How many deficiencies did Spanish Fork Rehabilitation and Nursing get at its last inspection?

3 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on November 24, 2025. The Utah average is 8.8.

Does Spanish Fork Rehabilitation and Nursing accept Medicaid?

It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.

Who owns Spanish Fork Rehabilitation and Nursing?

CMS lists 22 owners and managers, and links the home to Beaver Valley Hospital. Legal business name: BEAVER VALLEY HOSPITAL.

Spanish Fork Rehabilitation and Nursing: Inspections

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on November 24, 2025, inspectors cited 3 health deficiencies (the Utah average is 8.8, the national average 9.2).

Of 10 health citations since November 2021, 2 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.

CMS lists 2 fines totaling $47,509 in the last three years; the largest was $40,066, and the latest is dated November 24, 2025.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 2.74 hours per resident per day, against 4.09 across Utah and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.62 of those hours.

69.6% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Utah average 50.7%).

CMS links it to Beaver Valley Hospital, an affiliated group of 5 nursing homes.

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

411/21

310/23

311/25

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 10 health citations on file.

Severity

Isolated

Pattern

Widespread

Immediate jeopardy

Actual harm

Potential for more than minimal harm

Potential for minimal harm

November 24, 2025Standard inspection · 3 citations

G

Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

F689 · Quality of Life and Care · Actual harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 2, 2026

Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined for 1 of 16 sampled residents, that the facility did not ensure that each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents. Specifically, the resident sustained four falls with no new interventions implemented and one of those falls resulted in a head laceration that required ten staples. This was identified at a Harm level. Resident identifier: 4.
E

Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 2, 2026

Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility did not store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Specifically, the food was not served in a sanitary manner and open spices were not dated.
D

Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 2, 2026

Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review it was determined, for 1 of 16 sampled residents, that the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment; and the comprehensive care plan failed to describe the services that were to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Specifically, one resident sustained four falls and no new interventions were implemented on the care plan. Resident identifier: 4.

October 5, 2023Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 3 citations

G

Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.

F600 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · Actual harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 3, 2023

Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, it was determined, for 1 of 21 sampled residents, that the facility did not ensure each residenthas the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation. Specifically, a resident fell and experienced a head laceration and broken ribs after not being checked on for an extended period of time. This resulted in a finding of HARM. Resident identifier: 35.
E

Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.

F610 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 3, 2023

Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined, for 4 of 21 sampled residents, that in response to allegations of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment the facility did not have evidence that all alleged violations were thoroughly investigated. Specifically, allegations of physical, sexual, and verbal abuse were not thoroughly investigated to determine if abuse occurred. Resident identifiers: 24, 31, 35 and 94.
D

Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.

F602 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 3, 2023

Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, it was determined for 1 of 21 sampled residents, that the facility did not ensure that the resident was free of misappropriation of resident property. Specifically, a nursing assistant stole a resident's credit card and made several unauthorized purchases with the card. Resident identifier: 11.

November 10, 2021Standard inspection · 4 citations

E

Perform COVID19 testing on residents and staff.

F886 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 28, 2022

Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility did not conduct COVID-19 testing based on the criteria for conducting testing of asymptomatic individuals, such as the positivity rate of COVID-19 in a county. Specifically, unvaccinated staff were not tested twice a week when the county positivity rate was High >10%). This occurred for 2 out of 5 sampled staff members.
D

Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 28, 2022

Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review it was determined that the facility did not develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights, that included measurable objectives and timeframe's to meet a resident's medical, nursing, mental and psychosocial needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment. Specifically, a resident with an active diagnosis, medical orders for medication and monitoring of anxiety did not have anxiety addressed in the resident's care plan. This occurred for 1 of 19 sampled residents. Resident identifier: 18.
D

Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.

F685 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 28, 2022

Inspectors wroteBased on interview, observation and record review it was determined the facility did not ensure that the resident received proper treatment and assistive devices to maintain vision abilities. Specifically, for 1 out of 19 sampled residents, a resident received a new prescription for eye glasses and the new glasses were not ordered as the resident believed they had been. Resident identifier: 1.
D

Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.

F758 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 28, 2022

Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and medical record review it was determined that the facility did not ensure that PRN (as needed) orders for psychotropic drugs were limited to 14 days, except if the attending physician or prescribing practitioner believed that it was appropriate for the PRN order to be extended beyond 14 days and he or she documented their rationale in the resident's medical record and indicated the duration for the PRN order. Specifically, a resident, who had psychotropic drug PRN orders that remained active for more than 14 days without a duration specified by the prescribing practitioner. This occurred for 1 of 19 residents. Resident identifier: 18.

Fire safety inspections

18 fire safety citations on file: 7 on November 24, 2025, 9 on October 5, 2023, 2 on November 10, 2021.

