Find a nursing home

Home / Texas / Porter

The Heights on Valley Ranch

23200 Valley Ranch Parkway, Porter, TX 77365 · Montgomery County · (346) 326-5085

122 certified beds, about 111 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 2020

Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
4 of 5
Health inspections
4 of 5
Staffing
3 of 5
Quality measures
3 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 676476 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on May 15, 2025, inspectors cited 6 health deficiencies (the Texas average is 9.4, the national average 9.2).

None of its 18 health citations since December 2022 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.

CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.74 hours per resident per day, against 3.39 across Texas and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.17 of those hours.

39.3% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Texas average 55.3%).

CMS links it to Touchstone Communities, an affiliated group of 25 nursing homes.

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 18 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
0G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
5D
12E
0F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
1B
0C
July 18, 2026Complaint inspection · 2 citations
  1. E
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 10, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections to meet the needs of 2 of 5 residents (Resident #1 and Resident #2) reviewed for infection control. The facility failed to enter Resident #1's contact isolation orders in her electronical medical record and failed to initiate contact precautions for Resident #1 who was positive for c.difficile (a bacterium that causes an infection of the colon) for 2 days. The facility failed to separate Resident #2 from Resident #1, who had a confirmed c. difficle infection, in a timely manner. This failure could place residents at risk of spread of infection.
  2. D
    Provide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
    F773 · Administration · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 10, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to promptly notify the ordering physician, physician assistant, nurse practitioner, or clinical nurse specialist of laboratory results that fall outside of clinical reference ranges in accordance with facility policies and procedures for notification of a practitioner or per the ordering physician's orders for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for physician notification of laboratory services. The facility failed to review Resident #1's stool test results for c. difficile (a bacterium that causes an infection of the colon) and notify the MD/NP in a timely manner. The results were reviewed and NP was notified approximately 17 hours after the results were sent to the facility. This failure could place residents at risk of delayed treatment and spread of infection.
May 15, 2025Standard inspection · 6 citations
  1. E
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    F640 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 15, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to transmit encoded, accurate, and complete MDS data to the Center for Medicaid/Medicare System (CMS) System for 3 of 6 closed records (CR #1, #2 and #3) reviewed for Minimum Data Set (MDS) transmission. CR #1, CR #2 and CR #3's discharge MDS assessment was not completed and transmitted within 14 days of CR's discharges. This failure could place residents at risk of not having assessments completed and submitted in a timely manner as required.
  2. E
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 15, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for dietary services, in that: The facility failed to ensure the ice machine was free from items (wet towel) within the stored ice. These failures could place residents at risk for food borne illness.
  3. D
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    F584 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 15, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a clean, comfortable, and homelike environment including a clean bed in good condition for 1 of 9 Resident's (Resident #4) whose bed was observed for sanitation. The facility failed to change Resident #4's bed linen which had several spills. This deficient practice could affect any resident and result in dissatisfaction and poor self-esteem.
  4. D
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    F761 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 15, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure in accordance with State and Federal laws, all drugs and biologicals were stored securely in locked compartments under proper temperature controls and permitted only authorized personnel to have access to the keys for one (Medication Aide Cart South Station 500 (Medication Cart #1)) of five medication carts observed for storage of medications. The facility failed to ensure the Medication Cart #1 was secured when unattended. This deficient practice could place residents at risk for loss of prescribed medications, resident's safety, and drug diversion.
  5. D
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 15, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, and sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #195) reviewed for infection control. The facility failed to ensure intravenous tubing was stored safely with medication attached, dated, timed, initialed, and free of contamination while hanging on pole. This failure could place residents at risk of infection, worsening infection, and a decreased quality of life.
  6. B
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    F814 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 15, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to dispose of garbage and refuse properly for 2 of 2 dumpster reviewed for food and nutrition services. 1. The facility failed to ensure doors were closed on 2 of 2 dumpsters and 1 of the 2 dumpsters had exposed bagged trash at the door's opening. This failure could place residents at risk of contact with pests and associated diseases
October 11, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. E
