Find a nursing home

Home / California / Grass Valley

Wolf Creek Care Center

107 Catherine Ln., Grass Valley, CA 95945 · Nevada County · (530) 273-4447

59 certified beds, about 55 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 1967

Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
4 of 5
Health inspections
3 of 5
Staffing
2 of 5
Quality measures
5 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 055512 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on May 22, 2025, inspectors cited 6 health deficiencies (the California average is 15.6, the national average 9.2).

Of 25 health citations since November 2019, 1 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.

CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.82 hours per resident per day, against 4.52 across California and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.47 of those hours.

53.7% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (California average 36.7%).

CMS links it to PACS Group, an affiliated group of 275 nursing homes.

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 25 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
1G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
17D
5E
2F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
0C
January 28, 2026Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. D
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    F887 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 18, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain consent for the administration of a Covid Vaccine (vaccine designed to induce immunity against SARS-Co-V-2, virus responsible for coronavirus disease 2019) for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1 was administered the vaccine after Resident 1's RP's (Responsible Party) declined the vaccine. This failure resulted in Resident 1 to receive a covid vaccine without consent and violated the resident's RP's right to make health care decisions.
December 8, 2025Complaint inspection · 2 citations
  1. G
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · Actual harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 22, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident safety for two out of six sampled residents (Resident 1 and Resident 2) when:1. Resident 1 left the facility without staff knowledge and was found at a gas station without her Wander Guard (wearable monitoring device that alerts caregivers when a resident leaves a protected area); and2. Resident 2 had an avoidable fall (unintentional fall that happens because of identifiable and correctable factors) when she was not properly secured during transportation to an appointment. This failure resulted in Resident 1 leaving the facility unsupervised and increased her risk for harm and injury and in Resident 2 sustaining a left femur (lower end of thigh bone) fracture (crack, break, or chip in bone) that required surgery.
  2. D
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    F658 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 22, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their Policy and Procedures (P&P) and ensure professional standards of practice were met for one of six sampled residents (Resident 3) when, Resident 3 was administered medications with possible drug interactions without clarification from the doctor. This failure had the potential to have caused adverse outcomes and worsen Resident 3's condition and decreased the potential to provide safe administration of medication. [...]
May 22, 2025Standard inspection · 6 citations
  1. F
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    F801 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 11, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service for a census of 53 residents when the Registered Dietician (RD) and Dietetic Services Supervisor (DSS) were both hired as part time (an employee who is scheduled to work and who does work a schedule of anything under 32 hours per week) employees. This failure had the potential for unsafe food handling and spread of food borne illnesses in a highly susceptible population.
  2. F
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 11, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure food storage and preparation, and maintenance of food contact surfaces were in accordance with professional standards for food safety for the 53 residents who ate facility prepared meals when: 1. Three out of three small cutting boards had stains, and two out of six large cutting boards had deep scratches; and, 2. A box of garlic bread, a box of fried eggs, and a box of bacon were found with ice crystals built-up, opened and were exposed to air in the freezer. These failures had the potential to put residents at risk for foodborne illnesses.
  3. E
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 11, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow and maintain an effective infection prevention and control program for one out of 16 sampled residents (Resident 17) when: 1. Resident 17's nebulizer (machine that turns liquid medicine into a mist that can be easily inhaled) face mask was not changed every seven days and was left uncovered when not in use; and, 2. Resident 17's oxygen nasal cannula (a medical device with two prongs that is connected to an oxygen source used to deliver supplemental oxygen directly into the nostrils) was not changed every seven days. These failures resulted in an increased risk for cross-contamination (movement or transfer of harmful bacteria from one person, object, or place to another), potential exposure to germs, and may cause infection to Resident 17.
  4. D
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    F684 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 11, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure physician orders were followed in accordance with the facility's policy and procedures as well as professional standards of care for one out of 16 sampled residents (Resident 20), when Resident 20 did not receive insulin (hormone that controls the amount of sugar in the blood) medication within the parameters as ordered by the physician. This failure had the potential for Resident 20 to experience hypoglycemia (condition where the level of sugar in the blood drops below a healthy range) and for the resident to not achieve their highest practicable well-being.
  5. D
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    F690 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 11, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one out of 16 sampled residents (Resident 2) received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, and facility's policy, procedure (P&P), and care plan when Resident 2's suprapubic catheter (a tube that drains urine from the bladder through a small incision in the lower abdomen) drainage bag was not positioned below Resident 2's bladder during a wound care treatment. This failure had the potential for Resident 2 to develop infection and possible suprapubic catheter complications.
  6. D
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    F697 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 11, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one out of 16 sampled residents (Resident 43) received appropriate pain management services consistent with professional standards of practice, facility's policy and procedure (P&P), and physician's order when Resident 43's pain medication orders were not consistently followed. This failure had the potential for Resident 43 to experience over medication, not achieve pain relief, and not attain her highest practicable well-being.
December 28, 2023Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. D
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 8, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a sanitary environment when one out of three sampled residents, (Resident 1), had oxygen tubing, suctioning tubing and yankhauer (hard tube-like plastic tool which is placed into a person ' s mouth to suction secretions) laying on Resident 1 ' s bedroom floor. This failure had the potential to transmit communicable diseases and infections to Resident 1.
October 12, 2023Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. D
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    F600 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 31, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect Resident 1 from abuse when Resident 1 was scratched on the face and her hair was pulled by Resident 2. This failure caused a scratch to the left cheek and mild scalp pain for Resident 1, potentially leading to adverse clinical outcomes.
