What is Riderwood Village's Medicare star rating?

CMS rates Riderwood Village 5 out of 5 stars overall, with 5 for health inspections, 5 for staffing and 5 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).

How many deficiencies did Riderwood Village get at its last inspection?

5 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on September 22, 2025. The Maryland average is 17.

Has Riderwood Village been fined?

CMS lists no fines in the last three years.

Does Riderwood Village accept Medicaid?

It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.

Who owns Riderwood Village?

CMS lists 48 owners and managers, and links the home to Erickson Senior Living. Legal business name: RIDERWOOD VILLAGE, INC..

Riderwood Village: Inspections, Staffing & Ratings

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on September 22, 2025, inspectors cited 5 health deficiencies (the Maryland average is 17, the national average 9.2).

None of its 18 health citations since February 2019 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.

CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 5.37 hours per resident per day, against 3.87 across Maryland and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 1.54 of those hours.

19.3% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Maryland average 40.2%).

CMS links it to Erickson Senior Living, an affiliated group of 17 nursing homes.

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

1002/19

310/23

509/25

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 18 health citations on file.

Severity

Isolated

Pattern

Widespread

Immediate jeopardy

Actual harm

Potential for more than minimal harm

17D

Potential for minimal harm

September 22, 2025Standard inspection · 5 citations

D

Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.

F550 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 14, 2025

Inspectors wroteNumber of residents sampled: Number of residents cited: Based on observation, record review and interviews, it was determined that the facility staff failed to treat resident with dignity and care for resident's Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) /hygiene in a manner that promotes maintenance or enhancement of resident's quality of life. This was evident for 1 (Resident #69) out of 3 residents reviewed resident's dignity and ADLs/hygiene care during an annual survey.
D

Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.

F679 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 14, 2025

Inspectors wroteNumber of residents sampled: Number of residents cited: Based on observation, interview, record review and facility policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure meaningful activities to meet the needs/interests of the residents and to provide consistent resident centered/personalized activities for the dependent, confined residents in a manner that promotes maintenance or enhancement of residents' quality of life. This was evident for 2 (Resident #35 and Resident #69) out of 3 residents reviewed for ongoing resident centered activities program during an annual survey.
D

Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 14, 2025

Inspectors wroteBased on observations and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the environment of 1) resident's rooms and 2) a resident's shower chair was maintained in a manner that minimized the potential for the spread of infection. This was evident for 3 of 4 areas reviewed during the annual recertification survey.
D

Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.

F919 · Environmental · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 14, 2025

Inspectors wroteNumber of residents sampled: Number of residents cited: Based on observation and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the call system cord was accessible in the resident's bathroom. This was evident for 1 (Resident #57) of 1 resident's bathroom observed during the annual survey.
D

Put firmly secured handrails on each side of hallways.

F924 · Environmental · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 14, 2025

Inspectors wroteNumber of residents sampled: Number of residents cited: Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure that handrails were on all walls in resident areas including both resident's rooms and all resident common areas. This was evident for 2 of 2 nursing units and all common areas observed during the survey. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents, staff, and visitors on the units.

October 18, 2023Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 3 citations

D

Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.

F695 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 30, 2023

Inspectors wroteBased on observation, medical record review and interview it was determined the facility failed to follow physician's orders and the resident's care plan for the administration of oxygen. This was evident for 1 (#56) of 1 resident reviewed for the administration of oxygen.
D

Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.

F883 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 30, 2023

Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure documentation of residents' Pneumococcal vaccination status in their medical records. This was evident for 1 (Resident #369) of 5 residents reviewed who were eligible for Pneumococcal vaccines during the survey.
C

Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.

F623 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for minimal harm, widespread · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 30, 2023

Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to notify the resident/resident representative in writing of a transfer/discharge of a resident along with the reason for the transfer. This was evident for 3 (#52, #65, #218) of 3 residents reviewed for hospitalization.

February 7, 2019Standard inspection · 10 citations

D

Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.

F550 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 24, 2019

Inspectors wroteBased on observation and staff interview it was determined that facility staff failed to ensure that residents' dignity was provided in 1) Providing personal grooming care, and 2) Long call light response times. This was evident for 2 out of 32 residents (R#63 and R#93) reviewed during the survey process. The resident has a right to a dignified existence, self-determination, and communication with and access to persons and services inside and outside the facility.
D

Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.

