Find a nursing home

Home / Maryland / North Bethesda

Tuckerman Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center

5550 Tuckerman Lane, North Bethesda, MD 20852 · Montgomery County · (301) 897-8566

41 certified beds, about 34 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1998

Last standard inspection more than 2 years ago Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
5 of 5
Health inspections
5 of 5
Staffing
3 of 5
Quality measures
5 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 215320 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on February 25, 2021, inspectors cited 1 health deficiency (the Maryland average is 17, the national average 9.2).

None of its 23 health citations since May 2018 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.

CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.84 hours per resident per day, against 3.87 across Maryland and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 1.13 of those hours.

35.7% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Maryland average 40.2%).

CMS links it to Marquis Health Services, an affiliated group of 90 nursing homes.

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 23 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
0G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
13D
6E
0F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
3B
1C
November 5, 2025Complaint inspection · 5 citations
  1. E
    Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
    F627 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 19, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, it was determined that the facility discharged a resident without an appropriate reason and failed to appropriately document the discharge of a resident. This was evident for 2 (#3 and #4) of 2 residents reviewed for an inappropriate discharge.
  2. E
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    F628 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 19, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to issue a 30-day notice to residents when they planned to discharge them. This was evident for 2 (#3 and #4) of 2 residents reviewed for an inappropriate discharge.
  3. D
    Give the resident's representative the ability to exercise the resident's rights.
    F551 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 19, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to honor the wishes of the resident representative and allow the resident to stay at the facility while receiving hospice services. This was evident for 1 (#3) of 2 residents reviewed for discharge.
  4. D
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    F605 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 19, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, it was determined that facility staff failed to ensure that residents were free of chemical restraints and that PRN (as needed medications) psychotropics were limited to 14 days. This was evident for 1 (#4) of 2 residents reviewed for discharge.
  5. D
    Not require residents to give up Medicare or Medicaid benefits, or pay privately as a condition of admission; and must tell residents what care they do not provide.
    F620 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 19, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to inform residents and/or resident representatives about limitations in the care services that they provided. This was evident for 1 (#3) of 2 residents reviewed for discharge.
April 25, 2025Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. D
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    F610 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 29, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on record reviews and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a thorough investigation was completed for allegations of abuse. This was found to be evident for 2 (Resident #189 & 180) out of 8 Residents investigated for abuse during the recertification and complaint survey.
February 25, 2021Standard inspection · 1 citation
  1. D
    Provide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
    F773 · Administration · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 26, 2021
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility's staff failed to promptly notify the ordering physician of laboratory results for 1 of 5 residents selected for review of Unnecessary Medications during the survey (Resident #122).
July 3, 2019Standard inspection · 3 citations
  1. E
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 31, 2019
    Inspectors wroteBased on surveyor observation and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility staff failed to store and serve food under sanitary conditions. This finding was evident in the facility's kitchen, dining room and passing of trays during Lunch observation.
  2. D
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    F684 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 31, 2019
    Inspectors wroteBased on resident interview, staff interview and record review, it was determined that facility staff failed to provide timely treatment and care. This was evident for 1 of 17 residents selected to review during the survey (#77).
  3. D
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    F908 · Environmental · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 31, 2019
    Inspectors wroteBased on surveyor observation and interview of facility staff, it was determined that the facility staff failed to inspect and maintain an electrically powered air mattress in safe operating condition. This finding was evident for 1 of 17 residents selected for review during the survey (#19).
May 14, 2018Standard inspection · 13 citations
  1. E
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    F684 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 15, 2018
    Inspectors wroteBased on surveyor review of the clinical records, observation of staff practice and interview of facility staff, it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide care and treatment to meet an individual's need as ordered. This finding was evident for 4 of 16 residents selected for review during the survey process (#1, #73, #20, and #122).
  2. E
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    F842 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 15, 2018
    Inspectors wroteBased on surveyor review of the clinical records and interview of facility staff and the consultant, it was determined that the facility staff failed to obtain a psychiatric nurse practitioner's progress notes timely. This finding was evident for 3 of 16 residents selected for review during the survey process (#12, #20, and #21).
  3. E
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 15, 2018
    Inspectors wroteBased on surveyor observation of staff practices, review of the clinical records and facility policy, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility staff failed to use the correct transmission-based precautions for two residents with infections. This finding was evident for 2 of 16 residents selected for review during the survey process (#16 and #122).
  4. D
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    F578 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 15, 2018
    Inspectors wroteBased on surveyor review of the clinical records, observation of resident and staff practice, and interview of a family member and the facility staff, it was determined that the facility staff failed to honor an individual's advance directives. This finding was evident for 2 of 3 residents selected for review of advance directives (#1, #22).
  5. D
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    F580 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 15, 2018
    Inspectors wroteBased on surveyor review of the clinical records, observation of resident and staff practice, and interview of a resident, a family member, facility staff and a consultant, it was determined that the facility staff failed to notify the responsible parties when a change of treatment was made. This finding was evident for 2 of 2 residents selected for review of notification of change (#12 and #20).
  6. D
    Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
    F678 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 15, 2018
    Inspectors wroteBased on surveyor review of the clinical record and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility staff failed to address how resident preferences and physician orders related to CPR are communicated throughout the facility so that staff know immediately what action to take or not take when an emergency arises. This finding was evident for 1 of 1 resident selected for review of resident death (#22).
  7. D
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    F757 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 15, 2018
    Inspectors wroteBased on surveyor review of the clinical records and interview of the facility staff, it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure that an individual was free from excessive dosage of an antibiotic therapy for a prolonged period of time. This finding was evident for 1 of 7 residents selected for medication regimen review (#7).
  8. D
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    F758 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 15, 2018
    Inspectors wroteBased on surveyor observation, review of the clinical records and interview of a family member, facility staff and consultant, it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure that an individual receive anti-depressants with appropriate clinical indications. This finding was evident for 2 of 7 residents selected for medication regimen review (#12 and #20).
  9. D
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    F759 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 15, 2018
    Inspectors wroteBased on surveyor observation, review of the clinical record and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure that medication error rates were not 5 percent or lower. This finding was evident during the surveyors' observation of medication administration.
  10. C
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    F814 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 15, 2018
    Inspectors wroteBased on surveyor observation of the building and interview of the facility staff, it was determined that the facility staff failed to maintain the garbage storage in a sanitary condition.
  11. B
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    F655 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 15, 2018
    Inspectors wroteBased on surveyor review of the clinical record and interview of a resident and the facility staff, it was determined that the facility staff failed to develop a baseline care plan within 48 hours after admission (#73). This finding was evident for 1 of 5 residents who were admitted within 30 days of the survey.
  12. B
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 15, 2018
    Inspectors wroteBased on surveyor review of the clinical records, observation of resident and staff practice and interview of the facility staff, it was determined that the facility staff failed to develop a person-centered care plan for an individual. This finding was evident for 2 of 16 residents reviewed for comprehensive care plans (#11 and #122).
  13. B
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    F867 · Administration · No actual harm, potential for minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 15, 2018
    Inspectors wroteBased on surveyor review of the Quality Assurance (QA) minutes and interview of the administrator, it was determined that the QA committee failed to conduct ongoing monitoring of complaint and grievances. In addition, the QA committee failed to evaluate quality of care for an individual, who expired in the facility.

Fire safety inspections

7 fire safety citations on file: 2 on February 25, 2021, 1 on July 3, 2019, 4 on May 14, 2018.

Every fire safety citation7 citations
  1. D
    Have corridors or aisles that are unobstructed and are at least 8 feet in width.
    K 232 · February 25, 2021 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  2. D
    Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
    K 353 · February 25, 2021 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  3. B
    Install emergency lighting that can last at least 1 1/2 hours.
    K 291 · July 3, 2019 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  4. D
    Ensure that special areas are constructed so that walls can resist fire for one hour or have an approved fire extinguishing system.
    K 321 · May 14, 2018 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  5. D
    Install corridor and hallway doors that block smoke.
    K 363 · May 14, 2018 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  6. C
    Properly select, install, inspect, or maintain portable fire extinguishes.
    K 355 · May 14, 2018 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  7. C
    Have proper medical gas storage and administration areas.
    K 923 · May 14, 2018 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeMarylandUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)3.843.873.86
Registered nurses1.130.840.69
All nursing staff on weekends3.513.473.42
Nurse aides1.92
Licensed practical nurses0.80
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)35.7%40.2%45.8%
Registered nurse turnover22.2%38.7%42.9%
Administrators who left0

CMS expects 5.10 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.98 on weekdays and 3.51 on weekends, 12% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 1.4% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.97 in April to June 2025 to 3.84 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20263.841.133.983.51 1.4%0 of 9034
Oct to Dec 20253.451.123.563.17 1.4%0 of 9237
Jul to Sep 20253.821.083.943.49 1.2%0 of 9234
Apr to Jun 20253.970.944.113.62 2.2%0 of 9133
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
Maryland, Jan to Mar 20263.730.743.883.348.0%0.1% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Staff pay reports

Staff pay at this home

No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.

Official wage estimates for Maryland

JobMedianMiddle halfEmployed
Maryland, all employers
CNAs (nursing assistants)$20.79$18.46 to $22.0027,720
LPNs and LVNs$35.89$31.40 to $38.309,560
Registered nurses$47.98$40.26 to $51.6152,910
United States, nursing care facilities
CNAs (nursing assistants)$20.67$17.91 to $22.55534,270
LPNs and LVNs$33.86$30.05 to $37.40188,210
Registered nurses$41.11$37.85 to $47.68142,270

Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.

Work here? Share your pay anonymously

For Tuckerman Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center. No name, email or phone, and nothing you could type about a resident: every answer is a number or a choice.

Your job
Employed by
Usual shift
Do you get a shift differential?
Optional questions
Mandatory overtime?
How did staffing feel on your usual shift?

Every report is reviewed before it counts; what it says about the home never decides whether it counts. How pay reports are handled.

