2401 Laconia Avenue, Bronx, NY 10469 · Bronx County · (718) 798-8600
200 certified beds, about 189 residents a day · For profit - Partnership · Medicare and Medicaid since 1976
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 335486 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on August 26, 2025, inspectors cited 5 health deficiencies (the New York average is 8.1, the national average 9.2).
None of its 24 health citations since April 2021 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 2.60 hours per resident per day, against 3.63 across New York and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.33 of those hours.
32.8% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (New York average 40.3%).
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 24 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review conducted during an Abbreviated Survey (2741076), the facility failed to ensure that an alleged violation involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, was reported immediately but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury, to the administrator of the facility and to other officials (including to the State Survey Agency and adult protective services where state law provides for jurisdiction in long-term care facilities) in accordance with State law through established procedures. This was evident for one (1) of six (6) residents (Resident #1) sampled for abuse. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, and interviews conducted during the abbreviated survey (#2622204), the facility did not ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, including injuries of unknown source were reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation was made, if the events that caused the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury, or no later than 24 hours if the events that cause the allegation do not involve abuse and do not result in serious bodily injury, to the New York State Department of Health. This was evident for one (1) of one (1) (Resident #1) sampled. Specifically, Resident #1 had an unwitnessed incident on 09/06/2025 when they were observed on the floor and noted with swelling to the forehead, left peri-orbital (area around the eye) swelling and an abrasion on the nose. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and staff interviews conducted during the Recertification survey, the facility did not ensure that each resident was treated with respect, dignity and care in a manner that promotes maintenance or enhancement of their quality of life and recognizes each resident's individuality. This was observed on five (5) out of five (5) units observed during the kitchen and Dining Observation Task. Specifically, the residents' meals were served on disposable dishware with plastic cutlery.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews, observations and record reviews conducted during a recertification survey, the facility did not ensure that a comprehensive care plan was developed within 7 days after completion of the comprehensive assessment. This was evident for one (Resident #192) of five residents sampled for Unnecessary Medications. Specifically, Resident #192 was taking medication for Gastrointestinal issues and there was no care plan in place.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview conducted during the Recertification survey, the facility did not ensure that the resident's comprehensive care plan was reviewed and revised by the interdisciplinary team after each assessment, including both the episodic, comprehensive, and quarterly review assessments. This was evident for one resident (Resident #8) reviewed for Hospice and one resident (Resident #192) reviewed for Unnecessary Medications out of an investigative sample of 38 residents. Specifically, 1). The care plan related to Hospice for Resident #8 was last reviewed on 04/09/2025, and 2). Resident #192's care plan related to Cognitive loss was last reviewed on 01/03/2025, the care plan related to Social Isolation was last reviewed on 10/22/2024, and the care plan related to psychosocial well-being was last reviewed on 07/22/2024.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during the Recertification survey, the facility did not ensure that medical records were maintained in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices and that they were complete and accurately documented for each resident. This was evident for one (Resident #57) of five residents reviewed for Unnecessary Medication and one (Resident #174) of five residents reviewed for Pressure Ulcer/Injury) out of 85 total sampled residents. Specifically, 1). A care plan for schizophrenia was documented for Resident #57 who does not have a schizophrenia diagnosis, and 2). The Treatment Administration Records for Resident #174 documented nursing staff performed wound care when Resident #174 refused to allow the facility staff to perform the treatments.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during the Recertification Survey from 08/19/2025 to 08/26/2025, the facility did not ensure that residents' right to a clean, comfortable, and homelike environment was maintained. This was evident on 3 units (Unit1, Unit 2, and Unit 4) out of 5 units observed during the Environmental Task. Specifically, 1). On Unit 1 doors to the foyer and utility room were observed with multiple large areas of chipped and scrapped paint. The wall of the pull station was observed with dried uneven plaster, and the first-floor conference room windowsills were observed with peeling tape and 1 ripped window shade. 2) On Unit 2, multiple resident rooms were observed with broken and or missing slats from vertical blinds. The ceiling in room [ROOM NUMBER] was observed brown stained with peeling paint and a cracked window. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during an Abbreviated Survey (NY00344413 and NY00376155), the facility failed to report the results of all investigations to the administrator or his or her designated representative and to other officials in accordance with State law, including to the State Survey Agency, within 5 working days of the incident, and if the alleged violation is verified appropriate corrective action must be taken. This was evident in two (2) out of seven (7) residents (Resident #3 and #5) sampled. Specifically, on 05/30/2025 at 9:30 AM, Resident #3 was escorted by Certified Nursing Assistant #6 for clinic appointment and Resident #3 had an accident by sliding off from wheelchair in the vehicle. Certified Nursing Assistant #6 did not report the incident to anyone at the facility. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review conducted during the recertification survey from 6/13/23 to 6/21/23, the facility did not ensure residents received notices orally and in writing with the list of names and addresses of the State regulatory agencies, resident advocacy groups, and Ombudsman information. This was evident for 6 (Resident #s 133, 113, 64, 30, 96, 109) of 8 residents in attendance at Residnt Council out of 30 total sampled residents. Specifically, Resident #s 133, 113, 64, 30, 96, and 109 stated they were not aware of their rights and were not provided with contact information for State agencies and advocates.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, and record review conducted during the recertification survey from 6/13/23 through 6/21/23, the facility did not ensure that food was prepared, distributed, and served in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This was evident during the Kitchen facility task. Specifically, 2 cold sandwiches were not held at a safe temperature of 41 F or below.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review conducted during the recertification survey, the facility did not ensure a resident received notice of their rights and services upon admission. This was evident for 1 of 30 total sampled residents. Specifically, Resident #64 was not provided with an admission Agreement explaining their rights and services upon admission to the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, and record review conducted the recertification survey from 6/13/23 to 6/21/23, the facility did not ensure incorporate the recommendations from the Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review) PASARR level II determination into the resident's assessment, care planning, and transitions of care. This was evident for 1 (Resident #123) of 30 total sampled residents. Specifically, The facility did not obtain a neurology consult for Resident #123 after the resident was admitted with a PASARR level II recommendation for a neurology consult.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, and record review conducted during the recertification survey from 6/13/23 to 6/21/23 the facility did not ensure a Comprehensive Care Plan (CCP) was developed and implemented to address resident needs. This was evident for 1 (Resident #149) of 30 total sampled residents. Specifically, a CCP related to oxygen use was not developed and implemented for Resident #149.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, and record review conducted during the recertification survey from 6/13/23 through 6/21/23, the facility did not ensure the comprehensive care plans (CCP) were reviewed and revised after each assessment. This was evident for 2 of 2 residents (#101 and #21) reviewed for Nutrition out of 30 total sampled residents. Specifically, 1) the CCP related to oral care/dental and cancer for Resident #101 were not reviewed upon significant change assessment, and 2) the CCP related to diabetes mellitus (DM) was not reviewed or reviewed or revised upon change in the resident's medication regime.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review conducted during the recertification survey from 6/13/23 to 6/21/23, the facility did not ensure a resident received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice. This was evident for 1 (Resident #123) of 30 total sampled residents. Specifically, Resident #123 was delayed in receiving an appointment to be seen by the neurologist.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, and record review conducted during the recertification survey from 6/13/23 to 6/21/23 the facility did not ensure a resident was provided with respiratory care in accordance with professional standards of practice. This was evident for 1 (Resident #149) of 30 total sampled residents. Specifically, Resident #149 was ordered to receive oxygen via nasal canula and was observed with a oxygen face mask and received no oxygen saturation monitored.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review conducted during the Recertification survey conducted 4/5/21 to 4/13/21, the facility did not ensure that a qualified dietician was employed either full time, part time, or on a consultant basis. Specifically, the facility did not have the services of a Registered Dietician (RD) from April 2020 to March 2021. The finding is: During the tour of the Kitchen on 4/13/21 at 11:30 AM, the facility provided a resume which documented that the dietician had a Bachelor of Arts in Home Economics and had completed Master Program and courses in clinical nutrition. Administrator stated that the facility did not have any additional documentation regarding the dietician being certified or registered. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview during the recertification survey, the facility did not ensure that the comprehensive care plans were reviewed and/or revised after each assessment and as needed. Specifically, the care plan was not reviewed and/or revised (1) after a resident on isolation for an infection kept leaving the room, (2) after a resident had multiple falls, and (3) after quarterly and annual assessment. This was evident for 3 out of 31 sampled residents. (Resident #s 126, 137, and 46).
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, during a Recertification survey, the facility did not ensure that pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) were provided to meet the needs of each resident. Specifically (1). Systems in place did not prevent diversion of controlled medications on 2 resident units, (2). Systems in place did not prevent diversion of controlled medications from the nursing office and (3). Medications were not removed timely from the narcotic cabinet on resident units resulting in diversion of narcotics. This was evident on Unit 5, Unit 2, and the Nursing Office.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview during the recertification and abbreviated survey (#NY00253374), the facility did not ensure that the resident's representative has the right to exercise the resident's rights to the extent those rights are delegated to the representative of the resident. Specifically, the facilty presented the spouse of Resident#44 with change of Health Insurance forms to sign, however the spouse was not the resident's representative to excercise those rights. The resident had two chidren designated as Health Care Proxies and one child was also designated as the resident's Power of Attorney. Neither were presented with information regarding change of Health Insurance. The change in health coverage was executed without their permission. This was evident for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for Notification of Changes out of a sample of reviewed for Resident rights. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and staff interview conducted during the recertification survey, the facility did not ensure that each resident maintained acceptable parameters of nutritional status such as usual body weight range and electrolyte balance. Specifically, a resident with significant weight loss and decreased meal intake was not reassessed timely to determine whether changes to the nutritional plan of care were warranted. This was evident for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for nutrition hydration (Resident #21). The finding is: Resident #21 was a resident admitted to the facility with diagnoses which include: Dysphagia, Unstable Angina, and Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus. The Minimum Data Set 3.0 (MDS) assessment dated 01/21 2021 documented the resident had intact cognition. The resident required the extensive assist of one person for Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and staff interview during the recertification survey and abbreviated survey (# NY00267480), the facility did not ensure that the residents' attending physicians reviewed the total program of care at each visit. Specifically, the physician increased psychotropic medications twice within four months to treat a resident with Dementia and dementia-related behaviors. This was evident for 1 of 31 residents reviewed in the investigation sample (Resident #74). The finding is: The facility Policy and Procedure titled Psychotropic Drugs dated 11/2018 documents and quotes the F758 of the State Operation Manual (SOM), Appendix PP (Rev. 11-22-17), that residents who use psychotropic drugs receive gradual dose reductions, and behavioral interventions, unless clinically contraindicated, in an effort to discontinue these drugs. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record reviews, and staff interviews conducted during an Abbreviated (NY00267480) and Recertification Survey, the facility did not ensure a resident was free from unnecessary medications. Specifically, a resident with a diagnosis of Dementia was given increased dosages of psychotropic medications to treat the dementia-related behavior of screaming. This was evident for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for Unnecessary Medications (Resident #74). The Finding is: The facility Policy and Procedure titled Psychotropic Drugs dated 11/2018 documents and quotes the F758 of the State Operation Manual (SOM), Appendix PP (Rev. 11-22-17), that residents who use psychotropic drugs receive gradual dose reductions, and behavioral interventions, unless clinically contraindicated, in an effort to discontinue these drugs. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and staff interview the facility did not ensure that drugs and biologicals used in the facility were stored and labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles, and include the appropriate accessory and cautionary instructions, and the expiration date when applicable. Specifically, open insulin was not labeled with an expiration date or discarded after expiration. This was evident for 1 of 4 units observed for Medication Storage (Unit 2). The finding is: The Medication Storage Policy of the facility revised on 06/2019 states : Pelham Parkway Nursing Care shall store all drugs and biologicals in a safe, secure and orderly manner. [...]
11 fire safety citations on file: 2 on August 26, 2025, 5 on June 21, 2023, 4 on April 13, 2021.
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | New York | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 2.60 | 3.63 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.33 | 0.71 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 2.46 | 3.18 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 1.75 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.52 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 32.8% | 40.3% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 39.1% | 39.8% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.57 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 2.66 on weekdays and 2.46 on weekends, 8% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 10.7% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 2.59 in April to June 2025 to 2.60 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 2.60 | 0.33 | 2.66 | 2.46 | 10.7% | 0 of 90 | 189 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 2.59 | 0.33 | 2.66 | 2.41 | 12.9% | 0 of 92 | 191 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 2.60 | 0.31 | 2.66 | 2.44 | 14.0% | 0 of 92 | 187 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 2.59 | 0.30 | 2.64 | 2.45 | 15.9% | 0 of 91 | 189 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| New York, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.55 | 0.68 | 3.72 | 3.13 | 9.8% | 0.1% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| New York, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $23.36 | $21.04 to $24.99 | 87,990 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $32.30 | $29.52 to $37.00 | 39,400 |
| Registered nurses | $52.62 | $45.60 to $62.34 | 205,810 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | New York | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 9.9 | 14.1 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.3 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.9 | 3.1 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.1 | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 6.5 | 12.5 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.7 | 6.5 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 15.4 | 13.7 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 8.7 | 20.6 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 0.0 | 9.6 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.3 | 1.7 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 0.6 | 1.4 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Pelham Parkway Nursing Care and Rehabilitation Fac's Medicare short-stay residents. How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
US median of homes 51.5% · New York: 101 better, 157 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 9 eligible stays.
12.4% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · New York: 12 better, 5 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 34 eligible stays.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
US median of homes 7.1% · New York: 7 better, 21 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 24 eligible stays.
24.1% this home
Median of homes: New York60.6% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 29 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: New York0.6% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 33 residents counted.
3.5% this home
Median of homes: New York2.0% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 33 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: New York98.5% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 3 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: PELHAM PARKWAY NURSING CARE & REHABILITATION FACILITY, LLC.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Weingarten, Otto | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 95% | 05/17/1999 |
| Cuccinello, Laura | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 08/01/2008 | |
| Stern, Helene | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 01/01/1999 | |
| Weingarten, Otto | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 04/03/2014 | |
| Weingarten, Rosemarie | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 09/26/1979 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
Licensed assisted living homes in the same town or within 5 miles, each with its New York inspection record.
These are the official offices in New York. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.