117 Bartlett Street, Marietta, OH 45750 · Washington County · (740) 434-5900
80 certified beds, about 69 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 2020
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 366478 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on August 4, 2025, inspectors cited 7 health deficiencies (the Ohio average is 10.5, the national average 9.2).
None of its 24 health citations since January 2023 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.68 hours per resident per day, against 3.69 across Ohio and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.63 of those hours.
31.7% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Ohio average 48.7%).
CMS links it to Foundations Health Solutions, an affiliated group of 64 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 24 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, interviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure the physician was notified of medications not being administered as ordered. This affected one (Resident #21) of nine residents reviewed. The facility census was 73. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #21 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia, restlessness and agitation, depression, anxiety disorder and neurocognitive disorder. Review of the most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment revealed the resident had severely impaired cognition. The MDS assessment revealed Resident #21 was short tempered and easily annoyed with behaviors occurring daily. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on closed record review, staff interview, family interview, provider interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was provided with accurate information regarding home care access for a discharge. This affected one resident (Resident # 84) of four residents reviewed for discharge. The facility census was 73.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, beneficiary notice review, policy review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were informed of what type of skilled services were being terminated. This affected three residents (#2, #20 and #83) of three residents reviewed for beneficiary notifications.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, review of email correspondence to the local Ombudsman, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the State Ombudsman was notified of a resident's discharge from the facility. This affected one resident (#81) of three residents reviewed for discharge.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to attempt new interventions for skin conditions (non-pressure related) and behaviors for Resident #42. This affected one resident (#42) of two residents reviewed for skin conditions. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure residents were positioned appropriately in their wheelchair. This affected one resident (#45) of one resident reviewed for positioning. The facility census was 69.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide a safe environment for a resident left unattended with medications. This affected one resident (#28) of 69 residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 69. Findings Include: Medical record review revealed Resident #28 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including rheumatoid arthritis, anxiety disorder, chronic pain and cerebral infarction without residual deficits. Review of the electronic Order Summary Report dated 07/31/25 revealed no evidence the resident was capable to self-administer medications. There was also no physician order for Resident #28's medications could be left at bedside unsupervised by the nurse. On 07/31/25 at 7:45 A.M., the surveyor observed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #130 at the medication cart in the 400 hallway preparing medications. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the physician addressed all the recommendations made by the facility's consulting pharmacist for irregularities that were identified during their monthly medication regimen review. This affected two residents (#3 and #8) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, interview, and policy review the facility failed to follow physician ordered parameters for medication administration. This affected two residents (#3, #5) of five residents reviewed for medication regimens. Findings Include:1. Review of Resident #3's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included Parkinson's disease, adult onset diabetes mellitus, malignant neoplasm of the colon, schizo-affective disorder of the bipolar type, and mild intellectual disabilities. Review of Resident #3's physician's orders revealed the resident had an order to receive Hydrocodone- Acetaminophen (Norco) 5-325 milligrams (mg) by mouth (po) every six hours prn for pain rating 5-10. That order originated on 07/18/25. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, medical record review, policy review and interview, the facility failed to maintain adequate infection control practices during the administration of medications. This affected two residents (#35 and #51) of three residents observed for medication administration.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to evaluate and treat a resident's skin condition. This affected one of one resident (#31) reviewed for non pressure skin impairment. The facility census was 71.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, staff interview, resident interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision to prevent accidents. This affected one of one residents reviewed for falls (#12). The facility census was 71.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review, the facility failed to monitor a dialysis site per the resident centered care plan. This affected one resident (#26) of one resident reviewed who was receiving dialysis. The facility census was 71.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents with Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) were appropriately evaluated to identify the cause of the resident's PTSD and minimize triggers and/or re-traumatization. This affected two residents (#23 and #24) of two residents identified by the facility as having PTSD/trauma. The facility census was 71.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to administer medication as ordered for Resident #26 after dialysis treatments. This affected one resident (#26) of one resident reviewed for dialysis. The facility census was 71.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, resident interview, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to adequately monitor resident nutritional status and health. This affected four (Residents #7, #39, #41, and #59) of five residents reviewed for nutrition. The census was 71. Findings Include: 1. Record review revealed Resident #7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses were acute of chronic right heart failure, atrial fibrillation, generalized edema, low back pain, disorder of bone density, constipation, enterococcus as the cause of diseases, urinary tract infection, and hypertension. Review of her Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/02/22, revealed she was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #7 weights revealed the following weights and dates in which significant change occurred: [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, review of resident fund management services authorization agreement form, interviews, and policy review the facility failed to obtain written authorization to manage residents' funds. This affected two (Resident #33 and #35) of six residents reviewed for personal funds.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, resident fund review, interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure residents received spend down notifications timely and reimbursed funds timely after death. This affected one (Resident #35) of five residents reviewed for personal funds and one (Resident #74) of two residents reviewed for closer of account.
Inspectors wroteBased on Resident medical and financial record review, resident interview, resident family interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to allow residents to receive all mail without it being unopened. This affected one (Resident #33) of one resident reviewed for opened mail. The census was 71. Findings Include: Resident #33 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included heart and kidney failure. Review of his Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment revealed he was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #33 financial records revealed he had an opened personal funds account with the facility. There were multiple entries per month of funds that were being added, via checks that were deposited by the facility into this account. There were between two and four checks per month added to this financial account; [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, review of hospital records, interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure a resident was involved in advance directive decisions. This affected one (Resident #225) of two residents reviewed for advance directives.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, medical record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's back brace (ordered to be in place at all times when out of bed) was implemented. This affected one (Resident #19) of the 24 residents reviewed for orders being implemented. The facility census was 71.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observation, interviews, and policy review the facility failed to ensure respiratory equipment was maintained to prevent infection. This affected two (Resident #1 and #59) of two reviewed for respiratory.
Inspectors wrote2. Review of the medical record for Resident #46 revealed an initial admission date of 06/29/20 and re-admission [DATE]. Diagnoses included dementia without behavioral disturbances, carcinoma in situ of prostate, squamous cell carcinoma of skin of right ear and external auricular canal, acquired absence of part of head and neck, and psoriasis. Review of the plan of care dated 09/15/22 revealed Resident #46 had an alteration in skin integrity as evidenced by open lesion present at right ear with a cancer lesion 2nd squamous cell carcinoma. Resident picks at skin at times. Interventions included to assess area for size, color, drainage as needed, and complete skin care. Review of the plan of care, (no date noted) revealed Resident #46 was at risk for infection related to cancer lesion to right ear and resident has a habit of picking at area. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on review of COVID-19 testing records, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure employees who tested positive for COVID-19 had a negative COVID test within 48 hours of returning to work when returning in seven days. This affected three of three employees who tested positive for COVID-19 in the past 50 days and had the potential to affect 71 of 71 residents residing in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff personnel record review, staff interview, and facility handbook review, the facility failed to complete reference checks for newly hired staff in a timely manner. This had the potential to affect 71 of 71 residents. Findings Include: Review of Registered Nurse (RN) #109 personnel file revealed she was hired by the facility on 06/13/22. Her reference checks were completed on 06/16/22 and 06/17/22. Review of State Tested Nursing Aide (STNA) #198 personnel file revealed she was hired by the facility on 09/16/22. Her reference checks were completed on 09/13/22 and 09/21/22, which one was after her hire date. Review of Human Resource (HR) Director #110 personnel file revealed she was hired by the facility on 01/24/22. She had three hand written notes on the back of her application in which it appeared that reference checks were completed/attempted. [...]
16 fire safety citations on file: 6 on August 4, 2025, 6 on May 29, 2024, 4 on January 24, 2023.
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Ohio | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.68 | 3.69 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.63 | 0.64 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.41 | 3.28 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.05 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.00 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 31.7% | 48.7% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 11.1% | 43.9% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.82 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.80 on weekdays and 3.41 on weekends, 10% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.68 in April to June 2025 to 3.68 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.68 | 0.63 | 3.80 | 3.41 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 69 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.79 | 0.66 | 3.92 | 3.48 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 68 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.65 | 0.64 | 3.76 | 3.37 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 71 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.68 | 0.59 | 3.78 | 3.42 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 70 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Ohio, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.64 | 0.60 | 3.80 | 3.24 | 4.6% | 0.4% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ohio, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.76 | $17.93 to $21.44 | 63,280 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $29.78 | $27.34 to $31.68 | 39,900 |
| Registered nurses | $39.67 | $38.08 to $47.61 | 143,730 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Ohio | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.3 | 5.3 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.9 | 3.2 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.1 | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.6 | 6.1 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.6 | 3.4 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 8.1 | 8.8 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 28.3 | 24.9 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 11.0 | 12.9 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.4 | 1.7 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.6 | 1.8 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Waterview Pointe Nursing & Rehabilitation's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (46.5% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
46.5% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Ohio: 147 better, 20 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 118 eligible stays.
9.7% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Ohio: 3 better, 7 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 153 eligible stays.
8.0% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Ohio: 1 better, 4 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 80 eligible stays.
25.0% this home
Median of homes: Ohio55.6% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 48 residents counted.
1.5% this home
Median of homes: Ohio0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 68 residents counted.
2.5% this home
Median of homes: Ohio1.4% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 68 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Ohio100.0% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 15 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: FHS MARIETTA INC. CMS links this home to Foundations Health Solutions, a group of 64 nursing homes averaging 4.2 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Colleran, Brian | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2021 | |
| Colleran, Brian | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/01/2021 | |
| Krystowski, John | Corporate officer | Individual | 04/15/2020 | |
| Foundations Health Solutions, LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 04/15/2020 | |
| Colleran, Brian | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/01/2021 | |
| Jonas, Christopher | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 04/15/2020 | |
| Krystowski, John | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 04/15/2020 | |
| Foundations Health Solutions, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 07/15/2025 | |
| Colleran, Brian | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2021 | |
| Jonas, Christopher | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 04/15/2020 | |
| Krystowski, John | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 04/15/2020 | |
| Lloyd, John | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 04/15/2020 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Ohio. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.