What is Autumn Care of Nash's Medicare star rating?

CMS rates Autumn Care of Nash 3 out of 5 stars overall, with 3 for health inspections, 3 for staffing and 2 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).

How many deficiencies did Autumn Care of Nash get at its last inspection?

7 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on July 30, 2025. The North Carolina average is 4.7.

Has Autumn Care of Nash been fined?

CMS lists no fines in the last three years.

Does Autumn Care of Nash accept Medicaid?

It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.

Who owns Autumn Care of Nash?

CMS lists 23 owners and managers, and links the home to Saber Healthcare Group. Legal business name: AUTUMN CORPORATION.

Autumn Care of Nash: Inspections, Staffing & Ratings

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on July 30, 2025, inspectors cited 7 health deficiencies (the North Carolina average is 4.7, the national average 9.2).

None of its 14 health citations since February 2023 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.

CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.53 hours per resident per day, against 3.85 across North Carolina and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.65 of those hours.

44.8% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (North Carolina average 49.0%).

CMS links it to Saber Healthcare Group, an affiliated group of 126 nursing homes.

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

402/23

206/24

105/25

707/25

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 14 health citations on file.

Severity

Isolated

Pattern

Widespread

Immediate jeopardy

Actual harm

Potential for more than minimal harm

11D

Potential for minimal harm

July 30, 2025Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 7 citations

D

Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.

F550 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Past noncompliance: already fixed when inspectors found it

Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to treat a resident in a dignified and respectful manner when Resident #86 requested toileting assistance from Nurse Aide (NA) #1 to use the bed pan for a bowel movement and the NA told the resident to have a bowel movement in his brief. A reasonable person expects to be assisted with toileting needs by their caregiver and would have experienced embarrassment when told to have a bowel movement in their brief rather than be assisted with toileting needs as requested. This deficient practice affected 1 of 3 residents reviewed for dignity (Resident #86).
D

Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.

F580 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 21, 2025

Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review, and staff, resident, and Medical Director interviews, the facility failed to notify the physician of a significant change when the resident's feeding tube site was identified by staff as visibly irritated, leaking, and caused the resident pain when touched for 1 of 1 sampled resident reviewed for feeding tube care (Resident #64).
D

Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.

F602 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Past noncompliance: already fixed when inspectors found it

Inspectors wroteBased on record review, staff and resident interviews, Pharmacy Manager and Medical Director interviews, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from misappropriation of narcotic medication for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for misappropriation of property (Resident #96 and Resident #18).
D

Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 21, 2025

Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to develop a care plan for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for psychotropic medications (Resident #2).
D

Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.

F755 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Past noncompliance: already fixed when inspectors found it

Inspectors wroteBased on record review, and staff, Pharmacy Manager, and Medical Director interviews, the facility failed to have effective systems in place for the inventory of controlled substances which resulted in a narcotic medication being ordered for a resident that did not have a physician order and the medication being diverted from the facility for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for misappropriation of resident's property (Resident #96).
D

Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.

F842 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 21, 2025

Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to maintain an accurate medication administration record for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for medication administration (Resident #36).
B

Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.

F628 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 21, 2025

Inspectors wroteBased on record review and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to notify the Ombudsman in writing of an unplanned discharge to home for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for discharge (Resident #68). In addition, the facility failed to notify the Resident Representative in writing of the reason for the transfer/discharge to the hospital and failed to provide a copy of the bed hold policy to the resident and Resident Representative for 3 of 4 residents reviewed for hospitalization (Resident #5, Resident #36, and Resident #54).

May 22, 2025Complaint inspection · 1 citation

D

Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.

F842 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 3, 2025

Inspectors wroteBased on record review, and staff and Medical Doctor interviews, the facility failed to enter a physician's order into the electronic medical record and document the administration of a medication for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for medication administration documentation (Resident #1).

June 13, 2024Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 2 citations

D

Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.

F550 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 28, 2024

Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review, and staff interviews the facility failed to maintain dignity when a resident had an uncovered urinary drainage bag with urine visible for public view from the hallway. The reasonable person concept was applied as individuals have the expectation of being treated with dignity and would not want their urine visible to visitors, staff, and other residents. This deficient practice was for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for dignity. (Resident #213)
D

Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted

F655 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 28, 2024

Inspectors wroteBased on interviews with staff and record review the facility failed to complete a baseline care plan within 48 hours of admission to address the immediate needs for 1 of 3 newly admitted residents reviewed (Resident #213).

February 9, 2023Standard inspection · 4 citations

D

Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 3, 2023

Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview the facility failed to implement a comprehensive care plan for 1 of 1 resident who received renal dialysis (Resident #43).
D

Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.

F698 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 3, 2023

Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interviews the facility failed to ensure a resident receiving dialysis had a physician's order for 1 of 1 sampled resident reviewed for receiving dialysis. (Resident #43).
C

Post nurse staffing information every day.

