23775 Kingwood Place, Kingwood, TX 77339 · Montgomery County · (281) 318-2600
194 certified beds, about 79 residents a day · Government - Hospital district · Medicare and Medicaid since 2007
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 676160 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on June 29, 2025, inspectors cited 6 health deficiencies (the Texas average is 9.4, the national average 9.2).
Of 30 health citations since March 2023, 7 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (7 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $72,573 in the last three years; the largest was $72,573, and the latest is dated June 3, 2025.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.40 hours per resident per day, against 3.39 across Texas and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.33 of those hours.
72.8% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Texas average 55.3%).
CMS links it to Momentum Skilled Services, an affiliated group of 9 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 30 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that residents who required colostomy, urostomy, or ileostomy services, received such care consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the resident's goals and preferences for one of three residents (Resident #2) reviewed for quality of care. The facility failed to ensure adequate and consistent colostomy care was provided every 3 days. Resident #2 went 6 days without her colostomy bag being changed. This failure could place residents at risk of physical and mental health decline and could cause pain and further discomfort.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment and furnish services to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 2 of 11 residents (CR #1and Resident #34) reviewed for comprehensive care plans. The facility failed to care plan CR #1 for risk of elopement and document interventions prior to CR #1 eloping from the facility on 06/20/2025 around 4:45pm and did not know her whereabouts until 06/20/2025 around 8:40pm. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that 1 (Resident #61) of 5 residents reviewed for hearing services, received proper treatment to maintain hearing capabilities. -The facility did not complete an Audiology (hearing) referral for Resident #61 who was hard of hearing until 06/27/25. -The facility failed to identify that Resident #61's hearing aids were not functioning properly when resident placed new batteries in hearing aids. This failure could place residents at risk for further decrease in communication, social engagement, and decrease in quality of life.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to properly store, label, and/or secure medications and biologicals for 1 of 4 medication carts (400 hall medication cart), in accordance with State and Federal laws, all drugs and were stored in locked compartments under proper temperature controls and permitted only authorized personnel to have access to for 1 of 14 residents reviewed for medication administration (Resident #67). The facility failed to ensure Resident #67 medication was not left unattended on [DATE], 600-hall medication cart had medication open not dated. This failure could place residents at risk to having access to unauthorized medication and/or lead to possible harm or drug diversion and receiving the appropriate medications and not reaching the intended therapeutic dose and possible exacerbation of health conditions.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to immediately consult with the resident's physician of a significant change in the resident's physical, mental, or psychosocial status (that is, a deterioration in health, mental, or psychosocial status in either life-threatening conditions or clinical complications) for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #34) reviewed for resident rights. -The facility failed in notifying Resident #34's physician on 06/24/25 right away when resident had a significant change in condition. Resident experienced a choking episode while eating his breakfast at 8:48AM on 06/24/25. This failure placed all residents in the facility who may experience a significant change in condition at risk for harm or injury if not reported to the physician in a timely manner. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5 percent. There were 3 errors out of 37 opportunities, resulting in a 8 percent medication error involving for 1 of 14 residents (Resident #67) reviewed for medication errors. LVN J did not administer the full dose of carvedilol oral tablet 3.125 mg (carvedilol=medication used to help lower blood pressure and reduce the workload of the heart). Misoprostol oral tablet 100 mcg (misoprostol= medication used to protect the stomach against acid damage, and decreases the amount of acid produced by the stomach) and Famotidine oral tablet 40 mg (famotidine) (medication used to reduce the amount of acid produced in your stomach) as ordered by the Physician to Resident #67 on 6/24/25. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 2 (Residents #8 and #41) of 4 residents reviewed for infection control practices. -LVN A did not wipe his accu-check machine between after using it on Resident #8 and Resident #41 to check their blood glucose and did not store the accu-check machine properly to prevent infection on 06/24/2025. This failure could put residents at risk of a spread of infection and diseases due to not following infection control policies and procedures.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations , interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as possible and that each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 2 out of 11 residents (CR#1 and Resident # 58) reviewed for adequate supervision and accident hazards. -CR #1 left the faciity on [DATE] around 5:45pm and the facility was not aware of CR #1's whereabouts until 06/20/2025 at 8:42pm when they received notice CR #1 was found walking on the road near the facility . This was determined to be an IJ on 6/26/25 for CR #1's elopement. The Administrator and DON were notified on 6/26/25 at 4:23pm. The DON and Administrator were provided with the IJ template on 6/26/25 at 4:27pm and a Plan of Removal was requested. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure 4 (CR#2, CR#3 R#1 and R#2) of 9 resident reviewed was free from abuse and neglect The facility failed to prevent neglect and failed to provide the required structures and processes in order to meet the needs of CR#2 when interventions were not implemented: WCD orders for changing bandages, turning, and repositioning, and getting CR#2 in the chair twice daily. As a result, CR#2 did not receive proper treatment to prevent wound deterioration and infection, which resulted in hospitalization with severe sepsis and required surgical wound debridement. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified on 5.28.2025. The IJ template was provided to the facility on 5.28.2025 at 1:15p.m. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on Interviews and record review the facility failed to implement the facility's abuse policy ensuring 1 (CR#3) of 9 residents was free from abuse reviewed for developing/implementing abuse policies. The facility failed to implement their abuse policy when CR #3 made an allegation of physical and verbal abuse. The allegation was not reported to the abuse coordinator or investigated and the alleged abuser had access to CR#3 after an allegation of abuse was made. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified on 5.30.2025. The IJ template was provided to the Administrator and DON on 5.30.2025 at 1:27p.m. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review the facility failed to immediately investigation, report and protect 1 (CR#3) of 9 residents reviewed for abuse and neglect. The facility failed to immediately investigate, report, and protect CR#3 when he reported being stabbed in the arm with an insulin needle and scratched on the nose by LVN B. They facility failed to prevent further potential abuse when the facility failed to remove CR#3 from LVN B care after the report of abuse. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified on 5.30.2025. The IJ template was provided to the Administrator and DON on 5.30.2025 at 1:27p.m. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure that a resident receives care, consistent with professional standards of practice, to prevent pressure ulcers and does not develop pressure ulcers unless the individual ' s clinical condition demonstrates that they were unavoidable; and a resident with pressure ulcers receives necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing, prevent infection and prevent new ulcers from developing for 3 (CR2, R#1, R#2) of 9 residents reviewed for Treatment/Services to Prevent/Heal Pressure Ulcers in that: The facility failed to ensure CR #2's wound interventions were implemented: WCD orders for changing bandages, turning, and repositioning, and getting CR#2 in the chair twice daily. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on, interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure resident environment remains as free of accident hazards as is possible; and each resident receives adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 1 of 9 residents (CR #1) reviewed for accidents and supervision, in that: The facility failed to ensure CR#1 was transferred properly per therapy assessments and instruction, by CNA B. CR#1, a bedbound resident, who was totally dependent on staff for care sustained an unexplained head injury and hip fracture in her room alone. The facility failed to ensure precautionary interventions in place for CR#1, who was a known fall risk. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified on 5.22.2025. The IJ template was provided to the Administrator on 5.22.2025 at 1:07 p.m. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident for 4 of 8 residents (Resident #68, Resident #18, Resident #25, and Resident #3) reviewed for pharmacy services. -LVN J and LVN C failed to ensure the narcotic count was correct during shift change for Resident #68, Resident #18, Resident #25, and Resident #3. - LVN J failed to document the administration of narcotic medications in a correct manner for Resident #68, Resident #18, Resident #25, and Resident #3. -Staff administered Tramadol 50 mg instead of Tramadol 37.5 mg - Acetaminophen 325 mg as ordered by the Physician to Resident #68 for an unknown period. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews, observations, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided with a reasonable accommodation to access the ability to call for staff assistance through a communication system for one of twenty-four (Resident #79) reviewed for call system placement. -Resident #79's call light cord was wrapped around the call light base on the wall in an area inaccessible to the resident. This failure could place this resident or other residents at risk for not having their call light answered timely in an emergency and staff not being aware of an emergency situation for an extended period of time, injury, or death.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review, the facility failed to refer all residents with newly evident or possible serious mental disorders, intellectual disabilities, or a related conditions for level II resident review upon a significant change in status assessment for 1 of 18 residents (Resident #48) reviewed for PASARR evaluations. The facility failed to refer Resident #48 to the appropriate, State-designated authority when she was diagnosed with delusional disorder (firmly held false beliefs), mood disorder (psychiatric disorders that impact emotions), generalized anxiety disorder (over worry), psychosis (difficulty determining what is real or not), and bipolar disorder (mood disorder with ups and downs). This failure could place residents at risk for not receiving necessary PASARR mental health services, causing a possible decline in mental health.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' choices for 1 (Resident #35) of 18 residents reviewed for quality of care. -LVN M failed to document notification to NP B of Resident #35's blood sugar of 422 on 5/13/24, and failed to document and/or give 10u of Insulin that was ordered by NP B for Resident #35's blood sugar. This failure could place the resident at risk for high blood sugar, and possible hospitalization.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure a psychotropic drug that affects brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior is free from unnecessary drugs for one of five residents (Resident #79) reviewed for unnecessary drugs. -The facility failed to document a correct diagnosis, monitor its effectiveness, and side effects of Seroquel (antipsychotic medication) prescribed for Resident #79. This failure affected one resident and placed him at risk of receiving unnecessary medications.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the medication error rate was not five percent (%) or greater. The facility had a medication error rate of 11% based on 3 errors out of 27 opportunities, which involved 2 of 7 residents (Residents #2 and #59) reviewed for medication errors. -LVN N did not administer the full dose of Lacosamide (a medication used to prevent and control seizures) to Resident #59 until State Surveyor intervention. -MA V administered Sucralfate (a medication used to treat and prevent ulcers in the intestines) to Resident #2 at 9:06 a.m. instead of 6:30 a.m. as scheduled and did not administer Lexapro (a medication used to treat depression and anxiety) to Resident #2 as ordered by the Physician. These failures could place residents at risk of inadequate therapeutic outcomes.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews, observations, and record reviews, in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices, the facility failed to maintain medical records on each resident that were complete, accurately documented, readily accessible, and systematically organized for 2 (Resident #48 and Resident #63) of 18 residents reviewed for accurate medical records. -The facility failed to update Resident #48's oxygen order to PRN instead of continuous, when she no longer wore it. -The facility failed to order Resident #63's oxygen, when he was on it continuously. This failure could place residents at risk of receiving unnecessary oxygen or the wrong amount of oxygen.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for infection control. -The facility failed to submit a completed PIR(#419917) to the SSA within 5 working days after CNA B tested positive for COVID-19 on 04/19/2023. -The facility failed to submit a completed PIR(#422526) to the SSA within 5 working days after Resident#1 tested positive for COVID-19 on 05/04/2023. -The facility failed to submit a completed PIR(#438333) to the SSA within 5 working days after CNA C tested positive for COVID-19 on 07/20/2023. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for four sharps containers (Shower rooms on Hall 200, 400,500, and 600) of 12 sharps containers observed for safe storage of sharps. The facility failed to monitor the sharps containers in the shower rooms on Halls 200, 400, 500 and 600 for fill levels and safe storage of contaminated sharps. These failures placed residents at risk of being exposed to contaminated sharps and possible bloodborne pathogens.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to use the service of an RN for at least eight consecutive hours a day, seven days a week in the facility for 20 of 30 days (12/04/22, 12/17/22, 12/18/22, 12/25/22, 01/21/23, 01/22/23, 01/28/23, 01/29/23, 02/04/23, 02/05/23, 02/11/23, 02/12/23, 02/18/23, 02/19/23, 02/25/23, 02/26/23, 03/04/23, 03/05/23, 03/11/23, and 03/12/23) reviewed during a look back period from 12/03/22 to 03/12/23. The facility failed to have RN coverage in the facility for eight consecutive hours on 12/04/22, 12/17/22, 12/18/22, 12/25/22, 01/21/23, 01/22/23, 01/28/23, 01/29/23, 02/04/23, 02/05/23, 02/11/23, 02/12/23, 02/18/23, 02/19/23, 02/25/23, 02/26/23, 03/04/23, 03/05/23, 03/11/23, and 03/12/23. This failure could place residents at risk for missed resident nursing assessments, interventions, care, and treatment.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident for four (Resident #63, Resident #9 and Resident #29, Resident #30) of 8 residents reviewed for medication administration and labeling and storage. 1. MA E left a cup of pills at the bedside of Resident #63 and MA M left a cup of pills at the bedside of Resident #30, failing to observe the resident take the pills. 2. The facility failed to monitor the MARs and narcotic logs for Hall 200 and Hall 500 hall for Residents #9 and #29 to ensure the narcotics were being administered. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interviews the facility failed to adequately equip resident rooms to allow residents to call for staff assistance through a communication system which relays the call directly to a staff member or to a centralized staff work area from each resident's bedside, toilet and bathing facilities for three (Residents # 43, #65, and #197) of 12 residents reviewed for call lights. The facility failed to provide a call light button, or an alternative, for Residents # 43, #65, and #197. These failures placed residents at risk of not receiving immediate care in the event of an emergency.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to electronically transmit encoded, accurate, and complete MDS data to the CMS System, including a quarterly review and subset of items upon a resident's discharge for 4 (Residents #46, #84, #58, and #6) of 18 residents reviewed for MDS assessments. The facility failed to complete and transmit the discharge MDS assessment as required for Residents #46, #84, #58, and #6. This failure could place residents at risk of not having timely assessments to identify care needs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure necessary treatment and services to promote healing for 1 of 3 residents (Residents #31) reviewed for wounds. LVN G failed to follow-up with Resident #31's surgical wound dressing after being informed Resident #31's wound dressing came off. This failure could place residents at risk of severe pain, and lead to systemic infections causing harm for residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents fed by enteral means received the appropriate treatment and services to prevent complications of enteral feedings for three (Resident #83, Resident #81, and Resident #90) of seven residents reviewed for enteral nutrition, in that: 1. The facility failed to follow the physician orders for enteral feedings for Residents #83 and #81. 