Home / New Jersey / Hazlet
622 S Laurel Avenue, Hazlet, NJ 07730 · Monmouth County · (732) 787-6300
202 certified beds, about 172 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 1975
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 315119 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on June 25, 2026, inspectors cited 12 health deficiencies (the New Jersey average is 8.6, the national average 9.2).
None of its 31 health citations since December 2023 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.26 hours per resident per day, against 3.85 across New Jersey and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.50 of those hours.
54.1% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (New Jersey average 39.7%).
CMS links it to Excelsior Care Group, an affiliated group of 33 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 31 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, record review, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to follow professional standards of practice and physician orders to ensure resident's receiving enteral feeding received appropriate care and services to prevent complications of enteral feeding. This deficient practice was identified for 3 of 3 residents (Residents #2, #8 and #75), reviewed for tube feeding. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. On 6/9/26 at 10:17AM, the surveyor observed Resident #2 lying in bed with a tube feeding (a medical device that delivers nutrition, fluids, and medications directly into the digestive system when a person cannot eat or swallow safely) in place and the pump turned off. The tube feed bottle was labeled Glucerna 1.5 and was dated for 6/7/26 at 9 AM. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and review of pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain infection control practices implemented to prevent the spread of infection in accordance with accepted national standards, Centers for Disease Control (CDC) guidelines by ensuring a.) proper sanitizing of point of care equipment, (blood pressure machine) between residents during the medication administration observation for one (1) of two (2) nurses observed while administering medications, b.) performing appropriate hand washing technique during the medication administration observation for one (1) of two (2) nurses observed while administering medications, c.) appropriate handling of medications during the medication administration observation for one (1) of two (2) nurses observed while administering medications to one (1) resident, d.) posting [...]
Inspectors wroteComplaint #s: NJ2676162, NJ2786980Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain the facility in a clean and sanitary environment. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 4 units, (D Wing) and was evidenced by the following: On 6/09/2026 at 10:19 AM, during initial tour of D wing, the surveyor observed dark brown areas on the floors throughout the hallways. On 6/10/2026 at 8:58 AM, the surveyor observed the D wing hallways to have multiple dark brown areas on the floors. On 6/11/2026 at 10:01 AM, the surveyor observed the D wing hallways with wet floor signs in front of the nurse's station. The floor around the wet floor sign was observed with multiple dark brown areas. On 6/11/2026 at 10:15 AM, the surveyor interviewed a porter who stated that the floors were mopped daily as were the hallways. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews, review of the facility's policy, and other pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to implement their abuse policy to a.) complete reference checks for 10 out of 102 employees (Employee #7, #21, #22, #26, #33, #35, #50, #72, #91, #97) and b.) complete background checks for 14 out 102 employees (Employee #2, #19, #23, #29, #30, #35, #41, #50, #62, #70, #72, #76, #84, #97). This deficient practice was identified for newly hired employees reviewed since the last Department of Health recertification survey of 1/24/25. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following:On 6/9/26 at approximately 10:31 AM, during the entrance conference, the surveyor requested from the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA), all newly hired employee files for active and inactive employees from 1/24/25 to the current date. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, record review, and review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, it was determined that the facility failed to complete the Comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS), a periodic and federally mandated, standardized assessment tool, within the required time frame. This deficient practice was identified for 2 of 10 residents (Resident #22 and Resident #153) reviewed for timing of assessments and was evidenced by the following: On 6/10/26, the surveyor reviewed the electronic medical records (EMR) of the residents in the Resident Assessment task which revealed:Resident #22 had an annual MDS with a date of 3/19/26 which was completed on 4/6/26 (due 4/2/26). Resident #153 had an annual MDS with a date of 5/14/26 which was completed on 5/29/26 (due 5/28/26). [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, record review, and review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, it was determined that the facility failed to complete the Comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS), a periodic and federally mandated, standardized assessment tool, within the required time frame. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 9 residents (Resident #121) reviewed for timing of assessments and was evidenced by the following: On 6/10/26, the surveyor reviewed the electronic medical records (EMR) of the residents in the Resident Assessment task which revealed: Resident #121 had a Quarterly MDS with a date of 2/5/26 was completed on 2/21/26 (due 2/19/26). On 6/11/26 at 10:54 AM, the surveyor interviewed the Regional MDS Coordinator (RMDSC), who stated Resident #121's MDS should have been completed by 2/19/26. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews, review of medical records, and review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, it was determined that the facility failed to electronically transmit the Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), within 14 days of completing the resident's assessment. This deficient practice was identified for 6 of 9 residents, (Sampled Resident # 8 and #22, Unsampled Resident #40, #60, #100, and #121) reviewed in the Resident Assessment Task for MDS record over 120 days old. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following:On [DATE] and [DATE], the surveyor reviewed the MDS history in the electronic medical records for the residents in the Resident Assessment task which revealed the following:Resident #8's Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] was completed on [DATE] and transmitted on [DATE] (due [DATE]). [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, record review and facility documents it was determined the facility failed to ensure a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) Level 1 a.) was completed and b.) was accurate for a newly admitted resident. This deficient practice was identified for one of three residents reviewed for PASRR (Resident #68) and was evidenced by the following: On 6/9/2026 at 11:40 AM, during the initial tour, the surveyor observed Resident #68 lying in bed, with their eyes closed. On 6/10/2026 at 10:54 AM, the surveyor reviewed the electronic medical record (EMR) for Resident #68. A review of the admission Record (an admission summary) revealed the resident was admitted to the facility in April of 2026 with diagnoses which included but were not limited to; [...]
Inspectors wroteComplaint #: NJ00187199 (406115), 2676162Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to timely provide incontinence care to residents who required assistance with the activities of daily living (ADL). This deficient practice was identified for 2 of 9 residents (Resident #7 and 141) reviewed for Incontinence care. This deficient practice was evidenced as follows:This deficient practice was evidenced as follows:1.) On 6/12/26 at 9:13 AM, during incontinence rounds with the Licensed Practical Nurse Unit Manager (LPN UM), Resident #7 was agreeable to be checked, and it was noted that the resident's incontinence brief was saturated with urine, the draw sheet was soaked with urine, and the bed pad was soaked with urine. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, record review and pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that all medications were administered without error of 5% or more. During the morning medication administration observation on 6/10/26, the surveyor observed two (2) nurses administered medications to four (4) residents. There were 27 opportunities, and two (2) errors were observed which calculated to a medication administration error rate of 7.41%. The deficient practice was identified for two (2) of four (4) unsampled Residents, (unsampled Resident #147 and #128), that were administered medications by one (1) of two (2) nurses that were observed. The deficient practices were evidenced by the following: 1. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure insulin was administered in accordance with physician ordered parameters to prevent significant medication (med) errors. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #19) reviewed for insulin administration. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45. Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states: [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, record review, and pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a.) a medication (Lactulose solution) was properly labelled for one (1) of four (4) medication carts inspected and b.) an expired refrigerated medication (Omeprazole solution) was removed from active inventory for one (1) of two (2) medication refrigerators inspected. The deficient practices were evidenced by the following: 1. On 6/10/26 at 8:16 AM, during the medication administration observation, the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN #1) was preparing medications for unsampled Resident #64. LPN #1 stated there was a physician's order for Lactulose solution (a medication used to relieve constipation) and removed the bottle from the medication cart. The surveyor with LPN #1 reviewed the bottle for a label. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews, record review, and review of other pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to: ensure a physician's order to administer medication was followed for one of two residents reviewed, Resident # 2. Resident #2 did not received their Liothyronine medication (medication used to treat hypothyroidism) insufficient thyroid hormone. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following:Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45. Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states: [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain kitchen sanitation in a safe and consistent manner to prevent food borne illness. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 1/16/25 at 9:23 AM, during the initial tour of the facility kitchen in the presence of the Food Service Director (FSD) and the Regional FSD (RFSD), the surveyor observed the following: The FSD performed hand hygiene at the hand washing station and was timed by the surveyor using a digital stopwatch to lather her hands with soap for 16 seconds prior to rinsing. The trash receptacle by the hand wash station was positioned under a stainless-steel shelf which had a tray of clean plastic cups stacked. When the FSD used the foot pedal to open the receptacle lid, it hit against the tray of clean cups. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain the resident's living environment in a clean, comfortable, homelike manner. This deficient practice was identified on 2 of 4 nursing units (A Wing and D Wing) reviewed for environmental concerns, and was evidenced by the following: 1. On 1/16/24 at 9:24 AM, the surveyor observed the A-wing nursing unit and identified the following concerns: The Shower Room was a large room with two shower stalls, three windows, and three metal wall heaters. The left shower stall had copious amount of standing water with a white milky coloring that filled half of the shower floor. Two of the three metal wall heaters had a red/orange discoloration on the heaters and on the tile under the heaters. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and reviewed of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to a) label, date, and store respiratory equipment in a manner to prevent contamination for infection control; b) obtain a physician's order for the administration of oxygen; c.) document the assessment of vital signs as ordered for a nebulizer treatment; and d) perform tracheotomy care with aseptic (sterile) technique to prevent infection. This deficient practice was identified for 3 of 4 residents reviewed for respiratory care (Resident #71, #73, and #85) and 1 of 1 resident reviewed for tracheostomy care (Resident #115), and was evidenced by the following: 1. On 1/16/25 at 10:15 AM, during the initial tour of the facility, the surveyor observed Resident #85 sleeping in their bed. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a.) that a physician's ordered pain medication specified a pain level and b.) appropriate monitoring of pain with adequate assessment and re-assessment was consistently completed for a resident who exhibited pain. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for pain management (Resident #133), and was evidenced by the following: On 1/16/25 at 9:39 AM, the surveyor interviewed Resident #133 who was sitting at the side of the bed. The resident was cognitively intact and stated that they were admitted to the facility with a right below knee amputee (BKA). The surveyor observed that the resident had a dressing intact to the right stump area and that was wrapped in a bandage. The resident reported that they had frequent pain in the surgical area of the right stump. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a resident's dignity while providing feeding assistance. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 29 residents observed for dignity (Resident #7), and was evidenced by the following: On 1/16/25 at 12:09 PM, during initial tour of the facility, the surveyor observed Resident #7 in bed in their room with a Certified Nurses Aid (CNA #3) providing feeding assistance to the resident. CNA #3 had the tray table with the lunch tray back and slightly to the side behind her while she stood over Resident #7 feeding them. CNA #1 was observed turning away from the resident to obtain a spoonful of food which was positioned away from the resident and she was not seated alongside the resident during this care. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to a) revise an individual comprehensive care plan (ICCP) for a resident with floor mats and b) revise an ICCP for residents who received oxygen. This deficient practice was identified for 2 of 29 residents reviewed for care plans (Resident #71 and Resident #85), and was evidenced by the following: 1. On 1/16/25 at 10:15 AM, during the initial tour of the facility, the surveyor observed Resident #85 sleeping in their bed. Resident #85 was receiving oxygen via nasal cannula (device that gives additional oxygen through the nose) at 2 liters per minute (lpm). The surveyor observed floor mats folded up in the resident's room. On 1/17/25 at 11:12 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #85 lying in bed awake looking around the room. Resident #85 was receiving oxygen via nasal cannula at 2 lpm. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to: a) properly secure medication being administered during medication pass and b) ensure that a resident received care and services for the provision of dressing changes to a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) site consistent with professional standards of practice. The deficient practice was identified for 2 of 29 residents reviewed for medication administration (Resident #77 and Resident #127) . Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45. Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states: [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to: a.) ensure the accountability of the narcotic shift count logs were completed and b.) accurately document the administration of controlled medications. This deficient practice was identified on 2 of 4 medication carts reviewed for medication storage, and was evidenced by the following: During medication storage review on 1/22/25 at 11:15 AM, the surveyor in the presence of the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN #1), reviewed the D Wing medication cart #2's November 2024, December 2024 and January 2025 Change of Shift Controlled Medication Accountability Record (a shift-to-shift controlled substance and narcotics (narc) count sheet signed by the outgoing and incoming nurses each shift) which revealed the following: [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to a) properly label opened multidose medications and b) properly secure prefilled normal saline syringes. This deficient practice was identified in 2 of 4 medication carts reviewed for medication storage and labeling and 1 of 4 nursing units (D Wing) and was evidenced by the following: 1. On 1/22/25 at 11:15 AM, the surveyor, in the presence of the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN #1), observed the D Wing nursing unit's medication cart #2. The following was observed: Two (2) opened foil pouches of ipratropium bromide 0.5 milligram (mg)/albuterol sulfate 3 mg inhalation solution (medication used to treat symptoms of lung disease), which were not dated with an opened date. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that food brought in to residents by family and visitors were stored and handled in a safe and sanitary condition. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 2 facility freezers reviewed during kitchen tour, and was evidenced by the following: On 1/16/25 at 9:23 AM, during initial tour of the facility kitchen, the surveyor, in the presence of the Food Service Director (FSD) and the Regional FSD (RFSD), observed a one and a half (1.5) quart container of black raspberry ice cream which was approximately three quarters (3/4) empty dated opened 9/23/24, stored in the ice cream freezer. On 1/16/25 at 9:24 AM, the RFSD informed the surveyor that this was a specific resident's personal ice cream that was being stored by the facility. [...]
