710 Sunrise Drive, Ferdinand, IN 47532 · Dubois County · (812) 504-2048
88 certified beds, about 86 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1993
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 155493 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on May 22, 2026, inspectors cited 5 health deficiencies (the Indiana average is 7.2, the national average 9.2).
None of its 13 health citations since December 2023 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 2.91 hours per resident per day, against 3.69 across Indiana and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.43 of those hours.
44.3% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Indiana average 45.9%).
CMS links it to Trilogy Health Services, an affiliated group of 127 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 13 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents with pressure ulcers received necessary treatment for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. Wound assessments were incomplete and treatment orders were not followed. (Resident 3)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident with weight loss was provided ordered nutritional supplements and monitored for weight loss for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for weight loss. Phyisican orders were not followed and meals and supplements were documented as given and were not. (Resident 48)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the clinical record included accurate documentation for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for nutrition and 2 of 2 resident reviewed for pressure ulcers. Documentation showed resident was getting supplements but was not and meal/snack consumption was documented before the resident had them. Resident's wound documentation lacked complete wound assessments. (Resident 48, Resident 2, Resident 3)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide sanitary care for 1 of 2 observations of incontinence care and 2 of 2 observations of wound care. The nursing staff failed to lather hands with soap for 20-30 seconds during handwashing, change gloves after touching multiple items in the bathroom during incontinence care, staff left an incontinence pad on after a resident urinated in it, and hands were not sanitized and gloves were not changed between dirty and clean tasks. (Resident 37, Resident 2, Resident 3)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure waste was properly contained in dumpsters for 2 of 2 random observations. A full garbage bag was observed hanging out of the dumpster, debris was scattered throughout the grounds, and a worn recliner sat behind the dumpsters.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain resident dignity, and to protect and promote the rights of the residents. A dependent resident waited several minutes to be assisted to eat during 2 of 2 meals observed. (Resident 42)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure services provided met professional standards of quality for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for skin conditions. A blister on a resident was not assessed when initially identified, the nurse was unaware of the correct timing of the treatment, and the area was not cleaned appropriately. (Resident 40)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision and assistance devices were received to prevent accidents for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for falls. A resident's mattress was not moved with the resident during a room change resulting in a fall, and fall interventions were observed not in place. (Resident 40)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe and sanitary environment to help prevent the development and transmission of diseases and infections for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for skin conditions, and the facility failed to properly prevent and/or contain COVID-19 for 2 random observation. Staff failed to use proper Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) when providing care of residents and entering a COVID-19 room, did not clean a wound or wash hands with appropriate infection control techniques, did not change gloves between tasks, and touched medication with bare hands prior to administering to a resident. (Resident 40, Resident 52, Resident 81)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure appropriate labeling and storage of medications for 2 of 3 medication carts (500 Hall Cart and 300 Hall Cart) with 11 of 16 residents reviewed for Medication Storage. (Residents 9, 4, 77, 28, 20, 17, 46, 14, 43, 23, and 18)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure food was served and stored under sanitary conditions during 3 of 3 kitchen observations. This deficiency had the potential to affect 81 current residents who received meals from the kitchen.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a clean, homelike environment in resident resident rooms and resident areas for 2 of 2 days during the survey. Resident rooms were not cleaned daily and resident areas contained dust, debris, and trash. (Resident B, Resident C, Resident D, Resident F)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide qualilty care and services timely following resident falls that resulted in fractures for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for falls with fractures. A resident was not sent out for further assessment and treatment following a fall with multiple fractures that occurred before lunch, until after 8:00 P.M. that evening, and a resident's X-ray results confirming fractures were not communicated to the physician prior to receiving an order to transfer the resident to the hospital until more than 6 hours after the X-ray results were made available to the facility. (Resident F, Resident G)
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Indiana | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 2.91 | 3.69 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.43 | 0.67 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 2.75 | 3.25 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 1.78 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.70 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 44.3% | 45.9% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 64.3% | 40.3% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 4.30 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 2.98 on weekdays and 2.75 on weekends, 8% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.00 in April to June 2025 to 2.91 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 2.91 | 0.43 | 2.98 | 2.75 | 0.0% | 1 of 90 | 86 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 2.88 | 0.47 | 3.02 | 2.54 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 86 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 2.85 | 0.43 | 2.92 | 2.65 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 84 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.00 | 0.44 | 3.13 | 2.69 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 83 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Indiana, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.63 | 0.62 | 3.80 | 3.19 | 3.4% | 0.4% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Indiana, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.43 | $17.80 to $21.36 | 33,640 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $31.60 | $29.35 to $35.30 | 14,480 |
| Registered nurses | $40.14 | $37.86 to $48.28 | 68,980 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Indiana | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 13.3 | 11.0 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.3 | 1.1 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.6 | 3.9 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.0 | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 13.6 | 11.9 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.4 | 3.6 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 11.2 | 13.6 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 16.4 | 22.2 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 17.8 | 10.8 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.7 | 1.6 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.1 | 1.4 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Scenic Hills at the Monastery's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (56.1% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
56.1% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Indiana: 111 better, 7 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 90 eligible stays.
8.7% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Indiana: 0 better, 17 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 93 eligible stays.
6.9% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Indiana: 0 better, 4 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 69 eligible stays.
76.0% this home
Median of homes: Indiana60.0% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 75 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Indiana0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 83 residents counted.
2.5% this home
Median of homes: Indiana1.4% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 83 residents counted.
100.0% this home
Median of homes: Indiana100.0% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 50 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: GOOD SAMARITAN HOSPITAL. CMS links this home to Trilogy Health Services, a group of 127 nursing homes averaging 4.2 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Good Samaritan Hospital | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 05/01/2015 |
| Corbin, Kathy | Corporate director | Individual | 05/01/2015 | |
| McLin, Robert | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/06/1992 | |
| Schuckman, Matthew | Corporate officer | Individual | 12/15/2021 | |
| Thacker, Adam | Corporate officer | Individual | 09/01/2013 | |
| Good Samaritan Hospital | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 05/01/2015 | |
| Trilogy Healthcare of Ferdinand, LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 05/01/2015 | |
| Lusk, Kevin | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 05/01/2015 | |
| McLin, Robert | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/06/1992 | |
| Schuckman, Matthew | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 12/15/2021 | |
| Sherman, Bailey | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 05/01/2015 | |
| Thacker, Adam | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 09/01/2013 | |
| Davis, David | Limited partnership interest | Individual | 12/31/2019 | |
| Barney, Leigh | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 10/03/2025 | |
| American Healthcare Reit Holdings LP | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 12/01/2015 | |
| American Healthcare Reit Inc | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 10/01/2018 | |
| Continental Merger Sub LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 10/01/2021 | |
| Gahc3 Trilogy Jv LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 12/01/2015 | |
| Gahc4 Trilogy Jv LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 10/01/2018 | |
| Paragon Outpatient Rehabilitation Services LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 12/01/2015 | |
| Sisters of St. Benedict of Ferdinand Ind., Inc. | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 12/31/2017 | |
| Trilogy Investors LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 12/01/2015 | |
| Trilogy Management Services LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 10/23/2025 | |
| Trilogy Real Estate Ferdinand II, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 06/20/2025 | |
| Trilogy Real Estate Investment Trust | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 12/01/2015 | |
| Trilogy Reit Holdings LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 12/01/2015 | |
| Lusk, Kevin | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 06/17/2025 | |
| McLin, Robert | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/06/1992 | |
| Schuckman, Matthew | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 12/15/2021 | |
| Sherman, Bailey | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 05/01/2025 | |
| Thacker, Adam | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 09/01/2013 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Indiana. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.