What is Pruitthealth- Dillon's Medicare star rating?

CMS rates Pruitthealth- Dillon 3 out of 5 stars overall, with 3 for health inspections, 3 for staffing and 3 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).

How many deficiencies did Pruitthealth- Dillon get at its last inspection?

2 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on June 23, 2026. The South Carolina average is 3.7.

Does Pruitthealth- Dillon accept Medicaid?

It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.

Who owns Pruitthealth- Dillon?

CMS lists 24 owners and managers, and links the home to Pruitthealth. Legal business name: PRUITTHEALTH - DILLON, LLC.

Pruitthealth- Dillon: Inspections, Staffing & Ratings

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on June 23, 2026, inspectors cited 2 health deficiencies (the South Carolina average is 3.7, the national average 9.2).

Of 13 health citations since June 2024, 2 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (2 immediate jeopardy).

CMS lists 1 fine totaling $10,036 in the last three years; the largest was $10,036, and the latest is dated June 21, 2024.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 2.96 hours per resident per day, against 3.84 across South Carolina and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.47 of those hours.

26.8% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (South Carolina average 45.9%).

CMS links it to Pruitthealth, an affiliated group of 96 nursing homes.

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

706/24

405/25

206/26

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 13 health citations on file.

Severity

Isolated

Pattern

Widespread

Immediate jeopardy

Actual harm

Potential for more than minimal harm

Potential for minimal harm

June 23, 2026Standard inspection · 2 citations

F

Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 17, 2026

Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure proper thawing practices were in place; ensure food was covered, labeled, and dated; ensure the kitchen was clean; ensure proper glove use and hand hygiene; and ensure the thermometer was sanitized between use for one of one kitchen. These failures created the potential for foodborne illness, cross-contamination, and unsafe food handling practices affecting all residents who received food services from the facility.
E

Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.

F550 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 17, 2026

Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to refrain from arguing in a raised voice with one of 24 sample residents (Resident (R) 59) when the resident was engaged in a conversation with the Activity Director (AD) and failed to provide a dignified dining experience for four of 24 sample residents (R12, R12, R14, and R26) who required encouragement to maintain independent eating. This failure had the potential to create a delay in consuming meals.

May 23, 2025Standard inspection · 4 citations

D

Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.

F580 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 22, 2025

Inspectors wroteBased on record review, interviews, and procedure guide review, the facility failed to notify a physician of a high blood sugar level for one of five residents (Resident (R) 50) reviewed for unnecessary medication of 27 sample residents. The facility failed to notify the resident's physician of a significant change in the resident's blood glucose levels.
D

PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities

F645 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 22, 2025

Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to accurately complete Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) as required for one of one resident (Resident (R) 25) reviewed for PASARRs of 27 sample residents. R25 did not have an accurate PASARR Level I which failed to identify that the resident had intellectual disabilities prior to his admission to the facility. This deficient practice resulted in R25 not being evaluated for and/or provided specialized care and treatment.
D

Provide a neutral and fair arbitration process and agree to arbitrator and venue.

F848 · Administration · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 22, 2025

Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to contain specific language into the facility's arbitration agreement for three of three residents (Resident (R) 5, R15, and R45) reviewed for arbitration agreement of 27 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure that residents and/or their representatives were informed of the opportunity to agree on a neutral arbitrator and convenient location for the arbitration to be held.
D

Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 22, 2025

Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to adhere to infection control practices and policies for three of three residents (Resident (R)5, R50, and R73) reviewed for infection control of 27 sample residents. The facility failed to wear a gown and implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) for R5 and failed to ensure the residents' catheter was not touching the ground for R50 and R73. The deficient practice increased the risk of infection for the residents.

June 21, 2024Standard inspection · 7 citations

J

Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.

F605 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 22, 2024

Inspectors wroteBased on interview, record review, and facility policy the facility failed to ensure Resident (R)369 was free from chemical restraints when it was identified that R369 was administered Haloperidol (An antipsychotic used to treat certain types of mental disorders (eg, schizophrenia). It can also control symptoms of Tourette syndrome) for 'exit-seeking behaviors, for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. On 06/20/24 at 2:09 PM, the survey team notified the Administrator and DON that the failure to ensure residents are free from physical or chemical restraints imposed for purposes of discipline or convenience and that are not required to treat the residents medical symptoms constituted IJ at F605. [...]
J

Prepare residents for a safe transfer or discharge from the nursing home.

F624 · Resident Rights · Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 22, 2024

Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide Resident (R)369 and her Resident Representative with sufficient preparation and presentation to ensure an orderly and safe discharge from the facility, for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for transfer/discharge. On 06/19/24 at 9:09 PM, the Administrator and Director of Nursing (DON) were notified that the failure to provide and document sufficient preparation and orientation to ensure residents have a safe and orderly discharge from the facility constituted Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) at F624. On 06/19/24 at 9:09 PM, the survey team provided the Administrator and DON with a copy of the CMS IJ Template and informed the facility the IJ existed as of 06/19/24. The IJ was related to 483.15 Admission, Transfer, and Discharge. On 06/20/24 the facility provided an acceptable IJ Removal Plan. [...]
F

Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 22, 2024

Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy, observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure: accurate labeling and dating of foods and removal of expired foods from 1 of 1 main kitchen.
D

Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.

F657 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 22, 2024

Inspectors wroteBased on interview, record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to implement care plan interventions for Resident (R)55 for oxygen use, for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for care plans.
D

Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.

F677 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 22, 2024

Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy, observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was dependent on staff for Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) received the necessary services to maintain personal hygiene, specifically nail care, bed baths and showers, for 1 of 7 sampled residents (Resident (R) 2).
D

Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.

F842 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 22, 2024

Inspectors wroteBased on interview, record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to maintain complete and accurate medical records for Resident (R)55, in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices, for 1 of 5 residents reviewed.
D

Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 22, 2024

Inspectors wroteBased on review of the facility policy, observations, interviews, recorded reviews, the facility failed to utilize appropriate hand hygiene during serving of meals on 1 of 3 units.

Fines and payment denials

Date	Penalty	Amount or length
June 21, 2024	Fine	$10,036

A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

Measure	This home	South Carolina	United States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)	2.96	3.84	3.86
Registered nurses	0.47	0.63	0.69
All nursing staff on weekends	2.45	3.33	3.42
Nurse aides	1.73
Licensed practical nurses	0.76
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)	26.8%	45.9%	45.8%
Registered nurse turnover	0.0%	42.1%	42.9%
Administrators who left	0

CMS expects 3.48 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.16 on weekdays and 2.45 on weekends, 22% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.18 in April to June 2025 to 2.96 in January to March 2026.

Quarter	All nursing staff	Registered nurses	Weekdays	Weekends	Contract staff share	Days with no RN hours	Residents a day
Jan to Mar 2026	2.96	0.47	3.16	2.45	0.0%	0 of 90	84
Oct to Dec 2025	3.13	0.46	3.31	2.66	0.0%	0 of 92	82
Jul to Sep 2025	3.03	0.47	3.23	2.52	0.0%	0 of 92	78
Apr to Jun 2025	3.18	0.48	3.39	2.67	0.0%	0 of 91	74
United States, Jan to Mar 2026	3.75	0.62	3.92	3.33	5.3%	0.5% of days
South Carolina, Jan to Mar 2026	3.62	0.53	3.81	3.13	7.2%	0.3% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Staff pay reports

Staff pay at this home

No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.

Official wage estimates for South Carolina

Job	Median	Middle half	Employed
South Carolina, all employers
CNAs (nursing assistants)	$17.90	$16.81 to $19.08	21,760
LPNs and LVNs	$29.72	$27.59 to $34.24	9,400
Registered nurses	$39.60	$37.17 to $46.75	49,750
United States, nursing care facilities
CNAs (nursing assistants)	$20.67	$17.91 to $22.55	534,270
LPNs and LVNs	$33.86	$30.05 to $37.40	188,210
Registered nurses	$41.11	$37.85 to $47.68	142,270

Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.

How staff pay reports work · CNA pay by state

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

Measure	This home	South Carolina	US
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	11.4	11.9	13.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	0.6	0.6	0.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	0.4	1.3	1.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	1.8	3.2	3.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	2.0	1.5	1.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	10.5	12.7	14.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	4.5	5.1	4.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	20.8	15.3	15.4
Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231	25.9	24.3	23.8
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231	10.2	13.9	12.0

Short-term rehab results

For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Pruitthealth- Dillon's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (44.0% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.

Went home or back to the community

44.0% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 51.5% · South Carolina: 53 better, 21 worse

Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 46 eligible stays.

Potentially preventable readmissions

11.4% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 10.7% · South Carolina: 0 better, 5 worse

Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 48 eligible stays.

Infections that led to a hospital stay

8.3% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 7.1% · South Carolina: 1 better, 3 worse

Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 27 eligible stays.

Self-care and mobility at discharge

Not reported

CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

Median of homes: South Carolina57.6% · US 56.6%

Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 9 residents counted.

Falls with major injury

Not reported

CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

Median of homes: South Carolina0.5% · US 0.0%

Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 10 residents counted.

New or worsened pressure ulcers

Not reported

CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

Median of homes: South Carolina2.1% · US 1.7%

Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 10 residents counted.

Medication list given at discharge

Not reported

CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

Median of homes: South Carolina98.3% · US 98.7%

Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 8 residents counted.

Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.

Owners and operators

Legal business name: PRUITTHEALTH - DILLON, LLC. CMS links this home to Pruitthealth, a group of 96 nursing homes averaging 3 stars overall.

Name	Role	Type	Since
United Health Services of Georgia, Inc.	Direct ownership interest	Organization	11/17/2007
United Health Services of South Carolina Inc	Direct ownership interest	Organization	11/27/2013
J Paige Pruitt Trust	Indirect ownership interest	Organization	06/22/2021
Lisa P Hamby Trust	Indirect ownership interest	Organization	06/22/2021
Neil L Pruitt Jr Trust	Indirect ownership interest	Organization	06/22/2021
Nwp 2020 Child Tr Fbo J Paige Pruitt	Indirect ownership interest	Organization	01/17/2007
Nwp 2020 Child Tr Fbo Lisa P Hamby	Indirect ownership interest	Organization	01/17/2007
Nwp 2020 Child Tr Fbo Neil L Pruitt Jr	Indirect ownership interest	Organization	01/17/2007
Uhs-Pruitt Holdings, Inc.	Indirect ownership interest	Organization	01/17/2007
United Health Services Inc	Indirect ownership interest	Organization	01/17/2007
Small, Philip	Corporate director	Individual	11/27/2013
Pruitt, Nancy	Corporate officer	Individual	11/27/2013
Pruitt, Neil	Corporate officer	Individual	01/12/2007
Campbell, Celeste	Operational/managerial control	Individual	06/30/2013
Wallace, James	Operational/managerial control	Individual	06/01/2013
J Paige Pruitt Trust	Adp of the SNF	Organization	06/22/2021
Lisa P Hamby Trust	Adp of the SNF	Organization	06/22/2021
Neil L Pruitt Jr Trust	Adp of the SNF	Organization	06/22/2021
Nwp 2020 Child Tr Fbo J Paige Pruitt	Adp of the SNF	Organization	01/17/2007
Nwp 2020 Child Tr Fbo Neil L Pruitt Jr	Adp of the SNF	Organization	01/17/2007
Pruitt Properties Inc	Adp of the SNF	Organization	01/07/2007
Pruitthealth Consulting Services Inc	Adp of the SNF	Organization	11/26/2013
Campbell, Celeste	Adp of the SNF	Individual	03/21/2025
Wallace, James	Adp of the SNF	Individual	02/20/2026

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on June 23, 2026: "Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights."
When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on May 23, 2025: "PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities"
Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on June 23, 2026: "Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards."
What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on May 23, 2025: "Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program."
Who is on the floor on Saturday and Sunday, and how many residents does each aide care for?Weekend nurse staffing here was 2.45 hours per resident per day, below the South Carolina average of 3.33.

Other nursing homes nearby

Carlyle Senior Care of Fork
Fork, 12.7 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 8 citations
Musc Health Mullins Nursing Home
Mullins, 17.2 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 13 citations
Bennettsville Health and Rehabilitation Center
Bennettsville, 19.7 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 18 citations
Pembroke Center
Pembroke, 20 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 38 citations
Scotia Village - SNF
Laurinburg, 22.4 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 4 citations
Senior Care of Marion
Marion, 22.6 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 15 citations
Scottish Pines Rehabilitation and Nursing Center
Laurinburg, 23.6 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 5 citations
Harborview Lumberton
Lumberton, 24.7 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 19 citations

South Carolina contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in South Carolina. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Inspections and complaints: South Carolina Department of Public Health, Healthcare Quality, Nursing Homes, the state agency that inspects nursing homes for CMS and takes complaints about care.
Resident advocate: South Carolina Long Term Care Ombudsman Program, Department on Aging, 1-800-868-9095. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
State inspection reports: SC Survey and Certification Public CMS-2567 Search, where South Carolina publishes its own records on licensed homes.

Common questions

What is Pruitthealth- Dillon's Medicare star rating?: CMS rates Pruitthealth- Dillon 3 out of 5 stars overall, with 3 for health inspections, 3 for staffing and 3 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Pruitthealth- Dillon get at its last inspection?: 2 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on June 23, 2026. The South Carolina average is 3.7.
Has Pruitthealth- Dillon been fined?: Yes. CMS lists 1 fine totaling $10,036 in the last three years.
Does Pruitthealth- Dillon accept Medicaid?: It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Pruitthealth- Dillon?: CMS lists 24 owners and managers, and links the home to Pruitthealth. Legal business name: PRUITTHEALTH - DILLON, LLC.

Sources

Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.