Inspectors wroteComplaint # NJ166916 Based on interview, medical record review and other pertinent documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) ensure skin conditions were addressed in accordance with professional standards by failing to obtain physician's orders and treatments for a surgical site dressing, leg wound, and skin tear; assess and document monitoring of a surgical site, leg wound and heel blister b.) ensure a care plan was in place which addressed actual skin impairment c.) complete an incident report for a skin tear and d.) ensure timely physician notification and timely transfer of a resident to the hospital. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 28 residents (Resident #287) reviewed for quality of care and was evidenced by the following: 1. [...]
Inspectors wroteComplaint #NJ 161020 Based on interview, record review, and review of pertinent documents, it was determined that the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse to the New Jersey Department of Health (NJDOH) for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for investigations and was evidence by the following: On 12/4/23 at 12:30 PM, the surveyor interviewed Resident #93, who stated that while at the facility, they had broken their arm. The resident further said a resident had pushed them at the nurse's station and caused the broken arm. A review of Resident #93's Face Sheet (an admission summary) reflected that the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but not limited to hypertension, open-angle glaucoma, and left eye cataract. [...]
Inspectors wroteComplaint #NJ 161020 Based on interviews, record review, and review of pertinent documents, it was determined that the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of abuse for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for investigations and was evidenced by the following: On 12/4/23 at 12:30 PM, the surveyor interviewed Resident #93, who stated that while at the facility, they had broken their arm. The resident further said a resident had pushed them at the nurse's station and caused the broken arm. A review of Resident #93 Face Sheet (an admission summary) reflected that the resident was admitted to the facility with a diagnosis that included hypertension, open-angle glaucoma, and left eye cataract. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, review of medical records and other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to accurately complete the Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool, for 2 of 27 residents reviewed (Resident #116 and #97). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. On 11/30/2023 at 9:40 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #116 in bed eating lunch. The surveyor reviewed the medical record for Resident #116. A review of the Resident Face Sheet (an admission summary) reflected that the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included chronic congestive heart failure and essential hypertension. A review of Resident #116's August 2023 Nursing Progress Notes included an entry dated 8/14/2023 at 12:37 PM, which indicated the resident was admitted to the facility for longterm care and was receiving Hospice services. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, review of medical records and other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to a) properly transcribe a physician's order for 2 of 27 residents reviewed for medications (Resident #59 and #388); b) failed to follow physician's order to obtain blood sugar and administer insulin for 1 of 27 residents reviewed for medications (Resident #388). These deficient practices were evidenced by the following: Reference: New Jersey Statutes, Annotated Title 45, Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the state of New Jersey states: [...]
Inspectors wroteComplaint # NJ166083 Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services in accordance with professional standards to ensure that a dispensed and administered controlled substance medication was accurately accounted for 1 of 1 residents reviewed, Resident #187. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45. Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states: [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to address the recommendations made by the Consultant Pharmacist (CP) in a timely manner. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident #116), and was evidenced by the following: On 11/29/2023 at 1:02 PM, the surveyor observed Resident #97 sitting on the bed eating lunch. The surveyor observed the resident wearing oxygen. The surveyor reviewed the medical record for Resident #97. A review of the Resident Face Sheet (an admission summary) reflected that the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnosis that included Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease with (acute) exacerbation. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, and review of other documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain infection control standards and procedures when performing a wound care treatment for 1 of 1 residents (Resident #4) performed by 1 of 1 nurses observed providing a wound care treatment. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 11/29/23 at 11:41 am, the surveyor observed Resident #4 sitting in bed eating lunch. A review of the Resident Face Sheet, Resident #4 was admitted to the facility in 9/2021 with diagnoses that included cerebral infarction (damage to the brain due to loss of oxygen), hemiplegia (one-sided paralysis of the body) and stage 4 pressure ulcer to the sacrum. [...]
