1125 Clarion Ave, Holland, OH 43528 · Lucas County · (419) 866-6124
99 certified beds, about 82 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 1995
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 366042 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on August 28, 2025, inspectors cited 5 health deficiencies (the Ohio average is 10.5, the national average 9.2).
Of 28 health citations since November 2021, 2 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (1 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 2 fines totaling $45,766 in the last three years; the largest was $32,139, and the latest is dated August 28, 2025.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.47 hours per resident per day, against 3.69 across Ohio and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.47 of those hours.
35.1% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Ohio average 48.7%).
CMS links it to Villa Healthcare, an affiliated group of 21 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 28 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, staff interviews, review of the guidelines from the National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (NPUAP), and review of facility policy, the facility failed to timely identify the resident's pressure until it reached an advanced stage and failed to ensure pressure ulcer preventions consistent with professional standards of practice were in place. This resulted in Actual Harm to Resident #55 who was at risk for pressure ulcers and the facility found Resident #55's avoidable pressure ulcer as a stage three pressure ulcer (Full thickness tissue loss. Subcutaneous fat may be visible but bone, tendon or muscle is not exposed). This affected one (Resident #55) of two residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 80.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, staff interviews, and review of facility policies, the facility failed to serve food in a manner that prevented contamination. This affected seven (Residents #13, #19, #35, #45, #54, #86, and #87) observed for room tray service and had the potential to affect all residents in the facility except Residents #4, #9, #12, and #88 who do not receive food from the kitchen. The facility census was 80.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, resident and staff interview, observation, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments accurately reflected the resident's care needs. This affected two resident (#2 and #27) of 18 residents reviewed for MDS accuracy. The facility census was 80.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to regularly monitor a resident's weight according to physician orders and facility policy. This affected one (Resident #55) of one resident reviewed for nutrition. The facility census was 80.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure physician orders were obtained for use of oxygen therapy and Bilevel Positive Airway Pressure (BIPAP) use. This affected one (#27) of one resident reviewed for oxygen and BIPAP use. The facility identified 29 residents who require the use of oxygen and six residents who require the use of BIPAP machine. The facility census was 80.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, staff interview, review of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidance, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure Resident #16 who had a indwelling catheter received the appropriate treatment and services related to a urinary tract infection (UTI). This affected one (#16) of six residents reviewed for UTIs. The facility census was 76.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and staff and resident interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered appropriately and not left unsecured in a resident room. This affected one (#15) of one resident reviewed for medications. The facility census was 76.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, and review of the menu spreadsheet, revealed the facility failed to provide adequate portions of food. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure adequate food was prepared to provide all residents with an appropriate portion of food. This had the potential to affect all residents in the facility except Resident #92 who received no food by mouth. Finally, the facility failed to ensure residents on a pureed diet received all items on the menu. This affected five (#13, #24, #39, #42, and #94) residents on a pureed diet. The facility census was 90.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, record review, menu review, and recipe review, the facility failed to ensure residents on a mechanical soft diet received appropriately textured food. This had the potential to affect 12 (#11, #15, #28, #29, #38, #44, #48, #55, #68, #69, #82 and #97) residents on a mechanical soft diet. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure residents received appropriate food textures and thickened beverages with their meals. This affected two (#24 and #42) residents on a pureed diet observed during meal service. The facility census was 90.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff practiced proper hand hygiene during meal service. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure food was covered during delivery to resident rooms. This had the potential to affect all residents in the facility except Resident #92 who received no food from the kitchen. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure staff practiced proper sanitation practices when handling resident meal trays. This affected one (Resident #101) resident's tray observed during meal service. The facility census was 90.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, staff interview, review of email correspondence, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure resident representatives received copies of medical records in a timely manner. This affected two (#12 and #72) of two residents reviewed for medical record requests. The facility census was 90.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, medical record review, staff interviews, interviews with the Local Health Department (LHD), review of hospital medical records, review of water sample testing reports, review of chlorine level logs, review of the facility's water management plan and review of the facility's water treatment program, the facility failed to implement immediate action to protect residents from Legionella (bacteria that causes a severe form of pneumonia with exposure generally from droplets of water) when a water sample test detected Legionella on the 300 Hall on 06/03/24. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and serious life-threatening harm and the potential for additional negative health outcomes and/or death when one resident (#01), who resided on the 100 Hall, developed respiratory symptoms and experienced a change in condition on 06/13/24. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, medical record review, resident and staff interview, and review of facility policies, the facility failed to ensure medications were kept secure at all times. This affected one (#17) of three residents observed for medication storage. The facility census was 85.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, resident interview, staff interview, hospital record review, review of facility incident report, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to report an injury of unknown origin to the state agency for Resident #23 and failed to report a resident to resident incident to the state agency for Resident #84. This affected two (#23 and #84) of three reviewed for abuse and neglect. The facility census was 84.
Inspectors wroteBased medical record review, resident interview, staff interview, review of hospital records, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to complete a thorough investigation after an injury of unknown origin was identified. This affected one (#23) of three residents reviewed for injury. The facility census was 84.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, observation, resident interview, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure dependent residents received showers according to their schedule and as needed. This affected three (#28, #87 and #88) of three residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). The facility census was 84.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of physician orders, observations, resident interviews, staff interviews, and review of dietary spreadsheets, the facility failed to provide therapeutic diets according to physician order. This affected two (#51 and #28) of three residents reviewed for diabetic (carbohydrate consistent - CCD) diet orders, with the potential to affect 19 (#2, #5, #8, #10, #13, #16, #18, #22, #31, #38, #40, #42, #45, #48, #53, #69, #78, #80, and #89) additional residents identified by the facility with physician ordered CCD diets. The facility census was 84.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, policy review, and family and staff interview, the facility failed to conduct quarterly care conferences routinely. This affected seven (Residents #28, #32, #46, #56, #63, #70, and #71) of 10 residents reviewed for care planning. The facility census was 91.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, review of Resident Council meeting minutes, resident and staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents received showers per the resident's preference. This affected two (Residents #32 and #76) of two residents reviewed for choices. The facility census was 91.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, observation, and resident and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure care and maintenance was provided for a midline catheter. This affected one (#30) of one residents reviewed for peripheral venous catheters. The facility census was 91.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, resident and staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was provided with physician ordered wound healing supplement. This affected one resident (#28) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility identified 11 residents with pressure ulcers. The facility census was 91.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure a fistula was routinely monitored for a resident on dialysis. This affected one (#21) of one resident reviewed for dialysis. The facility identified four residents who received dialysis. The facility census was 91.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the medications administered were documented accordingly in the medical record. This affected one (Resident #42) of five residents reviewed for medications. The facility census was 91.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of medical record, family and staff interview, review of facility correspondence, and policy review, the facility failed to allow residents to have visitation by family members at any time. This affected one (#55) resident who's family was interviewed and had the potential to affect all 81 residents residing in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of the medical record, resident representative interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to hold care conferences and failed to invite residents or their representatives to care conferences. This affected two (#36 and #68) of 20 residents reviewed. The facility census was 81.
Inspectors wroteBased on resident record review, observation, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure activity preferences and physician orders were followed for one (#53) out of 20 residents reviewed. The facility census was 81.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, observation, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to follow physician orders for fluid restrictions for one (#18) of one resident reviewed for dialysis. The facility had two residents receiving dialysis. The facility census was 81.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, medical record review, and review of a facility policy, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored and removed from use per manufacturer instructions. This affected one (#44) of 21 residents with medications stored in the 100 Hall medication cart. The census was 81.
16 fire safety citations on file: 5 on August 28, 2025, 8 on May 10, 2023, 3 on November 4, 2021.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| August 28, 2025 | Fine | $32,139 |
| July 1, 2024 | Fine | $13,627 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Ohio | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.47 | 3.69 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.47 | 0.64 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.10 | 3.28 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.03 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.97 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 35.1% | 48.7% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 11.1% | 43.9% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 4.57 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.62 on weekdays and 3.10 on weekends, 14% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.47 in April to June 2025 to 3.47 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.47 | 0.47 | 3.62 | 3.10 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 82 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.43 | 0.47 | 3.60 | 3.00 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 82 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.64 | 0.52 | 3.80 | 3.21 | 0.1% | 0 of 92 | 79 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.47 | 0.50 | 3.67 | 2.96 | 1.3% | 0 of 91 | 85 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Ohio, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.64 | 0.60 | 3.80 | 3.24 | 4.6% | 0.4% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ohio, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.76 | $17.93 to $21.44 | 63,280 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $29.78 | $27.34 to $31.68 | 39,900 |
| Registered nurses | $39.67 | $38.08 to $47.61 | 143,730 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Ohio | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.5 | 5.3 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.5 | 0.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.5 | 3.2 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.4 | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 8.5 | 6.1 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.4 | 3.4 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.1 | 8.8 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 19.6 | 24.9 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 15.9 | 12.9 | 12.0 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Spring Meadows Nursing, a Villa Center's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (45.9% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
45.9% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Ohio: 147 better, 20 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 55 eligible stays.
10.0% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Ohio: 3 better, 7 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 59 eligible stays.
7.1% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Ohio: 1 better, 4 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 40 eligible stays.
50.0% this home
Median of homes: Ohio55.6% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 20 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Ohio0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 35 residents counted.
7.0% this home
Median of homes: Ohio1.4% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 35 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Ohio100.0% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 2 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: SPRING MEADOW NURSING & REHABILITATION CENTRE LLC. CMS links this home to Villa Healthcare, a group of 21 nursing homes averaging 2.7 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Omnia Opco Holdings LLC | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 07/01/2023 |
| Aaron Family Investment Trust | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 07/01/2023 | |
| Ab Investment Trust U/a/D 1/3/23 | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 07/01/2023 | |
| Todd a Stern 2015 Irrv Ins Tr | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 07/01/2023 | |
| Aaron, Jonathan | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Individual | 07/01/2023 | |
| Baumol, Yehoshua | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Individual | 07/01/2023 | |
| Graf, Marcella | Indirect ownership interest | Individual | 07/01/2023 | |
| Kroll, Gabriel | Indirect ownership interest | Individual | 07/01/2023 | |
| Nagel, Steven | Indirect ownership interest | Individual | 07/01/2023 | |
| Aaron, Jonathan | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 06/30/2023 | |
| Aaron, Jonathan | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 06/30/2023 | |
| Baumol, Yehoshua | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 06/30/2023 | |
| Evans, Kay | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 06/10/2024 | |
| Graf, Marcella | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 06/30/2023 | |
| Singerman, Joseph | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 02/25/2025 | |
| Evans, Kay | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 06/10/2024 | |
| Singerman, Joseph | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 02/25/2025 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Ohio. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.