3434 State Route 132, Amelia, OH 45102 · Clermont County · (513) 797-5144
78 certified beds, about 71 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 2004
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 366288 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on August 28, 2025, inspectors cited 1 health deficiency (the Ohio average is 10.5, the national average 9.2).
None of its 31 health citations since April 2019 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.80 hours per resident per day, against 3.69 across Ohio and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.85 of those hours.
73.6% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Ohio average 48.7%).
CMS links it to Cch Healthcare, an affiliated group of 33 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 31 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the right to privacy and confidential medical records for 2 (Resident #45 and Resident #59) of 67 facility residents. Specifically, observations revealed the computer screen on two medications carts was left visible in a facility hallway, while Resident #45 and Resident #59's identification and personal health information (PHI) was displayed.
Inspectors wroteTHE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on observation, staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff smoked only in designated areas of the facility in accordance with the facilities smoking policy. This affected one (Resident #58) of three reviewed for oxygen usage. The facility census was 62.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, staff interview interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure there were no expired tube feed formula bottles stored in the medication rooms and central supply room. The facility identified one resident (#26) who received Glucerna 1.5 (a specialized tube feed formula) and no residents currently who received Nephro 1.8 (a specialized tube feed formula). The facility identified 11 residents who receive tube feed formula. The facility census was 63.
Inspectors wroteTHE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on medical record review, review of the State of Ohio Board of Pharmacy Terminal Distributor Licensure of Prescriber Practices, review of facility policy, staff interview, and interview with contracted entity provider representative, the facility failed to ensure a contracted entity had appropriate State of Ohio required credentials for provision of services for residents. This affected four (#01, #09, #11, and #12) of the four residents reviewed for medications administered by a contracted ancillary provider. This also affected two additional current Residents (#03 and #19) and 16 discharged Residents (#02, #04, #05, #06, #07, #08, #10, #13, #14, #15, #16, #17, #18, #20, #21, and #22) for total of 22 residents. The facility census was 46.
Inspectors wroteTHE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on medical record review, review of the State of Ohio Board of Pharmacy Terminal Distributor Licensure of Prescriber Practices, staff interview and contracted entity provider representative interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were obtained from a source with a Terminal Distributor of Dangerous Drugs (TDDD) license (which allows a business entity to purchase, possess, and/or distribute dangerous drugs at a specific location) specific to the State of Ohio. This affected four (#01, #09, #11, and #12) of the four residents reviewed for medications administered by a contracted ancillary provider. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, review of the State of Ohio Board of Pharmacy Terminal Distributor Licensure of Prescriber Practices, review of facility policy, and interview the facility failed to ensure a contracted entity had appropriate State of Ohio required credentials for provision of services for residents. This affected four (#01, #09, #11, and #12) of the four residents reviewed for medications administered by a contracted ancillary provider. This also affected two additional current Residents (#03 and #19) and 16 discharged Residents (#02, #04, #05, #06, #07, #08, #10, #13, #14, #15, #16, #17, #18, #20, #21, and #22) for total of 22 residents. The facility census was 46.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observation, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to timely discard expired medications. This affected two (#195 and #15) residents with expired medications observed in the medication carts and had the potential to affect all 41 residents residing in the facility who could potentially receive expired stock medications. The census was 41.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, staff interviews, review of a meal spreadsheet and policy review, the facility failed to provide qualified staff to ensure meals were provided as ordered by the physician. This had the potential to affect all 41 residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 41.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, staff and resident interviews, review of a spreadsheet and policy review, the facility failed to ensure sufficient and trained dietary staff to meet residents' dietary needs. This had the potential to affect all 41 residents residing in the facility who received meals from the kitchen. The facility census was 41.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, staff interview, review of the dish machine log and policy review the facility failed to label foods, sanitize dishes and store ice machine scoop in a sanitary manner. This had the potential to affect all 41 residents residing in the facility who received food from the kitchen. The facility census was 41.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observation and staff , the facility failed to provide puree and mechanical soft diets as planned by a Registered Dietitian. This had the potential to affect two (#19 and #245) residents with orders for a puree diet, and six (#8, #10, #24, #41, #44 and #195) residents with orders for a mechanical soft diet. The facility census was 41.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observation, staff interview, and review of manufacturers guidelines, the facility failed to properly clean and sanitize blood glucose meters after use. This affected four (#22, #19, #7, and #14) of four residents observed for blood glucose monitoring. The census was 41.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observation, resident interview, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents were dressed in a dignified manner. This affected one (Resident #195) of 12 residents reviewed for dignity. The census was 41.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observation, resident interview, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents were bathed according to their preference. This affected one resident (#7) of 12 residents reviewed for bathing preferences. The census was 41.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observations and staff interview, the facility failed to implement a physician ordered intervention for a speciality cushion to a residents wheelchair to promote healing of a pressure ulcer. This affected one (#44) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 41.