Every fire safety citation18 citations

F
Keep aisles, corridors, and exits free of obstruction in case of emergency.

K 211 · November 24, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
F
Ensure proper usage of power strips and extension cords.

K 920 · November 24, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
E
Ensure that special areas are constructed so that walls can resist fire for one hour or have an approved fire extinguishing system.

K 321 · November 24, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
E
Install smoke barrier doors that can resist smoke for at least 20 minutes.

K 374 · November 24, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
D
Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.

K 353 · November 24, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
D
Have simulated fire drills held at unexpected times.

K 712 · November 24, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
D
Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.

K 918 · November 24, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
F
Develop and maintain an Emergency Preparedness Program (EP).

E 4 · October 5, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
F
Conduct testing and exercise requirements.

E 39 · October 5, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
D
Ensure that special areas are constructed so that walls can resist fire for one hour or have an approved fire extinguishing system.

K 321 · October 5, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
D
Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.

K 345 · October 5, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
D
Have properly installed electrical wiring and gas equipment.

K 511 · October 5, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
D
Ensure heating and ventilation systems that have been properly installed according to the manufacturer's instructions.

K 521 · October 5, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
D
Have simulated fire drills held at unexpected times.

K 712 · October 5, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
D
Ensure receptacles at patient bed locations and where general anesthesia is administered, are tested after initial installation, replacement or servicing.

K 914 · October 5, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
D
Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.

K 918 · October 5, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
E
Ensure that special areas are constructed so that walls can resist fire for one hour or have an approved fire extinguishing system.

K 321 · November 10, 2021 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
D
Add doors in an exit area that do not require the use of a key from the exit side unless in case of special locking arrangements.

K 222 · November 10, 2021 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

Date	Penalty	Amount or length
November 24, 2025	Fine	$40,066
November 24, 2025	Payment Denial	20 days from January 3, 2026
October 5, 2023	Fine	$7,443

A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

Measure	This home	Utah	United States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)	2.74	4.09	3.86
Registered nurses	0.62	1.25	0.69
All nursing staff on weekends	2.61	3.58	3.42
Nurse aides	1.60
Licensed practical nurses	0.52
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)	69.6%	50.7%	45.8%
Registered nurse turnover	77.8%	40.6%	42.9%
Administrators who left	0

CMS expects 3.72 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 2.80 on weekdays and 2.61 on weekends, 7% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 2.77 in April to June 2025 to 2.74 in January to March 2026.

Quarter	All nursing staff	Registered nurses	Weekdays	Weekends	Contract staff share	Days with no RN hours	Residents a day
Jan to Mar 2026	2.74	0.62	2.80	2.61	0.0%	0 of 90	43
Oct to Dec 2025	2.63	0.65	2.74	2.36	0.0%	0 of 92	44
Jul to Sep 2025	2.62	0.55	2.73	2.36	0.0%	0 of 92	42
Apr to Jun 2025	2.77	0.43	2.92	2.39	0.0%	0 of 91	44
United States, Jan to Mar 2026	3.75	0.62	3.92	3.33	5.3%	0.5% of days
Utah, Jan to Mar 2026	3.91	1.11	4.10	3.44	2.8%	0.2% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Staff pay reports

Staff pay at this home

No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.

Official wage estimates for Utah

Job	Median	Middle half	Employed
Utah, all employers
CNAs (nursing assistants)	$19.15	$17.81 to $21.32	12,260
LPNs and LVNs	$30.40	$25.71 to $35.86	1,680
Registered nurses	$40.67	$38.49 to $50.54	27,420
United States, nursing care facilities
CNAs (nursing assistants)	$20.67	$17.91 to $22.55	534,270
LPNs and LVNs	$33.86	$30.05 to $37.40	188,210
Registered nurses	$41.11	$37.85 to $47.68	142,270

Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.

How staff pay reports work · CNA pay by state

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

Measure	This home	Utah	US
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	15.8	11.3	13.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	0.0	0.7	0.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	2.6	1.8	1.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	2.5	2.5	3.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	0.0	0.9	1.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	18.3	15.1	14.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	6.1	3.9	4.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	11.2	14.2	15.4
Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231	15.3	16.6	23.8
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231	9.4	11.6	12.0

Short-term rehab results

For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Spanish Fork Rehabilitation and Nursing's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it better than the national rate (73.0% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.

Went home or back to the community

73.0% this home

Better than the national rate

US median of homes 51.5% · Utah: 40 better, 0 worse

Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 41 eligible stays.

Potentially preventable readmissions

9.9% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 10.7% · Utah: 3 better, 0 worse

Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 51 eligible stays.