33 fire safety citations on file: 8 on June 25, 2026, 3 on August 4, 2025, 22 on January 24, 2025.
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | New Jersey | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.26 | 3.85 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.50 | 0.68 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.31 | 3.50 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 1.82 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.94 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 54.1% | 39.7% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 65.4% | 37.7% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 1 |
CMS expects 3.92 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.25 on weekdays and 3.31 on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 34.7% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.53 in April to June 2025 to 3.26 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.26 | 0.50 | 3.25 | 3.31 | 34.7% | 0 of 90 | 172 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.35 | 0.52 | 3.34 | 3.35 | 33.3% | 0 of 92 | 146 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.37 | 0.55 | 3.33 | 3.45 | 31.4% | 0 of 92 | 140 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.53 | 0.62 | 3.50 | 3.60 | 36.0% | 0 of 91 | 152 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| New Jersey, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.68 | 0.59 | 3.82 | 3.34 | 11.6% | 0.2% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| New Jersey, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $22.52 | $21.13 to $23.44 | 32,400 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $36.13 | $32.16 to $38.45 | 17,410 |
| Registered nurses | $51.20 | $47.94 to $61.41 | 92,680 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | New Jersey | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 11.5 | 8.7 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.9 | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.1 | 2.3 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 14.2 | 8.2 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.7 | 5.4 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 16.2 | 12.8 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 15.9 | 24.9 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 4.4 | 8.1 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.2 | 2.1 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 0.3 | 1.1 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Arnold Walter Nursing & Rehabilitation Center's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (52.8% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
52.8% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · New Jersey: 130 better, 19 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 291 eligible stays.
9.9% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · New Jersey: 2 better, 8 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 281 eligible stays.
9.7% this home
Worse than the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · New Jersey: 3 better, 13 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 234 eligible stays.
69.8% this home
Median of homes: New Jersey68.7% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 215 residents counted.
0.3% this home
Median of homes: New Jersey0.6% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 322 residents counted.
3.0% this home
Median of homes: New Jersey1.7% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 322 residents counted.
93.8% this home
Median of homes: New Jersey99.5% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 80 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: HOLMDEL GARDEN GROUP LLC. CMS links this home to Excelsior Care Group, a group of 33 nursing homes averaging 2.6 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gitberk LLC | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 01/01/2026 | |
| Jbl 120 LLC | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 01/01/2026 | |
| Jm and Mazel LLC | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 01/01/2026 | |
| Berkowitz, Sam | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 02/01/2021 | |
| Springberg, Susan | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 02/01/2021 | |
| Zupnick, Joel | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 02/01/2021 | |
| Berkowitz, Sam | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 02/01/2021 | |
| Excelsior Care Group | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 07/21/2019 | |
| Mahadeo, Sarah | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 11/19/2024 | |
| Ribiat, Yitzchok | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 03/12/2024 | |
| Steinberg, Moshe | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 07/12/2019 | |
| Stern, Samuel | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 02/01/2021 | |
| Tasharofi, Kamran | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 09/01/2025 | |
| Excelsior Care Group | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 12/25/2025 | |
| Gitberk LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/01/2026 | |
| Jbl 120 LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/01/2026 | |
| Jm and Mazel LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/01/2026 | |
| Berkowitz, Sam | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2026 | |
| Mahadeo, Sarah | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 11/19/2024 | |
| Ribiat, Yitzchok | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 03/12/2024 | |
| Springberg, Susan | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2026 | |
| Steinberg, Moshe | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 07/12/2019 | |
| Stern, Samuel | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 02/01/2021 | |
| Tasharofi, Kamran | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 09/01/2025 | |
| Zupnick, Joel | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2026 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in New Jersey. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.