526 Altamont Ave, Schenectady, NY 12303 · Schenectady County · (518) 346-6121
240 certified beds, about 235 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1967
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 335014 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on August 19, 2025, inspectors cited 15 health deficiencies (the New York average is 8.1, the national average 9.2).
None of its 29 health citations since November 2020 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.64 hours per resident per day, against 3.63 across New York and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.40 of those hours.
51.8% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (New York average 40.3%).
CMS links it to Centers Health Care, an affiliated group of 36 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 29 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteF725 Based on observation, interviews, and record review during the recertification and abbreviated survey (Case #s:), the facility did not ensure provision of sufficient nursing staff to assure resident safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident throughout the facility. Specifically, the facility's minimum staffing levels were not met on multiple shifts and multiple units between 8/04/2025 and 8/17/2025. Additionally, there were multiple residents and family complaints regarding the lack of sufficient staffing, resulting in staff's timely response to call lights and not providing scheduled showers and treatments both during initial resident and family interviews and Resident Council, and complaints made through the complaint department of the New York State Department of Health nursing home complaint hotline. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review, and interviews during a recertification survey, the facility did not ensure that drug records were in order; and that an account of all controlled drugs was maintained and periodically reconciled on six (6)(Birch, Willow, Oak, Elm, Maple, and Cedar) of (6) six units reviewed. Specifically, the shift-to-shift staff signature form for controlled drugs, titled Shift Count, did not consistently include the signatures of staff members at each shift change, validating the correct narcotic count. This is evidenced by: The policy and procedure titled Narcotic Count, dated 8/2018, documented the on-coming and the off-going nurses assigned to the medication cart would be responsible for ensuring the accuracy of the controlled drug count. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview during the recertification survey, the facility did not ensure a policy was developed for the monthly medication regimen review that included time frames for the different steps in the process. Specifically, the policy did not include time frames for the different steps the pharmacist must take when he or she identifies an irregularity that requires urgent action to protect the resident. This is evidenced by: The policy and procedure titled Medication Regimen Reviews (MRR) dated 7/19/2019 with no review or revision dates stated if the situation was serious enough to present a risk to a person's life, health, or safety, the Consultant Pharmacist would contact the Physician directly to report the information to the Physician. There was no time frames included to state when this contact would happen. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interviews conducted during the recertification survey, the facility did not ensure drugs and biologicals were labeled and stored in accordance with professional standards of practice for two (2) (Cedar unit Side #2, [NAME] unit Side #1, ) of six (6) medication carts and two (2) (Elm unit #1 and #2 medication rooms) of six (6) medication rooms reviewed. Specifically, (a.) (1) (one) bottle of purified protein derivative (PPD) solution had no open and or expiration date; (b.) an opened insulin pen had no open and or expiration date; (c.) one (1) unopened insulin pen was stored improperly; (e.) stock medications in medication rooms had expired; (f.) opened stock medications were not dated; (g.) a resident specific medication was not dated and (h.) a medication cup with unidentified medication was found in the medication cart. This is evidenced by: [...]