F732 · Nursing and Physician Services · No actual harm, potential for minimal harm, widespread · deficient, provider has March 3, 2023

Inspectors wroteBased on staff interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to post accurate Daily Nurse Staffing Information that reflected the Daily Shift Assignment for licensed nurses for 6 out of 30 days.
B

Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.

F584 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for minimal harm, pattern · deficient, provider has March 3, 2023

Inspectors wroteBased on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to (1)maintain drywall in good repair as evidenced by drywall that was scratched and peeling off the wall behind resident beds and adjacent walls in occupied resident rooms for (room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], and room [ROOM NUMBER]), 2) ensure privacy curtains were free of stains (room [ROOM NUMBER] and room [ROOM NUMBER]), and 3) and ensure a tube feeding pump, a tube feeding pole, and suction equipment were in clean and sanitary condition (room [ROOM NUMBER]) for 3 of 4 halls observed.

Fire safety inspections

12 fire safety citations on file: 9 on June 13, 2024, 3 on February 9, 2023.

Every fire safety citation12 citations

F
Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.

K 345 · June 13, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
F
Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.

K 353 · June 13, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
F
Ensure receptacles at patient bed locations and where general anesthesia is administered, are tested after initial installation, replacement or servicing.

K 914 · June 13, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
F
Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.

K 918 · June 13, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
E
Use approved construction type or materials.

K 161 · June 13, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
E
Ensure that special areas are constructed so that walls can resist fire for one hour or have an approved fire extinguishing system.

K 321 · June 13, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
E
Install a fire alarm system that can be heard throughout the facility.

K 341 · June 13, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
E
Have proper medical gas storage and administration areas.

K 923 · June 13, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
D
Meet other general requirements that are deficient.

K 500 · June 13, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
F
Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.

K 353 · February 9, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
D
Ensure heating and ventilation systems that have been properly installed according to the manufacturer's instructions.

K 521 · February 9, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
D
Have proper medical gas storage and administration areas.

K 923 · February 9, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

Measure	This home	North Carolina	United States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)	3.53	3.85	3.86
Registered nurses	0.65	0.62	0.69
All nursing staff on weekends	3.09	3.42	3.42
Nurse aides	1.90
Licensed practical nurses	0.98
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)	44.8%	49.0%	45.8%
Registered nurse turnover	41.7%	45.6%	42.9%
Administrators who left	0

CMS expects 3.90 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.71 on weekdays and 3.09 on weekends, 17% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 1.5% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.80 in April to June 2025 to 3.53 in January to March 2026.

Quarter	All nursing staff	Registered nurses	Weekdays	Weekends	Contract staff share	Days with no RN hours	Residents a day
Jan to Mar 2026	3.53	0.65	3.71	3.09	1.5%	0 of 90	59
Oct to Dec 2025	3.74	0.68	3.89	3.34	0.3%	0 of 92	57
Jul to Sep 2025	3.87	0.78	4.14	3.17	0.6%	0 of 92	56
Apr to Jun 2025	3.80	0.75	4.04	3.21	0.4%	0 of 91	58
United States, Jan to Mar 2026	3.75	0.62	3.92	3.33	5.3%	0.5% of days
North Carolina, Jan to Mar 2026	3.65	0.53	3.82	3.25	8.0%	0.7% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Staff pay reports

Staff pay at this home

No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.

Official wage estimates for North Carolina

Job	Median	Middle half	Employed
North Carolina, all employers
CNAs (nursing assistants)	$18.49	$17.28 to $21.08	64,010
LPNs and LVNs	$30.42	$28.50 to $33.51	18,010
Registered nurses	$40.56	$37.87 to $49.06	111,120
United States, nursing care facilities
CNAs (nursing assistants)	$20.67	$17.91 to $22.55	534,270
LPNs and LVNs	$33.86	$30.05 to $37.40	188,210
Registered nurses	$41.11	$37.85 to $47.68	142,270

Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.

How staff pay reports work · CNA pay by state

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

Measure	This home	North Carolina	US
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	15.6	15.6	13.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	0.4	0.7	0.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	0.7	2.3	1.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	2.7	3.5	3.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	1.1	1.4	1.6
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	8.3	5.5	4.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	7.5	14.0	15.4
Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231	29.2	22.9	23.8
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231	15.5	12.9	12.0

Short-term rehab results

For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Autumn Care of Nash's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (54.0% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.

Went home or back to the community

54.0% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 51.5% · North Carolina: 93 better, 25 worse

Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 131 eligible stays.

Potentially preventable readmissions

9.5% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 10.7% · North Carolina: 1 better, 4 worse

Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 131 eligible stays.

Infections that led to a hospital stay

6.7% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 7.1% · North Carolina: 1 better, 3 worse

Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 82 eligible stays.