Infections that led to a hospital stay

6.8% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 7.1% · Utah: 2 better, 0 worse

Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 25 eligible stays.

Self-care and mobility at discharge

Not reported

CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

Median of homes: Utah63.5% · US 56.6%

Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 16 residents counted.

Falls with major injury

0.0% this home

Median of homes: Utah0.0% · US 0.0%

Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 20 residents counted.

New or worsened pressure ulcers

5.2% this home

Median of homes: Utah1.3% · US 1.7%

Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 20 residents counted.

Medication list given at discharge

Not reported

CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

Median of homes: Utah100.0% · US 98.7%

Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 13 residents counted.

Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.

Owners and operators

Legal business name: BEAVER VALLEY HOSPITAL. CMS links this home to Beaver Valley Hospital, a group of 5 nursing homes averaging 2.6 stars overall.

Name	Role	Type	Since
Langford, Scott	Corporate officer	Individual	07/01/2017
Cottonwood Healthcare LLC	Operational/managerial control	Organization	02/10/2016
Spanish Fork Rehabilitation and Nursing	Operational/managerial control	Organization	03/20/2015
Myers, Walter	Operational/managerial control	Individual	11/01/2015
Stubbs, Rachael	Operational/managerial control	Individual	07/02/2025
Swain, Taylor	Operational/managerial control	Individual	10/29/2024
Crump, Jason	Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF	Individual	07/14/2025
Crump, Susan	Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF	Individual	07/14/2025
Fullmer, Chad	Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF	Individual	07/14/2025
Fullmer, Rebecca	Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF	Individual	07/14/2025
McSpadden, Darin	Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF	Individual	07/14/2025
McSpadden, Heather	Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF	Individual	07/16/2025
Myers, Katie	Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF	Individual	07/14/2025
Swain, Holly	Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF	Individual	07/14/2025
Swain, Jared	Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF	Individual	07/14/2025
White, Derek	Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF	Individual	07/14/2025
White, Lori	Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF	Individual	07/14/2025
Beaver Valley Hospital	Adp of the SNF	Organization	11/01/2015
Cottonwood Healthcare LLC	Adp of the SNF	Organization	07/03/2025
Spanish Fork Rehabilitation and Nursing	Adp of the SNF	Organization	07/14/2025
Stubbs, Rachael	Adp of the SNF	Individual	07/03/2025
Swain, Taylor	Adp of the SNF	Individual	10/29/2024

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

How are allegations of abuse or neglect reported and investigated, and who tells the family?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on October 5, 2023: "Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody."
How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on November 24, 2025: "Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents."
When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on November 24, 2025: "Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured."
Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 1 problem in this area, most recently on November 24, 2025: "Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards."
Who is on the floor on Saturday and Sunday, and how many residents does each aide care for?Weekend nurse staffing here was 2.61 hours per resident per day, below the Utah average of 3.58.

Other nursing homes nearby

Stonehenge of Springville
Springville, 3.5 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 13 citations
Advanced Health Care of Salem
Salem, 5.4 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 7 citations
Rocky Mountain Care - Maple Dell
Payson, 5.6 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 80 citations
Mervyn Sharp Bennion Central Utah Veterans Home
Payson, 5.7 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 13 citations
Provo Rehabilitation and Nursing
Provo, 9.5 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 75 citations
Aspen Ridge of Utah Valley
Orem, 10.6 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 11 citations
Orem Rehabilitation and Nursing Center
Orem, 11.3 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 29 citations
Stonehenge of Orem
Orem, 13.3 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 2 citations

Utah contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in Utah. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Inspections and complaints: Utah Department of Health and Human Services, Division of Licensing and Background Checks, Health Facilities Licensing, the state agency that inspects nursing homes for CMS and takes complaints about care.
Resident advocate: Utah Long Term Care Ombudsman Program, Division of Aging and Adult Services, 801-538-3910. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
State inspection reports: Utah DLBC Find a Facility (licensing records and compliance history), where Utah publishes its own records on licensed homes.

Common questions

What is Spanish Fork Rehabilitation and Nursing's Medicare star rating?: CMS rates Spanish Fork Rehabilitation and Nursing 3 out of 5 stars overall, with 4 for health inspections, 1 for staffing and 4 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Spanish Fork Rehabilitation and Nursing get at its last inspection?: 3 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on November 24, 2025. The Utah average is 8.8.
Has Spanish Fork Rehabilitation and Nursing been fined?: Yes. CMS lists 2 fines totaling $47,509 in the last three years.
Does Spanish Fork Rehabilitation and Nursing accept Medicaid?: It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Spanish Fork Rehabilitation and Nursing?: CMS lists 22 owners and managers, and links the home to Beaver Valley Hospital. Legal business name: BEAVER VALLEY HOSPITAL.

Sources

Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.