Inspectors wrote2. Record review revealed Resident #44 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis of hemorrhage of cerebrum, loss of consciousness unspecified, pneumonia, dementia, and chronic heart failure. Resident #44 received hospice services. Review of the Significant Change Minimum Data Set, (MDS), dated [DATE] revealed Resident #44 was cognitively impaired and required extensive assistance of two staff for care. Review of current physician orders revealed continuous oxygen at 3.5 milliliters via nasal cannula and change oxygen tubing every week on Sunday night shift and as needed. Observation on 05/31 22 at 12:24 P.M. and on 06/01/22 at 2:49 P.M. revealed Resident #44 was receiving oxygen via nasal cannula and the oxygen tubing was not dated. Interview on 06/01/22 at 2:50 P.M. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observation, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure proper documentation of administration of controlled substances and accounting for controlled substance medications. This affected two (#15 and #20) of nine facility-identified residents with controlled substances stored on the Primrose Unit medication cart. The facility also failed to administer a residents medications (Ativan and Lyrica) as ordered. This affected one (#195) out of three residents reviewed for medication administration. The census was 41.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to date foods stored in the refrigerator and failed to dispose of outdated foods in the kitchen. This had the potential to affect all 33 residents in the facility receiving meals from the kitchen.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and staff interview, the facility failed maintain the stove and dish washer in safe operating conditions. This had the potential to affect all 33 resident receiving meals from the kitchen.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observation and interviews, the facility failed to honor a resident's dignity when she was not provided incontinence care in a timely manner during night shift and she was left sopping wet in her bed. This affected one (Resident #9) of 16 residents reviewed during the annual survey for dignity issues. The resident census was 33.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to accurately code resident's status on the Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessments. This affected two (Residents #36 and #27) of 16 residents sampled. The resident census was 33.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to initiate a baseline care plan within 48 hours of admission. This affected one (Resident #33) of 13 residents baseline care plans reviewed. The facility census was 33.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to complete comprehensive care plans to address resident needs. This affected two (Residents #9 and #33) of 13 residents reviewed for comprehensive care plans. The facility census was 33.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed ensure discharge records contained a recapitulation of the resident's stay, a final summary of resident's status, and a reconciliation of all pre- and post- discharge medications. This affected two (Residents #37 and #36) of four residents reviewed for discharge. The facility census was 33.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide a resident with incontinence care to maintain personal hygiene. This affected one (Resident #9) of 16 residents sampled. The resident census was 33.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide laboratory testing to monitor the use of medications. This affected one (Resident #17) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The resident census was 33.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of monitoring measures, interview and policy review, the facility failed to have any water monitoring for Legionella; failed to provide a functional sink where staff and residents could wash their hands in the Main Shower Room. This occurred in one (Main Shower Room) of two shower rooms used by 16 residents (Residents #12, #8, #13, #25, #30, #35, 328, #23, #34, #4, #16, #9, #10, #19, #22 and #17); and failed to administer Tuberculosis (TB) testing in accordance with facility policy. This involved six employees (Maintenance Director #2, Registered Nurse (RN) #21, Licensed Social Worker (LSW) #6, Housekeeper #34, the Director of Nursing (DON) and State Tested Nurse Aide (STNA) #4) of eleven personnel files reviewed. This had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. Facility census was 33.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure reference checks were obtained on employees prior to hire. This affected two (Dietary Manager #5 and Registered Nurse #21) of eight employees hired since 01/01/19. This had the potential to affect all 33 residents in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice (SNF ABN) letters to residents discharged from skilled care to nursing care. This affected three (Residents #13, #26 and #31) of three residents reviewed for Beneficiary Protection Notification. The facility census was 33.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to provide residents, resident representatives, and/or the local Ombudsman the required notification of transfer when the residents were sent out to the hospital. This affected two (Residents #26 and #33) of three residents reviewed for hospitalization. The facility census was 33.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, interview and policy review, the facility failed to provide residents and/or resident representatives the required bed hold notices when residents were transferred to the hospital. This affected two (Residents #26 and #33) of three residents reviewed for hospitalization. The facility census was 33.
