104 Rex Kerwin Court, Pflugerville, TX 78660 · Travis County · (512) 251-3915
120 certified beds, about 107 residents a day · Government - Hospital district · Medicare and Medicaid since 2010
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 676245 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on May 28, 2026, inspectors cited 1 health deficiency (the Texas average is 9.4, the national average 9.2).
None of its 28 health citations since February 2024 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 2.89 hours per resident per day, against 3.39 across Texas and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.34 of those hours.
31.3% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Texas average 55.3%).
CMS links it to Wellsential Health, an affiliated group of 67 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 28 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure each resident had the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation for one of 12 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for abuse and neglect. 1. The facility failed to prevent CMA A from mistreating Resident #1. CMA A threw a blanket on Resident #1's head and left the room without removing it from Resident #1's face who struggled to remove it herself. 2. The facility failed to ensure CMA A did not forcefully move Resident #1's jaw to administer medications while Resident #1 was not fully awake. These failures could place residents at risk for staff mistreatment.
Inspectors wroteBased on, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services, including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals, to meet the needs of each resident for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility failed to ensure CMA A and CMA H accurately documented Resident #1's medications on 06/19/2026, 06/20/2026 and 06/21/2026. This failure could place residents at risk of medication error or not receiving the intended therapeutic benefit of their medication and delayed healing.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to make sure that drugs are stored in locked compartments and only authorized persons have access for 1 of 8 medication carts reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility failed to ensure one nursing medication cart was locked. This failure could place residents at risk of having unauthorized access to medications, decreased effectiveness of medication, or missing medications.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive care plan was developed within 7 days after completion of the comprehensive assessment and reviewed and revised by the interdisciplinary team after each assessment, including both the comprehensive and quarterly review assessments for 67 of 105 (1, 2, 3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25, 26,27,28,29,30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39,40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67 ) residents reviewed for IDT meetings/ care plans in that:The facility failed to complete a quarterly assessment for Residents 1, 2, 3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25, 26,27,28,29,30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39,40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect are reported immediately, but not later than 24 hours if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse and do not result in serious bodily injury for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for abuse and neglect, in that: The facility failed to ensure that the DON reported allegations of abuse immediately, but no later than 2 hours to the ADM when Resident #1 reported she gave me a bruise to the DON on 06/12/2025. This failure could result in continued abuse or neglect of residents, injury, and/or psychosocial harm.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were given the appropriate services to maintain activities of daily living (ADLs) for three of seven residents (Resident #67, Resident #18, and Resident #2) reviewed for ADL abilities. Resident #67 had dirty, jagged fingernails and flaky, dry skin on legs. Resident #18 had long, jagged fingernails. Resident #2 had long, jagged fingernails, chipped nail polish and unbrushed teeth. This deficient practice could place residents who required assistance at risk of or not receiving care and services to meet their needs and avoid ADL decline.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for one of one kitchen reviewed for kitchen sanitation. 1. The facility failed to ensure Dietary [NAME] C, Dietary [NAME] D and Dietary Aide E used proper hand hygiene during food preparation. 2. The facility failed to ensure Dietary Aide E wear a hair net and Dietary Aide F wear a beard guard when standing over the oven and the food prep table. These failures could place residents who ate food from the kitchen at risk for foodborne illness.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to dispose of garbage and refuse properly for one of one kitchen 1. The facility failed to keep overflowing garbage away from an area where food was being prepared for resident meals. 