120 Chipola Ave, Deland, FL 32720 · Volusia County · (386) 738-3433
120 certified beds, about 108 residents a day · For profit - Individual · Medicare and Medicaid since 1996
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 105930 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on September 18, 2025, inspectors cited 1 health deficiency (the Florida average is 7.1, the national average 9.2).
None of its 13 health citations since December 2021 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.42 hours per resident per day, against 3.82 across Florida and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.48 of those hours.
38.9% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Florida average 41.4%).
CMS links it to Gold Fl Trust II, an affiliated group of 36 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 13 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who was unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADL), specifically nail care, received necessary services to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene for one (Resident #59) of a total survey sample of 32 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff and resident interviews, medical record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to appropriately store resident's medication by leaving medication at bedside for one (Resident #4) of three residents sampled for unsecured medication. Resident #4 who had not been assessed for self-administration of medication was observed taking medications that had been left on his overbed table. These medications were also accessible to other residents who should not have access to them.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interviews, medical record review, and facility policy and procedure review, the facility failed to ensure that services provided met professional standards of quality for one (Resident #74) of 28 residents in the total sample. Professional standards of quality means that care and services are provided according to accepted standards of clinical practice.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and a review of the facility's policies and procedures, the facility failed to ensure that residents with pressure ulcers received necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing for one (Resident #26) of 12 residents receiving pressure ulcer treatment, from a total sample of 28 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed ensure that residents who needed respiratory care, received oxygen therapy as ordered for two (Residents #11 and #43) of 18 residents receiving oxygen therapy from a total sample of 28 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, staff and resident interviews, medical record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure that it's medication error rate was not 5% or greater. There were two errors with 28 opportunities for error resulting in an error rate of 7.14% and affecting one (Resident #74) of eight residents observed during medication administration.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interviews, medical record review, and facility policy and procedure review, the facility failed to ensure its residents remained free of significant medication errors. This impacted one (Resident #74) of eight residents observed during medication administration, out of 28 residents in the total sample. Resident #74 received medication for low blood pressure outside of the ordered parameters for 44 of 128 doses administered.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record reviews, staff interviews, and a review of the facility's policy and procedure for Standards and Guidelines for Wound Care, the facility failed to ensure that resident medical records were complete and accurately documented, in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices, for two (Residents #65 and #26) of 12 residents receiving pressure ulcer treatment, from a total sample of 28 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, staff interviews, and a review of the facility's policies and procedures for Infection Control and Guidelines for Wound Care, the facility failed to prevent the potential development and transmission of infection by not following infection prevention techniques during a wound dressing change for one (Resident #65) of three residents observed during wound care, from a total sample of 28 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and employee interviews, the facility failed to distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety, by failing to practice appropriate hand hygiene and glove use during food preparation activities to prevent cross-contamination. This failure potentially affected all residents receiving food from the facility's kitchen.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan that addressed hearing and vision deficits for one (Resident #32) of 41 residents in the sample.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, staff and resident/resident representative interviews, and a review of resident and facility records, the facility failed to ensure residents who were dependent for grooming and hygiene, received the appropriate nail care to prevent soiled, jagged or excessively long nails for three (Residents #9, #35 and #78) of five residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs), from a total of 41 residents in the sample.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observations and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure oxygen therapy was administered as ordered by the physician for one (Resident #65) of nine sampled residents reviewed for oxygen therapy from a total sample of 41.
8 fire safety citations on file: 8 on September 18, 2025.
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Florida | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.42 | 3.82 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.48 | 0.73 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.23 | 3.49 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.15 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.78 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 38.9% | 41.4% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 40.0% | 46.0% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.86 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.49 on weekdays and 3.23 on weekends, 7% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.49 in April to June 2025 to 3.42 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.42 | 0.48 | 3.49 | 3.23 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 108 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.46 | 0.56 | 3.55 | 3.24 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 106 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.49 | 0.50 | 3.61 | 3.18 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 112 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.49 | 0.55 | 3.61 | 3.20 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 113 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Florida, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.76 | 0.70 | 3.90 | 3.44 | 1.1% | 0.2% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Florida, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.03 | $17.33 to $20.34 | 96,960 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $29.70 | $28.14 to $31.11 | 38,620 |
| Registered nurses | $40.48 | $37.82 to $48.64 | 229,940 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Florida | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.6 | 8.7 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.8 | 2.5 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.5 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.7 | 9.5 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.2 | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.5 | 8.6 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 18.8 | 26.1 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 5.1 | 9.1 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.1 | 2.1 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 0.4 | 1.1 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Villa Healthcare & Rehabilitation Center's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (53.4% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
53.4% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Florida: 169 better, 109 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 126 eligible stays.
11.3% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Florida: 2 better, 35 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 149 eligible stays.
8.4% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Florida: 6 better, 21 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 103 eligible stays.
51.6% this home
Median of homes: Florida55.1% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 128 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Florida0.6% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 191 residents counted.
0.5% this home
Median of homes: Florida1.3% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 191 residents counted.
95.7% this home
Median of homes: Florida97.7% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 92 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: VILLA HEALTHCARE & REHABILITATION CENTER LLC. CMS links this home to Gold Fl Trust II, a group of 36 nursing homes averaging 3.4 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Villa SNF Holdco LLC | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 03/23/2022 |
| Fl Master Opco Holdco LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 07/27/2022 |
| Zabele, Mary | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 07/27/2022 | |
| Shelby, Jack | Corporate officer | Individual | 07/27/2022 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Florida. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.