28 fire safety citations on file: 3 on August 28, 2025, 12 on June 9, 2022, 13 on April 11, 2019.
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Ohio | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.80 | 3.69 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.85 | 0.64 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.35 | 3.28 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 1.80 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.15 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 73.6% | 48.7% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 63.6% | 43.9% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 4.05 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.98 on weekdays and 3.35 on weekends, 16% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 18.6% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.03 in April to June 2025 to 3.80 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.80 | 0.85 | 3.98 | 3.35 | 18.6% | 0 of 90 | 71 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.86 | 1.00 | 4.02 | 3.44 | 24.5% | 0 of 92 | 69 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.80 | 0.98 | 4.02 | 3.24 | 19.1% | 0 of 92 | 65 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 4.03 | 0.96 | 4.26 | 3.46 | 26.1% | 0 of 91 | 64 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Ohio, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.64 | 0.60 | 3.80 | 3.24 | 4.6% | 0.4% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ohio, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.76 | $17.93 to $21.44 | 63,280 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $29.78 | $27.34 to $31.68 | 39,900 |
| Registered nurses | $39.67 | $38.08 to $47.61 | 143,730 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Ohio | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.4 | 5.3 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.3 | 0.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.9 | 3.2 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.5 | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.2 | 6.1 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.5 | 3.4 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.3 | 8.8 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 7.2 | 24.9 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 15.5 | 12.9 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.3 | 1.7 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.5 | 1.8 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Sunrise Nursing Healthcare LLC's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (48.4% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
48.4% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Ohio: 147 better, 20 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 34 eligible stays.
10.7% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Ohio: 3 better, 7 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 50 eligible stays.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
US median of homes 7.1% · Ohio: 1 better, 4 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 24 eligible stays.
44.0% this home
Median of homes: Ohio55.6% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 25 residents counted.
2.6% this home
Median of homes: Ohio0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 39 residents counted.
6.0% this home
Median of homes: Ohio1.4% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 39 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Ohio100.0% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 2 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: SUNRISE NURSING HEALTHCARE LLC. CMS links this home to Cch Healthcare, a group of 33 nursing homes averaging 2.5 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jeremias, Baruch | Corporate director | Individual | 12/01/2018 | |
| Stern, Jacob | Corporate director | Individual | 12/01/2018 | |
| Jeremias, Baruch | Corporate officer | Individual | 12/01/2018 | |
| Stern, Jacob | Corporate officer | Individual | 12/01/2018 | |
| Castellanos, Andrew | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/01/2026 | |
| Robles, Christopher | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 06/21/2022 | |
| Castellanos, Andrew | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 07/28/2026 | |
| Robles, Christopher | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 07/28/2026 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Ohio. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.