Self-care and mobility at discharge

32.7% this home

Median of homes: North Carolina54.0% · US 56.6%

Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 104 residents counted.

Falls with major injury

0.7% this home

Median of homes: North Carolina0.6% · US 0.0%

Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 151 residents counted.

New or worsened pressure ulcers

2.3% this home

Median of homes: North Carolina2.5% · US 1.7%

Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 151 residents counted.

Medication list given at discharge

89.2% this home

Median of homes: North Carolina97.5% · US 98.7%

Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 37 residents counted.

Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.

Owners and operators

Legal business name: AUTUMN CORPORATION. CMS links this home to Saber Healthcare Group, a group of 126 nursing homes averaging 2.9 stars overall.

Name	Role	Type	Share	Since
Shg Autumn, LLC	5% or greater direct ownership interest	Organization	100%	03/01/2016
Ohi Asset Nashville LP	5% or greater security interest	Organization		03/01/2016
Volpe, Benjamin	Corporate director	Individual		03/01/2019
Weisberg, William	Corporate director	Individual		03/01/2019
Nicoluzakis, Gregory	Corporate officer	Individual		03/01/2019
Volpe, Benjamin	Corporate officer	Individual		03/01/2019
Weisberg, William	Corporate officer	Individual		03/01/2019
Shg Management LLC	Operational/managerial control	Organization		09/01/2019
Lanier, Christopher	Operational/managerial control	Individual		12/04/2016
Sullivan, Melissa	Operational/managerial control	Individual		12/17/2023
Weisberg, William	Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF	Individual		02/01/2026
Cibc Bank USA	Adp of the SNF	Organization		03/31/2021
Citrin Cooperman Advisors LLC	Adp of the SNF	Organization		03/01/2016
Saber Governance LLC	Adp of the SNF	Organization		09/01/2019
Saber Healthcare Group LLC	Adp of the SNF	Organization		03/01/2016
Shg Management LLC	Adp of the SNF	Organization		09/01/2019
Walker & Associates PC	Adp of the SNF	Organization		12/18/2023
Bello, Broderick	Adp of the SNF	Individual		07/01/2022
Lanier, Christopher	Adp of the SNF	Individual		12/04/2016
Nicoluzakis, Gregory	Adp of the SNF	Individual		03/01/2019
Sullivan, Melissa	Adp of the SNF	Individual		12/17/2013
Volpe, Benjamin	Adp of the SNF	Individual		03/01/2019
Weisberg, William	Adp of the SNF	Individual		03/01/2016

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 5 problems in this area, most recently on July 30, 2025: "Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights."
When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 5 problems in this area, most recently on July 30, 2025: "Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured."
How are allegations of abuse or neglect reported and investigated, and who tells the family?Inspectors cited 1 problem in this area, most recently on July 30, 2025: "Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money."
How are medications reviewed, and how often are antipsychotic or sedating drugs used?Inspectors cited 1 problem in this area, most recently on July 30, 2025: "Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist."
Who is on the floor on Saturday and Sunday, and how many residents does each aide care for?Weekend nurse staffing here was 3.09 hours per resident per day, below the North Carolina average of 3.42.

Other nursing homes nearby

The Lodge at Rocky Mount Health and Rehabilitation
Rocky Mount, 3.5 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 16 citations
Rocky Mount Rehabilitation Center
Rocky Mount, 4.7 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 27 citations
The Carrolton of Nash
Rocky Mount, 5.2 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 17 citations
Longleaf Neuro-Medical Treatment Center
Wilson, 17.1 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 21 citations
Wilson Rehabilitation and Nursing Center
Wilson, 17.3 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 3 citations
Harmony Park at Wilson
Wilson, 17.4 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 14 citations
Wilson Pines Nursing and Rehabilitation Center
Wilson, 17.6 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 10 citations
Wilson Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center
Wilson, 18 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 3 citations

North Carolina contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in North Carolina. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Inspections and complaints: NC Division of Health Service Regulation, Nursing Home Licensure and Certification Section, the state agency that inspects nursing homes for CMS and takes complaints about care.
Resident advocate: North Carolina Long-Term Care Ombudsman Program. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
State inspection reports: NC DHSR Regulated Facilities search (Statements of Deficiencies), where North Carolina publishes its own records on licensed homes.

Common questions

What is Autumn Care of Nash's Medicare star rating?: CMS rates Autumn Care of Nash 3 out of 5 stars overall, with 3 for health inspections, 3 for staffing and 2 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Autumn Care of Nash get at its last inspection?: 7 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on July 30, 2025. The North Carolina average is 4.7.
Has Autumn Care of Nash been fined?: CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
Does Autumn Care of Nash accept Medicaid?: It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Autumn Care of Nash?: CMS lists 23 owners and managers, and links the home to Saber Healthcare Group. Legal business name: AUTUMN CORPORATION.

Sources

Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.