How staff pay reports work · CNA pay by state

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeMarylandUS
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1		 0.21.11.6
Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231		 19.221.023.8
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231		 8.49.812.0

Short-term rehab results

For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Tuckerman Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it better than the national rate (65.4% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.

Went home or back to the community

65.4% this home

Better than the national rate

US median of homes 51.5% · Maryland: 90 better, 29 worse

Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 462 eligible stays.

Potentially preventable readmissions

12.4% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 10.7% · Maryland: 0 better, 41 worse

Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 440 eligible stays.

Infections that led to a hospital stay

7.3% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 7.1% · Maryland: 5 better, 6 worse

Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 269 eligible stays.

Self-care and mobility at discharge

73.4% this home

Median of homes: Maryland61.2% · US 56.6%

Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 79 residents counted.

Falls with major injury

1.6% this home

Median of homes: Maryland0.4% · US 0.0%

Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 252 residents counted.

New or worsened pressure ulcers

2.4% this home

Median of homes: Maryland2.4% · US 1.7%

Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 252 residents counted.

Medication list given at discharge

100.0% this home

Median of homes: Maryland98.1% · US 98.7%

Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 189 residents counted.

Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.

Owners and operators

Legal business name: TUCKERMAN OPERATOR LLC. CMS links this home to Marquis Health Services, a group of 90 nursing homes averaging 3.1 stars overall.

NameRoleTypeShareSince
Quinto Nexgen LLCDirect ownership interestOrganization05/01/2023
Skilled Venture LLCDirect ownership interestOrganization05/01/2023
Ukr Nexgen LLCDirect ownership interestOrganization05/01/2023
Rsbrmk Holdings LLCIndirect ownership interestOrganization05/01/2023
Sk Nexgen TrIndirect ownership interestOrganization05/01/2023
Tryko Nexgen Holdings LLCIndirect ownership interestOrganization05/01/2023
Uak 2020 Irrv TrIndirect ownership interestOrganization05/01/2023
Yk Nexgen TrIndirect ownership interestOrganization05/01/2023
Yr Nexgen TrIndirect ownership interestOrganization05/01/2023
Israel Discount Bank of New York - Idb Bank of York5% or greater security interestOrganization05/21/2023
Dawodu, HakeemManaging control - governing bodyIndividual08/18/2024
Gunthorpe, JahiriManaging control - governing bodyIndividual05/01/2023
Viroja, YogeshManaging control - governing bodyIndividual05/01/2023
Posen, MindeeCorporate officerIndividual05/01/2023
Marquis Limited LLCOperational/managerial controlOrganization05/01/2023
Nutraco LLCOperational/managerial controlOrganization09/12/2024
Reliant Pro Rehab LLCOperational/managerial controlOrganization05/01/2023
Dawodu, HakeemOperational/managerial controlIndividual08/18/2024
Ronaghian, SherinOperational/managerial controlIndividual05/01/2023
Marquis Limited LLCAdp of the SNFOrganization05/01/2023
Nfr 2020 Irrv TrAdp of the SNFOrganization05/01/2023
Nutraco LLCAdp of the SNFOrganization09/12/2024
Quinto Nexgen LLCAdp of the SNFOrganization05/01/2023
Reliant Pro Rehab LLCAdp of the SNFOrganization05/01/2023
Rsbrmk Holdings LLCAdp of the SNFOrganization05/01/2023
Sk Nexgen TrAdp of the SNFOrganization05/01/2023
Tryko Nexgen Holdings LLCAdp of the SNFOrganization05/01/2023
Tuckerman Property LLCAdp of the SNFOrganization05/01/2023
Uak 2020 Irrv TrAdp of the SNFOrganization05/01/2023
Ukr Nexgen LLCAdp of the SNFOrganization05/01/2023
Yk Nexgen TrAdp of the SNFOrganization05/01/2023
Yr Nexgen TrAdp of the SNFOrganization05/01/2023
Dawodu, HakeemAdp of the SNFIndividual08/18/2024
Gunthorpe, JahiriAdp of the SNFIndividual05/01/2023
Posen, MindeeAdp of the SNFIndividual05/01/2023
Ronaghian, SherinAdp of the SNFIndividual05/01/2023
Viroja, YogeshAdp of the SNFIndividual05/01/2023

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 6 problems in this area, most recently on November 5, 2025: "Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge."
  2. How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on July 3, 2019: "Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals."
  3. When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on May 14, 2018: "Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards."
  4. How are medications reviewed, and how often are antipsychotic or sedating drugs used?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on May 14, 2018: "Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs."

Other nursing homes nearby

Maryland contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in Maryland. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Common questions

What is Tuckerman Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center's Medicare star rating?
CMS rates Tuckerman Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center 5 out of 5 stars overall, with 5 for health inspections, 3 for staffing and 5 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Tuckerman Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center get at its last inspection?
1 health deficiency at the standard inspection on February 25, 2021. The Maryland average is 17.
Has Tuckerman Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center been fined?
CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
Does Tuckerman Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center accept Medicaid?
It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Tuckerman Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center?
CMS lists 37 owners and managers, and links the home to Marquis Health Services. Legal business name: TUCKERMAN OPERATOR LLC.

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection