2515 Newton St., Jasper, IN 47547 · Dubois County · (812) 482-1722
107 certified beds, about 73 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1986
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 155282 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on June 13, 2025, inspectors cited 6 health deficiencies (the Indiana average is 7.2, the national average 9.2).
Of 38 health citations since February 2023, 1 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.55 hours per resident per day, against 3.69 across Indiana and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.40 of those hours.
40.0% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Indiana average 45.9%).
CMS links it to Continuum Healthcare, an affiliated group of 13 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 38 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a safe, sanitary, and homelike environment in 3 of 6 unit halls and common resident spaces. The 100 unit hall temperature was 70 degrees Fahrenheit (F), the Garden Ridge unit hall was 64 degrees F, and the Cedar point unit hall was 69 degrees F. (100 unit, Garden Ridge unit, Cedar Pointe unit, Resident B, Resident D).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure care plan interventions to prevent falls were in place for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for quality of care. A resident with a history of falls did not have specific interventions to prevent further falls in place according to the plan of care. (Resident C)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure care plan conferences were held for 4 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Resident 6, Resident 7, Resident 11, Resident 44)
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure notification to family/resident representative with a change in resident condition for 4 of 5 residents reviewed for falls. Family/resident representatives were not notified following falls. (Resident 39, Resident 43, Resident 52, Resident 56)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision and assistive devices were provided to prevent accidents for 4 of 5 residents reviewed for falls. Complete and thorough assessments were lacking after each fall, care plans were not updated with each fall, current interventions were not in place to at times of falls and a comprehensive review of all falls was not completed. (Resident 39, Resident 43, Resident 52, Resident 56)
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a required notice to a resident being discharged from Medicare services for 1 of 3 residents reviewed. No record of a SNF-ABN (Skilled Nursing Facility-Advanced Beneficiary Notification) notice was available that indicated the resident was notified of a discharge from Medicare services with days remaining prior to the resident's discharge from the facility. (Resident 75)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident's drug regimens were free from unnecessary drugs for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for falls. A resident was given an antipsychotic without a physician's order and a gradual dose reduction (GDR) wasn't done for a resident taking an antipsychotic and antianxiety medication. (Resident 39, Resident 6)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a sanitary environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 3 of 3 residents observed for incontinence care. Hand hygiene was not completed between glove changes, staff washed hands with less then 15 second lather, an incontinence pad was held between the bed and the staff's knees (with the inside of the incontinence pad against her scrub pants), staff left a visibly soiled incontinence pad on a resident after toileting him, and residents were not offered to wash their hands after toileting. (Resident 7, Resident 45, Resident 6)
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a notice of transfer or discharge was given to residents or resident representatives for 5 of 5 residents reviewed for hospitalizations. The transfer or discharge notice was not completed and clinical records lacked documentation of residents/representatives receiving a notice of transfer or discharge at the time of the hospitalizations. (Resident 38, Resident 52, Resident 46, Resident 43, Resident 15)
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a bed hold form and policy was given to residents or resident representatives for 5 of 5 residents reviewed for hospitalizations. The bed hold form was not completed and clinical records lacked documentation of residents/representatives receiving a bed hold form and policy at the time of the hospitalizations. (Resident 38, Resident 52, Resident 46, Resident 43)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure accuracy of assessments for 14 of 26 resident records reviewed during the survey. MDS (Minimum Data Set) Assessments did not accurately reflect resident status. (Resident 52, Resident 38, Resident 12, Resident 35, Resident 36, Resident 41, Resident 19, Resident 17, Resident 19, Resident 43, Resident 48, Resident 5, Resident 53)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan with resident specific needs for 4 of 22 residents reviewed for care plan development and implementation. Resident on hospice did not have a care plan for hospice, resident did not have a care plan for eating meals at a bedside table in the main dining room, residents that were taking an antianxiety, diuretic, and antidepressant did not have care plans for use. (Resident 19, Resident 5, Resident 48, Resident 45)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had care plan conferences and care plans were revised for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for accidents and 3 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. A resident moved out of the locked dementia unit and a resident's sleep medication was changed but the care plans were not revised. Residents did not have care plan conferences timely. (Resident 38, Resident 12, Resident 5, Resident 48)
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from unnecessary medications for 5 of 6 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Resident's as needed anti-anxiety medication was ordered for greater than 14 days. A resident had a Physician's Order for an antipsychotic with an unacceptable diagnosis. (Resident 45, Resident 3, Resident 14, Resident 19, Resident 48)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain safe and secure storage of medications for 3 of 4 medication carts observed and 1 of 3 medication storage rooms observed. Loose pills were observed in the medication carts, and refrigerator temperature logs were not filled out completely in the medication room.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure distribution and food service was provided in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 2 of 2 meals observed, and 1 of 1 meal services observed in the kitchen. (Main Kitchen, Locked Unit Dining Room)
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, and record review, the facility failed to properly document influenza and pneumococcal vaccines being offered to residents for 3 of 5 residents reviewed for influenza and pneumococcal vaccination. Clinical records lacked the vaccine consent/refusal date, the reason why it was refused, and a date education was provided to the resident and/or resident representative. (Resident 19, Resident 4, Resident 36)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents for 2 of 5 halls observed, and 1 of 1 common area observed. (Locked Unit, room [ROOM NUMBER] )
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with respect and dignity for 2 of 2 random observations. A staff member was observed standing while assisting to feed a resident, and a staff member walked away from a resident with visible urine under her chair. (Resident 27, Resident 48)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview the facility failed to provide services based on resident preferences for 1 of 5 residents reviewed. The facility failed to provide ice water to one resident when requested. (Resident 45)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to clarify a Resident's code status for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for Advanced Directives. A Resident's current Physician Orders did not match the signed DO NOT RESUSCITATE DECLARATION AND ORDER form. A Resident had a care plan for DNR (Do Not Resuscitate) and CPR (Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation). (Resident 18)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident right to be free of a physical restraint for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for physical restraints. A bed rail was used as a physical restraint. (Resident 12)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for abuse. A Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) physically removed the resident's fingers and hand from the stand aide lift. (Resident 4)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to properly investigate an allegation of abuse for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for abuse. A Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) physically removed the resident's fingers and hand from the stand aide lift. (Resident 4)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision to prevent accidents for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for falls. Neurological checks were not completed after a fall, new interventions were not put into place after falls, and interventions on care plans were not followed for residents at risk for falls resulting in multiple falls. (Resident 38, Resident 52)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident received services and assistance to prevent and treat urinary tract infections (UTI) for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for UTIs. A resident with recurrent UTIs was not treated appropriately, and incontinence care provided lacked appropriate infection control practices to prevent infection. (Resident 36)
Inspectors wrote2. On 5/15/24 at 1:58 P.M., Resident 28's oxygen filter on the side of the oxygen machine was observed to be caked with dust. Resident 28 was sitting in his recliner wearing O2 per nasal cannula at 2 lpm with gauze on the tubing to protect his ears. On 5/16/24 at 9:11 A.M., Resident 28 was observed sitting in his recliner with O2 on at 2 lpm per nasal cannula. The filter on the side of the oxygen machine remains dusty. On 5/15/24 at 2:49 P.M., Resident 28's clinical records were reviewed. Diagnosis included, but were not limited to chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia. The most current Annual MDS (Minimum Data Set) Assessment and State Optional MDS, dated [DATE], indicated Resident 28 was cognitively intact, required, extensive assistance of one for bed mobility and toilet use, limited assistance of one for transfers, and used oxygen. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were followed for 2 of 4 residents during observation of incontinence care and 1 of 3 observations of obtaining a blood sugar with a glucometer. Gloves were not changed between dirty and clean tasks during peri care and staff cleaned a glucometer for an unmeasurable amount of time. (Resident 7, Resident 11, Resident 43).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure posted nurse staffing sheets were posted daily during the survey for 2 of 9 days reviewed during the survey process. Post nurse staffing was not updated over the weekend. (May 18, May 19)
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure timely reporting of an abuse allegation to facility administration and to the state agency for 1 of 2 abuse allegations reviewed. Staff filed an abuse allegation as a grievance rather than immediately notifying the DON (Director of Nursing) or facility administrator, and the allegation was not reported to the state agency within the required 2 hour time frame. (Resident D)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision and assistive devices to prevent accidents for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for accidents. Care plan interventions were not followed or updated after falls, and one random observation of a treatment cart containing prescription medication was observed left unlocked and unattended. This deficient practice resulted in Resident 44 having 9 falls in 11 months resulting in three fractures. (Resident 44, Resident 28, Treatment Cart)