November 8, 2022Standard inspection · 8 citations
  1. E
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 4, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan to reflect the care needs for four of 14 Residents (Residents 8, 14, 33, and 45) when: 1. A care plan problem and intervention for Hoyer lift (a mechanical lift used to safely transfer residents) use was not listed for Resident 45. This failure resulted in a dislocated right shoulder and pain. 2. A comprehensive care plan was not developed for antipsychotic (medication use to treat behaviors) use for Resident 33. This had the potential for staff to be unaware of potential adverse events, side effects or therapeutic effect. 3. Resident 8's skin assessment intervention was not implemented. This had the potential to result in skin injury going unnoticed and untreated. 4. Resident 14's weekly weight interventions were not implemented. [...]
  2. E
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 4, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe and sanitary food preparation and storage practices in the kitchen when: 1. The blue plastic holder for the can opener and the base was unsanitary. 2. The chipped paint on white shelves in both three-door reach in refrigerators were not easily cleanable. 3. The rusting area of the shelf on the table had stored mixing bowls which had the potential to contaminate the clean metal bowls and containers. 4. A visible amount of water was observed in a kitchen drawer. 5. Four of the kitchen drawers had yellowish sticky food particles on the inside of the drawers which stored cooking utensils. 6. The ventilator fans had black debris in both three-door reach in refrigerators. 7. The cooking utensils had dried food particles. 8. [...]
  3. D
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    F657 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 4, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a care plan for one of fourteen sampled residents (Residents 8) was revised and updated to reflect current fall risk interventions. This failure had the potential for resident's individual care needs to go unrecognized, and a risk for a decline in residents physical, mental, and psychological status.
  4. D
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 4, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to transfer one of fourteen sampled residents, (Resident 45) safely using a Hoyer lift (a mechanical lift used to transfer residents safely) per resident's care plan when two Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA)transferred Resident 45 from the bed to the wheelchair without a lift. This failure resulted in an avoidable accident when Resident 45 sustained a dislocated right shoulder that caused pain.
  5. D
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
    F744 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 4, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide individualized dementia (the loss of cognitive functioning - thinking, remembering, and reasoning) care plan for two of fourteen sampled residents (Resident 28 and Resident 34). This failure resulted in Resident 28 feeling cold and startled and had the potential to adversely affect the psychosocial well-being of all dementia residents.
  6. D
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    F755 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 4, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe standards of medication administration for three of four sampled residents (Residents 164, 39, 33) when: 1. Resident 164 was instructed to take one puff on an inhaler instead of two puffs, resulting in receiving half of the ordered dose, and, 2. Resident 39's identification was not verified at the time of medication administration which placed him at risk of receiving the wrong medication, and, 3. Resident 33 was given a topical antibiotic ointment and the nurse failed to check the expiration date which placed the resident at risk of receiving expired and/or ineffective medication.
  7. D
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    F761 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 4, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored, labeled and disposed of correctly for two of 14 residents (Residents 19 and 34) when: 1. a. Two tubs of triamcinolone cream (a medicated cream to treat certain skin conditions) were found in the treatment cart when they should have been disposed of as the orders for use had expired, and b. An opened bottle of latanoprost (a medicated solution to treat a condition that leads to vision loss) that had not been dated when it was first opened was found in medication cart 2, and, c. An opened bottle of risperidone (a medication to treat certain mood/mental disorders) was found unlabeled in medication cart 2. These failures had the potential for medication misuse and ineffectiveness.
  8. D
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    F842 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 4, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain complete documentation of controlled drugs for two of 14 residents (Residents 35 and 22) when a licensed nurse (LN) did not document doses given at the time of administration. This failure resulted in the incorrect accounting of federally controlled drugs.
November 7, 2019Standard inspection · 6 citations
  1. E
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    F550 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 27, 2019
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with respect and dignity for two of three residents (Residents 16 and 46) when they were not informed of, nor provided with the opportunity to exercise the right to refuse a room change. This resulted in avoidable psychosocial distress and could have a negative impact on the resident's health and well-being.
  2. E
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 27, 2019
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to develop and/or implement infection control policies and procedures when: 1. No policy and procedure was found for use of the residential style washing machine in the laundry room (used for small loads). 2. Restorative Nurse Assistant (RNA) touched the lid of a trash can, then proceeded to assist residents with eating without performing hand hygiene. This failure resulted in the potential for cross-contamination of germs and viruses to residents, which could negatively impact their health and well-being.
  3. D
    Honor the resident's right to share a room with spouse or roommate of choice and receive written notice before a change is made.
    F559 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 27, 2019
    Inspectors wroteBased interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide written notice, including the reason for the change, before the resident's room or roommate in the facility was changed for three of three residents review for recent room changes (Residents 8, 16, and 46). This failure resulted in a process that did not take into account the Resident's preferences before making room changes for Residents are made.
  4. D
    Protect a residents' right to refuse some types of non-requested transfers within the nursing home.
    F560 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 27, 2019
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident right to refuse a room transfer, for one of three residents (Resident 16). This resulted in Resident 16, being moved to a new room without consent, solely for the convenience of the facility.
  5. D
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    F600 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 27, 2019
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to prevent physical abuse when Resident 21 was the aggressor in an altercation with Resident 47. This failure resulted in Resident 47 sustaining bruises from being pinched on the arm by Resident 21.
  6. D
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 27, 2019
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to store and prepare food in a safe and sanitary manner when a container filled with leftover chicken noodle soup was found unlabelled and areas on the clean side of the kitchen were found to contain areas of grime and food splatter, potentially exposing the residents to food borne illnesses associated with out-dated foods and unclean surfaces.

Fire safety inspections

22 fire safety citations on file: 8 on May 22, 2025, 9 on November 8, 2022, 5 on November 7, 2019.

Every fire safety citation22 citations
  1. F
    Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.
    K 345 · May 22, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  2. F
    Properly provide smoke detection systems in areas open to corridors.
    K 347 · May 22, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  3. F
    Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
    K 918 · May 22, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  4. E
    Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
    K 353 · May 22, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  5. D
    Install corridor and hallway doors that block smoke.
    K 363 · May 22, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  6. D
    Meet requirements for the use of electrical equipment.
    K 919 · May 22, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  7. C
    Conduct testing and exercise requirements.
    E 39 · May 22, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  8. C
    Have simulated fire drills held at unexpected times.
    K 712 · May 22, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  9. D
    Establish staff and initial training requirements.
    E 37 · November 8, 2022 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  10. D
    Conduct testing and exercise requirements.
    E 39 · November 8, 2022 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  11. D
    Implement emergency and standby power systems.
    E 41 · November 8, 2022 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  12. D
    Have properly located and lighted "Exit" signs.
    K 293 · November 8, 2022 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  13. D
    Ensure that special areas are constructed so that walls can resist fire for one hour or have an approved fire extinguishing system.
    K 321 · November 8, 2022 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  14. D
    Properly select, install, inspect, or maintain portable fire extinguishes.
    K 355 · November 8, 2022 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  15. D
    Install corridor and hallway doors that block smoke.
    K 363 · November 8, 2022 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  16. D
    Ensure smoke barriers are constructed to a 1 hour fire resistance rating.
    K 372 · November 8, 2022 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  17. D
    Ensure proper usage of power strips and extension cords.
    K 920 · November 8, 2022 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  18. D
    List the names and contact information of those in the facility.
    E 30 · November 7, 2019 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  19. D
    Establish staff and initial training requirements.
    E 37 · November 7, 2019 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  20. D
    Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
    K 353 · November 7, 2019 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  21. D
    Install corridor and hallway doors that block smoke.
    K 363 · November 7, 2019 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  22. D
    Have proper medical gas storage and administration areas.
    K 923 · November 7, 2019 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeCaliforniaUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)3.824.523.86
Registered nurses0.470.670.69
All nursing staff on weekends3.714.093.42
Nurse aides2.48
Licensed practical nurses0.88
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)53.7%36.7%45.8%
Registered nurse turnover62.5%38.1%42.9%
Administrators who left0

CMS expects 3.96 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.86 on weekdays and 3.71 on weekends, 4% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 8.3% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.80 in April to June 2025 to 3.82 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20263.820.473.863.71 8.3%0 of 9055
Oct to Dec 20253.750.473.813.60 16.3%0 of 9253
Jul to Sep 20253.840.473.953.54 8.1%0 of 9252
Apr to Jun 20253.800.423.923.50 6.2%1 of 9152
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
California, Jan to Mar 20264.360.594.523.972.3%0.5% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Staff pay reports

Staff pay at this home

No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.

