Home / Pennsylvania / Hazleton
Pavilion at St. Luke Village, the
1000 Stacie Drive, Hazleton, PA 18201 · Luzerne County · (570) 453-5100
120 certified beds, about 105 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 1969
Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
3 of 5
Health inspections
3 of 5
Staffing
3 of 5
Quality measures
4 of 5
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 395265 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on July 17, 2026, inspectors cited 4 health deficiencies (the Pennsylvania average is 10, the national average 9.2).
Of 33 health citations since September 2023, 2 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.
CMS lists 3 fines totaling $90,662 in the last three years; the largest was $55,419, and the latest is dated March 26, 2025.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.44 hours per resident per day, against 3.89 across Pennsylvania and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.56 of those hours.
47.1% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Pennsylvania average 44.5%).
CMS links it to Avardis Health, an affiliated group of 38 nursing homes.
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
109/23
204/24
207/24
310/24
711/24
203/25
809/25
807/26
Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 33 health citations on file.
Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
2G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
15D
13E
3F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
0C
July 17, 2026Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 8 citations
- G Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, a review of facility policies, clinical records, facility-provided investigative documentation, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and implement effective, individualized interventions to prevent repeated falls for one of 23 residents reviewed (Resident 104) resulting in actual harm including a subdural hematoma and sacral fracture, requiring hospitalization.
- F Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to maintain sanitary food storage and food service practices to prevent contamination and microbial growth (the growth of bacteria, mold, or other microorganisms that can make food unsafe) in the dietary department and failed to ensure that personal resident refrigerators were monitored and maintained at safe storage temperatures to reduce the risk of foodborne illness for two residents of five residents observed on the second-floor nursing unit (Residents 8 and 28).
- F Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
Inspectors wroteBased on pest control record review, observations, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement and maintain an effective pest management program to prevent and control pest activity in the dietary department.
- E Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, a review of clinical records, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to provide care in a manner that promotes and enhances each resident's dignity and quality of life by failing to respond in a timely manner to residents' requests for assistance and providing care in a language that is understood by the resident for 6 out of 23 residents reviewed (Residents 10, 58, 69, 6, 71, and 1) and including experiences reported by 7 out of 9 residents during a resident group interview (Residents 10, 27, 28, 31, 36, 53, 59, 1, and 92).
- E Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on a review of facility policy, Resident Council meeting minutes, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to put forth sufficient efforts to promptly resolve continued resident complaints and grievances expressed during resident group meetings, including those voiced by seven of nine residents attending a resident group meeting (Residents 10, 27, 28, 31, 36, 53, 59, 1, and 92).
- E Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
Inspectors wroteBased on a review of clinical records and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to transcribe and implement physician orders for eye care hygiene to reduce the risk of infection for one of 23 residents reviewed (Resident 71).
- D Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, review of clinical records and facility documents, review of select facility policy, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to provide food and beverages consistent with residents' assessed and documented food preferences and intolerances for two residents of 23 residents reviewed (Residents 69 and 58).
- D Have policies on smoking.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, staff and resident interviews, and select policy review, it was determined the facility failed to assure that smoking paraphernalia was properly secured for one smoking resident to assure the use of these materials were utilized in a safe manner for one resident who smoked (Resident 28).
September 12, 2025Standard inspection · 8 citations
- E Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
Inspectors wroteBased on a review of clinical records, resident council meeting minutes, and resident, resident representative, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to provide care in a manner that promotes each resident's quality of life by failing to respond timely to residents' requests for assistance, including experiences reported by two residents out of the 22 residents sampled (Residents 5 and 17) and experiences reported by seven out of the 11 residents during a resident group interview (Residents 26, 30, 34, 37, 49, 50, and 69).
- E Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on a review of facility policy, the minutes from facility Resident Council meetings, and grievances filed with the facility, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to put forth sufficient efforts to resolve continued resident complaints and grievances expressed during Resident Council meetings, including those voiced by seven of 11 residents attending a resident group meeting (Residents 26, 30, 34, 37, 49, 50, and 69), and failed to keep the residents apprised of the status of the facility's decisions and efforts toward grievance resolution.
- E Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
Inspectors wroteBased on a review of clinical records and the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set Assessments (MDS) accurately reflected the status of three residents out of 22 sampled (Residents 1, 4, and 96).
- E Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
Inspectors wroteBased on a review of clinical records, select facility policy, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide nursing services consistent with professional standards of practice by failing to thoroughly assess, obtain physician orders, and develop and implement a person-centered comprehensive care plan in accordance with standards of practice, for one resident out of 22 sampled (Resident 8) and failed to provide person-centered care to meet the clinical needs by failing to monitor intravenous therapy (a way of giving medication or fluids through a needle or tube inserted into a vein) in accordance with professional standards of practice for one of 22 residents sampled (Resident 1).
- E Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on a review of clinical records and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain accurate and complete clinical records for one of 22 sampled residents (Resident 5).
- D Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, review of select facility policy, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure that a resident's comprehensive care plan was reviewed and revised as needed to accurately reflect the current needs and services required by one of 22 residents sampled (Resident 96).
