1300 Carl Ramert Dr, Yoakum, TX 77995 · Lavaca County · (361) 293-2801
110 certified beds, about 86 residents a day · Non profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1997
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 675736 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on July 10, 2026, inspectors cited 4 health deficiencies (the Texas average is 9.4, the national average 9.2).
Of 29 health citations since March 2024, 1 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (1 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $13,627 in the last three years; the largest was $13,627, and the latest is dated June 9, 2024.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 2.59 hours per resident per day, against 3.39 across Texas and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.32 of those hours.
33.3% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Texas average 55.3%).
CMS links it to Wellsential Health, an affiliated group of 67 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 29 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen observed for food and nutrition services. The facility failed to ensure food items were properly dated in the refrigerator and the freezer. The facility failed to ensure dietary staff used facial hair restraints properly during meal preparation and dish washing. These failures could place residents at risk for food borne illness.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remains as free of accident hazards as is possible; for 1 of 4 hallways with 12 residents residing on the hallway reviewed for environment, in that:The facility failed to ensure a housekeeping cart on 200-hall was locked while unattended that contained potentially unsafe cleaning chemicals. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of coming in contact with potentially unsafe cleaning chemicals.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals were stored in locked compartments for 1 of 1 nursing station reviewed for storage. The facility failed to ensure that a Trulicity auto-injector pen was stored in a locked compartment. This failure could place residents at risk of misappropriation of medications.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 24 residents (Resident #18) reviewed for infection control in that: The facility failed to ensure CNA A changed soiled gloves and sanitized hands prior to applying Resident #18's clean C brief during incontinent care. The facility failed to ensure LVN B adhered to EBP recommendations and wore a gown when she administered an enteral medication for Resident #18. These facility failures affect residents who need assistance with ADL's or who require feeding tubes to receive medications and could result in cross contamination and the spread of infections.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences except when to do so would endanger the health and safety of the resident or other residents for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) observed for call light placement. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's call light was within reach. This deficient practice could place residents at risk for decreased ability to contact staff for assistance.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure assessments accurately reflected the status of the residents for 1of 5 residents (Residents #1) reviewed for resident assessments. The Facility failed to ensure Resident #1's fall on 04/15/2026 was reflected on his quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE]. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of missed or inaccurate care.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights set forth that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment for 1 resident of 5 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to implement Resident #1's intervention of keeping his call light within reach, and reflected he required a w/c on his fall care plan instead of a walker. These deficient practices could place residents at risk for missed or inaccurate care.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to voice grievances to the facility or other agency or entity that hears grievances without discrimination or reprisal and without fear of discrimination or reprisal. Such grievances include those with respect to care and treatment which has been furnished as well as those which had not been furnished, the behavior of staff and of other residents, and other concerns regarding their LTC facility stay for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for having their grievances heard. LVN A failed to generate a grievance report for Resident #1's Representative's grievance made on 10/20/2025 when Resident #1's representative complained that Resident #1 had blood on his linens as observed through a bedroom camera. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to maintain medical records on each resident that were complete; accurately documented; readily accessible; and systematically organized for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for reviewed for accurate records. LVN A and LVN B failed to document the failed attempts to instill a urinary indwelling catheter for Resident #1 and the report to the physician. These failures could place residents at risk for diminished health status.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to employ staff with the appropriate competencies and skill sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, taking into consideration resident assessments, individual plans of care, and the number, acuity and diagnoses of the facility's resident population in accordance with the facility assessment required for 1 of 1 staff (FSS) reviewed for competency and skill sets. The FSS did not have the appropriate certification, education, or qualifications to serve as the Director of Food and Nutrition Services. This deficient practice could place the residents who consume food prepared from the kitchen at risk of food borne illness and not receiving adequate nutrition.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food for 1 of 1 kitchen in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. 1. The facility failed to discard a bag of salad mix dated 03/24/2025 containing brown and rotted leaves in the reach-in cooler. 2. The facility failed to ensure an opened bag of pinto beans in the dry storage room was properly sealed. 3. The facility failed to properly sanitize the compartments of the blender used to puree food for modified diets in accordance with manufacturer's instructions. These failures could place residents at risk for food borne illness.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #52) whose assessments were reviewed, in that: Resident #52's quarterly MDS assessment incorrectly documented the resident as having received an insulin injection. This failure could place residents at risk for inadequate care due to inaccurate assessments.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights set forth at §483.10(c)(2) and §483.10(c)(3), that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #29) whose comprehensive person-centered care plans were reviewed. The facility failed to ensure that Resident #29's diagnosis of depression was a focus area in the resident's comprehensive care plan. This deficient practice could affect residents by failing to ensure residents received appropriate care for their health conditions.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who is incontinent of bladder receives appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections and to restore continence to the extent possible for 1 of 6 resident (Resident #63) reviewed for incontinent care, in that: While providing incontinent care for Resident #63, CNA B used a back to front motion to clean Resident #63's buttocks. This deficient practice could place residents at-risk for infection and skin break down due to improper care practices.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to enact a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors to ensure safe and sanitary storage, handling, and consumption, for 1 (Resident #1) of 8 residents reviewed, in that: The facility failed to ensure the thermometer inside Resident #1's personal refrigerator was functioning properly and the staff recorded the accurate temperatures of the refrigerator for five months. This failure could place residents at risk of foodborne illness due to consuming foods which might be spoiled.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to be free from misappropriation of resident property for 2 of 3 Residents (Resident #4 and Resident #5) whose records were reviewed for misappropriation of medications. 1. Nursing staff did not follow procedures when re-ordering Ativan for Resident #4; two Ativan tabs were unaccounted for after an exchange of a 30 day blister pack between MA G and LVN A . 2. MA G failed to sign off after administering Resident #5's scheduled Ativan 0.5 MG tab. These deficient practices could affect residents prescribed controlled medications and could result in the misappropriation of resident's medications.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, are reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury, or not later than 24 hours if the events that cause the allegation do not involve abuse and do not result in serious bodily injury to the State Survey Agency for 1 of 11 Residents (Resident #6) who were reviewed for abuse, in that: The facility did not report an allegation of abuse per facility policy to the State Survey Agency (HHSC) when Resident #6 alleged Resident #7 that provided unwanted sexual favors. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections, including a system for preventing, identifying, reporting, investigating, and controlling infections and communicable diseases for all residents, staff, volunteers, visitors, and other individuals providing services under a contractual arrangement based upon the facility assessment, and written standards, policies, and procedures for the program, which must include, but are not limited to: . (ii) When and to whom possible incidents of communicable disease or infections should be reported, for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for infection control, in that: [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to immediately inform the resident; consult with the resident's physician; and notify, consistent with his or her authority, the resident representative(s) when there is a significant change in the resident's physical, mental, or psychosocial status (that is, a deterioration in health, mental, or psychosocial status in either life-threatening conditions or clinical complications) for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for notification of changes, in that: Resident #1 developed new wounds on 08/01/24 and the resident representative (RP) was not informed until 08/02/24 by facility staff. This failure could lead to the facility making decisions without the resident's right to designate a surrogate or representative to make treatment or transfer decisions for the resident; [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that the comprehensive person-centered care plan described services that are to be furnished to maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for care plans, in that: Resident #1's care plan, undated, did not indicate that Resident #1 was on a regular diet consisting of mechanical soft texture and regular liquids as of 6/18/2024. Resident #1's care plan inaccurately indicated Resident #1 was NPO status, onset date 05/29/2024. This deficient practice could affect residents who had a diet order change by serving a resident the wrong diet.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents' right to be free from abuse for one (Resident #1) of 7 residents reviewed for abuse. The facility failed to prevent Resident #1 from being abused when a rubber band was discovered wrapped 4-5 times around the shaft of his penis on 6/07/2024 at approximately 2:00 AM. The non-compliance was identified as past non-compliance (PNC). The PNC IJ began on 06/07/24 and ended on 06/08/24. The facility had corrected the non-compliance before the state's investigation began on 6/08/2024 8:00 AM. This failure could place residents at risk of abuse, humiliation, intimidation, fear, shame, agitation, and decreased quality of life.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition services, taking into consideration resident assessments, individual plans of care, and the number, acuity, and diagnoses of the facility's resident population in accordance with facility assessment for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for qualified dietary staff. The facility failed to employ a certified dietary manager. This failure could place residents at risk of food borne illness and not receiving adequate nutrition.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the menu was followed for 1 of 1 meal (noon meal) reviewed for food and nutrition services observed in that: The facility failed to ensure that the lunch menu was followed This failure could place residents at risk for dissatisfaction, poor intake, and diminished quality of life.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for kitchen sanitation. 1. The facility failed to ensure that clean plastic bowls and cups were stored properly after removal from the dish machine. 2. The facility failed to ensure that expired items were discarded. These failures could place residents at-risk for food borne illness.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had a right to safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for resident rights. The facility failed to replace bathroom lights in four resident rooms, adequately clean three bathroom ceiling vents in resident rooms, and repair bathroom wall scraps in two resident rooms. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of a diminished quality of life due to exposure to an environment that is unpleasant, unsanitary, and unsafe.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to residents had the right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences except when to do so would endanger the health or safety of the resident or other residents for 1 of 15 residents (Resident #75) reviewed for call light; in that: The facility failed to ensure Resident #75's call light was with in reach. This failure could place residents at risk of achieving independent functioning, dignity, and well being.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that were are identified in the comprehensive assessment for 1 of 15 (Resident #24) residents reviewed for comprehensive assessments, in that: The facility failed to ensure Resident #24's care plan documented the resident was PASRR positive. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of not receiving proper care and services related to PASRR services.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain, in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices medical records on each resident that were complete and accurately documented for 1 of 15 residents (Resident #50), reviewed for accuracy of records, in that: The facility failed to ensure Resident #50's diagnosis for schizoaffective disorder was listed on face sheet. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of having misinformation about the professional care provided.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to promote and maintain the residents' right to be treated with respect and dignity for 4 of 4 residents (Residents #1, #2, #3, and #4) reviewed for dignity and respect, in that: RN A referred to residents who required assistance with dining as feeders within the hearing of residents. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of psychosocial harm due to diminished self-image.
9 fire safety citations on file: 4 on July 10, 2026, 3 on May 30, 2025, 2 on March 29, 2024.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| June 9, 2024 | Fine | $13,627 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Texas | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 2.59 | 3.39 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.32 | 0.43 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 2.22 | 2.98 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 1.62 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.64 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 33.3% | 55.3% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 37.5% | 54.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.81 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 2.74 on weekdays and 2.22 on weekends, 19% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 2.65 in April to June 2025 to 2.59 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 2.59 | 0.32 | 2.74 | 2.22 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 86 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 2.66 | 0.33 | 2.79 | 2.32 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 84 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 2.77 | 0.41 | 2.96 | 2.29 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 83 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 2.65 | 0.40 | 2.84 | 2.20 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 85 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Texas, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.33 | 0.40 | 3.50 | 2.93 | 2.2% | 0.7% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Trains nurse aides: this home runs a state-approved CNA program (state list: HHSC Approved NATCEP Providers, as of October 6, 2026). A nursing home cannot charge aides it employs, or has offered a job, for state-approved training (42 CFR 483.152(c)). See Yoakum Nursing and Rehabilitation Center CNA training on CareerFunded, our sister site for career training.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Texas, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.03 | $16.97 to $20.71 | 88,680 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $29.92 | $27.46 to $32.89 | 57,560 |
| Registered nurses | $46.14 | $38.06 to $50.53 | 271,380 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Texas | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 8.9 | 15.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.7 | 3.3 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.6 | 14.0 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.2 | 3.8 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 13.2 | 9.6 | 15.4 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Yoakum Nursing and Rehabilitation Center's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (40.0% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
40.0% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Texas: 116 better, 50 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 26 eligible stays.
10.2% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Texas: 0 better, 9 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 28 eligible stays.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
US median of homes 7.1% · Texas: 4 better, 11 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 21 eligible stays.
54.5% this home
Median of homes: Texas57.3% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 22 residents counted.
4.0% this home
Median of homes: Texas0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 25 residents counted.
4.3% this home
Median of homes: Texas1.3% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 25 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Texas98.5% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 7 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: OAKBEND MEDICAL CENTER. CMS links this home to Wellsential Health, a group of 67 nursing homes averaging 2.7 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oakbend Medical Center | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 03/01/2023 |
| Baird, Daniel | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 04/13/2021 | |
| Clapp, Barbara | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 06/01/2021 | |
| Cortese, Daren | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 08/10/2021 | |
| Crayton, Tom | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 01/15/2023 | |
| Dorman, John | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 01/18/2022 | |
| Freudenberger, Joseph | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 06/19/2007 | |
| Gibson, Patricia | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 08/01/2021 | |
| Haley, Jeff | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 07/15/2016 | |
| King, Abby | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 01/23/2018 | |
| King, Elizabeth | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 01/17/2023 | |
| Mandelbaum, Elliot | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Pisani, Adam | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 01/15/2019 | |
| Popatia, Amirali | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 03/17/2020 | |
| Stuart, Julius | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 01/16/2023 | |
| Uthman, Edward | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 01/15/2008 | |
| Freudenberger, Joseph | Corporate officer | Individual | 06/19/2007 | |
| Oakbend Medical Center | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 03/01/2023 | |
| Dekowski, Donovan | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 03/01/2023 | |
| Franke, Amanda | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 10/03/2022 | |
| 1300 Carl Ramert Drive LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 03/01/2023 | |
| Oakbend Medical Center | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 03/01/2023 | |
| Regency IHS Clinical Consulting, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 03/01/2023 | |
| Regency IHS of Yoakum LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 03/01/2023 | |
| Regency IHS Rehab LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 03/01/2023 | |
| Dekowski, Donovan | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 03/01/2023 | |
| Drost, James | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Franke, Amanda | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 10/03/2022 | |
| Lange, Kevin | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Surman, Tabitha | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2025 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Texas. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.