Home / New York / South Hampton
64 County Road 39, South Hampton, NY 11968 · Suffolk County · (631) 702-1000
280 certified beds, about 255 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 2006
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 335850 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on April 28, 2026, inspectors cited 4 health deficiencies (the New York average is 8.1, the national average 9.2).
Of 23 health citations since March 2023, 3 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (3 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $150,990 in the last three years; the largest was $150,990, and the latest is dated November 26, 2025.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 2.93 hours per resident per day, against 3.63 across New York and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.37 of those hours.
37.4% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (New York average 40.3%).
CMS links it to Philosophy Care Centers, an affiliated group of 3 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 23 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews during survey, the facility failed to assess a resident using the quarterly review instrument specified by the State and approved by Center of Medicare and Medicaid Services not less frequently than once every three (3) months. This was identified for four (4) (Resident #25, Resident #35, Resident #36, Resident #184) of ten (10) sampled from 61 residents triggered for the resident assessment task. Specifically, Resident #184's Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment with Assessment Reference Date of 02/06/2026 was not completed; Resident #35's Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment was not completed until 77 days after the Assessment Reference Date of 02/06/2026; Resident #25's Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment was not completed until 71 days after the Assessment Reference Date of 01/21/2026; [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews during survey, the facility failed to ensure that all completed Minimum Data Set assessments were electronically transmitted to the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services within 14 days of the resident assessment completion. This was identified for three (3) (Resident #36, Resident #43, and Resident #178) of ten (10) residents sampled from 61 residents triggered for the resident assessment task. Specifically, Resident #178's Annual Minimum Data Set assessment was not electronically transmitted to the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services until 56 days after the completion of the assessment; Resident #43's admission Minimum Data Set assessment was not electronically transmitted to the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services until 42 days after the completion of the assessment; [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interviews during surveys, the facility failed to ensure that each resident's environment remained free of accident hazards. This was identified for one (1) (Unit G) of seven (7) units reviewed for Accidents. Specifically, a free-standing E-Cylinder oxygen tank (a portable, high-capacity metal cylinder used to store compressed medical grade oxygen) was observed in the Unit G nursing station. The E-Cylinder tank was free standing and was not secured in a safety stand or a rack.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review, and interviews during a survey (Complaint #2962369), the facility failed to ensure all residents had the right to be treated with respect and dignity, including the right to retain personal possessions. This was identified for one (1) (Residents #266) of two (2) residents reviewed for resident rights. Specifically, Resident #266 was transferred to the hospital. The facility staff packed Resident 266's belongings. After the resident's was readmitted to the facility from the hospital, the facility did not return the resident's belongings.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews during the abbreviated survey (Intake # 2660131) the facility failed to ensure that residents were free from alleged sexual abuse for two (2) of eight (8) residents reviewed. Specifically, Resident#1 and Resident #2, both with intact cognition, reported allegations of sexual abuse. Resident #1 alleged on 08/25/2025 that Certified Nursing Assistant #1 made a sexually inappropriate comment while providing care. Resident #2 alleged Certified Nursing Assistant #1 touched and rubbed their genital area on 08/21/2025 that made them feel unsafe in the facility. Certified Nursing Assistant #1 was suspended for three (3) days without a thorough investigation and returned to work and had access to all 248 residents in the facility. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews during the abbreviated survey (Intake #2660131) the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source, and misappropriation of resident property, were reported immediately, but not later than two (2) hours after the allegation is made. This was identified for two (2) of eight (8) Residents (Resident #1 and Resident #2). Specifically, Resident #1 reported an allegation that Certified Nursing Assistant #1 stated to them they did not see many women with a shaved vaginal area in the nursing home and this made Resident #1 not feel safe. Resident #2 reported an allegation that Certified Nurse Assistant #1 touched and rubbed their genital area in a manner that made them feel violated. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews during the abbreviated survey (Intake #2660131), the facility failed to ensure that an investigation of alleged sexual abuse was thoroughly and timely investigated to prevent further potential abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment. This was identified for two (2) of eight (8) residents (Resident #1 and Resident #2) reviewed for accidents/incidents. Specifically, Resident #1 and Resident #2 alleged Certified Nursing Assistant #1 was sexually inappropriate which made them feel unsafe in the facility. There was no documented evidence that an investigation to rule out abuse, neglect, or mistreatment was initiated. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interviews during an abbreviated survey (NY00368741) on 2/26/2025 the facility did not ensure that all residents were free from physical restraints imposed for the purpose of discipline or convenience and are not required to treat the resident's medical symptoms. This was identified for three residents (Resident #1, Resident #2, and Resident #3) of three residents reviewed for restraints. Specifically, Resident #1, Resident #2 and Resident #3 were observed in their beds with the bed in the lowest position with thick fall prevention mats observed on their side (length wise), pushed up against both sides of the bed restricting the resident's freedom of movement.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record reviews, and interviews conducted during an abbreviated survey (NY00368741) on 2/26/2025 the facility did not ensure call systems were accessible to each resident while the resident were in their rooms. This was identified for three residents (Resident #1, Resident #2, and Resident #3) of three residents reviewed for call systems. Specifically, Resident #1, Resident #2 and Resident #3 were observed, multiple times in their beds, with no access to use their call bells preventing them to be able to call for assistance.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 9/23/2024 and completed on 9/30/2024, the facility did not ensure that each resident was treated with respect and dignity and in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life. This was identified for one (Resident #5) of three residents reviewed for Dignity. Specifically, on 9/23/2024 Resident #5's room was observed with a strong urine odor. A disposable bed pad with a large urine stain was observed on the floor adjacent to the resident's bed with three urinals one of which was full. Resident #5 stated they wanted the area to be clean. The finding is: [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews during the Recertification Survey and Abbreviated Survey (NY 00354353) initiated on 9/23/2024 and completed on 9/30/2024, the facility did not ensure that each resident's primary representative was immediately informed when a resident had an accident resulting in injury that had the potential for requiring Physician intervention. This was identified for one (Resident #230) of four residents reviewed for Accidents. Specifically, on 9/17/2024 Resident #230 fell from the bed and sustained bruising to their face. The resident's representative was not informed of the fall. The finding is: [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 9/23/2024 and completed on 9/30/2024, the facility did not ensure that each resident was provided a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment. This was identified for one (Unit E) of four units observed during the environmental task. Specifically, during an environmental tour of Unit E, Resident#144's bathroom door was observed with broken hinges and was not able to be closed; Resident#56's privacy curtains were observed with dark brown and yellow stains, and the bathroom floor was soiled with dark grayish stains.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey and Abbreviated Survey (NY 00351219) initiated on 9/23/2024 and completed on 9/30/2024, the facility did not ensure that accidents were thoroughly investigated to rule out abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. This was identified for one (Resident #161) of four residents reviewed for Accidents. Specifically, Resident #161 was found on the floor in their room near the bed on 7/28/2024 and sustained a six-centimeter laceration (cut or tear) with bruising to the left side of their face. The facility did not obtain statements from each staff member involved with the resident to identify the root cause of the accident. The finding is: The facility's Accident and Incident policy and procedure reviewed on 8/2024 documented that the charge nurse or supervisor will initiate the collection of statements from staff. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview during the recertification survey initiated on 9/23/2024 and completed on 9/30/2024, the facility failed to ensure that a Minimum Data Set Assessment was completed within the prescribed time frames. This was evident during the Resident Assessment task. Specifically, Resident #486 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The admission Minimum Data Set Assessment was completed on date 7/25/2024. The Minimum Data Set assessment was completed six days beyond the required timeframe. The finding is: The facility policy titled Minimum Data Set Version 3.0, last reviewed March 2024, documented the facility will conduct initially and periodically a comprehensive, accurate, standardized reproducible assessment of each resident's functional capacity. Resident #486 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of Congestive Heart Failure and Diabetes Mellitus. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during a Recertification and Abbreviated survey (NY 00326995) completed on 9/30/24, the facility did not ensure a resident who required respiratory care, including tracheostomy (an opening into the windpipe to help air reach the lungs) care, provided such care consistent with professional standards of practice. This was identified for one (Resident #129) of one resident reviewed for respiratory care. Specifically, 1) during observation of Resident #129's tracheostomy care on 9/27/2024, Registered Nurse #6 did not change the inner tracheostomy tube (cannula) as ordered by the Physician and 2) there was no documented evidence the resident's tracheostomy outer cannula was routinely being changed as per the manufacturer's specifications from March 2023 to October 2023. The finding is: [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 9/23/2024 and completed on 9/30/2024, the facility did not ensure that all residents were free of significant medication errors. This was identified for one (Resident #106) of 25 residents reviewed during medication pass observation. Specifically, Resident #106 had a physician's order for Ampicillin 1 Gram (antibiotic) Intravenous solution every 6 hours at 12:00 AM; 6:00 AM; 12:00 PM; and 6:00 PM for Cellulitis (skin infection). The Medication Administration Record lacked documented evidence that Resident #106 received their 12:00 AM and 6:00 AM dosage of the Physician-ordered antibiotic on 9/23/2024. The finding is: The facility's policy for Medication Administration and Documentation, last reviewed 10/2023, documented administering medication at the time it is prepared. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review during the Recertification Survey initiated on 9/23/2024 and completed on 9/30/2024, the facility did not ensure that food was prepared and served in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This was identified during the Kitchen observation task. Specifically, Dietary Aide #1 was observed handling peeled, hard-cooked eggs wearing the same gloves that were used while entering and exiting the walk-in refrigerator; and the cold food temperatures were above the safety zone. The finding is: The undated facility policy and procedure for Food Service Hand Washing, documented that hands are frequently and properly washed throughout the day. The purpose is to remove bacteria that may cause infection. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews during the Recertification Survey and Abbreviated Survey (NY 00354353) initiated on 9/23/2024 and completed on 9/30/2024, the facility did not ensure that timely arrangements were made for outside services that met professional standards. This was identified for one (Resident #230) of four residents reviewed for Accidents. Specifically, Resident #230 with severely impaired communication was transferred to the Neurologist's office for a medical appointment on 9/11/2024. The resident was not accompanied by the facility staff or the resident representative who could speak on behalf of the resident; therefore, the appointment was canceled and the resident was returned to the facility. There was no documentation in the resident's medical record that the appointment was canceled; no documentation regarding how to coordinate future medical appointments; [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review during the Recertification Survey initiated on 9/23/2024 and completed on 9/30/2024, the facility did not ensure that all completed Minimum Data Set assessments were electronically transmitted to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services within the required timeframe. This was identified for six (Residents #52, #148, #13, #105, #206, and 486) of 12 residents reviewed for the Resident Assessment Facility Task. Specifically, the Minimum Data Set assessment for Residents #52, #148, #13, #105, #206, and #486 were not transmitted to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services within 14 days of the assessment completion date. The finding is: [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on [DATE] and completed on [DATE], the facility did not ensure that the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments accurately reflected each resident's current status. This was identified for one (Resident #115) of two residents reviewed for Resident Assessment and one (Resident #145) of one resident reviewed for Physician's Services. Specifically, 1) Resident #115 expired on [DATE] while out of the facility and a Discharge MDS assessment was not completed. 2) Resident #145's admission MDS assessment did not include that the resident had a Pacemaker and an Automatic Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (AICD) device under Section I for active diagnosis. The finding is: [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on [DATE] and completed on [DATE], the facility did not ensure that a comprehensive patient-centered care plan was implemented to include measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical and nursing needs. Specifically, Resident #145 was admitted with a diagnosis of status post Permanent Pacemaker insertion. The Comprehensive Care Plan (CCP) documented to conduct Pacemaker checks as per the facility's protocol. There was no documented evidence that the resident's Pacemaker/ Automatic Implantable Cardiac Defibrillator (AICD) was checked. The finding is: The facility's Policy and Procedure dated 1/2022 for Pacemaker/ AICD included to ensure that Pacemaker/AICD checks are conducted and reported in compliance with the physician's orders every 3-6 months. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 2/23/2023 and completed on 3/2/2023 the facility did not ensure that each resident's comprehensive person-centered Care Plan (CCP) was reviewed and revised by the Interdisciplinary Team after each assessment. This was identified for one (Resident #146) of three residents reviewed for positioning and mobility. Specifically, Resident #146 had a Physician's order for a left-hand resting splint to be worn as tolerated. There was no documented evidence that the resident's care plan was updated to include the use of the left-hand resting splint. The finding is: The facility Comprehensive Care Plan Policy and Procedure dated 11/2017 documented each resident's comprehensive care plan shall be reviewed and updated by the interdisciplinary team as per the MDS 3.0 schedule: [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on [DATE] and completed on [DATE], the facility did not ensure that each resident's medical care was supervised by a physician throughout the resident's stay for one (Resident #145) of three residents reviewed for Permanent Pacemaker (PPM- a cardiac implanted device). Specifically, Resident #145, with diagnoses of status post (s/p) Myocardial Infarction, Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis following Cerebral Infarction, was admitted in [DATE]. The Physician did not address the resident's PPM upon admission. Additionally, there were no physician orders instructing staff to monitor the PPM. The finding is: The Policy/Procedure for Pacemaker/Automatic Implantable Cardiac Defibrillator (AICD) dated 1/2022 included: [...]
11 fire safety citations on file: 3 on September 30, 2024, 8 on March 2, 2023.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| November 26, 2025 | Fine | $150,990 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | New York | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 2.93 | 3.63 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.37 | 0.71 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 2.71 | 3.18 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 1.73 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.83 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 37.4% | 40.3% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 25.0% | 39.8% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.38 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.02 on weekdays and 2.71 on weekends, 10% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 44.8% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 2.87 in April to June 2025 to 2.93 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 2.93 | 0.37 | 3.02 | 2.71 | 44.8% | 0 of 90 | 255 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 2.97 | 0.38 | 3.03 | 2.80 | 45.3% | 0 of 92 | 252 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.05 | 0.38 | 3.16 | 2.79 | 46.0% | 0 of 92 | 249 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 2.87 | 0.43 | 2.99 | 2.57 | 40.9% | 0 of 91 | 247 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| New York, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.55 | 0.68 | 3.72 | 3.13 | 9.8% | 0.1% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| New York, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $23.36 | $21.04 to $24.99 | 87,990 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $32.30 | $29.52 to $37.00 | 39,400 |
| Registered nurses | $52.62 | $45.60 to $62.34 | 205,810 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | New York | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 9.2 | 14.1 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.1 | 1.3 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.3 | 3.1 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.7 | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 6.6 | 12.5 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 7.5 | 6.5 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 21.8 | 13.7 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 22.3 | 20.6 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 3.9 | 9.6 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.6 | 1.7 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 0.9 | 1.4 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for The Hamptons Center for Rehabilitation and Nursing's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (55.5% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
55.5% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · New York: 101 better, 157 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 335 eligible stays.
10.9% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · New York: 12 better, 5 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 325 eligible stays.
5.9% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · New York: 7 better, 21 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 220 eligible stays.
57.3% this home
Median of homes: New York60.6% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 157 residents counted.
0.4% this home
Median of homes: New York0.6% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 233 residents counted.
1.9% this home
Median of homes: New York2.0% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 232 residents counted.
93.1% this home
Median of homes: New York98.5% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 102 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: NORTH SEA ASSOCIATES LLC. CMS links this home to Philosophy Care Centers, a group of 3 nursing homes averaging 3 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bacchi, Anthony | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 10% | 09/20/2005 |
| Farbenblum, Edward | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 15% | 09/20/2005 |
| Farbenblum, Michael | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 5% | 09/20/2005 |
| Hoffman, Pinchus | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 5% | 09/20/2005 |
| Philipson, Bent | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 16% | 09/20/2005 |
| Steinmetz, Dina | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 5% | 09/20/2005 |
| Stern, Ronald | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 5% | 09/20/2005 |
| Benden, Joseph | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 08/27/2015 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in New York. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.