- D Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, clinical record review, select policy review, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to provide care and services designed to prevent potential complications associated with enteral tube feedings for one resident receiving enteral nutrition out of 22 residents sampled (Resident 8).
- D Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
Inspectors wroteBased on a review of clinical records, select facility policy, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to develop and implement an individualized person-centered plan to render trauma-informed care to a resident with a diagnosis of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder for one out of 22 residents reviewed (Resident 98).
March 26, 2025Complaint inspection · 2 citations
- G Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
Inspectors wroteBased on a comprehensive review of clinical records, facility policies, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement care and services consistent with professional standards of practice to prevent the development of a pressure ulcer for one of 14 sampled residents (Resident CR 1), resulting in actual harm.
- D Have a Compliance and Ethics Program.
Inspectors wroteBased on policy review, review of facility documentation, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to effectively implement and enforce its compliance and ethics program in a manner that uses internal controls to more effectively monitor adherence to applicable statutes, regulations, and program requirements, in order to prevent and detect criminal, civil, and administrative violations under the Act, and promote quality of care for two employees identified (Employee 1 and Employee 2) out of two employees employed by the activity department and business office.
November 21, 2024Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 7 citations
- F Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, review of the facility's infection control tracking logs and infection control and prevention policy and staff interviews it was determined the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive infection control program to prevent the spread of infectious diseases including scabies for two of 21 residents reviewed (Resident 7 and Resident 54) and failed to maintain an environment conducive to infection prevention.
- E Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
Inspectors wroteBased on a review of clinical records, resident council meeting minutes, grievances filed with the facility, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to provide care in a manner that promotes each resident's quality of life by failing to respond timely to residents' requests for assistance, including experiences reported by two residents out of 21 sampled (Residents 25 and 74) and experiences reported by five out of the nine residents during a resident group interview (Residents 24, 28, 31, 55, and 57).
- E Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
Inspectors wroteBased on a review of clinical records and select facility investigative reports, observation and resident and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to consistently provide care and services to prevent the development of a pressure sore for two residents out of 21 sampled (Residents 19 and 26).
- E Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
Inspectors wroteBased on a review of clinical records, select facility policy, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents receive appropriate services and assistance to maintain or improve mobility with the maximum practicable independence for one out of 21 residents sampled (Resident 74).
- D Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
Inspectors wroteBased on a review of clinical records, select facility policies, and staff interviews it was determined the facility failed to assess and implement individualized measures to meet the toileting needs of one resident out of 21 sampled residents. (Residents 26).
- D Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
Inspectors wroteBased on a review of clinical records, select facility policy, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services in acquiring medication to meet the needs of one resident out of 21 sampled (Resident 9).
- D Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure the presence of physician documentation of the clinical rationale for the continued administration of an antipsychotic medication for one resident out of five sampled residents for unnecessary medication use. (Resident 96).
October 16, 2024Complaint inspection · 3 citations
- D Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and resident and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to provide services to maintain a clean and homelike environment for one of nine residents sampled (Resident 76).
- D Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review and resident interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide nursing services consistent with professional standards of practice by failing to ensure physician ordered medication, an antibiotic, was timely obtained and administered to treat cellulitis for one resident (Resident 75).
- D Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
Inspectors wroteBased on a review of clinical records, select facility policies, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the resident's drug regimen was free of unnecessary antibiotic drugs for one out of nine residents sampled (Resident 76).
July 19, 2024Complaint inspection · 2 citations
- E Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, a review of clinical records, a review of nurse staffing, and grievances filed with the facility, and interviews with staff and residents, it was determined that the facility failed to provide sufficient nursing staff to provide timely and quality care to each resident including eight residents out of 24 sampled (Residents 19, 20, 21, 48, 151, 38, 30 and 85), including concerns expressed in grievances filed with the facility (Resident 85).
- D Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of clinical records and select facility policy, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to thoroughly assess and evaluate bowel and bladder function, to identify factors for decline, and implement individualized interventions, including timely toileting assistance, to improve bladder and bowel function to the extent possible for one out of 24 sampled residents (Residents 38).
April 9, 2024Complaint inspection · 2 citations
- E Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, review of select facility policy and clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement a system to assure timely disposition of resident medications (the process of returning and/or destroying unused medications) to prevent loss and potential drug diversion.
- D Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the consistent implementation of infection control procedures designed to prevent the spread of infection in one out of two medication rooms (3 rd floor medication room).
September 7, 2023Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- D Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to accommodate one resident's needs for assistive positioning devices during wheelchair transport of one of three resident reviewed (Resident 74).
Fines and payment denials
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| March 26, 2025 | Fine | $25,184 |
| July 19, 2024 | Fine | $55,419 |
| October 27, 2023 | Fine | $10,059 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Pennsylvania | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.44 | 3.89 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.56 | 0.79 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.00 | 3.53 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 1.99 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.89 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 47.1% | 44.5% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 10.0% | 39.9% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.61 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.62 on weekdays and 3.00 on weekends, 17% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.37 in April to June 2025 to 3.44 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.44 | 0.56 | 3.62 | 3.00 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 105 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.29 | 0.56 | 3.40 | 3.02 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 106 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.50 | 0.58 | 3.61 | 3.20 | 2.9% | 0 of 92 | 100 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.37 | 0.57 | 3.55 | 2.94 | 4.0% | 0 of 91 | 103 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Pennsylvania, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.69 | 0.65 | 3.82 | 3.34 | 11.3% | 0.1% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
Staff pay at this home
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.
Official wage estimates for Pennsylvania
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pennsylvania, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $21.44 | $18.88 to $22.52 | 67,740 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $30.74 | $29.02 to $35.01 | 38,260 |
| Registered nurses | $46.36 | $38.75 to $50.35 | 146,520 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Pennsylvania | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 14.1 | 16.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.8 | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.8 | 3.1 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 13.5 | 17.0 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.4 | 4.8 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 14.2 | 17.7 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 17.3 | 22.5 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 6.4 | 9.5 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.6 | 1.6 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.1 | 1.2 | 1.8 |
Owners and operators
Legal business name: 1000 STACIE DRIVE OPCO LLC. CMS links this home to Avardis Health, a group of 38 nursing homes averaging 2 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grove of Hazel Parentco LLC | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 05/01/2025 |
| Citeanthra Holdco LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 05/01/2025 | |
| Paop Holdco LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 05/01/2025 | |
| Hazleton Re Owner, LLC | 5% or greater security interest | Organization | 05/01/2025 | |
| Hoback, Tiffany | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 05/01/2025 | |
| Morgan, Daniel | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 05/01/2025 | |
| SNF Mgr LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 05/01/2025 | |
| Corcoran, Mary | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 05/01/2025 | |
| Hoback, Tiffany | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 05/01/2025 | |
| Jones, Tequilla | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 05/01/2025 | |
| Lobitz, Mark | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 05/01/2025 | |
| Martuscelli, Cassandra | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 05/01/2025 | |
| Morgan, Daniel | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 05/01/2025 | |
| Hazleton Re Owner, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 05/01/2025 | |
| SNF Mgr LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 04/09/2025 | |
| Corcoran, Mary | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 05/01/2025 | |
| Hoback, Tiffany | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 05/01/2025 | |
| Jones, Tequilla | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 05/01/2025 | |
| Lobitz, Mark | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 05/01/2025 | |
| Martuscelli, Cassandra | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 05/01/2025 | |
| Morgan, Daniel | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 05/01/2025 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 11 problems in this area, most recently on July 17, 2026: "Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents."
- How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 7 problems in this area, most recently on July 17, 2026: "Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights."
- How are medications reviewed, and how often are antipsychotic or sedating drugs used?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on November 21, 2024: "Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist."
- When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on September 12, 2025: "Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment."
- Who is on the floor on Saturday and Sunday, and how many residents does each aide care for?Weekend nurse staffing here was 3.00 hours per resident per day, below the Pennsylvania average of 3.53.
Other nursing homes nearby
- Manor at St. Luke Village,the Hazleton, 0.2 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 33 citations
- Mountain City Nursing & Rehabilitation Center Hazleton, 1.8 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 53 citations
- Forest Hills Rehabilitation & Healthcare Center Weatherly, 7.1 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 34 citations
- Kadima Rehabilitation & Nursing at Luzerne Drums, 7.3 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 57 citations
- Greenwood Center for Nursing and Rehab Tamaqua, 8.4 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 48 citations
- St. Luke's Rehabilitation and Nursing Center Coaldale, 8.7 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 10 citations
- Mahoning Operating LLC Lehighton, 12.6 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 21 citations
- Mountain Top Rehabilitation & Healthcare Center Mountain Top, 14.6 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 29 citations
Pennsylvania contacts for a concern about a nursing home
These are the official offices in Pennsylvania. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.
- Inspections and complaints: Pennsylvania Department of Health, Division of Nursing Care Facilities, the state agency that inspects nursing homes for CMS and takes complaints about care.
- Resident advocate: Pennsylvania Long-Term Care Ombudsman Program, Department of Aging, 717-783-8975. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
- State inspection reports: Pennsylvania Department of Health Nursing Care Facility Locator, where Pennsylvania publishes its own records on licensed homes.
Common questions
- What is Pavilion at St. Luke Village, the's Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates Pavilion at St. Luke Village, the 3 out of 5 stars overall, with 3 for health inspections, 3 for staffing and 4 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did Pavilion at St. Luke Village, the get at its last inspection?
- 4 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on July 17, 2026. The Pennsylvania average is 10.
- Has Pavilion at St. Luke Village, the been fined?
- Yes. CMS lists 3 fines totaling $90,662 in the last three years.
- Does Pavilion at St. Luke Village, the accept Medicaid?
- It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
- Who owns Pavilion at St. Luke Village, the?
- CMS lists 21 owners and managers, and links the home to Avardis Health. Legal business name: 1000 STACIE DRIVE OPCO LLC.
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.