs was maintained and periodically reconciled for 1 of 10 staff (LVN A) for pharmacy services. - LVN A failed to maintain an accurate inventory of controlled substances when she failed to log into 80 controlled substances into the automated dispensing system on [DATE] which resulted in drug diversion. This failure could result in accurate controlled substance counts and drug diversion.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure in accordance with State and Federal laws, all drugs and biologicals were stored in locked compartments under proper temperature controls and permitted only authorized personnel to have access to the keys for 1 of 10 staff (LVN A) reviewed for medication storage . - LVN A failed to ensure that controlled substances were stored behind a double lock when she left them unattended at the nursing station on [DATE] which resulted in 80 tabs of controlled medication stolen from the facility. This failure could place residents at risk of misappropriation of medications, adverse reactions to medications, overdose and hospitalization.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the daily staffing was posted and readily accessible for review for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for required postings. - The facility failed to update the facility nursing postings on 10/14/25 and 10/21/25. This failure could affect residents, facility visitors, vendors, and emergency personnel by placing them at risk of not having access to information regarding daily nursing staffing in a timely manner. Findings Include: Observations on Tuesday, 10/14/25, at 08:21 AM and 10:14 AM revealed, the facility Direct Care Report posting on the top of the nursing station facing the front door that read Monday [DATE]. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to consult with the resident's physician when there was a significant change in the resident's physical, mental, or psychosocial status (that is, a deterioration in health, mental, or psychosocial status in either life-threatening conditions or clinical complications); for 1 of 4 residents (CR #1) when reviewed for quality of care. 1. The facility failed to notify CR#1's physician at 7 am when he had blurry vision, increased heart rate, shortness of breath, and his O2 levels dropped below baseline. 2. The first attempt at contact was made by text at 8:17 am but the NP did not respond until 9:30 am. CR#1 was transported to the hospital at 10am on 06/02/25, 3 hours after chief complaints of shortness of breath and unsuccessful interventions. An IJ was identified on 06/05/25. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure based on the comprehensive assessment of a resident, that resident received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the resident's choices for 2 of 4 residents (CR #1, CR#2) reviewed for quality of care. 1. The facility failed to notify CR#1's physician at 7 am when he had blurry vision, increased heart rate, shortness of breath, and his O2 levels dropped below baseline. 2. The first attempt at contact was made by text at 8:17 am but the NP did not respond until 9:30 am. CR#1 was transported to the hospital at 10am on 06/02/25, 3 hours after chief complaints of shortness of breath and unsuccessful interventions. 3. The facility failed to notify the Doctor when CR#2 began to have open wounds to her lower legs, identified on 09/24/24. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 40 of 106 residents reviewed for kitchen safety. 1. Dietary staff failed to ensure all perishable items were fresh before serving to residents. 2. During the lunch service on 06/09/25, Resident #1 took a sip of chocolate milk that had an expiration date of 05/19/25. This failure could place residents at risk of contracting a food borne illness.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that the medication error rate was not five percent or greater. The facility had a medication error rate of 6.9 % based on 2 errors out of 29 opportunities, which involved 2 of 8 residents (Resident #15 and Resident #96) reviewed for medication errors in that:. - LVN L failed to administered medication as ordered to Resident #96 by administering Multivitamins w/ Minerals instead of plain Multivitamins as ordered. - LVN M failed to administer medications as ordered to Resident #15 by administering eye drops with Tetrahydrozoline Hydrochloride 0.05% instead of eye drops with Carboxymethylcellulose Sodium as ordered. These failures could place residents receiving medication at risk of inadequate therapeutic outcomes. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all Pre admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) Level I residents with mental illness were provided with a PASRR Level II assessment for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for a mental illness, intellectual disability or developmental disability. (Resident #64) Resident #64 was admitted to the facility with a pre-admission screening reflecting no indicators of a mental illness when the resident had a diagnosis of Bipolar Disorder. This failure could place residents with mental illness, intellectual disability or developmental disability at risk for not receiving needed care and services to meet their needs or decreased quality of life.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 2 residents (Resident #96) reviewed for pressure ulcers received necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing, in that: Resident #96 was observed to not be repositioned off of sacral wound for a span of 4 hours. This failure could place residents at risk for skin breakdown or failure for ulcers to heal.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to use the services of a registered nurse for at least 8 consecutive hours a day 7 days a week from 10/2/2023 to 10/7/2023, 10/9/2023 to 10/13/2023, 10/15/2023 to 10/31/2023 and 11/1/2023 to 11/16/2023. The facility had no DON from 9/29/2023 to 10/10/2023. These failures placed the residents at risk for not having decisions made that would have required an RN to make in the management of the resident's healthcare needs and in managing and monitoring of the direct care staff.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to accurately assess each resident's status for 2 of 4 residents (Resident #52 and Resident #78) reviewed for assessment accuracy in that: - The facility failed to accurately assess and document Resident #78's use of hearing aids. - The facility failed to ensure Resident #52's MDS reflected the correct pain medication regimen. These failures could place residents at risk of not having accurate assessments, which could compromise their plan of care.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan and the residents' choices for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #74) reviewed for quality of care. - The facility failed to properly assess Resident #74 when she returned to the facility with a dressing of approximately 5 X 5 inches located on her right chest under the collarbone from 11/07/23 to 11/14/23. This failure could place residents at risk of late identification of wounds and or worsening of current wounds as well as infection. Findings Included: Record review of Resident #74's Face Sheet dated 11/14/23 revealed, a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included: [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of 1 of 8 residents (Resident#58) and 1 out of 4 Med Carts (400 Hall Nursing Cart) reviewed for pharmaceutical services. - The facility failed to ensure Resident #58's rapid-acting pre-prandial insulin (insulin that should be administered within 5-20 minutes before meals), NovoLog, was administered without regard to the facility scheduled or actual meal times. - The facility failed to ensure the 400 Hall nursing Cart did not contain expired liquid protein supplements. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving the therapeutic benefit of medications, adverse reactions to medications and hospitalization. Findings Include: [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, comfortable, and homelike environment for 1 of 8 Residents (Resident #78) reviewed for a safe, clean and homelike environment. - The facility failed to ensure Resident #38 had clean and unsoiled linens on his bed. This could place the residents at risk of decreased quality of like due to the lack of a well-kept environment.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to conduct a comprehensive assessment of a resident within 14 calendar days after admission for 1 of 21 residents (Resident #207) reviewed for comprehensive assessments, in that: - Resident #207 had no admission comprehensive assessment completed within 14 calendar days of admission. This failure may place residents at risk of not having all medical needs assessed and met.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with resident rights, that include measurable objectives and timeframes to meet resident's medical, nursing and mental and psychosocial needs which were identified in the comprehensive assessment for 1 of 5 residents(Resident #78) reviewed for care plans. -The facility failed complete a comprehensive care plan that addressed Resident #78's use of hearing aids. This failure could place residents at risk of not having their needs met, decreased quality of life or injury.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure irregularities noted by the pharmacist were acted upon for 1 (Resident #26) of 5 residents reviewed for pharmacy review. The facility failed to ensure: - The pharmacist's Director of Nursing Report dated October 13,2023 reflected order for Aspirin capsule 81mg daily be updated for Resident #26. - The pharmacist's Director of Nursing Report dated October 13, 2023, recommended changing Lipitor from morning to bedtime for Resident #26. These failures could place residents at risk for having a change in condition and not having the desired therapeutic effect.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility were labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles, for 1 out of 4 medication carts ( 300 Hall Medication Aide Cart ) reviewed for medication storage. - The facility failed to ensure the 300 Hall Medication Aide Cart did not contain inappropriately labeled and in use protein supplements. These failures could place residents at risk of not receiving the therapeutic benefit of medications or adverse reactions to medications. Findings Included: In an observation and interview on 11/15/23 at 12:15 PM, inventory of the medication 300 Hall Medication Aide Cart with MA B revealed: - one open and in use bottle of Active Liquid Protein with no open date and manufacturers instructions to discard 3 months after opening. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain medical records on each resident that were complete and accurately documented, in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices, for 2 of 8 residents (CR #1 and CR #2) whose records were reviewed for accuracy and completeness. - The facility failed to maintain complete and accessible records of medication administration times for CR #1 and CR #2. These failures could place residents at risk of having incomplete or inaccurate records.
5 fire safety citations on file: 1 on March 26, 2026, 3 on December 12, 2024, 1 on November 16, 2023.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| June 9, 2025 | Fine | $14,069 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Texas | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.20 | 3.39 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.20 | 0.43 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 2.92 | 2.98 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 1.95 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.05 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 47.3% | 55.3% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 50.0% | 54.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.99 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.31 on weekdays and 2.92 on weekends, 12% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.01 in April to June 2025 to 3.20 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.20 | 0.20 | 3.31 | 2.92 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 110 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 2.77 | 0.19 | 2.86 | 2.53 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 118 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 2.98 | 0.28 | 3.11 | 2.64 | 0.0% | 2 of 92 | 113 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.01 | 0.25 | 3.15 | 2.68 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 108 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Texas, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.33 | 0.40 | 3.50 | 2.93 | 2.2% | 0.7% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Texas, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.03 | $16.97 to $20.71 | 88,680 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $29.92 | $27.46 to $32.89 | 57,560 |
| Registered nurses | $46.14 | $38.06 to $50.53 | 271,380 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Texas | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 6.4 | 15.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.6 | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.8 | 3.3 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.7 | 14.0 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 6.8 | 3.8 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 6.0 | 9.6 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 30.6 | 25.7 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 14.9 | 12.3 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.2 | 2.2 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.2 | 2.1 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Park Manor of Tomball's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (42.9% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
42.9% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Texas: 116 better, 50 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 81 eligible stays.
11.2% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Texas: 0 better, 9 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 108 eligible stays.
6.2% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Texas: 4 better, 11 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 38 eligible stays.
67.4% this home
Median of homes: Texas57.3% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 46 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Texas0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 77 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Texas1.3% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 77 residents counted.
95.5% this home
Median of homes: Texas98.5% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 44 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: WINNIE-STOWELL HOSPITAL DISTRICT. CMS links this home to Hmg Healthcare, a group of 31 nursing homes averaging 3.2 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cibc Bank USA | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 04/01/2018 | |
| Forvis Mazars LLP | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 04/01/2018 | |
| Zions Bancorporation | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 04/01/2018 | |
| Winnie-Stowell Hospital District | Direct ownership interest | Organization | 04/01/2018 | |
| Stramecki, Anthony | Corporate director | Individual | 11/01/2016 | |
| Murrell, Edward | Corporate officer | Individual | 11/01/2012 | |
| Rollo, Jeffery | Corporate officer | Individual | 11/01/2012 | |
| Balsamo, Krystal | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 09/29/2021 | |
| Boamah, Bernadette | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 08/20/2001 | |
| Culp, Roland | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 02/01/2012 | |
| Daspit, Laurence | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 02/01/2012 | |
| Dohn, William | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 03/27/2019 | |
| Guggenheim, Jessica | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 08/30/2022 | |
| Murrell, Edward | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 04/01/2018 | |
| Pico, Ana | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 02/01/2012 | |
| Prince, Derek | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 02/01/2012 | |
| Quinn, Peter | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 10/19/2011 | |
| Reinarz, Christian | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 05/13/2024 | |
| Rollo, Jeffery | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 04/01/2018 | |
| Stramecki, Anthony | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 04/01/2018 | |
| Vratis, Kacey | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 04/01/2018 | |
| Way, George | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 04/01/2018 | |
| Healthmark Group Ltd | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 09/11/2025 | |
| Hm Group LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 09/11/2025 | |
| Hmg Healthcare LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 09/11/2025 | |
| Hmg Park Manor of Tomball, L.L.C. | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 09/11/2025 | |
| Balsamo, Krystal | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 09/29/2021 | |
| Boamah, Bernadette | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 08/20/2001 | |
| Culp, Roland | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 02/01/2012 | |
| Daspit, Laurence | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 02/01/2012 | |
| Dohn, William | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 03/27/2019 | |
| Guggenheim, Jessica | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 08/30/2022 | |
| Pico, Ana | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 02/01/2012 | |
| Prince, Derek | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 02/01/2012 | |
| Quinn, Peter | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 10/19/2011 | |
| Reinarz, Christian | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 05/13/2024 | |
| Stanbridge, Norma | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 09/29/2014 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Texas. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.