2. The facility failed to keep garbage away from an area where clean cook ware was stored. These failures could place residents at risk for exposure of germs and diseases carried by vermin and rodents. Findings Included: Observation on 04/01/2025 at 2:30 PM revealed there was a garbage barrel with the lid off on half of the barrel. There was overflowing garbage with cans and boxes with food residue inside and outside of the cans, containers and, boxes located in the garbage barrel. The garbage barrel was located approximately three feet from the stove-oven, and less than two feet away from clean pans in the food prep area. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interviews, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program so that the facility was free of pests for one of one kitchen reviewed for pests. Cockroaches were seen in the kitchen near the garbage can located beside clean pots and pans and one located in the dining room near the large wall of cabinets. This failure could place residents at risk of infection, discomfort, and diminished quality of life.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed, to provide an ongoing activities program to support residents in their choice of activities, both facility sponsored group and individual activities and independent activities, designed to meet the interests of and support the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident , encouraging both independence and interaction in the community for one of five residents (Resident #15) reviewed for activities. The facility failed to provide Resident #15 in room activities during the months ofFebruary and March of 2025. This failure could place residents at risk for boredom, depression, and diminished quality of life.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure medications and biological's were stored in locked compartments for one of seven (Hall 300 medication cart) medication carts reviewed for medication storage. The facility failed to ensure Hall 300 medication cart was locked and medications were secure and not accessible to other staff, resident, or visitors. This failure could place residents at risk of having unauthorized access to medications, biological's, and needles.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to employ staff with the appropriate competencies and skill sets to conduct the functions of the food and nutrition services for one of three kitchen staff (Dietary Aide E) reviewed for qualified dietary staff. Dietary Aide E had not received onboarding training with the appropriate competencies and skills to conduct the functions of the food and nutrition services department and his food handler certificate was expired. This failure placed residents at risk of not having their nutritional needs met and placed them at risk of food borne illness.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prepare food by methods that conserve nutritive value for 1 of 1 kitchen observed. The facility failed to provide a recipe for pureeing sausage which resulted in Dietary Aide E adding an unmeasured amount of water to the puree. This failure could place residents at risk of decreased food intake, hungry, unwanted weight loss, and diminished quality of life.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable disease and infection for 2 of 4 residents (Resident #35 and, Resident #68) reviewed for infection control: 1. The facility failed to ensure MA B sanitized the nasal spray before it was used in Resident #68's nostril and before storing it in the med cart after her use. 2. The facility failed to ensure CNA A was not using soiled gloves while handling clean items during peri care on Resident #35. These failures could place residents at-risk for infection due to improper care practices.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure that all allegations involving abuse, neglect, or serious bodily injuries were reported immediately but not later than 24 hours after the allegation was made for one (Resident #1) of five residents reviewed for abuse and neglect. The facility failed to report to the State Agency an incident on the facility's van where the Van Driver failed to ensure Resident #1 was properly strapped in the facility's van on 09/23/2024. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of abuse and neglect.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection and prevention control program that included, at a minimum, a system for preventing and controlling infections for 1 (Resident #2) of 2 residents reviewed for blood glucose monitoring. RN A failed to perform hand hygiene and wear gloves while checking Resident #2's blood glucose. This failure place residents at risk of infections.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' choices for one (Resident #1) of three residents reviewed for quality of care. The facility failed to check Resident #1's glucose level or A1C for five months after he was admitted to the facility with a diagnosis of type II diabetes and was recently discontinued from Metformin and Trulicity (medications utilized to manage high blood glucose levels with individuals with type II diabetes) at the hospital. These failures could place residents at risk of not receiving necessary medical care, harm, and hospitalization.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all resident who were unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene for 3 of 8 (Resident #210, Resident #213, and Resident #10) residents reviewed for activities of daily living. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #210 and Resident #213 received nail care. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #10 received help with eating. These failures placed residents at risk of poor hand hygiene, skin tears, infection, poor nutrition, and weight loss.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all residents were free from unnecessary drugs for 1 (Residents #63) of 3 residents reviewed for unnecessary drugs. -The facility failed to implement or provide reasoning for not implementing the recommendation by the licensed pharmacist to update the diagnosis for Seroquel XR for resident #63. -The facility failed to develop policies and procedures to address the timeframes of the medication regimen review. This failure could place resident as risk of not having their pharmacy consultations reviewed or recommendations implemented.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that the medication error rate was not five percent or greater. The facility had a medication error rate of 10.71 % based on 3 errors out of 28 opportunities, which involved 2 of 4 residents (Resident #38 and Resident #44) reviewed for medication administration. 1. The facility failed to ensure MA H administered medication as ordered to Resident #38 by administering Ferrous Sulfate 325mg instead of Ferrous Fumarate 324mg. 2. The facility failed to ensure MA H administered medication as ordered to Resident #44 by administering Calcium 600mg instead of Calcium 600mg with Vitamin D3 5mcg and Aspirin 81mg chewable tablet instead of Aspirin 81mg Delayed Release tablet. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that drugs and biologicals used in the facility were labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles, and include the appropriate accessory and cautionary instructions, and the expiration date when applicable for 1 of 1 medication storage rooms reviewed for medication storage. The facility failed to date two multi-use vials of Tuberculin, Purified Protein Derivative, Diluted Aplisol (a solution used to administer Tuberculin skin tests) when opened. This failure could place residents and staff at risk of not receiving the intended effect or contaminated solution.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for sanitation. The facility failed to ensure all items were properly covered, dated and discarded when expired. The facility failed to ensure CK L washed her hands as required and sanitized dishes properly. These failures placed resident risk of foodborne illness.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 5 staff (CNA I) viewed for infection control. The facility failed to ensure CNA I performed hand hygiene when changing gloves while providing catheter care. This failure could place residents at risk for infection or a decline in health.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure individuals with mental health disorders were provided an accurate Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) Level 1 Screening for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for PASRR (Resident #94). The facility failed to ensure Resident #94 had an accurate PASRR Level 1 Screening indicating a diagnosis of mental illness on 02/26/23. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving needed individualized care, and specialized services to meet their needs.\
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all residents were provided foot care and treatment, in accordance with professional standards of practice, for 2 of 8 (Resident #72 and Resident #82) residents reviewed for podiatry care. The facility failed to ensure Resident #72 and Resident #82 received podiatry care. This failure placed residents at risk of untreated podiatry issues, long nails, skin tears, and infection.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure that the resident environment remains as free of accident hazards as is possible or prevent accidents for 2 of 2 residents (Resident #12 and #77) reviewed for accidents and hazards in that: The facility failed to ensure Resident #12 and Resident #77 had fall mats in place in accordance with physician's orders and care plans. This failure could place residents at risk for injury.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure that licensed nurses have the specific competencies and skill sets necessary to care for residents' needs, as identified through resident assessments, and described in the plan of care for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #212 ) reviewed for nursing services. The facility failed to ensure the DON was competent in policy and procedure in PICC line removal for Resident #212. These failures could result in residents receiving inadequate nursing care and decreased quality of life.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all residents who had not used psychotropic drugs were not given those drugs and that all residents on psychotropic drugs received a gradual dose reduction for 1 of 8 (Resident #31) residents reviewed for psychotropic drugs. The facility failed to ensure Resident #31 had a preexisting mental illness for which psychotropic drugs (Cymbalta and Zyprexia) would be warranted. The facility failed to ensure Resident #31 received a gradual dose reduction for Cymbalta (antidepressant) and Zyprexia (antipsychotic). These failures placed residents at risk of unnecessary psychotropic drug use. Finings included: [...]
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Texas | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 2.89 | 3.39 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.34 | 0.43 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 2.47 | 2.98 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 1.90 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.65 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 31.3% | 55.3% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 28.6% | 54.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.59 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.06 on weekdays and 2.47 on weekends, 19% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 2.60 in April to June 2025 to 2.89 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 2.89 | 0.34 | 3.06 | 2.47 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 107 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 2.62 | 0.31 | 2.74 | 2.33 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 112 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 2.76 | 0.29 | 2.88 | 2.44 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 111 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 2.60 | 0.32 | 2.73 | 2.29 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 114 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Texas, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.33 | 0.40 | 3.50 | 2.93 | 2.2% | 0.7% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Trains nurse aides: this home runs a state-approved CNA program (state list: HHSC Approved NATCEP Providers, as of October 6, 2026). A nursing home cannot charge aides it employs, or has offered a job, for state-approved training (42 CFR 483.152(c)). See Pflugerville N&H NATCEP on CareerFunded, our sister site for career training.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Texas, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.03 | $16.97 to $20.71 | 88,680 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $29.92 | $27.46 to $32.89 | 57,560 |
| Registered nurses | $46.14 | $38.06 to $50.53 | 271,380 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Texas | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 20.7 | 15.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.7 | 3.3 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.7 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 9.4 | 14.0 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.6 | 3.8 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 12.3 | 9.6 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 32.3 | 25.7 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 4.7 | 12.3 | 12.0 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Pflugerville Nursing and Rehabilitation Center's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (57.4% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
57.4% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Texas: 116 better, 50 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 32 eligible stays.
11.5% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Texas: 0 better, 9 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 62 eligible stays.
6.6% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Texas: 4 better, 11 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 29 eligible stays.
61.9% this home
Median of homes: Texas57.3% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 21 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Texas0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 30 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Texas1.3% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 30 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Texas98.5% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 14 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: DEWITT MEDICAL DISTRICT. CMS links this home to Wellsential Health, a group of 67 nursing homes averaging 2.7 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Regency IHS of Pflugerville LLC | Direct ownership interest | Organization | 02/28/2015 | |
| Csv Rhea Management Holdco, LLC | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 02/28/2015 | |
| Dwd Tx Holdings LLC | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 02/28/2015 | |
| Jack and Nancy Dwyer Workforce Development Center Inc | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 02/28/2015 | |
| Reg Bridge Opco LLC | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 02/28/2015 | |
| Reg Hg Opco LLC | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 02/28/2015 | |
| Reg Operator Holdco LLC | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 02/28/2015 | |
| Regency Integrated Health Services LLC | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 02/28/2015 | |
| Regency Texas Holdings LLC | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 02/28/2015 | |
| Alexander, Alma | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 05/27/2020 | |
| Baird, Daniel | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 04/13/2021 | |
| Carvajal, Antonio | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 05/16/2024 | |
| Clapp, Barbara | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 06/01/2021 | |
| Cortese, Daren | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 08/10/2021 | |
| Frels, John | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 11/04/2014 | |
| Gibson, Patricia | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 08/01/2021 | |
| Gonzales, Veronica | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 05/16/2024 | |
| Kaufman, Nicole | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 08/10/2021 | |
| Mandelbaum, Elliot | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Papacek, Charles | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 10/01/1997 | |
| Sheppard, Anna | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 05/01/2019 | |
| Sheppard, Cynthia | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 06/25/2013 | |
| Papacek, Charles | Corporate director | Individual | 10/01/1997 | |
| Alexander, Alma | Corporate officer | Individual | 05/27/2020 | |
| Dewitt Medical District | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 02/28/2015 | |
| Regency IHS of Pflugerville LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 02/28/2015 | |
| Regency Integrated Health Services LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 02/28/2015 | |
| Chavies, Akil | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 09/16/2019 | |
| Dekowski, Donovan | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 02/28/2015 | |
| 104 Rex Kerwin Court LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 02/28/2015 | |
| Dewitt Medical District | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 04/03/2025 | |
| Regency IHS Clinical Consulting, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 02/28/2015 | |
| Regency IHS of Pflugerville LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 04/03/2025 | |
| Regency IHS Rehab LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 02/28/2015 | |
| Regency Integrated Health Services LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 04/03/2025 | |
| Burk, Allison | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Chavies, Akil | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 06/19/2019 | |
| Dekowski, Donovan | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 02/28/2015 | |
| Felder, Latanya | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Gutierrez, Michael | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2025 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Texas. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.