Home / New Jersey / Wayne
305 Oldham Road, Wayne, NJ 07470 · Passaic County · (973) 585-2132
406 certified beds, about 270 residents a day · Government - County · Medicare and Medicaid since 1996
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 315361 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on January 22, 2025, inspectors cited 15 health deficiencies (the New Jersey average is 8.6, the national average 9.2).
Of 35 health citations since July 2021, 1 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (1 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $15,646 in the last three years; the largest was $15,646, and the latest is dated November 26, 2024.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.01 hours per resident per day, against 3.85 across New Jersey and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 1.06 of those hours.
23.7% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (New Jersey average 39.7%).
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 35 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and review of pertinent facility documents on 01/08/26, it was determined that the facility failed to provide the necessary care to ensure freedom from accidents to a resident (Resident #1) who required two person assistance for care and transfers resulting in the resident sustaining a fractured finger and multiple skin lacerations requiring stitches. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 5 residents surveyed. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: The surveyor reviewed the hybrid [paper and electronic] medical record of Resident #1. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews, review of medical records, and review of pertinent documentation provided by the facility on 05/02/2025, it was determined that the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of physical abuse and follow the facility's Resident Abuse policy. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for abuse and was evidenced by the following: A Facility Reported Event (FRE), a document used to report incidents, submitted to the New Jersey Department of Health (NJDOH) by the facility's Director of Nursing (DON) on 04/15/2025 was reviewed. The FRE revealed that on 04/15/2025 at 4:20 P.M., the facility's Executive Director (ED) listened to a voice message left by Resident #2 at 6:29 A.M., the same day. The voice message was described in the FRE as follows: [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and review of facility policies, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain proper kitchen sanitation practices in a manner to prevent food borne illness. This deficient practice was observed and evidenced by the following: On 1/15/25 at 9:24 AM, the surveyor in the presence of the Dietary Supervisor (DS#1) and the Registered Dietitian (RD) observed the following during the kitchen tour: 1. The surveyor observed in the dry storage room: a dented can of sliced potatoes in the regular rotation of non-dented canned goods; 3 boxes stored above 18 inches (in) from the ceiling, and the following items were observed opened without an open/use by label: [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and review of pertinent documentation provided by the facility, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure reference checks were completed for 10 out of 10 newly hired staff (Staff #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, #9, and #10) prior to their start date of employment. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: The surveyor reviewed 10 randomly selected new employee files for reference checks for 10 of the 10 new employees revealed the following: A review of Staff #1's file, a Recreation Activity Aide (RA), date of hire (doh) on 10/30/23, showed there were no reference checks in their file. A review of Staff #2's file, a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), doh on 1/29/24, showed there were no reference checks in their file. A review of Staff #3's file, a Registered Dietician, doh on 5/28/24, showed there were no reference checks in their file. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to complete and transmit a Minimum Data Set (MDS) in accordance with the federal guidelines. This deficient practice was identified for 17 of 17 system selected residents, Resident #2, #12, #34, #38, #46, #48, #69, #70, #139, #166, #199, #205, #209, #220, #233, #267, and #271) and was evidenced by the following: On 1/21/25 at 9:09 AM, the surveyor reviewed the facility assessment task that included the Resident's MDS assessment. The MDS was a comprehensive tool that was federal mandated process for clinical assessment of all residents that must be completed and transmitted to the Quality Measure System. The facility must electronically transmit the MDS within 14 days of the assessment being completed. [...]
Inspectors wroteREPEAT DEFICIENCY Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that all medications were administered without error of 5% or more during the medication administration, 4 nurses administered medications to 5 residents. There were 25 opportunities for error, 2 errors were observed which calculated to a medication administration error rate of 8%. This deficient practice was identified for 2 of 5 residents, (Resident #55 and Resident #122), that were administered medications by 2 of 5 nurses that were observed. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45. Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states: [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined the facility failed to treat a resident with respect and dignity in a manner that promotes maintenance or enhancement of their quality of life specifically by ensuring staff able to communicate with the resident in the language that the resident understood and preferred according to plan of care. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 2 residents, Resident #158, reviewed for communication. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 1/17/25 at 9:40 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #158 laying on an air mattress (a specialized mattress) and the resident spoke Spanish. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to follow standards of clinical practice to ensure, a.) a physician's order (PO) for a heel booties 2 of 2 residents, Residents #72 and #158, were followed, and b.) a PO to document weekly vital signs for 1 of 5 residents was followed, Resident #88, reviewed for unnecessary medications. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Reference: New Jersey Statues, Annotated Title 45, Chapter 11 Nursing Board, The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states; [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the resident receive care and treatment in accordance with professional standards of practice by developing and implementing a comprehensive person-centered care plan (CP), and the resident's choices that included refusal of care. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 39 residents, (Resident #262), reviewed for quality of care. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Reference: New Jersey Statues, Annotated Title 45, Chapter 11 Nursing Board, The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states; [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, record review, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the foley urinary catheter drainage bag was stored in a manner to prevent Urinary Tract Infection (UTI) for 1 of 4 residents, Resident #77, reviewed for urinary catheter or UTI. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 1/17/25 at 9:08 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #77's urinary catheter drainage bag hung from the bed's side rail that was in the up position and not in a privacy bag. The tubing leading to the drainage bag was above the bed. On 1/17/25 at 9:09 AM, the surveyor interviewed the Registered Nurse (RN) after the RN also observed Resident #77's urinary catheter drainage bag. The RN stated that the drainage bag and tubing should be lowered. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain proper infection control practices during tracheostomy care. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 1 resident observed for tracheostomy care, (Resident #92), and was evidenced by the following: On 1/15/25 at 10:46 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #92 in a reclined lounge chair in their room. The resident had a tracheostomy (trach, a surgically made hole through the front of the neck into the trachea (windpipe) with a tube placed through the hole to help the person breathe), which was attached to a ventilation system (a breathing machine that helps or breathes for a person). The surveyor reviewed the medical record for Resident #92. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to; a) complete the Hemodialysis Communication Record (HCR) to include a signature by the facility nurse that acknowledged review of the HCR for 14 of 14 days reviewed; b) document a complete assessment of vital signs and/or disposition of access site post dialysis treatment in the medical record; c) follow a recommendation for a change in medication; and d) had a diet order for 1 of 3 residents, Resident #169. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 1/15/25 at 10:52 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #169 lying in bed, who stated that they were going to dialysis today and that they had a communication binder (binder for HCRs) that they took with to dialysis. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that due to a shortage of staff, the facility failed to a.) honor the resident's shower schedule for 1 of 5 residents, Resident #141 and b.) ensure residents were provided morning care in a timely manner for 2 of 5 residents, Residents #141 and #213 of Resident Council group. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 1/17/25 at 11:01 AM, the surveyor conducted a resident group meeting with five residents who were alert and oriented and were selected by the facility to attend the group meeting. Resident#141 informed the surveyor that two weeks ago, not this past Monday (1/13/25), the resident did not get showered. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services in accordance with professional standards to ensure accurate documentation of the receipt of a controlled substance for 4 of 4 Schedule II controlled substance medications ordered and received by the facility for use as an emergency backup supply, on three Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) 222 Forms (a form used to order controlled substances from a provider) reviewed. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Reference: 21 CFR 1305.13 Procedure for filling DEA Forms 222. Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45. Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states: [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the resident did not receive an unnecessary medication for 1 of 7 residents, Resident #43. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: The surveyor reviewed Resident #43's medical record (MR) and revealed the following: A review of Resident #43's admission Record (an admission summary) reflected that the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included but were not limited to acute kidney failure, (when the kidneys are damaged and can't filter blood the way they should) and urinary tract infection. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to properly a.) label, dispose and secure medications in 3 of 9 medication carts inspected and b.) store medication for 1 of 4 medication carts inspected according to facility's policy and standard of clinical practice. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45. Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states: [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain the prior year's Federal and State of New Jersey (State) inspection results and post the location of those results in an area that was readily accessible to residents, families, and the public. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following. On 1/16/25 at 8:29 AM, the surveyor observed a binder in the reception desk for Licensure Reports (survey results) which the Security Staff (SS) confirmed that the survey results were for date 8/12/21. On 1/16/25 at 11:08 AM, the surveyor interviewed the Director of Nursing (DON), who stated that the facility's most recent Federal and State surveys were from 2023. [...]
Inspectors wroteComplaint # NJ00 181747 Based on interview, medical records (MR) review, and review of pertinent facility documents on 01/14/2025, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement a care plan (CP) focus to include behaviors for residents who were on psychoactive medications. The deficient practice was found in 2 of 4 residents, (Resident #1 and #2), reviewed for behavior monitoring and comprehensive care planning and was evidenced by the following: 1. According to the admission Face Sheet Record (AFSR), Resident #1 had diagnoses which included but were not limited to: Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Atrial Fibrillation, Hypothyroidism, Essential Hypertension, and Hyperlipidemia. [...]
Inspectors wroteComplaint#: NJ00179720 Based on interviews and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to follow the Medical Emergency Response policy for a resident (Resident #2) in respiratory distress. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for medical emergency response procedures. The facility also failed to provide the needed emergency transportation services to manage the acute respiratory symptoms of Resident #2, which resulted in the Resident's failure to improve. In addition, the facility failed to develop a policy and procedure for the staff to follow to determine the use of emergency or non-emergency transportation services based on residents presenting symptoms. [...]
Inspectors wroteComplaint #: NJ171754 Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of other facility documentation on 3/1/2024, it was determined that the facility failed to notify and obtain a physician's order to change the form of a medication from liquid to tablets. The Physician order for this medication could not be filled by the Pharmacy because this medication did not come in liquid form. The facility failed to follow its policy titled Prescribing and Ordering of Medications. The deficient practice was identified for 1 of 4 residents( Resident #2) reviewed for medication administration, and was evidenced by the following deficient practice: Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45. Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states: [...]
Inspectors wroteComplaint #: NJ157711, NJ159758, NJ162870, NJ162871 Based on interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure allegations of abuse / neglect and/or the investigations were submitted to the New Jersey Department of Health (NJDOH) within the time limits of the policy and federal regulation for three of seven residents (Resident (R)18, R409, R458) with NJDOH reportable incidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, document review, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than five percent. During observation of medication pass, there were eight errors observed out of 29 opportunities, resulting in a 27.59% error rate. This had the potential to place one (Residents (R) 410) at risk of not receiving the full benefit of their medication therapy.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and review of manufacturer's instructions, the facility failed to ensure bed frames and rails, if present, were inspected and serviced per the Manufacturer's Instructions for Use (MIFU) for three of three residents (Resident (R) 18, R140, and R232) to minimize the risks of bed malfunction or resident injury. This failure had the potential to affect 267 of 267 residents who reside at the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure six of six Certified Nurse Aides (CNA), two of two Licensed Practical Nurses (LPN), and two of two Registered Nurse's (RN) reviewed had received behavioral health training to care for residents diagnosed with mental health illnesses indicated as admittable in the facility assessment. This failure had the potential for direct care staff to lack current knowledge to work with the unique challenges mental health illnesses present.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure that one (Resident (R) 218) of 34 sampled residents were treated with respect and dignity by providing care in a manner to enhance R218's quality of life.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that tube feeding poles were maintained in a sanitary manner for three (Residents (R) 51, R160 and R203) of 34 sampled residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, interview, review of Facility Reported Incidents (FRI), and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that a thorough investigation was conducted regarding staff-to-resident abuse allegations involving one (Resident (R) 409) of 34 sampled residents. There was no evidence that the facility interviewed other current residents regarding the allegations.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide to the resident and/or their representative, a written notice of the reason for transfer for two (Residents (R) 191 and R98) of three residents transferred to the hospital and provided that notice to the Ombudsman.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide to the resident and/or their representative, a bed hold policy to two (Residents (R) 191 and R98) of three residents transferred to the hospital.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure that three of three residents (Resident (R) 18, R140, and R232) and/or Resident Representative (RR) reviewed for bed rail use had documented safety assessment for the use of bed rails and were advised of the risks and/or benefits of rail use. This failure had the potential for residents with bed rails to be uninformed of the risk of severe injury and/or death associated with bed rail use.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered in a manner that prevented cross-contamination for one (Resident (R) 410) of 34 sampled residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the daily nursing staffing hours were included in the prominently displayed nurse staffing for residents, visitors, and/or staff. This failure could affect the knowledge of the availability of staff to care for the 50 residents, their family members, or their representatives.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to assure that the physician responsible for supervising the care of residents signed and dated monthly physician's orders and resident's lab results. This deficient practice continued over numerous months for 2 of 35 residents reviewed, Resident #54 and #153 residing on two different facility units. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. On 7/7/21 at 10:47 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #54 seated in a wheelchair with eyes closed. The surveyor approached the resident for an interview, but the resident was not alert or oriented. The surveyor was unable to interview Resident #54. The surveyor reviewed the admission Record Face sheet (one-page summary of important information about a resident) for Resident # 54. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure in person physician visits were conducted in and documented at required intervals. This deficient practice was identified for 2 of 35 residents, Resident #54, #153 reviewed. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. On 7/7/21 at 10:47 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #54 seated in a wheelchair with eyes closed. The surveyor approached the resident for an interview, but the resident was not alert or oriented. The surveyor was unable to interview Resident #54. The surveyor reviewed the admission Record Face sheet (one-page summary of important information about a resident) for Resident # 54. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review and review of facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to: a.) utilize disposable dining ware for a resident on Transmission Based Precautions (TBP) in accordance with facility policy; and, b.) practice appropriate use of personal protective equipment (PPE) in accordance with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines for infection control to mitigate the spread of COVID-19. This was identified for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for TBP (Resident #12). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: According to the U.S. CDC guidelines Interim Infection Prevention and Control Recommendations for Healthcare Personnel During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic, updated February 23, 2021, included 2. [...]
14 fire safety citations on file: 9 on January 22, 2025, 3 on September 8, 2023, 2 on July 14, 2021.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| November 26, 2024 | Fine | $15,646 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | New Jersey | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 4.01 | 3.85 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 1.06 | 0.68 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.74 | 3.50 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.53 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.41 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 23.7% | 39.7% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 20.3% | 37.7% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.68 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.12 on weekdays and 3.74 on weekends, 9% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 35.9% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.17 in April to June 2025 to 4.01 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.01 | 1.06 | 4.12 | 3.74 | 35.9% | 0 of 90 | 270 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 4.03 | 1.12 | 4.14 | 3.74 | 37.8% | 0 of 92 | 275 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 4.19 | 1.10 | 4.31 | 3.87 | 38.2% | 0 of 92 | 282 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 4.17 | 1.07 | 4.31 | 3.81 | 34.5% | 0 of 91 | 281 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| New Jersey, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.68 | 0.59 | 3.82 | 3.34 | 11.6% | 0.2% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| New Jersey, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $22.52 | $21.13 to $23.44 | 32,400 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $36.13 | $32.16 to $38.45 | 17,410 |
| Registered nurses | $51.20 | $47.94 to $61.41 | 92,680 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | New Jersey | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 7.8 | 8.7 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.1 | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.8 | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.0 | 2.3 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.0 | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 6.5 | 8.2 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 7.9 | 5.4 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 13.8 | 12.8 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 27.9 | 24.9 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 13.1 | 8.1 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.6 | 2.1 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.8 | 1.1 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Preakness Healthcare Center's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (41.7% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
41.7% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · New Jersey: 130 better, 19 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 88 eligible stays.
10.7% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · New Jersey: 2 better, 8 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 179 eligible stays.
7.3% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · New Jersey: 3 better, 13 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 99 eligible stays.
44.8% this home
Median of homes: New Jersey68.7% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 105 residents counted.
1.5% this home
Median of homes: New Jersey0.6% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 131 residents counted.
3.4% this home
Median of homes: New Jersey1.7% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 131 residents counted.
100.0% this home
Median of homes: New Jersey99.5% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 22 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: COUNTY OF PASSAIC DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| County of Passaic Department of Finance | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 12/01/2017 |
| Williamson, Thomas | Corporate officer | Individual | 06/01/2004 | |
| Corrado, Lucinda | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 12/01/2006 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in New Jersey. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.