Inspectors wroteF804 Based on observation and interviews conducted during a recertification survey and abbreviated survey (Case #NY00596012), the facility did not ensure residents were provided food and drink that was palatable, flavorful, at an appetizing temperature for two (2) of two (2) meals reviewed (Lunch meals on 8/14/2025 and 8/15/2025). Specifically, food was not served at a palatable and appetizing temperature during the lunch meal on 8/14/2025 and 8/15/2025. This is evidenced by: During an observation on 8/11/2025 at 11:51 AM, meal trays were prepped by Dietary Aides in the unit kitchenette. During an interview on 8/07/2025 at 11:18 AM, Resident #239 stated the food was terrible, so they bought their own food. During an interview on 8/7/2025 at 11:35 AM, Resident #157 stated the food was not good and the only food items they ate were the macaroni salad and meatloaf. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews conducted during recertification and abbreviated (Case #s: 2578580, 2576246, 596027, 2566657, 596028, 594500, 596019, 596018, 596016, 596012, 596015, 59600, 596011, 596005) surveys, the facility did not ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for (seven) 7 of 35 residents reviewed. Specifically, (a) for Resident #14, medication was not administered per physician orders. Specifically, (b) for Resident #35, medication was not administered per physician orders. Specifically, (c) for Resident #103, medication was not administered per physician orders. Specifically, (d) for Resident #177, medication was not administered per physician orders. Specifically, (e) for Resident #146, weekly weights were not obtained per physician orders. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews conducted during the recertification survey, the facility did not ensure each resident was treated with respect and dignity, and care in a manner and in an environment that promoted maintenance or enhancement of their quality of life for two (2) (Resident #68 and #100) of thirty-five (35) residents reviewed. Specifically, (a.) Resident #100 did not receive showers as scheduled, or when requested for July and August 2025. On or about 8/1/2025, Resident Representative #1 was approached by Certified Nurse Aide # 1 to bring in toiletries for Resident #100 such as soap, deodorant, and shampoo, because Resident #100 had an odor ; (b.) On 8/08 /2025, staff did not respond to Resident #68 yelling out for help during mid-morning and then again at lunch time. This is evidenced by: [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews conducted during recertification and abbreviated (Case #s: 2578580, 2576246, 596027, 2566657, 596028, 594500, 596019, 596018, 596016, 596012, 596015, 596007, 596011, 596005) surveys, the facility did not ensure residents were free from neglect for one (1) (Resident #253) of thirty-five (35) residents reviewed for neglect. Specifically, Resident #253 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with NPO status (nothing by mouth) and received nutrition/hydration via a gastrostomy tube (G-tube, a feeding tube inserted through the abdomen into the stomach. It is used to deliver nutrition, fluids, and medications when a person is unable to eat or drink adequately on their own.) Tube feedings (a way to provide nutrition and hydration) were not initiated until the following day the resident was admitted to the facility (6/24/2025) at 10:00 AM. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and staff interviews during the recertification survey, the facility did not ensure that each resident's drug regimen was free from chemical restraints. This was identified for 1 (one) of 1 (one) residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Specifically, Resident # 14 was ordered Buspirone 7.5 milligrams twice a day for anxiety, Seroquel 50 milligrams twice a day for antipsychotic, Seroquel 25 milligrams daily at bedtime for antipsychotic, oxycodone 5 milligrams three times a day for severe pain, and OxyContin 5 milligrams every 12 hours for severe pain. There was no evidence that a gradual dose reduction was attempted, and Resident #14 was observed to be lethargic-looking when observed during the day. This is evidenced by: [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews during the recertification survey, the facility did not ensure that each resident was screened for a mental disorder or intellectual disability prior to admission for 2 (Resident #s 185 and 218) of 35 residents reviewed. Specifically, the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review was incorrect for Resident #185 and incomplete for Resident #218. This is evidenced by: The facility Policy titled, Preadmission Screening and Resident Review /Screens, dated 12/2019, documented every admission to the facility would have a completed Level 1 Screen prior to admission to ensure the resident was appropriate for admission to the facility. Residents with identified serious mental illness or intellectual disability would have a completed Level II Preadmission Screening and Resident Review prior to admission, if indicated on their Level 1 Screen. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility did not ensure the development and implementation of comprehensive person-centered care plans, that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet the resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs for five(5) (Resident #s 35, 48, 146, 157, and 199) of 35 residents reviewed for comprehensive care plans. Specifically, (a.) for Resident #35 there was no documented evidence that there was a care plan in place related to the known contracture of Resident #35's right hand; [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review, and interviews conducted during the recertification and abbreviated surveys (NY00596011; NY00596018; NY00594500), the facility did not ensure residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain grooming and personal hygiene for three (3) of nine (9) residents (Resident #100, #218 and #250) reviewed. Specifically, (a.) Resident #100 was not showered per the facility schedule and as requested. (b.) Resident #'s 218 and 250 were not provided toileting checks or care in accordance with their plan of care. This is evidenced by: The facility's Policy and Procedure titled Activities of Daily Living Care and Support, revised 2/28/2025, documented: 1. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during the recertification survey, the facility did not ensure ongoing provision of programs to support each resident and their choices of activities, designed to meet the interests of and support the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of one (1) (Resident #8) of three (3) residents reviewed. Specifically, Resident #8 (eight) did not consistently participate in meaningful, accommodating activities to maintain their highest practicable quality of life. This is evidenced by: [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview during the recertification survey, the facility did not ensure residents at risk for pressure ulcers received necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote wound healing, and prevent new ulcers from developing for 1(one) of 6 (six) residents (Resident #35) reviewed for Pressure Ulcers. Specifically, for Resident #35 there was no documented evidence that preventative measures were taken to prevent skin breakdown due to their hand contracture. The is evidenced by: The facility policy titled Contracture Prevention dated 8/2020, documented that each resident must be assessed for need of contracture prevention procedures on admission and as needed. Additionally, hand rolls may be placed in any hand that the resident cannot move. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review, and interviews conducted during the recertification survey, the facility did not ensure that each resident received the necessary respiratory care and services that are in accordance with professional standards of practice, the resident's care plan and the resident's choice, for (two) 2 (Residents #48 and #163) of 3 (three) residents reviewed for oxygen administration. Specifically, a) Resident #48, the oxygen tubing was not dated and labeled to reflect when the tubing was changed; b) Resident # 163, nebulizer tubing was not dated and labeled to reflect when the tubing was changed, and the nebulizer mask was not stored per facility policy (in a plastic bag with the resident's name on it) when not in use. Resident #48 Resident #48 was admitted to the facility with the diagnoses of acute infarction of the intestine, hypertension, and hypoxemia. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews during an abbreviated survey (Case # NY00289779), the facility did not inform the resident representative(s) when accidents occurred for one (1) (Resident #3) out of sixteen (16) sampled residents. Specifically, the facility did inform Resident #3's representative after the resident had an unwitnessed fall on 3/3/2022.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews during an abbreviated survey (Case #NY00278031) the facility did not ensure prompt efforts were made to resolve a grievance and keep the resident or resident representative appropriately apprised of progress towards resolution for one (1) resident (Resident #8) out of sixteen (16) sampled residents. Specifically, when a grievance was filed on behalf of Resident #8 on 6/14/2021, the facility did not complete a thorough investigation of the grievance and did not document that follow-up or resolution was ever provided to the resident and/or resident's spouse who filed the grievance.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review and interviews during an abbreviated survey (Case #NY00276279), the facility did not ensure the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as is possible for one (1) (Resident #7) out of sixteen (16) residents reviewed. Specifically, the facility did not ensure that Resident #7, a resident at risk for wandering and elopement, did not leave the facility. This is evidenced by: The Policy and Procedure (P&P) titled, Elopement Prevention, last revised June 2023, read in pertinent part, The facility strives to promote resident safety and protect the rights and dignity of the residents. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview during a recertification survey, the facility did not ensure a resident requiring dialysis services received such services consistent with professional standards of practice for three (3) (Residents #73. #105, and #168) of three (3) residents reviewed. Specifically: for Resident #'s 73, the facility did not consistently provide an ongoing documented assessment of the resident's condition and monitoring for complications before and after dialysis treatments received at a certified dialysis facility. Specifically, for Resident #105, the facility did not ensure the resident received ongoing assessments and monitoring for complications before and after dialysis treatments and did not ensure there was ongoing communication and collaboration with the dialysis facility regarding dialysis care and services; [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interviews during the recertification survey dated 03/27/23 through 04/05/23, the facility did not ensure food was stored, prepared, distributed, or served food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in the main kitchen and six (6) of 6 kitchenettes. Specifically, in the main kitchen the automatic dishwashing machine was being utilized to wash dishes while the LED (liquid crystal display) thermometer on the dishwashing machine was not functioning, a test kit to measure the concentration of chemical sanitizer was not available, the gaskets on the 3 walk-in refrigerator doors had splits, the 2-bay sink faucet leaked, 2 fire extinguishers were soiled with food particles, and a pocketbook and sandals were stored with food (thickener). [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, manufacturer's directions review, and staff interview during the recertification survey, the facility did not prepare food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. The safe and sanitary operation of a professional kitchen is to include particular methods of operation. Specifically, the concentration of quaternary ammonium compound chemical sanitizing rinse (QAC) was less than that required by the manufacturer, and food temperature thermometers were not in calibration. This is evidenced as follows. The kitchen was inspected on 10/27/2020 at 10:19 AM. The concentration of QAC used in the sanitizing rinse sink, and the third sink, was found to be between 0 and 150 parts per million (ppm) when measured at 66 degrees Fahrenheit (F). [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews during the recertification survey, the facility did not ensure to immediately inform the resident; consult with the resident's physician; and notify, consistent with his or her authority, the resident representative for 1 (Resident #117) of 6 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Specifically, the facility did not notify the Medical Doctor (MD) when the resident missed multiple doses of insulin. This is evidenced by: Resident #117: Resident #117 was admitted with diagnoses of diabetes with diabetic neuropathy, end-stage renal disease (ESRD) on dialysis, and congestive heart failure (CHF). The Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) dated 9/25/20 documented the resident was cognitively intact. Medical Doctor orders documented Admelog Insulin 100Units /milliliter: [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews and record reviews during a recertification survey the facility did not ensure summaries of the baseline care plans were provided to the resident and the residents representative for 4 (Residents #'s 12, 66, 113, and #407) of 21 residents reviewed. Specifically, the medical record did not contain evidence that the summary was given to the resident and resident representative, if applicable. This is evidenced by: A facility policy titled Care Plans - Baseline last reviewed 1/2020 documented; the facility will provide the resident and representative if applicable with a written summary of the baseline care plan by completion of the comprehensive care plan. Facility will document and record receipt of information by family, whether in the form of a copy of signed acknowledgement or note within resident's clinical record. Resident #66: [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interviews during the recertification survey the facility did not develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the residents rights, that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment for 4 (Resident #'s 12, 53, 87, and 117) of 35 residents reviewed for comprehensive care plans (CCPs). [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review and interviews during the recertification survey, the facility did not ensure residents were given the appropriate treatment and services to maintain or improve his or her ability to carry out the activities of daily living including functional communication systems for 2 (Resident #'s 58 and 190) of 2 residents reviewed for communication. Specifically, for Resident #58, the facility did not ensure the resident, whose primary language was not English, was consistently provided a functional communication system to independently and effectively communicate his/her needs and for Resident #190, the facility did not ensure the resident's hearing aids and glasses were applied daily. This is evidenced by: Resident #58: Resident #58 was admitted to the facility with the diagnoses of cerebral infarction, hypertension, and diabetes. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and staff interviews during a recertification survey, the facility did not ensure residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain personal hygiene for one (Resident #103) of three residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living. Specifically, for Resident #103, the facility did not ensure the resident, who was unable to carry out activities of daily living, received hair/scalp care to maintain good personal hygiene. This is evidenced by: The Policy and Procedure titled ADL- Bath (Shower) last revised 7/2019, documented it was the policy of the facility to shower the resident to cleanse and refresh the resident, observe the skin, and to provide increased circulation. Resident #103: [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review and interviews during the recertification survey, the facility did not ensure that residents who require dialysis receive such services, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences for 2 of two (Resident's #58 & 192) reviewed. Specifically for Resident #192, the facility did not ensure accurate monitoring of the residents fluid intake per the Medical Doctor (MD) ordered fluid restriction and for Resident #58, the facility did not ensure there was documentation of ongoing communication and collaboration with the dialysis facility regarding dialysis care and services. This is evidenced by: Resident #192: Resident #192 was admitted with diagnoses of End-Stage Renal Disease on dialysis and hypertension. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review, and interviews during a recertification survey the facility did not ensure that its medication error rates were not 5 percent or greater. Specifically, for 30 medication administration opportunities there were 12 errors resulting in a medication error rate of 40%. This is evidenced by: A Policy and Procedure titled Medication Administration with a date last revised of 12/2019, documented medications are to be administered within one hour of their prescribed time. It documented, if a drug is withheld, refused, or given at a time other than the scheduled time, the individual administering the medication shall initial and circle the Medication Administration Record (MAR) space provided for that drug and dose and the individual administering the medication will record the date and time the medication was administered. Finding #1: [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review and interviews during the recertification survey, the facility did not ensure it established and maintained an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 2 (Resident #'s 42 &165) of 4 wound dressings observed, and for 2 of 4 units. Specifically, for Resident #42, the facility did not ensure that infection control measures and hand hygiene were used during a dressing change, that medications were handled with gloves, and that ointments stored in the multi resident use medication cart were stored in a manner that prevented cross contamination, for Resident #165, the facility did note ensure a bedside table was sanitized after contaminated items were placed on it. This is evidenced by: [...]
13 fire safety citations on file: 6 on August 19, 2025, 3 on April 5, 2023, 4 on November 2, 2020.
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | New York | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.64 | 3.63 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.40 | 0.71 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.08 | 3.18 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.15 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.09 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 51.8% | 40.3% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 38.5% | 39.8% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 1 |
CMS expects 3.89 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.87 on weekdays and 3.08 on weekends, 20% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 1.1% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.02 in April to June 2025 to 3.64 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.64 | 0.40 | 3.87 | 3.08 | 1.1% | 0 of 90 | 235 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.87 | 0.39 | 4.11 | 3.25 | 2.8% | 0 of 92 | 235 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.96 | 0.40 | 4.34 | 3.01 | 3.0% | 0 of 92 | 234 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 4.02 | 0.41 | 4.35 | 3.20 | 3.5% | 0 of 91 | 231 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| New York, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.55 | 0.68 | 3.72 | 3.13 | 9.8% | 0.1% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| New York, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $23.36 | $21.04 to $24.99 | 87,990 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $32.30 | $29.52 to $37.00 | 39,400 |
| Registered nurses | $52.62 | $45.60 to $62.34 | 205,810 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | New York | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 15.0 | 14.1 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.3 | 0.5 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.6 | 1.3 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.0 | 3.1 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.1 | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 12.1 | 12.5 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.8 | 6.5 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 8.2 | 13.7 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 22.0 | 20.6 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 6.8 | 9.6 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.4 | 1.7 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 0.9 | 1.4 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Schenectady Center for Rehabilitation and Nursing's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it better than the national rate (57.5% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
57.5% this home
Better than the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · New York: 101 better, 157 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 390 eligible stays.
9.9% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · New York: 12 better, 5 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 337 eligible stays.
7.2% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · New York: 7 better, 21 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 260 eligible stays.
75.9% this home
Median of homes: New York60.6% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 286 residents counted.
0.9% this home
Median of homes: New York0.6% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 431 residents counted.
1.2% this home
Median of homes: New York2.0% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 428 residents counted.
94.6% this home
Median of homes: New York98.5% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 222 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: CLR SCHENECTADY LLC. CMS links this home to Centers Health Care, a group of 36 nursing homes averaging 2.2 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Goldman, Nathan | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Hendrix, Heidi | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Lantzitsky, Aharon | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Mirza, Ali | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 09/05/2017 | |
| Zeiler, Noah | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 08/18/2025 | |
| Abramchik, Amir | General partnership interest | Individual | 05/31/2022 | |
| Abramchik, Amir | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 09/01/2017 | |
| Mirza, Ali | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 09/05/2017 | |
| Zeiler, Noah | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 08/18/2025 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
Licensed assisted living homes in the same town or within 5 miles, each with its New York inspection record.
These are the official offices in New York. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.