8720 Jackson Springs Rd, Tampa, FL 33615 · Hillsborough County · (813) 341-5600
120 certified beds, about 117 residents a day · For profit - Individual · Medicare and Medicaid since 1982
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 105426 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on August 6, 2025, inspectors cited 8 health deficiencies (the Florida average is 7.1, the national average 9.2).
None of its 21 health citations since August 2021 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $1,764 in the last three years; the largest was $1,764, and the latest is dated October 2, 2023.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.69 hours per resident per day, against 3.82 across Florida and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.95 of those hours.
24.7% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Florida average 41.4%).
CMS links it to Fl SNF Trust, an affiliated group of 10 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 21 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, medical record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the safe and secure storage of all medications and biologicals, including a Schedule II controlled substance for one resident (#78), in one of one medication room, and in four carts (100 front, 100 back, 200 front and 200 back) out of four treatment carts.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident spaces were maintained in a clean and sanitary manner related to community shower room equipment in 2 of 2 shower rooms and in five resident rooms (222, 225, 128, 226 and 228) in two halls (100 and 200) of four halls observed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was not 5% or greater during two medication administration opportunities out of 27, resulting in a medication error rate of 7.41%.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews, medical record review, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure three residents (#10, #113, #114) out of 46 residents reviewed for medications were free from any significant medication errors.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews and facility records review, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen implemented safe defrosting methods of raw meat in one refrigerator walk in units of one reviewed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to promote and maintain dignity for one resident (#121) of two residents sampled.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure meal and equipment preferences were honored for one resident (#124) out of three residents reviewed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and interviews, the facility did not ensure the daily nursing staffing form was updated with the correct date on one day (8/3/2025) of four days observed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure a grievance was initiated in a timely manner for one (Resident #109) out of five residents sampled for grievances.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Preadmission Screening and Resident Review(s) (PASRR) were completed accurately and updated as needed for three (Residents #48, #473, and #77) out of 28 initially sampled residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure nutritional assessments were completed for two (Residents #29, and #61) of three residents sampled for nutrition.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure Oxygen orders were in place for one (Resident #323) of four residents and did not ensure respiratory equipment was stored appropriately for four (Residents #323, #53, #113 and #26) of four residents sampled for respiratory care in one (hall 100 upper) of four halls.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure that their Consultant Pharmacist made recommendations regarding irregularities in the residents drug regime for one (Resident #77) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to arrange for dental services for one (Resident #12) of three residents sampled for coordination of care services.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure one (Resident #29) of three residents sampled for nutrition were provided with special eating equipment when consuming meals.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain the kitchen in an clean and sanitary manner related to staff personal items, and failed to ensure that kitchen equipment is functioning appropriately related to an un-lit pilot light.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to 1. ensure staff and visitors appropriately donned Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) prior to entering two (106 and 112) of seven rooms posted for Droplet precautions and to 2. ensure the facility's laundry room had cleanable surfaces related to ceiling tiles and a door frame between the washing and dryer/folding room that had flaking paint.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to 1. maintain the privacy for six (Residents #9, #53, #70, #89, #98 and #208) of six residents in a confidential and private manner related to video camera recording of the residents during a resident council meeting without their knowledge. 2. The facility had 13 cameras through out the common areas without the resident's consent.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure dignity and respect were maintained for three (# 53, # 54, and #89) out of six residents related to call light response, concerns raised in resident interviews, in the resident grievance process, and during the Resident Council Meeting.
Inspectors wroteBased on resident record review, interviews, observation, and review of policy and procedures, the facility did not ensure it implemented a person centered care plan with individualized approaches for activities for one (Resident #57) of 46 sampled residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide activities, according to the resident's reported preferences to one (Resident #57) of 46 sampled residents.
3 fire safety citations on file: 1 on May 18, 2023, 2 on August 6, 2021.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| October 2, 2023 | Fine | $1,764 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Florida | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.69 | 3.82 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.95 | 0.73 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.48 | 3.49 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.46 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.28 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 24.7% | 41.4% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 30.8% | 46.0% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 4.00 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.77 on weekdays and 3.48 on weekends, 8% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.1% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.49 in April to June 2025 to 3.69 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.69 | 0.95 | 3.77 | 3.48 | 0.1% | 0 of 90 | 117 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.69 | 0.96 | 3.80 | 3.42 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 113 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.56 | 1.04 | 3.66 | 3.29 | 0.1% | 0 of 92 | 112 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.49 | 1.00 | 3.58 | 3.26 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 112 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Florida, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.76 | 0.70 | 3.90 | 3.44 | 1.1% | 0.2% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Florida, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.03 | $17.33 to $20.34 | 96,960 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $29.70 | $28.14 to $31.11 | 38,620 |
| Registered nurses | $40.48 | $37.82 to $48.64 | 229,940 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Florida | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.5 | 8.7 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.3 | 0.7 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 2.5 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.1 | 9.5 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 8.4 | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.8 | 8.6 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 30.9 | 26.1 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 0.8 | 9.1 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.5 | 2.1 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 0.5 | 1.1 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Woodbridge Care Center and Rehab's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (48.0% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
48.0% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Florida: 169 better, 109 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 152 eligible stays.
12.9% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Florida: 2 better, 35 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 174 eligible stays.
11.1% this home
Worse than the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Florida: 6 better, 21 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 116 eligible stays.
63.7% this home
Median of homes: Florida55.1% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 157 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Florida0.6% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 270 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Florida1.3% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 270 residents counted.
95.5% this home
Median of homes: Florida97.7% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 44 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: WOODBRIDGE NURSING AND REHAB LLC. CMS links this home to Fl SNF Trust, a group of 10 nursing homes averaging 3.4 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Woodbridge Nursing Holdco LLC | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 08/01/2023 |
| Fl Master Opco Holdco II LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 08/01/2023 | |
| Fl SNF Trust I | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 08/01/2023 | |
| Fl SNF Trust II | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 08/01/2023 | |
| Moreno, Carlos | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 08/01/2023 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
Licensed assisted living homes in the same town or within 5 miles, each with its Florida inspection record.
These are the official offices in Florida. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.