Prattville Health and Rehabilitation, LLC
601 Jasmine Trail, Prattville, AL 36066 · Autauga County · (334) 365-2241
162 certified beds, about 154 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1974
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 015065 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on June 10, 2022, inspectors cited 6 health deficiencies (the Alabama average is 4, the national average 9.2).
None of its 20 health citations since October 2018 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.11 hours per resident per day, against 3.88 across Alabama and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.64 of those hours.
57.2% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Alabama average 46.9%).
CMS links it to Nhs Management, an affiliated group of 43 nursing homes.
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 20 health citations on file.
June 10, 2022Standard inspection · 6 citations
- F Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and review of the facility's policy for Cycle Menus, the facility's Week 4 Week-At-A-Glance menu for June 5-11, 2022, the facility's Diet Guide Sheet for Day 24 (Week 4 - Tuesday), the facility's Diet Guide Sheet for Day 25 (Week 4 - Wednesday), and the facility's posted conversion information for portion control Dishers, the facility failed to ensure the menu was followed when: 1.) pears were not served at dinner on Tuesday, 6/7/2022, 2.) the specified 1/2 cup (4-ounce) serving of pudding for lunch on Wednesday, 6/8/2022, was being portioned with a #10 disher (3.25 ounces), and 3.) the Chicken and Dumpling alternate for dinner on Wednesday, 6/8/2022, had a 4-ounce (oz.) spoodle for trayline service, although the menu specified a 6 oz. portion was to be served. [...]
- F Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and review of the 2017 Food Code of the United States (U.S.) Public Health Service and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the facility's June 2022 refrigeration temperature logs for Unit 1, Unit 2, and the Dementia Unit, and the facility's policies for Dish Machine Sanitization, the policy for Foods from Families and Friends, and the policy titled, Nursing Pantry Foods, the facility failed to ensure 1.) the dishwashing machine consistently reached the minimum sanitizing temperature of 180 degrees Fahrenheit (F) on Wednesday, 6/8/2022, and Thursday, 6/9/2022; 2.) the air dryer used for drying clean dishes did not have a dirty filter on Tuesday, 6/7/2022, and Wednesday, 6/8/2022; 3.) the veneer of the door in the dishroom was not peeling away from the door surface in large pointed sections on Tuesday, 6/7/2022; [...]
- F Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and review of the facility's policy for Garbage and Refuse, and the 2017 Food Code of the United States (U.S.) Public Health Service and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the facility failed to ensure the oil/grease waste receptacle and the four by eight foot area around it did not have a buildup of oil/grease during June 7-9, 2022. This had the potential to affect all the residents in the facility, 138 of 138 residents. Findings Include: The facility's policy for Garbage and Refuse, dated 2/1/2002, included the following: . Purpose: To prevent the spread of bacteria that may cause food borne illnesses. Standard: Garbage and refuse containers should be free from cracks or leaks . The 2017 Food Code of the U.S. Public Health Service and the FDA included the following: . 5-501.13 Receptacles. (A) . [...]
- D Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews and review of a facility policy titled, Feeding the Impaired Resident, the facility failed to ensure Resident Identifier (RI) #25 was treated by staff in a manner to maintain dignity when Employee Identifier (EI) #11 Nursing Assistant (NA) stood up to feed RI #25, who was in bed during the breakfast meal on 6/8/2022. This affected one of 28 sampled residents. Findings Include: The facility policy titled Feeding the Impaired Resident with an effective date of 10/1/2010 documented: . Residents should eat in the location of their preference, and should be provided with a pleasant dining environment, regardless of the location. RI #25 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. 6/8/2022 at 8:19 AM EI #11 NA was observed to enter RI #25's room and set up the breakfast meal tray for RI #25 who was in bed. [...]
- D Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, interviews and review of facility policy Pressure Ulcers, the facility failed to ensure weekly wound assessments were accurately completed for Resident Identifier (RI) #114's sacral wound that was documented as a stage three on 5/2/2022. This had the potential to affect RI #114, one of six residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. Findings Include: A review of a facility policy titled Pressure Ulcers with an effective date of October 1, 2010 revealed . Stage III (three) . Full thickness tissue loss. Subcutaneous fat may be visible . Slough may be present . May include undermining and tunneling. Documentation . c) The status of ulcers should be recorded on the Wound Flow Record weekly. RI #114 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. [...]
- D Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, resident record review and review of a facility policy titled Hand Hygiene the facility failed to ensure Employee Identifier (EI) #10, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), washed and sanitized her hands after delivering and setting up Resident Identifier (RI) #25's meal tray prior to delivering and setting up RI #94's meal tray. This had the potential to affect RI #94, one of 61 total residents on unit one who received meal trays.
November 7, 2019Standard inspection · 9 citations
- F Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, a review of facility policies including Sanitation Principles, Use of Gloves and Hairnets, Food Reheating, Calibrating and Sanitizing Thermometers and Foods from Families and Friends, as well as the 2017 FOOD CODE regulations, the facility failed to ensure: 1) Food preparation equipment and dishes were maintained in a clean condition; 2) Dietary staff covered hair while handling food and working in food distribution areas; 3) Foods served from the 11/06/19 supper tray line were re-heated to recommended temperatures prior to service, and the thermometer used to check each item was sanitized prior to use; 4) Nursing staff handled ready-to-eat (RTE) food for Resident Identifier (RI) #16 during the 11/06/19 lunch meal without directly contacting the item with bare hands and 5) Resident food was dated and labeled in one of three nursing pantry refrigerators. [...]
- D Honor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, and a review of the facility's financial records titled, Resident Statement Landscape and Resident Fund Management Service, the facility failed to ensure Resident Identifier (RI) #103 was provided his/her thirty dollars from the trust fund account when requested. This affected one of 73 residents with money in their trust fund. Findings Include: A review of the facility's financial records revealed: The document tiltled, Resident Fund Management Sevice, dated 6/26/19 and signed by RI #103's sponsor and Employee Identifier (EI) #2, a Financial Specialist Assistant, authorized the facility to handle the residents' funds with a $30 monthly allowance. A review of the document titled, Resident Statement Landscape revealed a balance of $994.00 in RI #103's Trust Fund Account. RI #103 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted to the facility on [DATE]. [...]
- D Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews the facility failed to ensure Resident Identifier (RI) #17's care plan meetings were held quarterly. This had the potential to affect RI #17, one of 28 sampled residents.
- D Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, interviews and a facility policy titled, Bowel and Bladder Program, the facility failed to ensure Resident Identifier (RI) #17 had a bowel and bladder review after a change in physical ability. This affected RI #17, one of two residents sampled for bowel and bladder concerns.
- D Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
Inspectors wroteBased on a review of the facility policy titled Psychoactive Drug Monitoring, the pharmacist's recommendation for the consideration of antipsychotic dose reduction, and and an interview with the Certified Registered Nurse Practitioner (CRNP), the facility failed to provide justification for the continued use of an antipsychotic medication (Abilify) for Resident Identifier (RI) #23. This affected one of 5 sampled residents reviewed for the potential use of unnecessary medications.
- D Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
- D Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews, record review and a facility policy titled, Medication Administration-General Guidelines, the facility failed to ensure a Licensed Practice Nurse (LPN) documented Resident Identifier (RI) #64's administration of eye drops on 11/04/19 and 11/05/19. This deficient practice affected one of 28 residents reviewed for documentation on the Medication Administration Record. Findings Include: A review of a facility's policy titled, Medication Administration - General Guidelines, with a date of 03/11, included the following: .Procedures . 22. After administration, . document administration on the Medication Administration Record (MAR) . RI# 64 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. RI #64 had diagnoses to include Unspecified Glaucoma. [...]
- C Ensure the activities program is directed by a qualified professional.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, and document review of Employee Identifier (EI), #16's certification, the facility failed to ensure the Activity Program was directed by a qualified licensed or registered professional from [DATE] (date of hire) through the current survey. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 137 of 137 residents in the facility. Findings Include: A review of the Activity Director, Employee Identifier (EI) #16's certification document titled, National Certification Council for Activity Professionals (NCCAP), revealed the certification had expired [DATE]. The certification also indicated renewal was required bi-annually. On [DATE] at 1:31 p.m., the surveyor asked EI #16 how long she had been the Activity Director with the facility. EI #16 stated that she previously worked 2007-2014 but was re-hired at the facility two weeks prior, on [DATE]. [...]
- C Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interview and a review of the facility policy titled, Sanitation Principles, the facility failed to ensure the side door of one dumpster was closed. Facility staff also failed to ensure the interior garbage was securely contained in each bag prior to disposal to prevent the potential attraction of flies, ants and possible rodents. This affected two of two dumpster's on two of three days of the survey.
October 21, 2018Standard inspection · 5 citations
- D Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident Identifier (RI) #10's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an assessment reference date of 4/18/18 reflected the presence of an unhealed Stage 3 pressure ulcer. This affected one of 29 sampled residents for whom MDS assessments were reviewed.
- D Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Resident Identifier (RI) #52's care plan was implemented for daily skin checks. The facility further failed to ensure RI #118's care plan was implemented for pressure ulcer treatment. This deficient practice affected RI #52 and RI #118, two of 12 sampled residents reviewed for pressure ulcers.
- D Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, medical record review and review of the facility's policy titled Section: Documentation and Medical Records Policy Title: Charting and Documentation Guidelines, the facility failed to ensure Employee Identifier (EI) #8, a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) did not document completion of wound care on the Treatment Administration Record (TAR) before the treatment was administered. On 10/10/18, EI #8 signed that she completed RI #118's wound care treatment; however, she had not done it. This deficient practice affected RI #118, one of 12 sampled residents reviewed for pressure ulcers.
- D Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, interviews, and review of a facility policy titled Section: Physician Services Policy Title: admission Physician's Orders, the facility failed to ensure treatment orders were obtained for RI #118, a resident admitted to the facility with a Stage 2 pressure ulcer. The facility further failed to ensure RI #118's treatment orders were administered as ordered by the physician. This deficient practice affected RI #118, one 12 sampled residents reviewed for pressure ulcers.
- D Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Resident Identifier (RI) #50 was not left unattended by facility staff at an offsite physician's office after transport to a previously cancelled appointment. Further, the facility failed to ensure Nystatin powder was not left on RI #50's bedside table on 10/12/2018. This affected one of three sampled residents sampled for transport to outside appointments, and one on one sampled resident's observed with medication at the bedside.
Fire safety inspections
13 fire safety citations on file: 1 on June 10, 2022, 3 on November 7, 2019, 9 on October 21, 2018.
Every fire safety citation13 citations
- E Install corridor and hallway doors that block smoke.
- E Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.
- D Properly select, install, inspect, or maintain portable fire extinguishes.
- D Install smoke barrier doors that can resist smoke for at least 20 minutes.
- F Add doors in an exit area that do not require the use of a key from the exit side unless in case of special locking arrangements.
- E Install corridor and hallway doors that block smoke.
- E Ensure proper usage of power strips and extension cords.
- D Ensure that special areas are constructed so that walls can resist fire for one hour or have an approved fire extinguishing system.
- D Provide properly protected cooking facilities.
- D Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
- C Develop and maintain an Emergency Preparedness Program (EP).
- C Create arrangements with other facilities to receive patients.
- C List the names and contact information of those in the facility.
Fines and payment denials
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Alabama | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 4.11 | 3.88 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.64 | 0.65 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.48 | 3.26 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.51 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.97 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 57.2% | 46.9% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 42.9% | 39.5% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.47 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.37 on weekdays and 3.48 on weekends, 20% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.21 in April to June 2025 to 4.11 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.11 | 0.64 | 4.37 | 3.48 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 154 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 4.20 | 0.70 | 4.37 | 3.74 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 158 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 4.36 | 0.81 | 4.62 | 3.70 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 157 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 4.21 | 0.71 | 4.52 | 3.42 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 159 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Alabama, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.88 | 0.63 | 4.13 | 3.27 | 0.9% | 0.2% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
Staff pay at this home
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.
Official wage estimates for Alabama
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alabama, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $16.41 | $14.45 to $17.49 | 25,250 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $27.42 | $23.15 to $29.71 | 11,580 |
| Registered nurses | $37.06 | $30.53 to $40.09 | 54,340 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Alabama | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 14.5 | 12.0 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.1 | 0.9 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.0 | 2.4 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.8 | 3.3 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.1 | 2.0 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 10.3 | 12.1 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 12.3 | 5.4 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 26.3 | 21.2 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 28.3 | 24.8 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 10.0 | 11.3 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.4 | 2.0 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.4 | 1.7 | 1.8 |
Owners and operators
Legal business name: PRATTVILLE HEALTH AND REHABILITATION LLC. CMS links this home to Nhs Management, a group of 43 nursing homes averaging 2.9 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Northport Holding Operations, LLC | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 08/16/2002 |
| James N Estes Jr Family Dynasty Tr No 2 | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 18% | 12/27/2012 |
| James Norman Estes Jr Tr | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 6% | 06/30/2013 |
| Jennifer E Agee Family Dynasty Tr No 2 | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 18% | 12/27/2012 |
| Jennifer Lee Estes Tr 031093 | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 6% | 06/30/2013 |
| Estes, James | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Individual | 51% | 08/16/2002 |
| Capital Funding LLC | 5% or greater mortgage interest | Organization | 09/01/2013 | |
| Capital Funding LLC | 5% or greater security interest | Organization | 09/01/2013 | |
| Holding Facilities Group LLC | 5% or greater security interest | Organization | 09/01/2013 | |
| Prattville Health Realty LLC | 5% or greater security interest | Organization | 09/01/2013 | |
| Servisfirst Bank | 5% or greater security interest | Organization | 08/29/2018 | |
| Baggett, Bryan | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 05/27/2024 | |
| Rasco, Lynn | Corporate director | Individual | 07/01/2022 | |
| Simmons, Alice | Corporate director | Individual | 01/22/2024 | |
| Estes, James | Corporate officer | Individual | 08/16/2002 | |
| Long, Phillip | Corporate officer | Individual | 10/01/2019 | |
| Baggett, Bryan | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 05/27/2024 | |
| Rasco, Lynn | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 07/01/2022 | |
| Simmons, Alice | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/22/2024 | |
| Watkins, Roderick | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 07/29/2024 | |
| Watkins, Roderick | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 02/05/2025 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 5 problems in this area, most recently on June 10, 2022: "Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident."
- How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 5 problems in this area, most recently on June 10, 2022: "Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing."
- When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 5 problems in this area, most recently on November 7, 2019: "Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals."
- How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on June 10, 2022: "Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights."
Other nursing homes nearby
- Charlton Place Rehab and Healthcare Center Deatsville, 1.9 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 2 citations
- Merry Wood Lodge Elmore, 8.2 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 17 citations
- Montgomery Children's Specialty Center Montgomery, 9.1 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 12 citations
- Capitol Hill Healthcare Center Montgomery, 10.4 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 3 citations
- Father Purcell Memorial Exceptional Children's Ctr Montgomery, 10.7 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 10 citations
- Crowne Health Care of Montgomery Montgomery, 10.7 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 5 citations
- Diversicare of Montgomery Montgomery, 12.1 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 14 citations
- Hillview Terrace Montgomery, 12.6 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 16 citations
Alabama contacts for a concern about a nursing home
These are the official offices in Alabama. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.
- Inspections and complaints: Alabama Department of Public Health, Bureau of Health Provider Standards, the state agency that inspects nursing homes for CMS and takes complaints about care.
- Resident advocate: Alabama Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman Program, 334-242-5753. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
- State inspection reports: Alabama Health Care Facilities Deficiencies, where Alabama publishes its own records on licensed homes.
Common questions
- What is Prattville Health and Rehabilitation, LLC's Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates Prattville Health and Rehabilitation, LLC 1 out of 5 stars overall, with 1 for health inspections, 4 for staffing and 2 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did Prattville Health and Rehabilitation, LLC get at its last inspection?
- 6 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on June 10, 2022. The Alabama average is 4.
- Has Prattville Health and Rehabilitation, LLC been fined?
- CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
- Does Prattville Health and Rehabilitation, LLC accept Medicaid?
- It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
- Who owns Prattville Health and Rehabilitation, LLC?
- CMS lists 21 owners and managers, and links the home to Nhs Management. Legal business name: PRATTVILLE HEALTH AND REHABILITATION LLC.
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.