Official wage estimates for California

JobMedianMiddle halfEmployed
California, all employers
CNAs (nursing assistants)$22.90$22.04 to $26.35110,060
LPNs and LVNs$38.34$35.98 to $45.0682,850
Registered nurses$67.44$58.87 to $83.25338,940
United States, nursing care facilities
CNAs (nursing assistants)$20.67$17.91 to $22.55534,270
LPNs and LVNs$33.86$30.05 to $37.40188,210
Registered nurses$41.11$37.85 to $47.68142,270

Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.

Work here? Share your pay anonymously

For Wolf Creek Care Center. No name, email or phone, and nothing you could type about a resident: every answer is a number or a choice.

Your job
Employed by
Usual shift
Do you get a shift differential?
Optional questions
Mandatory overtime?
How did staffing feel on your usual shift?

Every report is reviewed before it counts; what it says about the home never decides whether it counts. How pay reports are handled.

How staff pay reports work · CNA pay by state

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeCaliforniaUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
6.310.313.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.00.80.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.01.21.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
2.81.63.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
1.61.41.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
11.49.814.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
4.74.34.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
13.812.015.4
Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
19.622.923.8
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
17.111.212.0
Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
1.32.31.9
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
0.61.61.8

Short-term rehab results

For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Wolf Creek Care Center's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it better than the national rate (61.5% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.

Went home or back to the community

61.5% this home

Better than the national rate

US median of homes 51.5% · California: 301 better, 190 worse

Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 186 eligible stays.

Potentially preventable readmissions

10.0% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 10.7% · California: 10 better, 22 worse

Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 180 eligible stays.

Infections that led to a hospital stay

8.6% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 7.1% · California: 8 better, 48 worse

Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 95 eligible stays.

Self-care and mobility at discharge

73.3% this home

Median of homes: California59.2% · US 56.6%

Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 105 residents counted.

Falls with major injury

0.7% this home

Median of homes: California0.0% · US 0.0%

Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 147 residents counted.

New or worsened pressure ulcers

1.5% this home

Median of homes: California0.6% · US 1.7%

Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 147 residents counted.

Medication list given at discharge

100.0% this home

Median of homes: California96.2% · US 98.7%

Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 99 residents counted.

Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.

Owners and operators

Legal business name: BLUEBELL HOLDINGS, LLC. CMS links this home to PACS Group, a group of 275 nursing homes averaging 2.9 stars overall.

NameRoleTypeShareSince
Pritchett, JonContracted managing employeeIndividual03/17/2017
Merrill, DaenenW-2 managing employeeIndividual06/19/2023
Apt, FrederickCorporate officerIndividual01/01/2024
Hancock, MarkCorporate officerIndividual01/01/2024
Jergensen, JoshuaCorporate officerIndividual01/01/2024
Mitchell, JohnCorporate officerIndividual01/01/2024

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 6 problems in this area, most recently on December 8, 2025: "Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents."
  2. What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on January 28, 2026: "Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status."
  3. When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on December 8, 2025: "Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality."
  4. Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on May 22, 2025: "Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician."
  5. Who is on the floor on Saturday and Sunday, and how many residents does each aide care for?Weekend nurse staffing here was 3.71 hours per resident per day, below the California average of 4.09.

Other nursing homes nearby

Assisted living in Grass Valley

Licensed assisted living homes in the same town or within 5 miles, each with its California inspection record.

Assisted living in California

California contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in California. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Common questions

What is Wolf Creek Care Center's Medicare star rating?
CMS rates Wolf Creek Care Center 4 out of 5 stars overall, with 3 for health inspections, 2 for staffing and 5 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Wolf Creek Care Center get at its last inspection?
6 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on May 22, 2025. The California average is 15.6.
Has Wolf Creek Care Center been fined?
CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
Does Wolf Creek Care Center accept Medicaid?
It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Wolf Creek Care Center?
CMS lists 6 owners and managers, and links the home to PACS Group. Legal business name: BLUEBELL HOLDINGS, LLC.

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection