Home / California / Los Angeles
6070 W. Pico Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA 90035 · Los Angeles County · (323) 653-3980
49 certified beds, about 45 residents a day · For profit - Partnership · Medicare and Medicaid since 1968
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 055119 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on April 17, 2026, inspectors cited 7 health deficiencies (the California average is 15.6, the national average 9.2).
None of its 41 health citations since October 2023 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.70 hours per resident per day, against 4.52 across California and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.56 of those hours.
CMS links it to Corporate Interface Services, an affiliated group of 40 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 41 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure:Four residents on the pureed diet (foods that do not require chewing and are easily swallowed. All food should be smooth and pureed to the consistency of pudding) received bread texture in form that meet their needs and in accordance with international Dysphagia Diet Initiative IDDSI (IDDSI- a framework made up of levels and describes food textures and drink thickness) Level Four (pureed foods and extremely thick drinks) when the texture of the pureed bread was lumpy, not smooth and had small pieces of bread crust present requiring chewing before swallowing. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to adhere to infection control practices when certified nursing assistant (CNA) 1 failed to wear a gown while providing direct care to one of five sampled residents (Resident 5). Resident 5 was on enhanced barrier precautions (EBP- are an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs)). This deficient practice had the potential to transmit infectious microorganisms to the other residents in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to protect the residents rights to privacy when Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1 failed to close the privacy curtain/s while the performing personal care for one of 32 sampled residents (Resident 5) to ensure Resident 5 was not visually exposed to the roommates. This deficient practice violated the resident's right for privacy for Resident 5.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of the three sampled residents' (Resident 4) Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR - a screening evaluation used to determine whether placement in a long term care facility is appropriate for the resident) Level I (a tool that helps identify possible serious mental illness and/or intellectual/development disability) assessment was accurately completed. This deficient practice of failing to accurately complete PASARR Level I assessment for Resident 4 puts Resident 4 at risk for not receiving the necessary care and services tailored to Resident 4's needs.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop an individualized and comprehensive plan that is specific for the of care for one of five sampled residents (Resident 5) with diagnosis of Diabetes Mellitus (DM-a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing). This deficient practice had the potential to result in a ineffective nursing and medical care for Resident 5.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure food served was flavorful and/or at the proper temperature for one of one sampled residents (Resident 34). This deficient practice had the potential to impact the resident's nutritional status, quality of life and can lead to insufficient food intake for Resident 34.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure three of 23 resident rooms (rooms [ROOM NUMBER]) had at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple resident bedrooms. This failure had the potential to have an adverse effect on the health, movement and safety of staff and eight of the nine residents (Residents 3, 9, 15, 16, 18, 20, 39, 46) in rooms [ROOM NUMBER].
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the medical records were complete and accurate for two of two sampled residents (Resident 1 and Resident 2). 1. For Resident 1, the facility failed to verify that the physician obtained the informed consent (voluntary agreement to accept treatment and/or procedures after receiving education regarding the risks, benefits, and alternatives offered) from Resident 1 on 4/1/25 before starting Resident 1 on Buspirone (medication that treats anxiety) 30 milligrams (mg. - metric unit of measurement, used for medication dosage and/or amount) two times a day. 2. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure boxed food items were not stored directly on the floor. This deficient practice had a potential to cause food contamination, which placed the residents of the facility at risk for foodborne illnesses (refers to illness caused by the ingestion of contaminated food or beverages).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to 1. Ensure one of 12 sampled residents (Resident 4) who tested negative for coronavirus (COVID-19 - an infectious disease that can cause respiratory illness in humans) was not cohorted with a resident who tested positive with COVID-19. 2. Ensure the Physician's order for transmission-based precaution was updated for Resident 30. These deficient practices had the potential to transmit infectious diseases and increase the risk of infection to the residents, staff, and visitors.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of six sampled residents, (Resident 3 and Resident 29)'s clinical record was updated per facility's policy and procedure by failing to: 1. Ensure Resident 3's Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST - is a form designed to improve patient care by creating a portable medical order form that records patients' treatment wishes so that emergency personnel know what treatments the patient wants in the event of a medical emergency) were complete and accurate. 2. Ensure Resident 29's Advance Healthcare Directives (AHCD - written statement of a person's wishes regarding medical treatment made to ensure those wishes are carried out should the person be unable to communicate them to a doctor) were followed up and discussed with the residents and/or responsible parties. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that one out of three sampled residents (Resident 10) was free from physical restraint by failing to ensure the physician's order for bilateral bed siderails was in placed and the proper use of use rails are appropriate according to facility's policy and procedure. This deficient practice had the potential to result in entrapment and injury with the use of restraints.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a bed hold notification (holding or reserving a resident's bed while the resident is absent from the facility for therapeutic leave or hospitalization) in writing at the time of transfer to the hospital for one of three sampled residents (Resident 38). This deficient practice denied Resident 38 or the Responsible Party (RP) of being informed of resident's right to have the facility hold and reserve his bed while absent from the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a change of condition (COC -a sudden deviation from person/patient's baseline in physical, cognitive, behavioral or function) in accordance with the facility's policy and procedures (P&P) titled Change of Condition Notification reviewed 6/20/2024 for one out of six residents (Resident 23) This deficiency practice had the potential to result in the delay of care for Resident 23.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to immediately develop and implement a baseline care plan according to their Policy and Procedures (P&P) in accordance with the facility's policy and procedures (P&P) titled Comprehensive Person-Centered Care planning revised 11/2018 for one of four sampled residents (Resident 6), by failing to: 1. Address the inclusion of activity programs that are tailored to Resident 6's interests and to Resident 6's cognitive, physical/functional and social abilities to stimulate and facilitate Resident 6's social engagement. 2. Outline a personalized treatment strategy for Resident 6's hearing loss within 48 hours of admission. These deficient practices had the potential to negatively affect the delivery of necessary care and services for Resident 6.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement a comprehensive care plan (CP) that met the care/services based on the resident's individual assessed needs for one of six sampled residents (Resident 10), by failing to ensure that a comprehensive CP was developed with the use of Resident 10's bilateral (both) bed siderails, when Resident 10 was hospitalized on [DATE], 7/22/2024, and 12/27/2024. This deficient practice had the potential to result in a negative impact on residents' health and safety, as well as the quality of care and services received.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to revise the enteral feeding care plan to meet the individual needs for one of two sampled residents (Resident 22). This deficient practice had the potential to prevent Resident 22 from receiving care to address specific needs, which could lead to a decline in her nutrition.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the physician when they were unable to collect urine sample for urinalysis, culture and sensitivity (UA [a test to check if the urine has an infection, kidney problem, diabetes or liver disease] and C&S [test to find germs & the type of antibiotics they respond to]) for one of three sampled residents (Resident 23) per physician's orders. This deficient had the potential to result in the delay of the appropriate instructions needed from the physician to prevent infection and hospitalization.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide outside services as required by physician orders in accordance with the facility's policy and procedures (P&P) titled Referral to Outside Services revised on 12/1/2013, by failing to refer one of four sampled residents (Resident 6) to an audiologist (a healthcare professional that specializes in evaluating and treating hearing problems, like hearing loss). This deficient practice had the potential to negatively affect the delivery of necessary care and services for Resident 6.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a safe, functional and comfortable environment for one of six sampled residents (Resident 4), by failing to ensure the exit pathway was clear of geriatric (relating to old people, especially with regard to their healthcare) recliner chairs (geri-chair - large, padded chairs with wheeled bases, and are designed to assist seniors with limited mobility) and clutter. This failure had the potential to place Resident 4 at risk of fire hazards injury and accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of two sampled residents' (Resident 22) enteral feeding (refers to any method of feeding that uses the gastrointestinal (stomach/intestines) tract to deliver nutrition and calories) bottle was changed after 24 hours. This deficient practice had the potential for the residents to develop tube feeding associated complications such as infection.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide necessary respiratory care services for one of three sampled residents (Resident 30), by failing to ensure the nasal cannula (NC -a connector attached to oxygen) tubing and humidifier (a device used to make supplemental oxygen moist) for oxygen (O2) therapy was changed per facility's policy. This deficient practice had the potential to cause complications associated with oxygen therapy.