Home / West Virginia / Parkersburg
2675 36th Street, Parkersburg, WV 26104 · Wood County · (304) 485-7447
105 certified beds, about 90 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1973
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 515047 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on April 2, 2025, inspectors cited 4 health deficiencies (the West Virginia average is 11.7, the national average 9.2).
Of 32 health citations since January 2022, 4 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (4 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $104,142 in the last three years; the largest was $104,142, and the latest is dated February 23, 2024.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.81 hours per resident per day, against 3.67 across West Virginia and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.73 of those hours.
50.5% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (West Virginia average 44.1%).
CMS links it to Communicare Health, an affiliated group of 110 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 32 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food safety. The staff failed to use proper hand hygiene and don a hairnet while in the kitchen. Lastly, failed to maintain the equipment in safe operating condition. This practice had the potential to affect more than an isolated number of residents. Facility census: 93.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to obtain labs, as ordered by the physician, for Resident #41. This was true for one (1) of five (5) residents reviewed for unnecessary medications during the survey process. Resident identifier: #41. Facility census: 93.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice. The facility failed to ensure a physician order for pain was correctly followed for Resident #4. This failed practice was true for one (1) of one (1) residents reviewed for pain. Resident identifier: #4. Facility census: 93.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to aid a resident and/or their legal representatives with advance care planning, including but not limited to completion of advanced directives per professional standards. This is true for one (1) of 27 reviewed for advanced directives. Resident identifier #75. Facility census: 93.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain a safe and accident-free environment as possible. This deficient practice had the potential for Resident #46 to harm himself in the absence of 1:1 supervision. Resident identifier: #46. Facility census: 93. The state agency determined this failure placed Resident #46's 1:1 observation status in an immediate jeopardy situation due to the potential of serious injury and/or death because of recent documented suicidal ideations and recent suicide attempt. The state agency notified the Nursing Home Administrator of the immediate jeopardy at 3:52 PM on 04/03/24. The facility submitted a plan of correction (POC) at 5:41 PM. At 5:48 PM, the POC was accepted by the state agency. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to develop and/or implement the care plan for Resident #92, #84, #39 and #95, four (4) of four (4) residents reviewed. Resident identifiers: #92, #84, #39 and #95. Facility Census: 93.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to follow physician's orders four (4) of four (4) residents. Resident identifiers: #92, #84, #39 and #95. Facility Census: 93.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, review of legislative rule § 69-10-1 TITLE 69 Rule Department of Health and Human Resources, Series 10 [NAME] Virgnia Clearance for Access: Registry and Employment Screening and staff interview, the facility failed to implement the facility policies to prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, exploitation of residents and misappropriation of resident property ensure provisional employment screening. The facility also failed to ensure completion of background checks before allowing staff to work and have direct access to the residents. All residents had the potential to be affected. The facility failed to provisionally employ staff pending the [NAME] Virginia Cares fitness determination and the facility failed to require a fingerprint-based background check before hiring staff. The facility had identified and corrected this issue prior to the survey. Staff identifiers: [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, review of legislative rule § 69-10-1 TITLE 69 Rule Department of Health and Human Resources, Series 10 [NAME] Virgnia Clearance for Access: Registry and Employment Screening and staff interview, the facility failed to operate and provide services in compliance with all applicable State and local laws, regulations, and codes, and with accepted professional standards and principles that apply to professionals providing services in such a facility. The facility failed to ensure provisional employment screening. The facility also failed to ensure completion of background checks before allowing staff to work and have direct access to the residents. All residents had the potential to be affected. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, staff interview and resident interview the facility failed to be administered in a manner which enabled it to use its resources effectively and efficiently to enable each resident to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical mental and psycho social well being. The facility's administration failed to identify and substantiate physical abuse and involuntary seclusion and take appropriate actions to ensure the alleged perpetrators did not abuse residents in the future. Neither resident was able to verbalize how these actions made them feel therefore the reasonable person standard was applied. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, staff interview and resident interview the facility failed to ensure residents were free from physical abuse due to being physically restrained. Resident #43 was physically restrained by a nurse aide who held her head preventing movement when a nurse swabbed her nose to test for COVID. Resident #11 became agitated and a nurse took the resident to their room where they locked the resident's wheelchair and physically held the resident's wheelchair preventing the residnet from moving and leaving the room. Neither resident was able to verbalize how these actions made them feel therefore the reasonable person standard was applied. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, staff interview and resident interview the facility failed to ensure residents were free from physical abuse. Staff physically restrained two (2) residents. Resident #43 was and #11 were both physically restrained. A nurse aide (NA) nurse aide held her head preventing movement so the nurse could perform a swab of the nose to test Resident #43 for COVID. Resident #11 became agitated and a nurse took the resident to their room where they locked the resident's wheelchair and physically held the resident's wheelchair preventing them from moving and leaving their room. Neither resident was able to verbalize how these actions made them feel therefore the reasonable person standard was applied. Not only did these failures harm Resident #11 and Resident #43 but they also placed them and the remaining 93 residents at risk for serious harm and/or death. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain appropriate infection control standards for the cleaning and disinfecting of the [NAME] Unit and maintaining the storage of clean linen. These were random opportunities for discovery. Facility Census: 95. Findings Include: a) Cleansing Dwell Time On 02/20/24 at 9:25 AM, Housekeeper (HK) #46 on the [NAME] wing was asked what type of cleanser does the facility use for surfaces and floors? HK #46 stated (Name of Cleanser) for the floors and surfaces. HK #46 was then asked, what is the dwell time? HK #46 stated, about 5 (five) minutes . On 02/20/24 at 9:40 AM, the Housekeeping Director (HKD) #41 confirmed the name of the cleanser and the dwell time was 10 minutes .it must remain wet . HKD #41 stated, we have reviewed the dwell times .I'm not sure why HK #46 didn't know. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, staff interview and resident interview the facility failed to ensure their policy as it pertained to abuse, abuse investigation, and abuse prevention was implemented. Two (2) residents were found to have been abused by being physically restrained. Resident #43 was physically and restrained by a nurse aide who held her head preventing movement so the nurse could perform a swab of the nose to test Resident #43 for COVID. Resident #11 became agitated and a nurse took the resident to her room where they locked the residents wheelchair and physically held the resident's wheelchair preventing her from moving and leaving her room. The state agency (SA) determined these failures caused Resident #11 and Resident #43 to suffer physically and mentally. Neither resident was able to verbalize how these actions made them feel. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and staff interview the facility failed to implement care plans related to fall interventions. This failed practice was found true for (2) two of (3) three residents reviewed for falls. Resident identifiers #44 and #1. Facility Census 95. Findings Include: a) Resident #44 A record review on 02/19/24 at 1:00 PM of Resident #44's care plan revealed the resident was at risk for falls and had a fall from bed on 02/10/24. Further record review of Resident #44's care plan found an intervention for, Fall mat to side of bed this intervention was initiated 02/13/24. An observation on 02/19/24 at 1:46 PM of Resident #44 found her lying in bed. No fall mat was beside the bed or in the room. An Observation on 02/21/24 at 11:30 AM of Resident # 44 in her bed, the fall mat was not at bedside. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain a complete and accurate medical record for Resident #97. This is true for one (1) of five (5) residents reviewed during the survey process. Resident Identifier: #97. Facility Census: 95. Findings Included: a) Resident #97 On 02/20/24 at 11:00 PM, a record review was completed for Resident #97. The record review found a Discharge summary dated [DATE]. The discharge summary under the section 3 Course of Illness/Progress stated, Resident has been unable to participate in getting up with therapy due to FX (fracture). (Typed as written.) After reviewing the physical therapy notes throughout the stay at the facility, the resident did participate fully and attended the therapy sessions in the facility gym while seated in a wheelchair. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and staff interview the facility failed to provide care/treatment and services in accordance with professional standards of practice. The facility failed to assess Resident #350 after a fall. The pharmacist and physician declined to complete the required Food and Drug Act (FDA) paper work to be able to continue to prescribe and administer Clozapine in a safe manner for Resident #395. Physician orders were not followed for house supplements for Resident #88.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure Advance Directive paperwork was part of the resident's medical record. This was true for one (2) of 19 residents reviewed in the Long-Term Care Survey process. Resident identifier: #31 and #72. Facility census: 93.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain good nutrition. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Resident Identifier #33. Facility census: 93.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, staff interview and resident interview, the facility failed to ensure respiratory care was provided according to professional standards of practice. These were random opportunities for discovery. Resident Identifiers: #6 and #49. Facility Census: 93. Findings Included: a) Resident #6 On 03/20/23 at 1:10 PM, a continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) mask was observed hanging from the night stand for Resident #6. The CPAP mask was not stored in a respiratory bag which decreases the risk of infections. On 03/20/23 at 1:12 PM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #37 confirmed the CPAP mask was not stored in a respiratory bag. LPN #37 stated, let me go get a respiratory bag. On 03/20/23 at 3:00 PM, the Directory of Nursing (DON) was notified and confirmed the CPAP mask should be stored in a respiratory bag. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on resident interviews during resident council, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a substantial/nourishing snack was provided between the evening meal and breakfast. This had the ability to affect all residents who did not have a dietary order to receive an evening snack or the cognitive and/or physical ability to make their way to the nurse's station to request something to eat from the nourishment room. Facility Census: 93.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain accurate and complete medical records for the Physician Orders for Scope of Treatment (POST) form for Resident #92 and Resident #39, a capacity form for Resident #92 and documentation of supplements for Resident #88. This is true for three (3) of 25 medical records reviewed during the long-term survey process. Resident Identifiers: #92, #39 and #88. Facility Census: 93. Findings Included: a1.) Resident #92 On 03/22/23 at 8:01 AM, a record review was completed for Resident #92. The review found the POST form was incomplete. The preparer's signature was not dated upon completion of the form. On 03/22/23 at 8:20 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) was notified and confirmed the POST form was incomplete. No further information was obtained during the long-term survey process. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure timely notification was made to a representative of the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman when residents were transferred to the hospital. This was true for three (3) of four (4) residents reviewed for the care area of hospitalization. Resident identifiers: #29, #192, #190, and #60. Facility census: 91.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents/responsible party were made aware of the facility's bed-hold notice when transferred to the hospital. This was true for three (3) of four (4) residents reviewed for the care area of hospitalization. Resident identifiers: #29, #192, #190, and #60. Facility census: 91.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the documented used by the facility to convey end of life care, the State's Physician Orders for Scope of Treatment (POST) form, was completed correctly. For Resident #28, the POST form contained conflicting documentation regarding placement of a feeding tube. For Resident #71, the facility changed the resident's wishes for end of life care without the residents consent. This was true for two (2) of three (3) Residents reviewed for the care area of advance directives. Facility census: 91.
Inspectors wroteBased on resident interview, staff interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure activities of daily living were completed for a dependent resident. This was true for one (1) of two (2) residents reviewed under the care area of activities of daily living during the long-term survey process. Resident Identifier: #63. Facility Census: 91.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, observation, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure Residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice. Physician's orders were not followed for neurological checks after an unwitnessed fall for Resident #70. In addition, weights were not obtained for Resident #201. This practice affected two (2) of (20) residents reviewed, during the Long-Term Care Survey Process (LTCSP). Resident identifier #70 and #201. Facility census: 91.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and staff interview the facility failed to ensure an environment free of accident hazards by leaving a refrigerator unlocked an unattended in the facility dinning room. This was a random opportunity for discovery. This has the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. Facility Census 91 Findings Included: a) Unlocked refrigerator in dining room. On 01/04/22 at 11:01 AM, during a visit to the social service (SS) office in the dinning room this surveyor observed a refrigerator sitting in the corner unattended and unlocked. A second surveyor also observed the refrigerator. The refrigerator opened without difficulty. Upon opening the refrigerator several lunch bags and loose food items were noted. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the administration of enteral nutrition followed the physician's orders. In addition, the facility failed to ensure direction for staff regarding how to manage and monitor the rate of flow of the feeding was consistent. This was true for two (2) of two (2) residents reviewed for tube feeding. Resident identifiers: #29 and #71. Facility census: 71.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, medical record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide respiratory care services consistent with professional standards of practice. The physician's order for oxygen was not followed. This practice affected two (2) of four (4) residents reviewed for respiratory care services during the Long-Term Care Survey Process (LTCSP). Resident Identifier: #17 and #19 Facility census:
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain the kitchen in a safe and sanitary manner in accordance with professional standards of practice. During the kitchen tour it was discovered nectar thickening was not dated after opening and two (2) of four (4) reach-in refrigerators were dirty. This deficient practice had the potential to affect a limited number of residents receiving nourishment from the kitchen. Facility census:
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure influenza and pneumonia immunizations were provided to one (1) of five (5) residents reviewed for the care area of immunizations. Resident identifier: #57. Facility census: 91.
8 fire safety citations on file: 5 on April 2, 2025, 3 on January 6, 2022.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| February 23, 2024 | Fine | $104,142 |
| February 23, 2024 | Payment Denial | 34 days from May 10, 2024 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | West Virginia | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.81 | 3.67 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.25 | 3.17 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.15 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.92 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 50.5% | 44.1% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 75.0% | 42.3% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 4.07 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.04 on weekdays and 3.25 on weekends, 20% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 16.4% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.41 in April to June 2025 to 3.81 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.81 | 0.73 | 4.04 | 3.25 | 16.4% | 0 of 90 | 90 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.92 | 0.70 | 4.14 | 3.38 | 18.7% | 1 of 92 | 90 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.33 | 0.39 | 3.53 | 2.84 | 8.3% | 0 of 92 | 95 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.41 | 0.63 | 3.66 | 2.77 | 4.7% | 0 of 91 | 95 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| West Virginia, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.56 | 0.67 | 3.75 | 3.08 | 3.9% | 0.2% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| West Virginia, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $17.66 | $17.05 to $18.47 | 9,390 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $26.61 | $23.71 to $29.47 | 6,050 |
| Registered nurses | $38.52 | $32.77 to $47.97 | 23,430 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | West Virginia | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 13.1 | 14.7 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.4 | 1.6 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.2 | 4.4 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 13.5 | 15.9 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.5 | 4.2 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 7.1 | 13.4 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 29.3 | 22.4 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 4.3 | 11.3 | 12.0 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Worthington Healthcare Center's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (41.5% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
41.5% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · West Virginia: 9 better, 28 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 72 eligible stays.
10.9% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · West Virginia: 0 better, 0 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 111 eligible stays.
7.0% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · West Virginia: 0 better, 2 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 54 eligible stays.
70.4% this home
Median of homes: West Virginia50.0% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 27 residents counted.
1.7% this home
Median of homes: West Virginia1.2% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 58 residents counted.
8.5% this home
Median of homes: West Virginia2.4% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 58 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: West Virginia97.6% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 9 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: THIRTY SIX LEASING CO LLC. CMS links this home to Communicare Health, a group of 110 nursing homes averaging 3.2 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PC Mstr Lsco, LLC | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 05/01/2017 |
| Rrw, LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 93% | 05/01/2017 |
| Romeo, Dominic | Corporate officer | Individual | 04/01/2023 | |
| Stoltz, Charles | Corporate officer | Individual | 05/01/2017 | |
| Wilheim, Ronald | Corporate officer | Individual | 05/01/2017 | |
| Thirty Six Mgt Co., LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 05/01/2017 | |
| Groves, Donna | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 04/14/2023 | |
| Montgomery, Tamara | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/01/2023 | |
| Romeo, Dominic | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 04/01/2023 | |
| Wright, Randy | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 11/04/2024 | |
| Thirty Six Mgt Co., LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 04/16/2025 | |
| Montgomery, Tamara | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2023 | |
| Wright, Randy | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 11/04/2024 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in West Virginia. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.