Home / North Carolina / Pembroke
310 E Wardell Drive, Pembroke, NC 28372 · Robeson County · (910) 521-1273
84 certified beds, about 68 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1992
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 345409 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on November 21, 2025, inspectors cited 17 health deficiencies (the North Carolina average is 4.7, the national average 9.2).
Of 38 health citations since September 2023, 2 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (1 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 3 fines totaling $37,339 in the last three years; the largest was $16,136, and the latest is dated November 21, 2025.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.37 hours per resident per day, against 3.85 across North Carolina and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.50 of those hours.
68.4% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (North Carolina average 49.0%).
CMS links it to Genesis Healthcare, an affiliated group of 184 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 38 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to obtain a physician's order for the initiation of oxygen therapy for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for respiratory services (Resident #1).
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observation, and resident, staff, Physician and Wound Physician interviews, the facility failed to administer two prescribed medications, ketoconazole 2% shampoo (an antifungal shampoo used to reduce scalp flaking, scaling, and itching) and fluocinonide 0.05% topical solution (a topical steroid used to relieve inflammation and itching) in accordance with the physician's orders. This failure occurred for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for significant medication errors (Resident #1).
Inspectors wroteBased on record reviews, and interviews with staff, Director of Nursing, Pharmacist, Administrator, and the Medical Director, facility failed to verify right patient before administering insulin, which resulted in an insulin injection being administered to a resident with the same last name without an insulin order for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for significant medication errors (Resident #19).
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review, staff interviews, Physician and Consulting Pharmacist interviews, the facility administered an expired medication that was stored in the medication cart to Resident #10 via enteral tube feeding for 9 days for a total of 18 doses. Resident #10 was sent to the Emergency Department and had no adverse outcome as a result of receiving this expired medication.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review, resident and staff interviews, the Consultant Pharmacist, and the Medical Director interviews the facility failed to have effective safeguards and systems in place to prevent drug diversion of discontinued narcotic pain medication (Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen oral tablet 5-325 milligrams) which resulted in a total of 20 missing tablets. This occurred for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #3) reviewed for misappropriation of medications.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to 1) secure an unattended medication cart that was facing the hallway for 13 minutes during which time 3 staff members and a resident propelling himself in a wheelchair passed the unattended opened medication cart for 1 of 1 medication carts observed (400 hall medication cart), and 2) remove loose and unsecured pills (200 hall cart), label inhalation breathing medication vials with an open date and store the vials according to manufacturer guidelines (300 hall cart) for 2 of 4 medication carts and failed to discard expired over the counter (OTC) stock medication from 1 of 2 medication storage rooms (200 hall medication room) that were reviewed for medication storage.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review, and staff interviews the facility failed to 1.) implement the infection control policy and procedures for special contact and droplet precautions for a resident (Resident #68) who was positive for COVID 19. Nurse Aide # 9 was observed walking into Resident# 68's room without wearing gloves or a gown and moved the mechanical lift that was used to transfer Resident # 68 from her bed. Nurse Aide #9 rolled the mechanical lift into the hallway without cleaning it, placed it against the wall, and left the lift unattended. Nurse Aide # 9 went back into Resident #68's room without donning gloves and a gown and moved the bedside table, picked up Resident #68's water cup and handed it to the resident. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review, and staff and resident interviews, the facility failed to honor a resident's right to make choices when a nurse aide (NA) turned off a resident's (Resident #21) air conditioning after she told them not to turn it off. This deficient practice occurred for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for choices.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, staff interviews, and Nurse Practitioner (NP) interview, the facility failed to notify the provider of significant weight gain for a resident with Congestive Heart Failure (CHF) and on diuretic medication (a medication that helps the body remove excess fluid) for 1 of 1 sampled resident reviewed for notification of change. (Resident #62)
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide written grievance summaries for 2 out of 2 residents reviewed (Resident #10 and #62).
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review, and interviews with residents and staff, the facility failed to protect a resident's right to be free from neglect when two nurse aides (NA) on the 3:00 PM to 11:00 PM shift refused a dependent resident's (Resident #21) requests for transferring her to bed and incontinence care. Resident #21 was left sitting up in her electric wheelchair in her room that had a strong odor resembling bowel incontinence. When Resident #21's incontinence care was provided her brief was heavily soiled with a bowel movement that was caked and dried on her skin. Resident #21 was in a semi-private room, and she stated she was embarrassed and humiliated in front of her roommate by the NAs refusal of care. The deficient practice occurred for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for neglect.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to complete quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments within 14 days of the Assessment Reference Date (ARD-referring to the last day of the observation period for 2 of 22 residents sampled for assessments (Resident #17 and Resident #21).
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review, and interviews with resident and staff, the facility failed to provide incontinence care to a dependent resident for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL) care (Resident #21).
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review, staff interviews, the Registered Dietician, the Nurse Practitioner and the Physician interviews the facility failed to verify the accuracy of physician ordered weights for a resident (Resident #6) with congestive heart failure. This occurred for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #6) reviewed for quality of care. Based on observations, record review, staff interviews, the Registered Dietician, the Nurse Practitioner and the Physician interviews the facility failed to verify the accuracy of physician ordered weights for a resident (Resident #6) with congestive heart failure. This occurred for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for quality of care.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, staff interviews, and the Wound Care Physician's interview, the facility failed to complete initial wound assessments upon admission to include the wound descriptions with measurements and obtain wound care orders upon admission and when the wound vac (vacuum assisted closure (vac), negative pressure wound therapy that uses suction to aid in wound healing) was not available in the facility for a resident admitted with multiple pressure wounds and osteomyelitis (infection of the bone tissue) requiring intravenous and oral antibiotics. This occurred for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #86) reviewed for wound care.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review, and staff interviews the facility failed to provide care in a safe manner when Nurse Aide #8 provided incontinence care to a resident (Resident #39). This resulted in Resident #39 rolling off of the bed onto the floor sustaining a fracture to the first cervical vertebrae (C1) of the cervical spine. This occurred for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for accidents (Resident #39). Resident #39 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included cerebral vascular accident (CVA), hemiplegia (paralysis or weakness on one side of the body), and dementia. A care plan dated 4/18/25 revealed Resident #39 required assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs) including bed mobility due to having limited mobility related to cerebral vascular accident (CVA) with hemiplegia. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, staff interviews, Nurse Practitioner (NP), and Registered Dietitian (RD) interviews, the facility failed to determine the accuracy of a weight when a resident had a significant weight gain of 26.8 pounds in 19 days and failed to communicate the significant weight gain to the Registered Dietitian for a nutritional assessment for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for nutrition (Resident #62).
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to complete a performance review every 12 months for 1 of 1 nursing assistant (Nurse Aide #4) reviewed to ensure in-service education was designed to address the outcome of the performance review.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, staff interviews, and the Consultant Pharmacist's interview the facility failed to act on the Pharmacist's recommendation to remove a residents (Resident #3) discontinued narcotic pain medication (Hydrocodone- Acetaminophen 5-325 milligrams) from the medication cart. This resulted in 20 missing tablets. This occurred for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #3) reviewed for medication administration.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, staff interviews, the Pharmacy District Director, and the Wound Physician interviews, the facility failed to administer two intravenous (IV) antibiotics (Piperacillin Sodium Tazobactam - a broad-spectrum antibiotic used to treat moderate to severe bacterial infections and Vancomycin - an antibiotic used to treat severe infections) prescribed for the treatment of osteomyelitis (infection of the bone) following admission for a resident (Resident #86). This resulted in 4 missed doses of the Piperacillin and 4 missed doses of the Vancomycin. This occurred for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for medication administration. The hospital discharge instructions dated 3/15/25 revealed an order for Resident #86 for Piperacillin Sodium Tazobactam. Use 3.375 grams intravenously every 8 hours for osteomyelitis for 18 days. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, and staff , Psychiatrist, Nurse Practitioner, and the Medical Director's interviews the facility failed to protect a residents right to be free from resident-to-resident abuse when Resident #1 hit and scratched Resident #2 on her left arm resulting in multiple areas of bruising and abrasions. This occurred for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for abuse (Resident #1).
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, and hospice staff and facility staff interviews, the facility failed to coordinate a plan of care with the Hospice provider and ensure required Hospice documentation was in the medical record for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #5) reviewed for Hospice care.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review, and staff, Nurse Practitioner, and Consultant Pharmacist interviews the facility failed to 1.) follow a physicians order and apply an ace wrap to a residents left foot due to swelling sustained from a fall (Resident #17) and 2.) obtain a blood pressure prior to the administration of the antihypertensive medication Hydralazine 25 milligrams prescribed three times a day with parameters to hold the medication for systolic blood pressure less than 120 millimeters of mercury (Resident #5). This occurred for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for quality of care.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review, staff, the Nurse Practitioner, and the Consultant Pharmacist interviews the facility failed to accurately transcribe an antihistamine order (Hydroxyzine 25 milligrams) prescribed as needed for itching. This resulted in the resident receiving the medication daily instead of as needed. The resident experienced no outcome from receiving the medication. This occurred for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #59) reviewed for medication administration.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to protect a resident's right to be free from physical abuse. Resident #80 removed some of Resident #67's belongings from her room and when Resident #67 went to retrieve the belongings Resident #80 denied having them. Resident #80 then swung at Resident #67, and in response, Resident #67 punched Resident #80 in the forehead with a closed fist for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for abuse. Resident #80 was not injured.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, and resident, staff, Nurse Practitioner and Physician interviews, the facility failed to provide care safely to a dependent resident when Resident #46 fell off the bed during care on 7/30/24 and 9/20/24 resulting in minor injuries. This deficient practice affected 1 of 3 residents reviewed for falls.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, resident, staff, Nurse Practitioner and Physician interviews, the facility failed to provide sufficient nursing staff to ensure the necessary supervision and assistance level was implemented in accordance with the resident's plan of care for the safe provision of activities of daily living care for a dependent resident. This deficient practice affected 1 of 3 residents reviewed for sufficient nursing staff.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide 8 consecutive hours of Registered Nurse (RN) coverage on 5 of 60 days reviewed.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, and staff and Consultant Pharmacist interviews the facility failed to act on the Pharmacist recommendations to clarify the dose of an antihypertensive medication (Hydralazine 25 milligrams) and to add blood pressure checks prior to administration. This occurred for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #5) reviewed for medication administration.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to maintain communication and coordination of services provided by Hospice in the medical record for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for Hospice services (Resident #41).
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, and staff interviews the facility failed to maintain complete medical records in the area of medication administration. This occurred for 3 of 5 residents (Resident #36, Resident #38 and Resident #54) reviewed for medication administration.
Inspectors wrote2) Resident #4 was admitted into the facility 12/7/2020 with diagnoses of unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, with psychotic disturbance, generalized anxiety disorder, depressive episodes, and acquired absence of right leg above knee. A review of Resident #4's quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] indicated that he was moderately cognitively impaired, had no behaviors, and no rejection of care. A review Resident #4's comprehensive care plan revealed a focus created on 2/9/21 of resident/patient exhibits or has the potential to exhibit physical and verbal behaviors related to: unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, with psychotic disturbance. Interventions included evaluating the nature and circumstances (i.e., triggers) of physical behavior with resident and/or resident representative. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interviews of residents, family, resident representative, and staff, the facility failed to provide nail care for dependent residents (Resident #s 32, 41, 45, and 50) and failed to provide hair wash for dependent residents (Resident #s 13, 32, 41, and 45) for 5 of 6 residents reviewed for activities of daily living.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, staff, Pharmacy Manager, Nurse Practitioner, and the Medical Directors interviews the facility failed to provide pain management by a.) not administering an as needed dose of the opioid medication Oxycodone prescribed for pain to a resident (Resident #222) who experienced frequent pain and b.) not following up with the Pharmacy regarding the anticonvulsant medication Lyrica prescribed three times a day for pain which resulted in the resident not receiving 11 doses of the medication and having complaints of pain for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #222) reviewed for pain management.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review, and staff interviews the facility failed to record an opened date on multi dose oral inhalers and record an opened date on ophthalmic drops on 3 of 3 medication carts reviewed for medication storage.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observations and staff interviews the facility's Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) program failed to maintain implemented procedures and monitor interventions the committee put in place following the recertification and complaint investigation survey completed on 7/6/21. This was for a deficiency originally cited in the area of Label/Store Drugs and Biologicals (F761). The continued failure during two federal surveys of record shows a pattern of the facility's inability to sustain an effective QA program.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, staff, and the Pharmacy Managers interviews the facility failed to obtain a medication (Lyrica) prescribed for pain from the Pharmacy resulting in the resident not receiving 11 doses of the medication for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #222) reviewed for the provision of pharmacy services.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review, and staff interviews the facility failed to protect a resident ' s right to be free from abuse when a cognitively impaired resident (Resident #1) had a physical altercation with another cognitively impaired resident (Resident #2). Resident #1 punched Resident #2 in the face on 08/10/23. Resident #2 was assessed with redness to his face and a small abrasion to his nose and forehead; his emotional response was assessed as baseline (no change). This was for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for abuse.
8 fire safety citations on file: 3 on November 21, 2025, 4 on November 20, 2024, 1 on November 16, 2023.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| November 21, 2025 | Fine | $10,335 |
| June 5, 2025 | Fine | $10,868 |
| May 31, 2024 | Fine | $16,136 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | North Carolina | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.37 | 3.85 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.50 | 0.62 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.05 | 3.42 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.04 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.83 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 68.4% | 49.0% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 80.0% | 45.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 4.52 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.50 on weekdays and 3.05 on weekends, 13% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 12.1% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 2.94 in April to June 2025 to 3.37 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.37 | 0.50 | 3.50 | 3.05 | 12.1% | 0 of 90 | 68 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.36 | 0.56 | 3.48 | 3.05 | 3.1% | 0 of 92 | 72 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.11 | 0.44 | 3.18 | 2.93 | 15.6% | 0 of 92 | 74 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 2.94 | 0.38 | 3.02 | 2.74 | 29.0% | 0 of 91 | 76 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| North Carolina, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.65 | 0.53 | 3.82 | 3.25 | 8.0% | 0.7% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| North Carolina, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.49 | $17.28 to $21.08 | 64,010 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $30.42 | $28.50 to $33.51 | 18,010 |
| Registered nurses | $40.56 | $37.87 to $49.06 | 111,120 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | North Carolina | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 13.2 | 15.6 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.8 | 0.7 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.2 | 2.3 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.3 | 3.5 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.2 | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 20.9 | 18.3 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 8.8 | 5.5 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 12.0 | 14.0 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 25.1 | 22.9 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 18.1 | 12.9 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 3.1 | 1.8 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 5.4 | 1.8 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Pembroke Center's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (42.4% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
42.4% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · North Carolina: 93 better, 25 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 36 eligible stays.
10.1% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · North Carolina: 1 better, 4 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 38 eligible stays.
6.5% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · North Carolina: 1 better, 3 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 28 eligible stays.
44.0% this home
Median of homes: North Carolina54.0% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 25 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: North Carolina0.6% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 40 residents counted.
6.9% this home
Median of homes: North Carolina2.5% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 40 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: North Carolina97.5% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 7 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: SUNBRIDGE RETIREMENT CARE ASSOCIATES, LLC. CMS links this home to Genesis Healthcare, a group of 184 nursing homes averaging 2.3 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sunbridge Healthcare LLC | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 02/01/2009 |
| Fc Gen Operations Investment LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 12/01/2012 | |
| Gen Operations I LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 12/01/2012 | |
| Gen Operations II LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 12/01/2012 | |
| Genesis Healthcare Inc | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 02/02/2015 | |
| Genesis Healthcare LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 12/01/2012 | |
| Genesis Holdings LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 02/02/2015 | |
| Sun Healthcare Group, Inc. | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 02/01/2020 | |
| Whitman, Arnold | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Individual | 12/01/2024 | |
| Berg, Michael | Corporate officer | Individual | 12/01/2012 | |
| Bridgeford, Laura | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/01/2024 | |
| Mendelson, Avi | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/01/2024 | |
| Genesis Administrative Services LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 01/01/2019 | |
| Powerback Rehabilitation LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 01/01/2019 | |
| Parham, Syreeta | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/01/2024 | |
| Seder, Jeffrey | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/01/2024 | |
| Genesis Administrative Services LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 02/04/2025 | |
| Powerback Rehabilitation LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 02/04/2025 | |
| Parham, Syreeta | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 02/04/2025 | |
| Seder, Jeffrey | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 02/04/2025 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in North Carolina. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.