Pruitthealth - Virginia Park
1000 Briarcliff Road Ne, Atlanta, GA 30306 · De Kalb County · (404) 875-6456
128 certified beds, about 118 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 1992
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 115531 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on June 12, 2025, inspectors cited 5 health deficiencies (the Georgia average is 5, the national average 9.2).
Of 19 health citations since June 2022, 4 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (2 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $8,788 in the last three years; the largest was $8,788, and the latest is dated June 12, 2025.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.72 hours per resident per day, against 3.56 across Georgia and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.50 of those hours.
41.1% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Georgia average 46.0%).
CMS links it to Pruitthealth, an affiliated group of 96 nursing homes.
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 19 health citations on file.
June 12, 2025Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 5 citations
- G Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, staff interviews, record review, and a review of the facility's policy titled, Care Plans, the facility failed to develop a care plan for one resident(R) (R51) related to wound care for one of 31 sampled residents. Actual Harm was identified on March 21, 2025, when R51 sustained a pressure ulcer to the left ankle due to the facility not conducting routine skin checks while wearing a wander guard.
- G Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, staff interviews, record reviews, and review of the facility policy titled, Wound Observation and Assessment Documentation, the facility failed to perform consistent weekly skin assessments and failed to follow up on identified skin issues for one resident (R) (R51) of thirteen residents. Actual Harm was identified to have occurred on March 21, 2025, when R51 sustained a pressure ulcer to the left ankle due to the facility not conducting routine skin checks while wearing a wander guard.
- D Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled, Medication Administration: General Guidelines, the facility failed to adequately assess one of 31 Residents (R) (R269) for self-administration of medication.
- D Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and review of the facility policy titled, Infection Control-Housekeeping Services the facility failed to ensure three of 18 rooms (Rm 306, 307, and 308) on the 300 Hall Packaged Terminal Air Conditioner (PTAC) units air filters were free or dirt and debris. The deficient practice had the probability of diminishing the air quality for the residents residing in rooms 306, 307 and 308.
- D Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, staff interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the bilevel positive airway pressure, (BiPAP) was properly stored in a manner to prevent contamination for one of 19 residents (R) (R54). The deficient practice had the potential to increase the risk of respiratory infection.
January 4, 2024Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 6 citations
- F Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, staff interviews, record reviews, review of the facility's policy titled, Covid-19 Isolation and Cohorting Process, and review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Interim Infection Prevention and Control Recommendations for Healthcare Personnel During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic the facility failed to follow droplet transmission-based precautions procedures prior to entering and exiting Covid positive resident rooms on one of four halls.
- D Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, resident and staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled, Self-Administration of Medications by Patients/Residents, the facility failed to assess and obtain a physician order for one of 29 sampled Residents (R) (R75) to safely self-administer and store nebulizer treatments at bedside. This failure had the potential for medication error and to alter the effectiveness of the medication.
- D Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interviews, record review, and review of facility's policy titled, Refusal of Care Against Medical Advice, the facility failed to document the risks and benefits of remaining at the facility, and notification of the physician at the time of discharge for one of 29 sampled Residents (R) (R116) that discharged from the facility Against Medical Advice (AMA).
- D Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled, Care Plan, the facility failed to ensure that a care plan was developed for one of 29 sampled Residents (R) (R568) reviewed for limitation in range of motion and Activities of Daily Living (ADL) deficits. This failure had the potential for the resident not to receive treatment and care according to her needs.
- D Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, resident and staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled Care Plans, the facility failed to revise the comprehensive care plan as needed related to self-administration of nebulizer treatments for one of 29 sampled Residents (R) (R75) following a hospital stay. This failure had the potential for the resident not to receive treatment and care according to her needs.
- D Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 29 sampled Residents (R) (R568) reviewed for limited range of motion received passive range of motion exercises as needed to address limited range of motion in her bilateral upper extremities. This failure created a potential for worsening contracture (fixed resistance to passive stretch), pain, or skin breakdown.
June 16, 2022Standard inspection · 8 citations
- L Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and interviews, the facility failed to maintain the facility at a safe temperature range of 71 to 81 degrees Fahrenheit (F) on four of four hallways, during four out of five survey days. Additionally, the facility failed to maintain a homelike environment for 24 of 63 rooms in the facility. On 6/16/2022, a determination was made that a situation in which the facility's noncompliance with one or more requirements of participation had caused or had the likelihood to cause, serious injury, harm, impairment, or death to residents. The facility's Administrator and Director of Health Services (DHS) were informed of the Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) on 6/16/2022 at 4:53 p.m. The noncompliance related to the immediate jeopardy was identified to have existed on 6/13/2022. The IJ is outlined as follows: [...]
- L Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review, interviews, and review of the policy titled Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Plan, the facility failed to have an effective Quality Assurance process to implement action plans for identified systemic quality deficiencies. Specifically, the facility failed to maintain a safe temperature range of 71 to 81°F, during four out of five survey days. The census was 116. On 6/16/2022, a determination was made that a situation in which the facility's noncompliance with one or more requirements of participation had caused or had the likelihood to cause, serious injury, harm, impairment, or death to residents. The facility's Administrator and Director of Health Services (DHS) were informed of the Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) on 6/16/2022 at 4:53 p.m. The noncompliance related to the immediate jeopardy was identified to have existed on 6/13/2022. [...]
- E Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to implement/develop care plans for four residents (R) (R#64, R#69, R#96, and R#100) of 41 sampled residents. Specifically, not implementing care plan related to oxygen administration for R#64, R#69, and R#100; and not developing care plan for R#96 for self-administration of medications.
- D Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review, interviews, and policy review titled Resident Independent Self-Administration and Medication Assistance of Medication, the facility failed to ensure one of 41 sampled residents (R) (R#96) had a physician's order for self-administration of respiratory medications prior to nebulizer medications being kept at bedside and self-administered by resident.
- D Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, interviews, and review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI,) the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for two of 41 sampled residents (R) (R#46 and R#64).
- D Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, record reviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered as ordered for one of 41 sampled residents (R) (R#323).
- D Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, record reviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure that three residents (R) (R#64, R#69, and R#100) of 11 residents that had tracheostomies with oxygen masks, received the correct physician ordered oxygen concentration. Findings Include: Review of the facility's policy titled Oxygen Administration dated 11/22/21, revealed the policy of [facility name] is to provide oxygen safely and accurately to appropriate patients .Oxygen will be administered by licensed personnel only when ordered by the physician, physician assistant (PA), or Nurse Practitioner (NP). 1. A review of the clinical record for R#64 revealed resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of but not limited to subarachnoid hemorrhage, acute respiratory failure, sepsis, and cardiac arrest. [...]
- D Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to maintain complete and accurately documented medical records for three of six residents (R) (R#87, R#26, R#47) records reviewed related to advance directives. Specifically, R#87 and R#26's code status levels were listed as Do Not Resuscitate (DNR); however, the physician orders indicated Full Code and R#47's code status was listed as Full Code and the physician orders indicated DNR.
Fire safety inspections
6 fire safety citations on file: 2 on January 4, 2024, 4 on June 16, 2022.
Every fire safety citation6 citations
- D Have an enclosure around a vertical opening shaft.
- D Have properly installed electrical wiring and gas equipment.
- E Have properly installed electrical wiring and gas equipment.
- D Provide properly protected cooking facilities.
- D Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
- D Ensure smoke barriers are constructed to a 1 hour fire resistance rating.
Fines and payment denials
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| June 12, 2025 | Fine | $8,788 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Georgia | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.72 | 3.56 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.05 | 3.10 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.26 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.96 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 41.1% | 46.0% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 41.7% | 44.5% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 4.20 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.00 on weekdays and 3.05 on weekends, 24% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.46 in April to June 2025 to 3.72 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.72 | 0.50 | 4.00 | 3.05 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 118 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.69 | 0.52 | 3.96 | 2.98 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 115 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.60 | 0.57 | 3.89 | 2.86 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 112 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.46 | 0.47 | 3.75 | 2.74 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 113 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Georgia, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.50 | 0.46 | 3.68 | 3.03 | 3.3% | 0.6% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Georgia | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 13.2 | 15.3 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.7 | 0.9 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.0 | 2.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.3 | 3.2 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.5 | 2.6 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 17.8 | 15.2 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 9.6 | 5.6 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 12.8 | 19.9 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 16.9 | 25.0 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 5.3 | 11.6 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.5 | 2.1 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.5 | 1.9 | 1.8 |
Owners and operators
Legal business name: PRUITTHEALTH - VIRGINIA PARK, LLC. CMS links this home to Pruitthealth, a group of 96 nursing homes averaging 3 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grant, Anthony | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 12/29/2019 | |
| Pruitt, Neil | Corporate director | Individual | 02/03/2015 | |
| Pruitt, Neil | Corporate officer | Individual | 02/03/2015 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 6 problems in this area, most recently on June 12, 2025: "Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured."
- How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 6 problems in this area, most recently on June 12, 2025: "Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate."
- How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on June 12, 2025: "Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing."
- What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on June 12, 2025: "Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program."
- Who is on the floor on Saturday and Sunday, and how many residents does each aide care for?Weekend nurse staffing here was 3.05 hours per resident per day, below the Georgia average of 3.10.
Other nursing homes nearby
- Westminster Commons Atlanta, 1.5 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 35 citations
- Parkside at Budd Terrace Operating Company LLC Atlanta, 1.6 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 37 citations
- Crossings at East Lake of Journey LLC, the Decatur, 3 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 29 citations
- Terraces at Peachtree Hills Place, the Atlanta, 3.2 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 7 citations
- A.g. Rhodes Home, Inc, the Atlanta, 3.3 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 14 citations
- Legacy Transitional Care & Rehabilitation Atlanta, 3.3 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 39 citations
- A.g. Rhodes Home Wesley Woods Atlanta, 3.3 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 13 citations
- Buckhead Center for Nursing & Healing Atlanta, 3.4 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 27 citations
Georgia contacts for a concern about a nursing home
These are the official offices in Georgia. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.
- Inspections and complaints: Georgia Department of Community Health, Healthcare Facility Regulation Division, the state agency that inspects nursing homes for CMS and takes complaints about care.
- Resident advocate: Georgia Long-Term Care Ombudsman Program, 1-866-552-4464. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
- State inspection reports: GaMap2Care, Find a Facility, where Georgia publishes its own records on licensed homes.
Common questions
- What is Pruitthealth - Virginia Park's Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates Pruitthealth - Virginia Park 3 out of 5 stars overall, with 3 for health inspections, 2 for staffing and 4 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did Pruitthealth - Virginia Park get at its last inspection?
- 5 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on June 12, 2025. The Georgia average is 5.
- Has Pruitthealth - Virginia Park been fined?
- Yes. CMS lists 1 fine totaling $8,788 in the last three years.
- Does Pruitthealth - Virginia Park accept Medicaid?
- It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
- Who owns Pruitthealth - Virginia Park?
- CMS lists 3 owners and managers, and links the home to Pruitthealth. Legal business name: PRUITTHEALTH - VIRGINIA PARK, LLC.
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.