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure to label an open date of one of five sampled residents (Resident 19)'s ipratropium-albuterol inhalation solution (used to prevent and treat difficulty breathing, wheezing, shortness of breath, coughing, and chest tightness) inhalation solution that can expire once opened with an open date according to manufacturer guidelines. 2. Ensure Resident 30's medications were not left unattended at the bedside. These deficient practices had the potential to compromise the therapeutic effectiveness of the stored medications and cause unintended accident concerning medication use.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to properly store one of five sampled residents (Resident 43)'s levalbuterol (used to prevent or relieve the wheezing, shortness of breath, coughing, and chest tightness caused by lung disease) inhalation solution medication that expires once opened according to manufacturer guidelines. This deficient practice had the potential to compromise the therapeutic effectiveness of the stored medications given to the residents because of inappropriate storage of medications.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide at least 80 square feet (sq. ft. -unit of measurement for space) per resident in multiple resident bedrooms for three (3) of 23 resident rooms (rooms [ROOM NUMBER]). This deficient practice had the potential to result in inadequate usable living space for all the residents and working space for the health caregivers, which could affect the quality of care and the quality of life for the residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services, including the provision of routine antibiotics as ordered for one of the three sampled residents (Resident 1) as per physician ' s order dated 10/11/2024 at 9:48 pm for Ciprofloxacin HCI (hydrochloride) Otic (relating to or located in the region of the ear) Solution (Ciprofloxacin HCI - is a fluoroquinolone antibiotic that kills bacteria by blocking a protein they need to reproduce and repair themselves) due to suspected ear infection. for had swelling and discharge to the right ear on 10/11/2024. This failure resulted in Resident 1 not receiving the ordered antibiotic for 2 days resulting in redness, swelling, severe pain (right side of face), and a cream-colored wiggling foreign body in the right ear which required the resident be transfer to General Acute Care Hospital (GACH) on 10/20/2024.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy and procedure (P&P) by not allowing one of four sampled residents (Resident 1) to return to the facility from [DATE] to [DATE] after hospitalization. This deficient practice resulted in Resident 1 remaining at the hospital longer than necessary and had the potential to affect the resident ' s psychosocial wellbeing.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide care and services based on comprehensive (complete) individualized assessments and physician's orders necessary to maintain the highest practical well-being for two of five sampled residents (Resident 5 and Resident 30). By failing to: 1. Notify Resident 5's physician of the need for a follow up (repeat) Chest Xray (CXR - imaging test that looks at the lungs, heart, and ribcage) due to resident position on 12/11/2023. 2. Notify Resident 5's physician of abnormally high monocytes (white blood cells - [WBC] cells that help fight infections in the body) count of 17.6 percent (% -unit of measure. Reference range [RR] normal value was between 2.0 % to 8.0 %) on 12/12/2023. 3. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide necessary care and treatment for urinary tract infection (UTI, an infection in the drainage system for removing urine) for one of three sampled residents (Resident 30) by failing to: 1. Collect a urine sample from Resident 30 on 12/17/2023 for urinalysis (UA - urine test used to check for infection or kidney problems) and culture and sensitivity (C&S -a test to diagnose germs such as bacteria or fungus [yeast or mold] per physician's orders. The urine sample was not collected until 12/20/2023. 2. Notify Resident 30's physician of abnormal positive for bacteria UA & C&S results on 12/20/2023. The physician was not notified until 12/25/2023. 3. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the licensed nurse had the skills and knowledge to collect a urine sample for one of three sampled residents (Resident 30). As a result, the facility delayed in collecting urine sample for urinary tract infection (UTI, an infection in any part of the urinary system [the kidneys (organs in the body that filter waste materials out of the blood and pass them out of the body as urine, regulates blood pressure and the levels of water, salts, and minerals), ureters (Tube/s that carry urine from the kidneys to the bladder [Hollow organ that stores urine]), bladder and urethra [The tube that leads from the bladder and transports and discharges urine outside the body]) by 3 days for Resident 30. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to a Registered Nurse for at least eight (8) consecutive hours a day, seven (7) days a week to ensure that Resident 30's clinical needs were met. As a result, Resident 30 did not receive Ertapenem (Antibiotic - prevent bacterial infections) 1gram (gm - Unit of measure) intravenous (IV - inside a vein) to treat urinary tract infection (UTI, an infection in any part of the urinary system [the kidneys (organs in the body that filter waste materials out of the blood and pass them out of the body as urine, regulates blood pressure and the levels of water, salts, and minerals), ureters (Tube/s that carry urine from the kidneys to the bladder [Hollow organ that stores urine]), bladder and urethra[The tube that leads from the bladder and transports and discharges urine outside the body]).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure call light (also known as call cord, used in communicating remotely with staff to alert a staff of the need for any type of assistance) was within reach for one (1) out of 15 sampled Residents (Resident 11). This deficient practice had the potential for the resident not being able to reach staff for assistance when needed for activities of daily living (ADLs) such as hydration and toileting, which could lead to delay of care and accidents including falls.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents' medical records were updated to show documentation that advance directives (Written statement of a person's wishes regarding medical treatment made to ensure those wishes are carried out should the person be unable to communicate them to a doctor) were discussed and written information were provided to the residents and/or responsible parties for four of 24 sampled residents (Residents 2, 24, 29, 30, and 95). This deficient practice violated the residents' and/or the representatives' right to be fully informed of the option to formulate their advance directives and had the potential to cause conflict with the residents' wishes regarding health care for Residents 2, 24, 29, 30, and 95.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow through with the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR- a federally required screening to help identify individuals with possible serious mental illnesses requiring a specialized follow up evaluation) recommendation to obtain a PASARR II (assessment that determines if resident's mental condition could be met in the nursing facility or if the individual requires specialized services) evaluation for one of three sampled residents (Resident 30). This deficient practice had the potential to result in inappropriate placement and unidentified specialized services for Resident 30.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and/or implement an individualized person-centered plan of care with measurable objectives, timeframe, and interventions to meet one of five sampled residents (Resident 29's) specific needs, by failing to: 1. Develop an individualized/person-centered care plan with goals and interventions for Resident 29's antidepressant (medication that helps calm the feelings of depression) medication. 2. Develop an individualized/person- centered care plan with goals and interventions to address Resident 29's risk for skin breakdown. These deficient practices had the potential to negatively affect the delivery of necessary care and services.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pressure ulcers (PU: damage to the layers of the skin caused by prolonged pressure on a part of the body; stage 1: red, warm to touch, stays red when pushed down on, stage 2: break in top layer of skin, stage 3 crater-like appearance damage to top layers and fat layers, stage 4: damage to all layers of skin, including muscle, bone may be visible) care and treatments as per physician's order for two of five sampled residents (Resident 29 and Resident 33). These deficient practices placed Resident 29 and Resident 33 at risk for worsening skin conditions, delay in healing of existing and complications resulting from untreated or improperly treated pressure ulcers which could result in systemic infections that could lead to death.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide services to maintain mobility (ability to move) for two of five sampled residents (Resident 9 and Resident 30) with rehabilitation (restoring function) and mobility concerns, by failing to: 1. Apply Resident 9's left-hand splint (a long, firm object used as a support for a broken bone so that the bone stays in a particular position while it heals) as per physician's order. 2. Ensure a soft neck collar brace was applied to Resident 30 as per physician's order. This deficient practice placed Resident 9 and Resident 30 at risk for a decline in mobility and contractures (occurs when soft, connective tissue [skin, muscles, tendons, ligaments] in the body becomes very stiff and/or shortened).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to post in a visible and prominent place daily the actual hours worked by licensed and unlicensed nursing staffing directly responsible for resident care per shift. This deficient practice resulted in the actual staffing information not being readily accessible and available to residents and visitors. The deficient practice had the potential to cause inadequate staffing.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Pneumonia (PNA-lung infection) vaccine was offered and/or re-offered to one (1) of six (6) sampled residents (Resident 6) per facility policy and as ordered. This deficient practice placed Resident 6 at risk of acquiring and transmitting pneumonia infection.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide at least 80 square feet (sq. ft. -unit of measure) per resident in three (3) out of (23) resident rooms. Those three rooms consisted of two and/or three beds each. This deficient practice had the potential to result in inadequate useable living space for the residents and working space for the staff.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure: 1. Residents' notice of proposed transfer/discharge's notification was sent to the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman (public advocate) on a timely manner for one of four sampled residents, Resident 5 2. The documentation was completed and recorded the reasons for the transfer or discharge in the resident ' s medical record for one of four sampled residents, (Resident 7). This deficient practice denied the residents additional protections from being inappropriately discharged for Resident 5 and an incomplete documentation of the discharge process for Resident 7.
