1502 E Centennial, Pittsburg, KS 66762 · Crawford County · (620) 235-0020
96 certified beds, about 84 residents a day · Non profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 2003
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 175465 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on October 21, 2024, inspectors cited 12 health deficiencies (the Kansas average is 9.5, the national average 9.2).
Of 29 health citations since May 2021, 2 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (1 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $13,397 in the last three years; the largest was $13,397, and the latest is dated May 6, 2024.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.06 hours per resident per day, against 4.07 across Kansas and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.48 of those hours.
88.8% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Kansas average 48.1%).
CMS links it to Recover-Care Healthcare, an affiliated group of 27 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 29 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteThe facility reported a census of 74 residents with 20 residents selected for review. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care plan meetings for four Residents (R) 13, R2, R7 and R57, as required.
Inspectors wroteThe facility reported a census of 74 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all resident equipment in one of the four neighborhoods were in clean, safe condition, regarding one toilet seat riser with legs and handles.
Inspectors wroteThe facility reported a census of 74 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a clean environment in one of the four neighborhoods regarding soiled, stained privacy curtains in a shower room in one of the four neighborhoods.
Inspectors wroteThe facility reported a census of 74 residents with 20 residents sampled. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to complete a comprehensive care plan for one Resident's (R)27's, regarding the care and maintenance of her personal humidifier.
Inspectors wroteThe facility reported a census of 74 residents with 20 residents sampled. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to review and revise the care plans for two Residents (R)59 and R 70, regarding footrests for their wheelchairs.
Inspectors wroteThe facility reported a census of 74 residents with 20 residents included for review, which included two residents reviewed for activities of daily living. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two Resident (R)13 and R37 received grooming assistance.
Inspectors wroteThe facility reported a census of 74 residents with 20 residents sampled, including two residents reviewed for positioning. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to properly position two Residents (R)59 and R 70, regarding footrests for their wheelchairs.
Inspectors wroteThe facility reported a census of 74 residents with 20 residents sampled, including one resident reviewed for respiratory services. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to properly clean and maintain a humidifier (a device for keeping the atmosphere moist in a room) in one Resident's (R)27's room.
Inspectors wroteThe facility reported a census of 74 residents with 20 residents selected for review, which included one resident reviewed for dialysis (a procedure to remove excess toxins and waste products from the blood when the kidneys fail). Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff provided assessment and monitoring for one Resident (R)2 who received dialysis three times a week.
Inspectors wroteThe facility reported a census of 74 residents with 20 residents selected for review, that included six residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one Resident (R)2, received medications within the physician ordered parameters.
Inspectors wroteThe facility reported a census of 74 residents with 20 residents sampled, that included six residents reviewed for unnecessary medication. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assess one Resident (R)44, for adverse effects of an antipsychotic (a class of medications used to treat psychosis and other mental emotional conditions).
Inspectors wroteThe facility reported a census of 74 residents, with 20 sampled. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to use proper hand hygiene while completing wound care for one Resident (R)27.
Inspectors wroteThe facility reported a census of 81 residents. The sample included three residents reviewed for neglect. Based on observations, record review, and interview, the facility failed to prevent the staff neglect of Resident (R) 1. On 11/27/23 at 08:45 AM Certified Medication Aide (CMA) R entered cognitively impaired R1's room and observed R1 on the floor with her legs extended in the doorway of the closet. CMA R administered medications to R1 while she remained on the floor, and then left the resident's room. CMA R failed to report to any staff member that R1 was on the floor. At 12:45 PM, four hours later, CNA M heard noises coming from R1's room and when she entered the residents' room, she observed R1 sitting on the floor next to her bed. CNA M asked Housekeeping Staff U, who was also in the room, to immediately get Licensed Nurse (LN) G. [...]
Inspectors wroteThe facility reported a census of 83 residents. The sample included three residents reviewed for pain-controlled substance medication. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prevent a medication error when Licensed Nurse (LN) I failed to document in Resident (R)1's Electronic Health Records (EHR). On 02/28/24 at 06:00 AM, LN I administered oxycodone (opioids [narcotic analgesics]), five milligram (MG) tablet, as an as needed (PRN) pain medication. On 02/28/24 at 08:00 AM, two hours later, LN H administered R1's scheduled oxycodone, which was to be administered one hour prior to leaving for dialysis (a blood purifying treatment given when kidney function in not optimum), for pain. The facility failed to ensure no use of as needed (PRN) administered within a six-hour time frame of the scheduled doses, as ordered by the physician. [...]
Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 79 residents and one kitchen. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to maintain sanitary dietary standards related to food storage. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk related to food borne illnesses and food safety concerns. Findings Included: - On 12/13/22 at 07:06AM an initial walkthrough of the facility's kitchen was completed. An inspection of the kitchen's walk-in refrigerator revealed that the air-conditioning unit was leaking clear liquid. The fluid was dripping down onto several shelves stored below the unit. An inspection of the shelves revealed two bags of collard greens, one box of cut okra, and one box of hot dogs were covered in ice. On 12/19/22 at 01:20PM Dietary Staff BB stated that staff should be going in an inspecting the storage areas daily for cleanliness and equipment function. [...]
Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 79 residents. The sample included 18 residents with one resident reviewed for dignity. Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide Resident (R)5 with dignity during basic cares. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for decreased psychosocial well-being. Findings Included: - The Medical Diagnosis section within R5's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) included diagnoses of cerebral palsy (progressive disorder of movement, muscle tone or posture caused by injury or abnormal development in the immature brain, most often before birth), epilepsy (brain disorder characterized by repeated seizures), intellectual disabilities, muscle weakness, Lennox-Gastuat syndrome (severe condition with recurrent epileptic seizures starting from early childhood), and dysphagia (swallowing difficulty). [...]
Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 79 residents. The sample included 18 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure foot pedals were provided for Resident (R) 30's wheelchair to prevent his feet from dragging on the floor. This deficient practice placed R30 at risk for accidents and injuries.
Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 79 residents. The sample included 18 residents with 18 residents reviewed for care plan revisions. Base on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to revise care plan interventions related to Resident (R)26's ongoing exit seeking behaviors and need for a Wanderguard bracelet (bracelet that sets off an alarm when residents wearing one attempt to exit the building without an escort). This deficient practice placed R26 at risk for wandering related accidents and unmet care needs. Findings Included: [...]
Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 79 residents. The sample included 18 residents with one reviewed for activities. Based on observations, interviews, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 30 was provided with a meaningful activity program to address his assessed needs. This placed him at risk for impaired psychosocial wellbeing including boredom, agitation and restlessness. Findings Included: - R30's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnoses tab documented diagnoses of muscle weakness, dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion), and hypertension (elevated blood pressure). The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of three which indicated severely impaired cognition. [...]
Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 79 residents. The sample included 18 residents with two residents reviewed for limited range of motion (ROM- the full movement potential of a joint, usually its range of flexion and extension). Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide the necessary services for Resident (R) 6's multiple contractures (abnormal fixation of a joint) to prevent further loss of ROM and mobility, which placed R6 at risk of a possible decline in independence, skin breakdown and impaired psychosocial wellbeing.
Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 79 residents. The sample included 18 residents with four residents reviewed for accidents. Base on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed utilize Resident (R)5's wheelchair seatbelt resulting in a minor-injury fall. The facility additionally failed to monitor, check placement, or function of R26's WanderGuard bracelet (bracelet that sets off an alarm when residents wearing one attempt to exit the building without an escort). This deficient practice placed both residents at risk for preventable accidents and related injuries. Findings Included: [...]
Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 79 residents. The sample included 18 residents with one resident reviewed for dementia care services. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion) care and treatment for Resident (R)76, a cognitively impaired resident displaying dementia related symptoms. This deficient practice placed R76 at risk for impaired ability to achieve and/or maintain her highest practicable level of physical and emotional wellbeing. Finding Included: - The Medical Diagnosis section within R76's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) included diagnoses of dysphagia (swallowing difficulty), difficulty walking, hearing loss, atrial fibrillation (rapid, irregular heartbeat), cognitive communication deficit, and a history of malignant neoplasm (cancer). [...]
Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 79 residents. The sample included 18 residents with five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the Consultant Pharmacist (CP) identified an inappropriate indication for use an antipsychotic (medication used to treat severe mental conditions) medication for Resident (R) 30 who had a diagnosis of dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion). This deficient practice had the potential of unnecessary psychotropic medication administration, thus leading to possible harmful potential side effects.
Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 79 residents. The sample included 18 residents with five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure AN appropriate indication for use of an antipsychotic (medication used to treat severe mental conditions) medication for Resident (R) 30 who had a diagnosis of dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion). This deficient practice had the potential of unnecessary psychotropic medication administration, thus leading to possible harmful potential side effects.
Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 79 residents and 10 medication carts. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to discard an outdated individual insulin (a hormone which regulates blood sugar) pen in one of the medication carts. This deficient practice left the affected resident at risk for adverse consequences or less effective medication treatment.
Inspectors wroteThe facility reported a census of 74 residents with 22 selected for review, which included eight residents reviewed for accidents. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure appropriate fall interventions were in place by determining the causal factors of the fall for four of the eight sampled residents. Of these Resident (R) 47 fell and sustained a nasal fracture and forehead laceration which required 11 sutures, with R2 and R33 experiencing repeated falls. The facility further failed to investigate and develop interventions for one of the eight residents, R51 who sustained repeated skin tears to the arms on three occasions.
Inspectors wroteThe facility reported a census of 74 residents. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure sanitary laundering of linen soiled with blood to prevent cross contamination with blood borne pathogens.
Inspectors wroteThe facility reported a census of 74 residents with 22 residents included in the sample. Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to review and revise the care plans for four of the residents sampled, including Resident (R) 2, R33, and R47 regarding timely interventions after falls to prevent further falls, and timely interventions to prevent further skin tears on the arms of one sampled resident R51.
Inspectors wroteThe facility reported a census of 74 residents with 22 residents sampled, including six residents reviewed for nutrition. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to identify, plan, and implement timely interventions to maintain nutritional status for one of the six residents reviewed, Resident (R) 172.
35 fire safety citations on file: 11 on October 21, 2024, 11 on December 19, 2022, 13 on May 13, 2021.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| May 6, 2024 | Fine | $13,397 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Kansas | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 4.06 | 4.07 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.48 | 0.71 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.77 | 3.60 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 3.01 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.56 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 88.8% | 48.1% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 90.9% | 42.0% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 1 |
CMS expects 3.66 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.18 on weekdays and 3.77 on weekends, 10% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.4% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.98 in April to June 2025 to 4.06 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.06 | 0.48 | 4.18 | 3.77 | 0.4% | 0 of 90 | 84 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 4.25 | 0.42 | 4.41 | 3.82 | 1.5% | 0 of 92 | 80 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 4.41 | 0.54 | 4.60 | 3.94 | 3.6% | 0 of 92 | 74 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.98 | 0.58 | 4.09 | 3.71 | 4.2% | 0 of 91 | 70 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Kansas, Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.01 | 0.67 | 4.19 | 3.56 | 4.8% | 0.6% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kansas, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.27 | $17.41 to $21.24 | 24,610 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $29.69 | $27.05 to $33.40 | 7,530 |
| Registered nurses | $38.14 | $35.24 to $45.53 | 33,800 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Kansas | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 19.9 | 17.9 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.7 | 1.6 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.5 | 2.9 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 7.9 | 4.3 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.6 | 1.9 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 22.5 | 16.2 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.0 | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 31.1 | 18.1 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 34.7 | 22.4 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 7.0 | 11.5 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.3 | 1.8 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.0 | 2.1 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Via Christi Village Pittsburg's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (48.8% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
48.8% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Kansas: 42 better, 17 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 103 eligible stays.
10.0% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Kansas: 3 better, 0 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 129 eligible stays.
8.3% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Kansas: 3 better, 0 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 79 eligible stays.
78.8% this home
Median of homes: Kansas55.7% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 66 residents counted.
1.1% this home
Median of homes: Kansas0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 93 residents counted.
4.6% this home
Median of homes: Kansas2.1% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 93 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Kansas99.3% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 16 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: VIA CHRISTI VILLAGE PITTSBURG KS LLC. CMS links this home to Recover-Care Healthcare, a group of 27 nursing homes averaging 2.5 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heartland Recovery LLC | Direct ownership interest | Organization | 07/01/2025 | |
| Bhnv LLC | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 02/28/2025 | |
| Kamna Holdings LLC | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 07/01/2025 | |
| Kansas Healthcare Holdings 200 LLC | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 07/01/2025 | |
| Mad Family Holdings LLC | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 07/01/2025 | |
| Natr Trust | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 07/01/2025 | |
| Rarmna Holdings LLC | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 07/01/2025 | |
| Ratr Trust | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 07/01/2025 | |
| Recover-Care SNF Holdings 200 LLC | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 07/01/2025 | |
| Rnr Holdings LLC | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 07/01/2025 | |
| Wetr Trust | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 07/01/2025 | |
| Zm SNF Holdings LLC | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 07/01/2025 | |
| Halberstam, Miriam | Indirect ownership interest | Individual | 07/01/2025 | |
| Halberstam, Moshe | Indirect ownership interest | Individual | 07/01/2025 | |
| Margulies, Zisha | Corporate director | Individual | 07/01/2025 | |
| Mrc SNF Management LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 07/01/2025 | |
| Bailey, Amy | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 07/01/2025 | |
| Garner, Mindi | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 07/01/2025 | |
| Kansas Healthcare Holdings 200 LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 07/01/2025 | |
| Kfar Habor LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 06/09/2025 | |
| Mad Family Holdings LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 07/01/2025 | |
| Mrc SNF Management LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 05/26/2025 | |
| Natr Trust | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 07/01/2025 | |
| Rarmna Holdings LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 07/01/2025 | |
| Ratr Trust | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 07/01/2025 | |
| Rnr Holdings LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 07/01/2025 | |
| Wetr Trust | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 07/01/2025 | |
| Bailey, Amy | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 07/03/2025 | |
| Garner, Mindi | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 05/26/2025 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.