Inspectors wrote4. During record review on 2/1/23 at 2:48 P.M., Resident 12 was [AGE] years old when admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 12's diagnosis included, but was not limited to, schizoaffective disorder, diagnosed 3/26/21. Resident 12's most recent significant change MDS, dated [DATE], indicated Resident 12 had schizophrenia and received antipsychotics on a routine basis. Resident 12's current physician orders included, but were not limited to, Zyprexa (antipsychotic medication) 5 milligrams (mg) by mouth two times a day for a diagnosis of schizoaffective disorder. Resident 12's assessments, behavior monitoring, and documentation of diagnosis criteria for schizoaffective disorder was requested, but not received. 5. During record review on 2/3/23 at 1:59 P.M., Resident 2 was [AGE] years old when admitted to the facility on [DATE]. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to properly prevent and/or contain COVID-19 during 1 random observation of staff entering a COVID-19 positive resident room, 3 of 5 resident observed for care, and 1 of 4 residents observed for medication administration. Gloves were not changed from dirty to clean tasks, hands were not washed appropriately, staff was not appropriately wearing a face mask, staff did not sanitize hands prior to providing incontinence care, and staff did not sanitize hands prior to handling medications. (Resident B, Resident G, Resident K, Resident M, Resident J)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that appropriate treatment and services were provided to for an incontinent resident in 1 of 2 residents reviewed for UTI (urinary tract infections). A resident with a UTI was observed incontinent of urine, and was not cleaned appropriately. (Resident B)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents received the necessary respiratory care and services in accordance with the professional standards of practice for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for respiratory care. The facility failed to follow physician oxygenation orders and have an oxygen use care plan. (Resident 29, Resident 303)
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a communication process with hospice personnel was developed and implemented, including how the communication will be documented between the LTC (long term care) facility and the hospice provider, and to ensure that the needs of the resident were addressed for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for hospice. The clinical record of Resident 41 lacked documentation of ongoing communication between facility staff and hospice staff. (Resident 41)
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff COVID-19 vaccination medical exemptions specified a clinically recognized contraindication for 1 of 1 staff medical exemptions reviewed. (Staff 10)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure completed staffing sheets were posted daily for 6 of 6 days during the survey.
34 fire safety citations on file: 5 on June 13, 2025, 14 on May 22, 2024, 15 on February 9, 2023.
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Indiana | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.55 | 3.69 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.40 | 0.67 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.25 | 3.25 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.28 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.87 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 40.0% | 45.9% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 25.0% | 40.3% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 3 |
CMS expects 3.60 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.67 on weekdays and 3.25 on weekends, 11% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.39 in April to June 2025 to 3.55 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.55 | 0.40 | 3.67 | 3.25 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 73 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.39 | 0.38 | 3.51 | 3.07 | 0.0% | 1 of 92 | 72 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.44 | 0.41 | 3.60 | 3.04 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 70 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.39 | 0.47 | 3.58 | 2.92 | 0.1% | 0 of 91 | 75 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Indiana, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.63 | 0.62 | 3.80 | 3.19 | 3.4% | 0.4% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Indiana, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.43 | $17.80 to $21.36 | 33,640 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $31.60 | $29.35 to $35.30 | 14,480 |
| Registered nurses | $40.14 | $37.86 to $48.28 | 68,980 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Indiana | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 25.4 | 11.0 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.9 | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.9 | 1.1 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.9 | 3.9 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.5 | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 25.7 | 11.9 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.3 | 3.6 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 27.7 | 13.6 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 20.0 | 22.2 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 15.4 | 10.8 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.9 | 1.6 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.8 | 1.4 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Serenity Spring Senior Living at Northwood's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (49.6% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
49.6% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Indiana: 111 better, 7 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 45 eligible stays.
10.3% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Indiana: 0 better, 17 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 60 eligible stays.
8.8% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Indiana: 0 better, 4 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 27 eligible stays.
23.9% this home
Median of homes: Indiana60.0% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 46 residents counted.
1.9% this home
Median of homes: Indiana0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 54 residents counted.
1.6% this home
Median of homes: Indiana1.4% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 54 residents counted.
100.0% this home
Median of homes: Indiana100.0% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 20 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: GREENE COUNTY GENERAL HOSPITAL. CMS links this home to Continuum Healthcare, a group of 13 nursing homes averaging 2.4 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reetz, Brenda | Corporate officer | Individual | 11/01/2014 | |
| Greene County General Hospital | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 11/01/2014 | |
| Jasper SNF Opco LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 04/03/2024 | |
| Meadows, Michael | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 05/12/2020 | |
| Meadows, Michael | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 05/12/2025 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Indiana. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.