2. The facility failed to notify the physician of Resident #90's refusal for continuous feedings during the day and to obtain new orders to address the need for tube feeding at night if Resident #90 was not able to eat my mouth. This failure could affect residents receiving enteral nutrition and hydration by placing them at risk of health complications.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards in the facility's only kitchen for food service safety. Cook J failed to ensure foods were handled in a manner to prevent contamination (bare hand contact). This failure could place residents who eat from facility's only kitchen at increased risk of exposure to food-borne illnesses.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for 1 (room [ROOM NUMBER] ) of 15 rooms observed. The facility failed to maintain room [ROOM NUMBER] in a safe and sanitary condition. This failure could place residents at risk for decreased quality of life.
4 fire safety citations on file: 1 on June 29, 2025, 2 on May 16, 2024, 1 on March 16, 2023.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| June 3, 2025 | Fine | $72,573 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Texas | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.40 | 3.39 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.33 | 0.43 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 2.90 | 2.98 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.09 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.98 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 72.8% | 55.3% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 75.0% | 54.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 2 |
CMS expects 3.90 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.60 on weekdays and 2.90 on weekends, 19% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 6.6% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.24 in April to June 2025 to 3.40 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.40 | 0.33 | 3.60 | 2.90 | 6.6% | 0 of 90 | 79 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.12 | 0.28 | 3.28 | 2.72 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 81 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.06 | 0.29 | 3.22 | 2.65 | 12.7% | 0 of 92 | 83 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.24 | 0.19 | 3.38 | 2.90 | 7.5% | 0 of 91 | 91 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Texas, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.33 | 0.40 | 3.50 | 2.93 | 2.2% | 0.7% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Texas, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.03 | $16.97 to $20.71 | 88,680 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $29.92 | $27.46 to $32.89 | 57,560 |
| Registered nurses | $46.14 | $38.06 to $50.53 | 271,380 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Texas | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 13.6 | 15.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.3 | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.3 | 3.3 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.1 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 12.4 | 14.0 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 6.6 | 3.8 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 7.2 | 9.6 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 44.0 | 25.7 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 5.6 | 12.3 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.3 | 2.2 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.9 | 2.1 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Kingwood Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (44.1% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
44.1% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Texas: 116 better, 50 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 69 eligible stays.
11.5% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Texas: 0 better, 9 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 84 eligible stays.
7.6% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Texas: 4 better, 11 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 33 eligible stays.
28.0% this home
Median of homes: Texas57.3% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 25 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Texas0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 68 residents counted.
1.3% this home
Median of homes: Texas1.3% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 67 residents counted.
57.1% this home
Median of homes: Texas98.5% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 21 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: UVALDE COUNTY HOSPITAL AUTHORITY. CMS links this home to Momentum Skilled Services, a group of 9 nursing homes averaging 2.1 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apolinar, Adam | Corporate director | Individual | 03/01/2024 | |
| Krhc, LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 09/17/2024 | |
| Doran, Anna | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 03/02/2026 | |
| Threadgill, Sharlyn | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 09/17/2024 | |
| Mmt Realty-Kingwood, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 09/17/2024 | |
| Chava, Ramakrishna | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 09/17/2024 | |
| Doran, Anna | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 03/02/2026 | |
| Threadgill, Sharlyn | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 09/17/2024 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Texas. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.