15 fire safety citations on file: 8 on April 17, 2026, 2 on February 9, 2025, 5 on January 19, 2024.
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | California | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 4.70 | 4.52 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.56 | 0.67 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 4.14 | 4.09 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.48 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.67 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | not reported | 36.7% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | not reported | 38.1% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | not reported |
CMS expects 4.86 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.93 on weekdays and 4.14 on weekends, 16% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.43 in April to June 2025 to 4.70 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.70 | 0.56 | 4.93 | 4.14 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 45 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 4.37 | 0.54 | 4.56 | 3.88 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 45 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 4.43 | 0.38 | 4.69 | 3.77 | 0.0% | 1 of 91 | 46 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| California, Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.36 | 0.59 | 4.52 | 3.97 | 2.3% | 0.5% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| California, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $22.90 | $22.04 to $26.35 | 110,060 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $38.34 | $35.98 to $45.06 | 82,850 |
| Registered nurses | $67.44 | $58.87 to $83.25 | 338,940 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | California | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 12.8 | 10.3 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.0 | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.9 | 1.6 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.6 | 9.8 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.2 | 4.3 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.8 | 12.0 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 19.8 | 22.9 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 3.7 | 11.2 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 3.9 | 2.3 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 0.7 | 1.6 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for West Pico Terrace Healthcare & Wellness Centre LP's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it worse than the national rate (39.2% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
39.2% this home
Worse than the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · California: 301 better, 190 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 110 eligible stays.
12.1% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · California: 10 better, 22 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 122 eligible stays.
7.9% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · California: 8 better, 48 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 98 eligible stays.
68.3% this home
Median of homes: California59.2% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 82 residents counted.
1.7% this home
Median of homes: California0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 177 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: California0.6% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 177 residents counted.
97.4% this home
Median of homes: California96.2% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 76 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: WEST PICO TERRACE HEALTHCARE & WELLNESS CENTRE LP. CMS links this home to Corporate Interface Services, a group of 40 nursing homes averaging 2.5 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Corporate Interface Services LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 03/18/2024 | |
| Rockport Administrative Services, LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 10/31/2014 | |
| Ramin, David | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/01/2021 | |
| Weiss, Meshulem | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 03/04/2024 | |
| West Pico Terrace Wellness Gp LLC | General partnership interest | Organization | 08/15/2014 | |
| Rechnitz, Shlomo | Limited partnership interest | Individual | 08/01/2014 | |
| Corporate Interface Services LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 07/24/2025 | |
| Rockport Administrative Services, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 07/25/2025 | |
| West Pico-Let LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 04/04/2025 | |
| Ramin, David | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2021 | |
| Weiss, Meshulem | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 03/04/2024 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
Licensed assisted living homes in the same town or within 5 miles, each with its California inspection record.
These are the official offices in California. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.