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    F561 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 28, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review, the facility failed to promote and facilitate resident self- determination through support of resident choice for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for resident rights. The facility failed to promote Resident #1's self-determination by not allowing her to eat in the dining room during meal time. This failure could place residents at risk of a decreased self-worth due to their preferences not being met.
March 21, 2024Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 7 citations
  1. E
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    F578 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 8, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to recognize the residents right to formulate an advance directive for 1 of 20 residents (Resident #264) reviewed for advanced directives. The facility failed to enter a code status (the type of emergent treatment a person would or would not receive if their heart or breathing were to stop) for Resident #264 from admission on [DATE] to 3/21/24. This failure could place residents at risk of not having their end of life wishes met.
  2. E
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 8, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights for 3 of 6 residents (Resident #24, Resident # 40, and Resident #213) reviewed for care plans. -Resident #24's care plan reflected she had a DNR status despite having orders to be full-code (desiring resuscitation if the heart stops) . -Resident #40's and Resident #213's care plans reflected they were a full-code status despite having orders and an active DNR on file. These failures could lead to confusion related to life saving measures, life saving measures being provided to a resident who had a DNR status, not providing life saving measures to a resident who had a full-code status.
  3. E
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    F677 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 8, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living were provided with the necessary services to maintain good personal hygiene for 1 of 20 (Resident #48) residents sampled for ADL care. -The facility failed to provide Resident #42 with a specialized call bell between 3/19/24 and 3/21/24. -The facility failed to shower and dress Resident #42 in his own clothes between 3/19/24 and 3/21/4. -The facility failed to get Resident #42 up out of bed between 3/19/24 and 3/21/24. These failures could place residents who are dependent on staff for ADLs, at risk of not receiving personal hygiene, experiencing a delay in receiving necessary careb.
  4. E
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    F684 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 8, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' choices for 1 (Resident #42) of 20 residents reviewed for quality of care. - The facility failed to treat Resident #42's wounds to his shins with available ointment that was prescribed. - The facility failed to treat Resident #42's tracheostomy stoma as directed by the Physician Orders. This failure could place residents at risk for diminished quality of care, pain, infection, and worsening conditions.
  5. E
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    F688 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 8, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident with limited range of motion received appropriate treatment and services to increase range of motion and/or to prevent further decrease in range of motion for 1 of 20 residents (Resident #42) reviewed for quality of care The facility failed to ensure Resident #42's interventions for his bilateral hand rolls (rolls for contractures), posey palm pad (pad in palm for contractures), and getting him up into a Geri chair (chair that helps prevent falls), were implemented. This failure could place residents at risk of a decrease in range of motion, problems with skin integrity, and decreased quality of care.
  6. E
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    F692 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 8, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure residents were offered sufficient fluid intake to maintain proper hydration and health for 1 of 20 residents (Residents #8) reviewed for hydration. The facility failed to ensure Resident #8 received adequate fluids from 3/19/24-3/21/24. This failure could place residents at risk for dehydration, electrolyte imbalance, and infections.
  7. E
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    F693 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 8, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure residents who were fed by enteral means received the appropriate treatment and services to prevent complications of enteral feeding for 1 (Resident #42) of 1 resident reviewed for gastrostomy tube management. The facility failed to follow the physician orders for Resident #42's enteral water flush (a set amount of water that is delivered into the digestive system via the feeding tube) that was ordered on 3/15/24. This failure could place residents at risk for fluid overload and nutritional deficits.
December 20, 2022Standard inspection · 2 citations
  1. E
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    F759 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 23, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the medication error rate was not five percent (%) or greater. The facility had a medication error rate of 5% based on 2 errors out of 38 opportunities, which involved 1 of 6 residents (Resident #43) reviewed for medication errors. -LVN T did not administer Ferrous sulfate (Iron) to Resident #43 and administered one Buspirone tablet (antianxiety medication) instead of two as prescribed by the physician. These failures could place residents at risk of inadequate therapeutic outcomes, increased negative side effects, and a decline in health.
  2. D
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    F584 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 22, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infection for 1 resident of 8 (Resident #359) observed for physical environment. The facility failed to maintain sanitary, functioning and a clean restroom for Resident #359. This failure placed the resident at risk for discomfort, infection and diminished quality of life and diminished clean, homelike environment.

Fire safety inspections

3 fire safety citations on file: 1 on May 15, 2025, 1 on March 21, 2024, 1 on December 20, 2022.