F622 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 24, 2019

Inspectors wroteBased on the medical record and staff interviews, the facility staff failed to provide a Care Plan for Resident #69's continuing care, to the hospital where the resident was being sent. This was evident for 1 out of 2 residents investigated for hospitalization during the survey process.
D

Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.

F623 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 24, 2019

Inspectors wroteBased on the medical record and staff interviews, the facility staff failed to provide necessary written notices for Resident #69, or the resident's responsible party, of a transfer out of the facility. This was evident for 1 out of 2 residents investigated for hospitalization during the survey process.
D

Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.

F625 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 24, 2019

Inspectors wroteBased on the medical record and staff interviews, the facility staff failed to provide required written notice for Resident #69, or the resident's responsible party, of the bed hold policy during a transfer out of the facility. This was evident for 1 out of 2 residents investigated for hospitalization during the survey process.
D

Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.

F641 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 24, 2019

Inspectors wroteBased on medical records review and interview with staff it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure that the information used to complete the Minimum Data Set (MDS) significant change in condition assessment was accurate and complete when a diagnosis for hospice care was not coded into the MDS assessment. This was evident for 1 of 32 residents (Resident #1) reviewed in the annual survey.
D

Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 24, 2019

Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review it was determined the facility staff failed to develop a care plan for residents with impaired skin integrity. This was evident for 2 out of 4 resident's reviewed with non-pressure related skin conditions. Resident #8 and Resident #37 were affected by the deficient practice.
D

Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.

F657 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 24, 2019

Inspectors wroteBased on facility staff interview, family interview, and observation of residents' records, the facility failed to individualize the care plan for Resident # 72. This was evident for 1 out of 32 residents investigated for care plan revision.
D

Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

F689 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 24, 2019

Inspectors wroteBased on observation, medical record review and interviews of facility staff it was determined the facility failed to ensure that staff were transferring residents from bed to chair/chair to bed in accordance with the residents' care plans. This was evident for 2 of 7 sampled residents reviewed for accidents. Resident #1 and Resident #5 were affected by the deficient practice.
D

Post nurse staffing information every day.

F732 · Nursing and Physician Services · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 24, 2019

Inspectors wroteBased on observations and staff interviews it was determined that required staff posting information was not in a prominent place readily accessible to residents and visitors. This was evident during the entire survey process.
D

Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.

F744 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 24, 2019

Inspectors wroteBased on interviews with family and staff; and record review, the facility failed to individualize the care plan for 1 out of 32 residents investigated for individualized care plans.

Fire safety inspections

20 fire safety citations on file: 12 on September 22, 2025, 6 on October 18, 2023, 2 on February 7, 2019.

Every fire safety citation20 citations

F
Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.

K 345 · September 22, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
F
Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.

K 353 · September 22, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
F
To conduct inspection, testing and maintenance of fire doors by qualified individuals.

K 761 · September 22, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
F
Have a battery powered remote alarm panel in a location accessible by operating personnel.

K 916 · September 22, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
F
Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.

K 918 · September 22, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
E
Meet other general requirements.

K 200 · September 22, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
E
Keep aisles, corridors, and exits free of obstruction in case of emergency.

K 211 · September 22, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
E
Provide exit doors that are held open by devices that will automatically close on the activation of a fire alarm or smoke detector.

K 223 · September 22, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
E
Install proper backup exit lighting.

K 281 · September 22, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
E
Ensure that corridors are separated from use areas by walls constructed to limit the passage of smoke.

K 362 · September 22, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
E
Ensure proper usage of power strips and extension cords.

K 920 · September 22, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
E
Have proper medical gas storage and administration areas.

K 923 · September 22, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
F
Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.

K 345 · October 18, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
F
Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.

K 353 · October 18, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
F
Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.

K 918 · October 18, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
E
Have simulated fire drills held at unexpected times.

K 712 · October 18, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
D
To conduct inspection, testing and maintenance of fire doors by qualified individuals.

K 761 · October 18, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
D
Have proper medical gas storage and administration areas.

K 923 · October 18, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
C
Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.

K 353 · February 7, 2019 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
C
Have proper medical gas storage and administration areas.

K 923 · February 7, 2019 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

Measure	This home	Maryland	United States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)	5.37	3.87	3.86
Registered nurses	1.54	0.84	0.69
All nursing staff on weekends	4.63	3.47	3.42
Nurse aides	3.13
Licensed practical nurses	0.70
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)	19.3%	40.2%	45.8%
Registered nurse turnover	20.0%	38.7%	42.9%
Administrators who left	3

CMS expects 3.66 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 5.66 on weekdays and 4.63 on weekends, 18% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.83 in April to June 2025 to 5.37 in January to March 2026.

Quarter	All nursing staff	Registered nurses	Weekdays	Weekends	Contract staff share	Days with no RN hours	Residents a day
Jan to Mar 2026	5.37	1.54	5.66	4.63	0.0%	0 of 90	62
Oct to Dec 2025	5.02	1.41	5.27	4.38	0.0%	0 of 92	67
Jul to Sep 2025	4.83	1.32	5.05	4.26	0.0%	0 of 92	70
Apr to Jun 2025	4.83	1.27	5.07	4.25	0.0%	0 of 91	70
United States, Jan to Mar 2026	3.75	0.62	3.92	3.33	5.3%	0.5% of days
Maryland, Jan to Mar 2026	3.73	0.74	3.88	3.34	8.0%	0.1% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Staff pay reports

Staff pay at this home

No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.

Official wage estimates for Maryland

Job	Median	Middle half	Employed
Maryland, all employers
CNAs (nursing assistants)	$20.79	$18.46 to $22.00	27,720
LPNs and LVNs	$35.89	$31.40 to $38.30	9,560
Registered nurses	$47.98	$40.26 to $51.61	52,910
United States, nursing care facilities
CNAs (nursing assistants)	$20.67	$17.91 to $22.55	534,270
LPNs and LVNs	$33.86	$30.05 to $37.40	188,210
Registered nurses	$41.11	$37.85 to $47.68	142,270

Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.

How staff pay reports work · CNA pay by state

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

Measure	This home	Maryland	US
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	9.6	20.4	13.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	0.4	0.5	0.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	1.0	1.5	1.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	3.1	2.4	3.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	0.8	1.1	1.6
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	4.4	5.9	4.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	9.1	13.8	15.4
Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231	23.6	21.0	23.8
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231	8.1	9.8	12.0
Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231	0.5	1.3	1.9
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231	0.2	1.2	1.8

Short-term rehab results

For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Riderwood Village's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it better than the national rate (66.9% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.

Went home or back to the community

66.9% this home

Better than the national rate

US median of homes 51.5% · Maryland: 90 better, 29 worse

Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 356 eligible stays.

Potentially preventable readmissions

11.9% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 10.7% · Maryland: 0 better, 41 worse

Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 365 eligible stays.

Infections that led to a hospital stay

5.7% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 7.1% · Maryland: 5 better, 6 worse

Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 223 eligible stays.

Self-care and mobility at discharge

43.6% this home

Median of homes: Maryland61.2% · US 56.6%

Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 140 residents counted.

Falls with major injury

0.6% this home

Median of homes: Maryland0.4% · US 0.0%

Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 165 residents counted.

New or worsened pressure ulcers

0.8% this home

Median of homes: Maryland2.4% · US 1.7%

Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 165 residents counted.

Medication list given at discharge

100.0% this home

Median of homes: Maryland98.1% · US 98.7%

Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 121 residents counted.

Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.

Owners and operators

Legal business name: RIDERWOOD VILLAGE, INC.. CMS links this home to Erickson Senior Living, a group of 17 nursing homes averaging 4.2 stars overall.

Name	Role	Type	Share	Since
National Senior Communities, Inc	5% or greater direct ownership interest	Organization	100%	01/14/2021
Brown, Ian	Corporate director	Individual		04/01/2023
Brown, Patricia	Corporate director	Individual		04/01/2022
Clupper, Katherine	Corporate director	Individual		04/01/2024
Colins, Mary	Corporate director	Individual		04/01/2018
Douglas, Karen	Corporate director	Individual		03/26/2026
Erstad, Eileen	Corporate director	Individual		02/15/2007
Jacque, Zina	Corporate director	Individual		04/01/2018
Leonard, Monty	Corporate director	Individual		04/01/2022
Moscato, Mary	Corporate director	Individual		04/01/2024
Paulk, Pamela	Corporate director	Individual		04/01/2022
Pomeranz, William	Corporate director	Individual		04/01/2025
Reel, Stephanie	Corporate director	Individual		04/22/2013
Roskiewicz, Michael	Corporate director	Individual		04/01/2019
Sharp, Russel	Corporate director	Individual		04/01/2023
Suchmann, Donna	Corporate director	Individual		03/26/2026
Wallick, Daniel	Corporate director	Individual		04/01/2025
Brown, Patricia	Corporate officer	Individual		04/01/2023
Colins, Mary	Corporate officer	Individual		04/01/2019
Embley, Mark	Corporate officer	Individual		10/27/2021
Erstad, Eileen	Corporate officer	Individual		04/01/2023
Hall, John	Corporate officer	Individual		04/30/2010
Merkert, Robert	Corporate officer	Individual		03/26/2026
Sawicki, Scott	Corporate officer	Individual		04/01/2024
Stiner, Pamela	Corporate officer	Individual		04/01/2024
Tyler, Daniel	Corporate officer	Individual		04/01/2025
Erickson Senior Living LLC	Operational/managerial control	Organization		11/23/2020
National Senior Communities, Inc	Operational/managerial control	Organization		01/14/2021
Butler, Richard	Operational/managerial control	Individual		01/01/2014
Diggs, Lynne	Operational/managerial control	Individual		08/05/2019
Embley, Mark	Operational/managerial control	Individual		10/27/2021
Hall, John	Operational/managerial control	Individual		04/30/2010
Loomis, Meagan	Operational/managerial control	Individual		09/29/2025
Merkert, Robert	Operational/managerial control	Individual		03/26/2026
Stiner, Pamela	Operational/managerial control	Individual		04/01/2024
Sweetser, Christian	Operational/managerial control	Individual		03/01/2022
Bison, Michael	Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF	Individual		10/15/2025
Ridley, Fred	Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF	Individual		10/15/2025
Sones, Randall	Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF	Individual		10/15/2025
Erickson Senior Living LLC	Adp of the SNF	Organization		03/12/2025
National Senior Communities, Inc	Adp of the SNF	Organization		01/14/2021
Diggs, Lynne	Adp of the SNF	Individual		03/12/2025
Embley, Mark	Adp of the SNF	Individual		10/27/2021
Hall, John	Adp of the SNF	Individual		04/30/2010
Loomis, Meagan	Adp of the SNF	Individual		09/29/2025
Merkert, Robert	Adp of the SNF	Individual		03/26/2026
Stiner, Pamela	Adp of the SNF	Individual		04/01/2024
Sweetser, Christian	Adp of the SNF	Individual		03/01/2022

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 6 problems in this area, most recently on September 22, 2025: "Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights."
How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on September 22, 2025: "Provide activities to meet all resident's needs."
When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on February 7, 2019: "Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment."
What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on September 22, 2025: "Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program."
How long has the current administrator been here?CMS counts 3 administrators who left in the period it measured.

Other nursing homes nearby

Autumn Lake Healthcare at Silver Spring
Silver Spring, 1.1 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 38 citations
Sterling Care Hillhaven
Adelphi, 1.4 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 18 citations
Fairland Center
Silver Spring, 1.9 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 60 citations
Complete Care at Springbrook
Silver Spring, 2.6 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 45 citations
Autumn Lake Healthcare at Oak Manor
Burtonsville, 3 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 41 citations
Harmony Suites Rehabilitation and Wellness Center
Silver Spring, 3.4 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 62 citations
Adelphi Nursing and Rehabilitation Center
Adelphi, 3.7 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 89 citations
Althea Woodland Nursing Home
Silver Spring, 3.9 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 30 citations

Maryland contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in Maryland. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Inspections and complaints: Maryland Department of Health, Office of Health Care Quality, the state agency that inspects nursing homes for CMS and takes complaints about care.
Resident advocate: Maryland Long-Term Care Ombudsman Program, Maryland Department of Aging, 800-243-3425. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
State inspection reports: Maryland Health Care Commission, Maryland Quality Reporting, Nursing Homes, where Maryland publishes its own records on licensed homes.

Common questions

What is Riderwood Village's Medicare star rating?: CMS rates Riderwood Village 5 out of 5 stars overall, with 5 for health inspections, 5 for staffing and 5 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Riderwood Village get at its last inspection?: 5 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on September 22, 2025. The Maryland average is 17.
Has Riderwood Village been fined?: CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
Does Riderwood Village accept Medicaid?: It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Riderwood Village?: CMS lists 48 owners and managers, and links the home to Erickson Senior Living. Legal business name: RIDERWOOD VILLAGE, INC..

Sources

Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.