Every fire safety citation3 citations
  1. E
    Provide properly protected cooking facilities.
    K 324 · May 15, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  2. E
    Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.
    K 345 · March 21, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  3. E
    Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.
    K 345 · December 20, 2022 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeTexasUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)3.743.393.86
Registered nurses0.170.430.69
All nursing staff on weekends3.332.983.42
Nurse aides2.46
Licensed practical nurses1.11
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)39.3%55.3%45.8%
Registered nurse turnover50.0%54.6%42.9%
Administrators who left1

CMS expects 3.65 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.91 on weekdays and 3.33 on weekends, 15% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 1.3% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.57 in April to June 2025 to 3.74 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20263.740.173.913.33 1.3%1 of 90111
Oct to Dec 20253.660.173.903.05 1.3%0 of 92109
Jul to Sep 20253.630.153.823.14 1.5%0 of 92107
Apr to Jun 20253.570.173.763.09 1.7%0 of 91108
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
Texas, Jan to Mar 20263.330.403.502.932.2%0.7% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeTexasUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
12.015.813.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.60.30.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.00.81.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
1.13.33.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.51.51.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
12.314.014.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
3.43.84.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
2.69.615.4
Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
31.625.723.8
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
12.112.312.0
Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
1.82.21.9
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
1.22.11.8

Owners and operators

Legal business name: WEST WHARTON COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICT. CMS links this home to Touchstone Communities, a group of 25 nursing homes averaging 2.9 stars overall.

NameRoleTypeShareSince
Frost Bank5% or greater security interestOrganization10/25/2024
Thompson, JohnnyCorporate officerIndividual11/01/2023
Touchstone Strategies - Mc2 LLCOperational/managerial controlOrganization03/01/2023
Boening, ChristopherOperational/managerial controlIndividual03/01/2023
Booker, MarilynOperational/managerial controlIndividual03/01/2023
Campbell, LeslieOperational/managerial controlIndividual03/01/2023
Carmouche, FeleciaOperational/managerial controlIndividual12/04/2023
Castillo, LynneaOperational/managerial controlIndividual03/01/2023
Sehlke, BryonOperational/managerial controlIndividual03/01/2023
Zurovec, DarrellOperational/managerial controlIndividual03/01/2023
Aegis Therapies, Inc.Adp of the SNFOrganization03/01/2023
Carvajal Pharmacy LTCAdp of the SNFOrganization03/01/2023
Nutritious Lifestyles, Inc.Adp of the SNFOrganization03/01/2023
Plante & Moran PLLCAdp of the SNFOrganization03/01/2023
The Bryon and Rena Sehlke Living TrustAdp of the SNFOrganization01/01/2023
Touchstone Communities IncAdp of the SNFOrganization03/01/2023
Touchstone Realty - Mc1 LLCAdp of the SNFOrganization03/01/2023
Touchstone Strategies - Mc2 LLCAdp of the SNFOrganization07/14/2025
Trident Health Services IncAdp of the SNFOrganization03/01/2023
Boening, ChristopherAdp of the SNFIndividual03/01/2023
Booker, MarilynAdp of the SNFIndividual03/01/2023
Campbell, LeslieAdp of the SNFIndividual03/01/2023
Carmouche, FeleciaAdp of the SNFIndividual12/04/2023
Castillo, LynneaAdp of the SNFIndividual03/01/2023
Fellbaum, ErnestAdp of the SNFIndividual03/01/2023
Sehlke, BryonAdp of the SNFIndividual03/01/2023
Studer, StanleyAdp of the SNFIndividual03/01/2023
Zurovec, DarrellAdp of the SNFIndividual03/01/2023

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 5 problems in this area, most recently on March 21, 2024: "Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable."
  2. How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on May 15, 2025: "Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely."
  3. What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on July 18, 2026: "Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program."
  4. When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on May 15, 2025: "Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment."
  5. How long has the current administrator been here?CMS counts 1 administrator who left in the period it measured.

Other nursing homes nearby

Texas contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in Texas. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Common questions

What is The Heights on Valley Ranch's Medicare star rating?
CMS rates The Heights on Valley Ranch 4 out of 5 stars overall, with 4 for health inspections, 3 for staffing and 3 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did The Heights on Valley Ranch get at its last inspection?
6 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on May 15, 2025. The Texas average is 9.4.
Has The Heights on Valley Ranch been fined?
CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
Does The Heights on Valley Ranch accept Medicaid?
It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns The Heights on Valley Ranch?
CMS lists 28 owners and managers, and links the home to Touchstone Communities. Legal business name: WEST WHARTON COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICT.

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection